Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
jimidom
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 02 2007
Location: Houston, TX USA
Status: Offline
Points: 570
|
Posted: November 19 2008 at 10:30 |
I cannot vote either!
|
"The music business is a cruel and shallow money trench, a long plastic hallway where thieves and pimps run free, and good men die like dogs. There's also a negative side." - HST
|
|
Hercules
Prog Reviewer
Joined: June 14 2007
Location: Near York UK
Status: Offline
Points: 7024
|
Posted: November 19 2008 at 11:32 |
Barrett Floyd would be close, but from Meddle to Animals, Floyd are so far ahead of King Crimson, it's a simple choice.
Ask any young person today who King Crimson were. They won't have a clue. But Floyd T shirts are all over the university campus, showing that quality lasts.
|
A TVR is not a car. It's a way of life.
|
|
Visitor13
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: February 02 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 4702
|
Posted: November 19 2008 at 11:39 |
Hercules wrote:
Barrett Floyd would be close, but from Meddle to Animals, Floyd are so far ahead of King Crimson, it's a simple choice.
Ask any young person today who King Crimson were. They won't have a clue. But Floyd T shirts are all over the university campus, showing that quality lasts.
|
|
|
Alberto Muñoz
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 26 2006
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 3577
|
Posted: November 19 2008 at 11:41 |
Hercules wrote:
Barrett Floyd would be close, but from Meddle to Animals, Floyd are so far ahead of King Crimson, it's a simple choice.
Ask any young person today who King Crimson were. They won't have a clue. But Floyd T shirts are all over the university campus, showing that quality lasts.
|
Edited by Alberto Muñoz - November 19 2008 at 11:41
|
|
|
ModernRocker79
Forum Groupie
Joined: November 02 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 62
|
Posted: November 19 2008 at 12:03 |
This one is hard. I love both but I have to chose Pink Floyd. King Crimson were better instrumentally. Pink Floyd had the melodies and the songs. That in the end of the day is what matters to me.
|
|
trackstoni
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 23 2008
Location: Lebanon
Status: Offline
Points: 934
|
Posted: November 19 2008 at 12:35 |
not easy to choose between two Giants , but Pink Floyd got my vote this time ////
|
Tracking Tracks of Rock
|
|
Logan
Forum & Site Admin Group
Site Admin
Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 35951
|
Posted: November 19 2008 at 14:02 |
Alberto Muñoz wrote:
Hercules wrote:
Barrett Floyd would be close, but from Meddle to Animals, Floyd are so far ahead of King Crimson, it's a simple choice.
Ask any young person today who King Crimson were. They won't have a clue. But Floyd T shirts are all over the university campus, showing that quality lasts.
|
|
But it's not like you see many kids around campus wearing Madonna shirts. That said, I think kids wear those because they think it's cool and iconic (as is wearing a Che Guevara shirt). Anyway, personally I wouldn't base quality on kids' fashion sense or what is popular. Shirts with the "Dark Side of the Moon" logo look cool, and Pink Floyd has long had cool cache. King Crimson is generally more challenging from a mainstream perspective, and would be harder for mainstream listeners to digest (I don't imagine that most of those kids are Proggers, and might be donning Nickleback or Slipknot tees when they aren't wearing their Floyd tees -- or Zeppelin, Hendrix, The Doors -- which I consider quality iconic bands/artist -- etc). When I was in college I didn't know King Crimson, and Pink Floyd was my favourite popular rock band, but King Crimson played an important role in this Prog journey that I'm still on. King Crimson for me, though I really do like Floyd too. I think Larks' Tongues in Aspic is a particularly terrific album One might ask, is it particularly because of quality that bands like Pink Floyd, Foreigner, Boston, Queen, Styx, Bon Jovi, and Kim Mitchell regularly play on my local classic rock radio station rather than bands such as King Crimson, Magma, Comus, The Soft Machine, and Henry Cow, or it because it's more accessible that it has become part of the standard classic rock radio format? Popularity breeds popularity. I do agree that Pink Floyd has withstood the test of time, and is "quality" music, however.
|
|
|
mithrandir
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 25 2006
Location: New Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 933
|
Posted: November 19 2008 at 14:29 |
Hercules wrote:
Ask any young person today who King Crimson were. They won't have a clue. But Floyd T shirts are all over the university campus, showing that quality lasts.
|
this is a joke, correct?
|
|
Padraic
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
|
Posted: November 19 2008 at 14:37 |
Logan wrote:
One might ask, is it particularly because of quality that bands like Pink Floyd, Foreigner, Boston, Queen, Styx, Bon Jovi, and Kim Mitchell regularly play on my local classic rock radio station rather than bands such as King Crimson, Magma, Comus, The Soft Machine, and Henry Cow, or it because it's more accessible that it has become part of the standard classic rock radio format? Popularity breeds popularity.
|
Right, it's because PF et. al. were more popular then, so for a "classic" rock station which hopes for a recall of "glory days" they play that music. Pink Floyd was sort of the ultimate crossover - in high school I could have counted on one hand the number of people I encountered who had a 70s Yes record (and King Crimson was worse, I think I met one person who had even the faintest clue who they were), yet everyone loved Floyd, all the normal "hard rock" guys and friends who loved Zep, Bad Company, and sort of your standard 70s classic rock fare were big Floyd fans, went to the concerts, etc. I mean, Magma and Henry Cow? Forget it, I didn't have any chance of discovering bands like that at the time.
|
|
TGM: Orb
Prog Reviewer
Joined: October 21 2007
Location: n/a
Status: Offline
Points: 8052
|
Posted: November 19 2008 at 14:44 |
Preference goes to Crimson. Love both.
|
|
The T
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
|
Posted: November 19 2008 at 14:58 |
mithrandir wrote:
Hercules wrote:
Ask any young person today who King Crimson were. They won't have a clue. But Floyd T shirts are all over the university campus, showing that quality lasts.
|
this is a joke, correct? |
And a terrible one at that...
