Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Prog rock under attack - I was
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedProg rock under attack - I was

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message
Swinton MCR View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 19 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 848
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Prog rock under attack - I was
    Posted: September 27 2004 at 08:32
in my car for a long time on Friday evening (this was due to M60 Manchester closure and ensuing grid-lock) - I had just listened to all of Red Queen/Rain Dancers (Gryphon) when I then switched the radio onto Radio GMR and they were discussing the 40th? Anniversary of the Fender Stratocaster! - They had a rock critic on expounding the virtues of Hank Marvin/Jimmy Page etc and then he went on to the Guitarist who bored everyone to death with tedium...The guitarist was of course Steve Howe (My favourite as it happens) the Music of Yes was then played as an example of mindless tedium.......I was (again) furious as my muscial taste was again denegrated by the popular media...Prog rock the music industries pariah and the paragon of bad-taste......When will it throw off such misconceptions and get the credit it deserves!
Back to Top
penguindf12 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: September 20 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 831
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 27 2004 at 08:35
Tedium? What's that supposed to mean? What is "tedium" in guitar playing by his definition? Or is tedium just his way of saying "something I do not understand which is not an annoyingly repeated guitar riff?"

Edited by penguindf12
Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 27 2004 at 09:11

Just the mainstream having a dig at an artist who dared to be different. Its nothing new. 'lucky' Hank Marvin got where he did because he was not actually that good. Thats the perverse thing about the music industry. The more simple and moronic the music the more successful its likely to be, commercially.

If this show on GMR had gone on about how great Steve Howe was, and other such artists not known to the proles, people would have turned off in their thousands.

Its a shame to celebrate the Strat with a salute to Hank, one of the most boring and overated musicans in the history of music. IMO.

 

Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
Back to Top
zappa123 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 13 2004
Location: Slovenia
Status: Offline
Points: 153
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 27 2004 at 10:29
Rock critic was probably 14 years old boy doing a holliday work for two weeks.

Edited by zappa123
Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 27 2004 at 11:03

I bet he was some old fart whose had his tounge in the industries pants for decades, always hanging around idiots like Elton John, Rod Stewart, and Cliff 'bleedin' Richard. He probably knows Pete Waterman, and reguarly drinks real ale with Chris Tarrent. A w*nker who lived through some of the greatest musical revolutions in rock history and can now only muster up enthusiasm for Hank Marvin and all the 'greats'

It's all down to personal taste, I guess.

Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
Back to Top
Swinton MCR View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 19 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 848
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 27 2004 at 12:49

I think GMR took a release (on that date) that was probably fed to all the commercial radio stations in the UK! - The mainstream (mass) media's portrayal of progressive rock has always been the same - long, boring over complicated and self indulgent (and you CAN'T dance to it!).

However - I Can't dance!

Back to Top
Marcelo View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 15 2004
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 310
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 27 2004 at 13:06

It's all about lack of imagination. Mainstream media could never dance with a moonlit knight.

 

Back to Top
Dick Heath View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Jazz-Rock Specialist

Joined: April 19 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 12818
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 27 2004 at 13:09
Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:

'lucky' Hank Marvin got where he did because he was not actually that good. Thats the perverse thing about the music industry. The more simple and moronic the music the more successful its likely to be, commercially.

Its a shame to celebrate the Strat with a salute to Hank, one of the most boring and overated musicans in the history of music. IMO.

 

Come on you can't leave it like that - Marvin was there at the end of the 50's, so has to be credited as a pioneer,   Scotty Moore being the only real influence. (Similarly Jet Harris the Shadows bass player, was the first Brit rock'n'roller to play electric bass guitar in the UK). Primitive absolutely but you have to a start somewhere and there is hardly a British, Canadian or Australian guitarist who came to the fore in the late 60's and early 70's who doesn't acknowledge Marvin as an influence - similarly before riffs from Smoke on the water or Stairway to heaven annoyed other shoppers in guitar shops, budding guitarists played Apache. But eventual tedium (yes I do agree with you up to a point), of the Shadows albums and singles, combined with my personal  discovery of Eric Clapton in the mid 60's quantum shifted me away from the Shads - nevertheless  both the first Cliff Richard and Shadows albums still get regularly played here because  both were innovative.

