Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > General Music Discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - The Classical Appreciation Thread
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedThe Classical Appreciation Thread

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 2345>
Author
Message
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65289
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 04 2008 at 20:53
I like Brahms very much, his two piano concertos particularly

Back to Top
Trademark View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 21 2006
Location: oHIo
Status: Offline
Points: 1009
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 05 2008 at 10:58
"i'm a huge fan of Brahms and Bach, but I love Schumann as well. In other words, BIG music. Who would you suggest I check out first?"

Sticking to the list for the time being, I'd go with Peter Boyer (Big and Very Romantic). His music  is an easy transition out of the 19th century style and into modern tonal music.  That should satisfy your Brahms / Schuman side.

For your Bach needs I'd suggest Aaron Jay Kernis.  Kernis himself is a major Bach devotee and his works are incredibly dense exercises in modern counterpoint without heading into atonal or serial territory, and still are very Big in a sort of late Beethoven sense (think "late string quartets").

This brings up a kind of weird thing that happens when we discuss Orchestral music and Kernis is a great example of it.  In the paragraph above I've compared his work to both Bach and Beethoven.  This could lead one to assume that there would be strong similarities in the sound.  The old "If you like Yes or Genesis you'll like The Flower Kings"  type of comparison we are used to in Prog just doesn't work as well when we're crossing nearly 200 years of music history (rather than 30 in the example here).  

Kernis uses counterpoint in a dramatic and sometimes almost extreme way, but also in a way that sounds nothing like J.S. Bach.  He uses structures (form) and texture in very similar ways to Beethoven but again, this music will never be mistaken for a lost Beethoven symphony.

Both composers have quite a different concept of melody.  It is a more modern style, and to my ears, quite distinctly North American in character.  Boyer takes the large scale approach of Brahms and combines it with melodies that might be more associated with Aaron Copland (but without the direct use of folk songs) and uses all the resources of the orchestra to showcase those tunes like Brahms, Schuman or Mahler would have done.

Kernis, like Bach or Beethoven, is more interested in "development" of his material.  He uses shorter melodic fragments and works and re-works them in a sometimes bewildering number of different ways.  His music is heavily, (often intensely) syncopated and very challenging to play (or conduct, just try beating time along with the recording!)

Comparing one composer to another in this way can feel misleading to listeners more accustomed to noting the similarities between say, Porcupine Tree and Pineapple Thief, RPWL and Pink Floyd,or  Dream Theater and Symphony X etc.. The comparisons you read about in Classical music (classical style not classical era) are more in structure and concept rather than style and sound.




Edited by Trademark - November 05 2008 at 11:01
Back to Top
Ricochet View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 27 2005
Location: Nauru
Status: Offline
Points: 46301
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 05 2008 at 11:24
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

I like Brahms very much, his two piano concertos particularly



Moi aussi, I'm currently studying the first (which is both difficult and sublime) - and doing that, it has really grown on me - plus I love the finale from the 2nd concert.
Back to Top
The Pessimist View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 13 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 3834
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 05 2008 at 17:24
Originally posted by Ricochet Ricochet wrote:

Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

I like Brahms very much, his two piano concertos particularly



Moi aussi, I'm currently studying the first (which is both difficult and sublime) - and doing that, it has really grown on me - plus I love the finale from the 2nd concert.


The D minor concerto is exceptionally good. I haven't heard t'other one though unfortunately...
"Market value is irrelevant to intrinsic value."

Arnold Schoenberg
Back to Top
limeyrob View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member

VIP Member

Joined: January 15 2005
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 1402
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 06 2008 at 13:13
Just caught this thread and you can count me in as a classical music listener. Though to be pedantic 'Classical' generally refers to music written between 1730 and 1820. Sandwiched between Baroque and Romantic periods.
 
My favourites are CPE, JC and JS Bach, Vivaldi, Boccherini, Beethoven, Tchaikovsky and Dvojak to name but a few. I also like brass band music (Black Dyke Band in particular) and a fair chunk of military music especially with the strains of bagpipes.
 
The only drawback I find is that there is not enough time in a day to listen to music.Smile
Back to Top
The Pessimist View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 13 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 3834
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 06 2008 at 18:30
"Market value is irrelevant to intrinsic value."

Arnold Schoenberg
Back to Top
jammun View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 14 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3449
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 06 2008 at 21:22
Haven't really been through all this thread, but I've always been partial to string quartets:  Beethoven, Debussy, Ravel.  Seems to me this is about as close to a rock band as you can get, obviously not power-wise, but in terms of instrumentation, just lacking the drums.  For classical to me less is more.
Back to Top
Trademark View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 21 2006
Location: oHIo
Status: Offline
Points: 1009
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 07 2008 at 10:41
The whole Classical Era vs. Classical Music issue gets a bit over done at times.  Yes, the basic genre of classical music is poorly named and in that way it has a lot in common with Prog.  There are pages and pages of threads about the difference between progressive approach and progressive style (i.e Prog vs. prog).