Anyway, even though I disagree with that popularity-based point of view, I definitely like Pink Floyd 349837 times more than King Crimson. Only ITCOTCK is a real masterpiece in my ears, and maybe even Red. But PF gave me 4 absolute masterpieces (from DSOTM to TW) and a few near-masterpieces (Meddle) and great songs in between.
On the other hand, King Crimson gave me "Discipline"
|
|
|
Alberto Muñoz
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 26 2006
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 3577
|
Posted: November 19 2008 at 15:40 |
Logan wrote:
Alberto Muñoz wrote:
Hercules wrote:
Barrett Floyd would be close, but from Meddle to Animals, Floyd are so far ahead of King Crimson, it's a simple choice.
Ask any young person today who King Crimson were. They won't have a clue. But Floyd T shirts are all over the university campus, showing that quality lasts.
|
|
But it's not like you see many kids around campus wearing Madonna shirts.
I think they do not need for, just see how profits get Madonna for his "concerts",
That said, I think kids wear those because they think it's cool and iconic (as is wearing a Che Guevara shirt). Anyway, personally I wouldn't base quality on kids' fashion sense or what is popular. Shirts with the "Dark Side of the Moon" logo look cool, and Pink Floyd has long had cool cache. King Crimson is generally more challenging from a mainstream perspective, and would be harder for mainstream listeners to digest (I don't imagine that most of those kids are Proggers, and might be donning Nickleback or Slipknot tees when they aren't wearing their Floyd tees -- or Zeppelin, Hendrix, The Doors -- which I consider quality iconic bands/artist -- etc). When I was in college I didn't know King Crimson, and Pink Floyd was my favourite popular rock band, but King Crimson played an important role in this Prog journey that I'm still on. King Crimson for me, though I really do like Floyd too. I think Larks' Tongues in Aspic is a particularly terrific album
One might ask, is it particularly because of quality that bands like Pink Floyd, Foreigner, Boston, Queen, Styx, Bon Jovi, and Kim Mitchell regularly play on my local classic rock radio station rather than bands such as King Crimson, Magma, Comus, The Soft Machine, and Henry Cow, or it because it's more accessible that it has become part of the standard classic rock radio format? Popularity breeds popularity. I do agree that Pink Floyd has withstood the test of time, and is "quality" music, however.
|
|
|
|
Visitor13
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: February 02 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 4702
|
Posted: November 19 2008 at 15:43 |
OK, how about Pink Floyd vs Madonna... Not that easy, Pink Floyd went downhill since Barrett left, Madonna has been going downhill since the release of Music ...
Edited by Visitor13 - November 19 2008 at 15:44
|
|
The Quiet One
Prog Reviewer
Joined: January 16 2008
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 15745
|
Posted: November 19 2008 at 15:43 |
Luckily I'm no huge fan of KC, so I can vote easily, Floyd it is. Though I do love Islands and Lizard by the King. Starless and Wake are very good too.
|
|
Alberto Muñoz
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 26 2006
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 3577
|
Posted: November 19 2008 at 15:55 |
|
|
|
darksideof
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 22 2007
Location: Newark N.J.
Status: Offline
Points: 2318
|
Posted: November 19 2008 at 16:11 |
I pick Both...Sorry I can't vote...
|
http://darksideofcollages.blogspot.com/
http://www.metalmusicarchives.com/
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Darksideof-Collages/
|
|
Takeshi Kovacs
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 27 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 2454
|
Posted: November 19 2008 at 16:43 |
Floyd are one of my all time favourites, and two of their albums (Wish You were Here & Animals) would be in my top 10 of all time (if not the top 5). Respect to Crimson too, but only one winner for me!
|
Open the gates of the city wide....
Check out my music taste: http://www.last.fm/user/TakeshiKovacs/
|
|
Mellotron Storm
Prog Reviewer
Joined: August 27 2006
Location: The Beach
Status: Online
Points: 13505
|
Posted: November 19 2008 at 17:16 |
This is one of the rare times i can't vote.Both are in my top 10 bands of all time,and there's not a clear cut favourite for me.Very evenly matched.
|
"The wind is slowly tearing her apart"
"Sad Rain" ANEKDOTEN
|
|
dzx
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 23 2008
Location: france
Status: Offline
Points: 117
|
Posted: November 19 2008 at 17:23 |
el böthy wrote:
Don´t mess with the King |
Exactly. Absolutely no contest for me, the most innovative of all. Floyd are how can I say it easy listening in comparison
|
was that just an Am augmented minor 9th i heard? nice!
|
|
Urs Blank
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 17 2007
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 214
|
Posted: November 19 2008 at 17:26 |
In a "progressive" point of view, I would have to choose KC.
But I vote for Pink Floyd, probably "The" group that made me become a huge fan of music in general.
|
Have no fear of perfection - you'll never reach it.
Salvador Dali.
|
|