 And take a look at the tribute album credits, for the contributors who cared to be involved with Marvin/Shadows tribute:

Twang: A Tribute to the Shadows (CD) 7243833928

Apache by Ritchie Blackmore/FBI by Brian May/Wonderful Land by Tommy Iommi/The savage by Steve Stevens/ The Rise & Fall of Flingel Bunt by Hank Marvin/ Midnight by Peter Green/Spring is nearly here by Neil Young & Randy Bachman/Atlantis by Mark Knopfler/ The frightened City by Peter Frampton/Dance on by Keith Urban & Stewart Copeland/Stingray by Andy Summers/ The Stranger by Bela Fleck & the Flecktones

Back to Top
emdiar View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 05 2004
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 890
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 27 2004 at 13:41
The mogals are worried that if people start listening to talented musicians again, it will fcuk up their plans to swamp the world with disposable Pop Idol crap.
Perception is truth, ergo opinion is fact.
Back to Top
gdub411 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 24 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3484
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 27 2004 at 13:54

I think the music critics have an inferiority complex. It must drive them crazy that there are musicians more intelligent than them.....that is why progressive rock is persecuted. So they come up with key words like pretentious or tedious to bring them down a peg

It must drive them absolutely bonkers to imagine fans being more intelligent

Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 27 2004 at 15:11

Sadly, in a way they are right; There is much mindless and up itself noodling in prog just as there is much dazzling technical wondrousness.

To state the bleedin' obvious, any musical genre has naff representatives as well as greats - although I can't think of any greats that hang out in the current hit parade...

If all you ever heard was the bad side of a genre, then maybe you'd get tainted against everything else in that genre too? Hands up who hates Disco? Heavy Metal? Folk? Trance?

Take Country and Western music (I wish someone would...). I know that I am needlessly and possibly mindlessly prejudiced against it and don't like anything I've heard in the genre - but I have heard some of the "greats" and can understand why fans of the genre love it so much. I also have a great amount of respect for Madonna - not particularly for her music (although the William Orbit collaboration worked well, IMO), but her dogmatic, flexible and hard-working approach to the whole art of being a world-class entertainer. I wouldn't buy her stuff (except the Orbit work), however.

It's just not my cuppa tea - but you won't get me doing a radio show about how naff I think it is, because that would be pointless - just like the radio broadcast in the subject of this thread

Question for that presenter - if the guitarist "bored everyone to death with tedium", how come people bought the records and went to the concerts - and are still buying the music? Jimmy Page was just as capable of going off on a mind-numbing noodle fest as he was of producing musically innovative and excellent solos. A little personal bias creeping in, perchance?

It's summed up quite well on the Genesis album that many proggers think was the beginning of the end; Duke('s Travels). "You kill what you fear and fear what you don't understand".

/end blat

Back to Top
penguindf12 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: September 20 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 831
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 27 2004 at 18:16

You are right, I guess. Prog is more intelligent and complex music. Which makes it not necessarily more qualified as a musical expression, but different. And because of taste, many like it and many do not, just like certif1ed and country music. An occaisional country or hip-hop (gasp!)(okay, so there's only one hip-hop song I like: OutKast's "Hey Ya" and that's it -- I dislike everything else hip-hop) song is okay, but any more than that is just boring or annoying to me. When I play prog music at my house, my friends might like one or two songs (especially Dream Theater), but any more and they try to kill me, and I try to kill them if they play too much Rammstein (eg: one song ).

But prog can at least claim to be the following: more complex; more intellectual; an aquired taste; music made for focusing on and understanding (except in the case of certain prog instrumental songs: some, like Godspeed You Black Emperor, lend themselves as background music. But even that requires some attempt to understand it because it is so far removed from traditional pop music); more experimental and adventurous; more daring; and......

 

 

 

better!

 

Back to Top
Dick Heath View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Jazz-Rock Specialist

Joined: April 19 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 12818
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 27 2004 at 20:10
Originally posted by Swinton MCR Swinton MCR wrote:

in my car for a long time on Friday evening (this was due to M60 Manchester closure and ensuing grid-lock) - I had just listened to all of Red Queen/Rain Dancers (Gryphon) when I then switched the radio onto Radio GMR and they were discussing the 40th? Anniversary of the Fender Stratocaster! - They had a rock critic on expounding the virtues of Hank Marvin/Jimmy Page etc and then he went on to the Guitarist who bored everyone to death with tedium...The guitarist was of course Steve Howe


For goodness sake exercise your rights,  don't listen to it. However, try one thing before giving up. When BBC 4 TV had a prog documentary a year ago, and unusually wheeled in one or two prog supporters, as well as the usual anti-prog brigade (e.g. John Peel), the BBC 4 noticeboard was deluged by the pro-proggers, demanding more prog (clearly it hasn't worked, but we came out of the woodwork in a relativley big way).Write in to GMR, find their website and  let everybody here know, and  let's have a concerted effort of letting these musical illiterates know.

There is a great conspiracy on part of the record industry. I look stopped believing the spiel the record industry put out for decades: 'we put out the music you want'. They try to get you to buy the music they want to hoist on you to fatten their profits - efforts concentrated on fewer prodcuts but sold to far more people, that appears to be their business philoosphy). And now alas they have found ways of manipulating through TV (and I don't simply mean paying for adverting): i.e. those Pop Star talentless shows, usually judged by Pete Waterman - who foisted Kylie Minogue and Jason Donavan on the unsuspecting 11 years at the end of the 80's. The music industry is back in a mind set they had before Dylan and the Beatles arrived, they have to control everything.