Classical music as a business entity (a genre with specific charts in Billboard as one example and of course there are others) is pretty well established.  It includes music for Orchestra, Chamber music played on orchestral instruments, music for keyboard instruments, choral music, opera, & art song.  In the present day the term also covers some hybrid forms such as electro-acoustic music.  But you already knew that....

The term classical music was not in use during the classical era, much like like the term progressive rock was not in use in the early/mid 70's when the genre was at its peak (commercially).  The term classical music came into being in the late 19th century and contrary to the absolutely horrible Wikipedia entry was NOT an attempt to canonize a certain body of music (Wiki lists Bach to Beethoven as the group but Bach was not even a classical era composer). The term was a convenient reference for journalists to the dominant position of Beethoven, Mozart, and Haydn (all composers of the Classical Era) on the concert programs of the day, but rapidly extended to any orchestral music given in concert and shortly thereafter to all the other genres listed above.

There have been a number of attempts to "re-name" the genre in the past 40 years or so and classical music is now also sometimes referred to as "art-music" or "serious music".  I believe you even referred to it in another thread recently as "tuxedo music", a name I wholeheartedly approve of in spite of having spent 25 years in the field without ever having worn a tux. LOL

Like Prog, classical music is a large and inclusive "umbrella" genre that includes a large number of sub-genres with a lot of parallels to prog. If we apply the nomenclature of this site to classical music we might see:

Proto-Classical / Proto Prog: The Renaissance & Baroque Eras.  The genre was just solidifying its main concept such as the major /minor key system, standard notation, and some of the basic forms (fugue, sonata, concerto). Instrumental technology was making new sounds and techniques (the improved violin and the early pianos circa 1710)  possible and composers were testing them out, but it wasn't really "classical" yet.

Classical & Romantic Eras/ Symphonic Prog  The instrumental forces The orchestra, piano and major chamber ensembles) are set in place and a group of composers (Mozart, Haydn, Beethoven) make their mark using these basic groups in such remarkably creative ways that they leave their stamp on the genre forever.  All composers from this time onward will labor in the shadow of these giants.  Eventually the genre gets too big and bloated (Wagner, Bruckner, Mahler) and collapses under the weight of its overly ambitious concept works.  This fragments the genre into a number of smaller sub-genres.

20th /21st Century:  All the main sub-genres of classical music in the 20th century (what I call "The Age of Isms" in my classes) are represented in the prog world.  Primitivism, Neo-Classicism, Minimalism, and the loose group of sub-genres known collectively as Modernist (which includes serialism, experimental, and aleatoric styles)  a can be represented by Heavy Prog, Neo-Prog, Electronica, and Avant-Prog and many bands from these genres list composers from the corresponding ones as influences.

In a thread like this one I'd advise not getting hung up on the Classical vs. classical issue.  It is a very small detail in a very big picture.

Russel, I know you were not specifically referencing the Wiki article.  But I can easily imagine that folks will check it out to see what it might say on the issue and it is just SOOOO badly done. The article has so many factual errors and errors of inference and logic that I wouldnn't even know where to begin to correct it.  Entries like this are the bedrock reason that Wikipedia is a joke in any academic community and why it is a dis-service rather than a service to people in general.  A Wiki entry can only be trusted if you already know the information.  The Wiki "definition" of this term is disputed by The Grove Encyclopedia of Music, The Harvard Dictionary of Music, The Oxford Music Dictionary, and Baker's Biographical Dictionary of Music and Musicians just to name just a few reliable sources and, if you read the first four paragraphs of the Wiki entry,  it even contradicts itself!  

Just say no to Wiki.Dead


Edited by Trademark - November 07 2008 at 10:43
Back to Top
Trademark View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 21 2006
Location: oHIo
Status: Offline
Points: 1009
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 07 2008 at 10:48
Kibbie Alex:. My daughter played that piece last February as part of her audition to University as a piano pedagogy major.  I'm pretty sure she didn't make that cool sound at the end though.Wink

Jammum, you should check out some music for wind quintets, brass quintets and saxophone quartets (Ok, well chamber music in general) to go along with your string quartets.  You'll find the same sort of intimate interplay between the instruments you often get in prog bands that appeals to you in the string quartets and which can be harder to find in orchestral music.