Music radio is just as bad: powerful programme controllers who say what can and can't be on the playlists (Trevor Dann screwed up the originality of nine tenths of BBC Radio One, for instance banning music more than 10 years old - hence  allowing blatent plagiarism in cover versions, while the jocks now no difference). It does means few people at the radio stations have to be reached/manipulated by the big record companies, to have a particular type of bland, uninspiring pop dumped on poor joe public.

Here endeth the first lesson.
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 28 2004 at 03:37

It gets worse than that with some radio stations (as you are no doubt aware); There is a practice whereby "playlists" are actually tapes or CDs made by a particular record company or group of moguls in order to promote by drip-feed a particular section of their stable. Radio stations are REQUIRED to play these CDs or face withdrawal of financial support. The "programme controllers" just go for regular drinkies with the moguls and keep the wallets nice and fat, and the moguls nicely stroked so that they will send more product.

Back to Top
Pixel Pirate View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 11 2004
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 793
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 28 2004 at 03:49
A good point raised somewhere else on this site a while ago: Why listen to these sorts of radio stations at all?. Except for the classical stations,I haven't listened to any music programs on radio since the late 80's because I know that 98% will be bloody awful and I'm not a masochist. Wading through the horrendous crap just to try and find a few possible,scattered,isolated nuggets of gold is just not worth it.
Odi profanum vulgus et arceo.
Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 28 2004 at 03:50

Dick Heath:

Marvin was clearly an inspiration to many. Fair enough. He was an innovator etc, It's just not my era, not my music. It means nothing to me.

It would be nice to have the sort of music I listern to catered for by mainstream radio. I'm not suggesting 24 hour Progathons, just a couple of hours a week late at night, when all the 'normal' people are tucked up in bed and wont be upset or frightened by the sound of real musicians playing.

Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
Back to Top
Pixel Pirate View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 11 2004
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 793
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 28 2004 at 04:24
Moronic music journalism has a long and inglorious history. As early as the 1790's when Haydn was touring England he was sl*gged off by critics and one actually wrote that Haydn's music was bad because it didn't resemble Handel,because as everyone knew,Handel was the definition of what good music was,so consequently,if it didn't resemble Handel it must be bad. Impeccable logic!. And that's the track in which music journalism has largely been stuck ever since. Case in point: A couple of years ago there was a series on tv about the history of rock music. Since I can't stand any other sort of rock than prog I didn't watch it,but I caught a trailer for one of the episodes and it showed ELP and so I thought that must the episode where they show the prog era,at least the 70's one,and so I thought I'd at least watch that one. So I settled down to do so and immediately ELP popped up in a live recording of "Fanfare For The Common Man" as far as I recall and we had about 60 seconds of that before it was abruptly cut and a voiceover came on and announced something like "this was how bad things had gotten by the mid seventies,something had to be done.And thankfully,rescue was at hand". Cut to the Sex Pistols as the saviours of rock. And that was it. 60 seconds of ELP only as a means of illustrating how "bad" things had got and then 60 minutes of talentless noise polluters that had done mankind a great service in slaying the evil prog dragon. So the great tradition of the kind of music "journalism" that a lobotomized hamster could do better is alive and well.
Odi profanum vulgus et arceo.
Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 28 2004 at 05:06

Pixel Pirate:

Malcolm McClaren stated in 'The great rock 'n' roll swindle' that a band that couldn't play was better than a band that could. He may have thought he was speaking out for musical rebellion but infact he was summarising the whole ethos of the music industry. In rock the best musicians are at best ignored by the mainstream media, at worst loathed and ridiculed. The actual reasons for this are unclear. At the heart of it, is that the masses want music that they can dance to or easily sing along to. Generally prog doesn't offer this. Dancey sing along music makes a quick buck and manifests itself in hit singles which can be sold to advertsiers to sell products. There's more financial millage in it. Prog acts stick around for decades like a bad smell, even after they have 'had their day' prodcuing albums for a loyal but ever shrinking middle age audience. Thats the view of the industry I reckon..

£££££$$$$$$

Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
Back to Top
Pixel Pirate View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 11 2004
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 793
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 28 2004 at 05:46
Dr.John said something wise once: The music industry would prefer to release records without music on them. That's very true.If they could bypass the music entirely,they could get straight to the important part: The money.
Odi profanum vulgus et arceo.
Back to Top
Swinton MCR View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 19 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 848
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 28 2004 at 08:09

In my defence I was listening to the radio to ascertain the severity of the grid-lock which I was sat in! - I only listen to talk-sport (because they mainly talk about Football (Soccer to you non-brits out there) and I thus satiate my two hobbies - football in the AM and Prog rock on the way home.....

incidentally - My two sons have not opened their minds to the gates of prog and unfortunately are controlled by peer-pressure and whats "In" with the people they hang around with! - C'est La Vie......

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.324 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.