Edited by Trademark - November 07 2008 at 10:53
Back to Top
The Pessimist View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 13 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 3834
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 07 2008 at 11:45
Originally posted by Trademark Trademark wrote:

Kibbie Alex:. My daughter played that piece last February as part of her audition to University as a piano pedagogy major.  I'm pretty sure she didn't make that cool sound at the end though.Wink

Jammum, you should check out some music for wind quintets, brass quintets and saxophone quartets (Ok, well chamber music in general) to go along with your string quartets.  You'll find the same sort of intimate interplay between the instruments you often get in prog bands that appeals to you in the string quartets and which can be harder to find in orchestral music.


Thanks man It is a very tough piece to pull off! By the way, just call me Alex
"Market value is irrelevant to intrinsic value."

Arnold Schoenberg
Back to Top
Ricochet View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 27 2005
Location: Nauru
Status: Offline
Points: 46301
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 08 2008 at 11:22
I'm proud to announce that I've composed something called Music For Invisible Pianoforte. I've already found the perfect musician to play it - no it's not Lang Lang, on the contrary, it's:



Big smile


Edited by Ricochet - November 08 2008 at 11:22
Back to Top
The Pessimist View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 13 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 3834
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 09 2008 at 09:30
Originally posted by Ricochet Ricochet wrote:

I'm proud to announce that I've composed something called Music For Invisible Pianoforte. I've already found the perfect musician to play it - no it's not Lang Lang, on the contrary, it's:



Big smile




Nice.

Is it a suite?
"Market value is irrelevant to intrinsic value."

Arnold Schoenberg
Back to Top
Ricochet View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 27 2005
Location: Nauru
Status: Offline
Points: 46301
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 09 2008 at 10:42
Suites are so (17)50s, it's just a long piece.
Back to Top
The Pessimist View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 13 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 3834
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 09 2008 at 12:40
Originally posted by Ricochet Ricochet wrote:

Suites are so (17)50s, it's just a long piece.


Long pieces are so 40s! Op.0 i take it?
"Market value is irrelevant to intrinsic value."

Arnold Schoenberg
Back to Top
Trademark View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 21 2006
Location: oHIo
Status: Offline
Points: 1009
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 09 2008 at 12:45
Long pieces are "Suuuiiiite" (s). 

Edited by Trademark - November 09 2008 at 12:47
Back to Top
Ricochet View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 27 2005
Location: Nauru
Status: Offline
Points: 46301
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 09 2008 at 12:46
Originally posted by kibble_alex kibble_alex wrote:

Originally posted by Ricochet Ricochet wrote:

Suites are so (17)50s, it's just a long piece.


Long pieces are so 40s! Op.0 i take it?


Op. 220, as the catalogue number will be inversely proportion with the chronological factor. Wink

(in English, I have 219 pieces left to write in my lifetime...Tongue)
Back to Top
The Pessimist View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 13 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 3834
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 09 2008 at 16:19
Originally posted by Ricochet Ricochet wrote:

Originally posted by kibble_alex kibble_alex wrote:

Originally posted by Ricochet Ricochet wrote:

Suites are so (17)50s, it's just a long piece.


Long pieces are so 40s! Op.0 i take it?


Op. 220, as the catalogue number will be inversely proportion with the chronological factor. Wink

(in English, I have 219 pieces left to write in my lifetime...Tongue)


May i make a suggestion for your next masterpiece?

BTW Ricochet, have you listen to my youtube link? I think you may like it
"Market value is irrelevant to intrinsic value."

Arnold Schoenberg
Back to Top
Ricochet View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 27 2005
Location: Nauru
Status: Offline
Points: 46301
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 09 2008 at 16:42
Originally posted by kibble_alex kibble_alex wrote:

Originally posted by Ricochet Ricochet wrote:

Originally posted by kibble_alex kibble_alex wrote:

Originally posted by Ricochet Ricochet wrote:

Suites are so (17)50s, it's just a long piece.


Long pieces are so 40s! Op.0 i take it?


Op. 220, as the catalogue number will be inversely proportion with the chronological factor. Wink

(in English, I have 219 pieces left to write in my lifetime...Tongue)


May i make a suggestion for your next masterpiece?

BTW Ricochet, have you listen to my youtube link? I think you may like it


You may inspire me. Wink

Just checked it now. You received 5 stars so far, wow! LOL
It just happens that, tomorrow, I shall play Brahms' Variations On A Theme by Paganini, 1st book in a class recital.

(I'm quite into Brahms lately...I've got these Variations in my repertoire for two years now, might move on to those on an Aria by Haydn soon, plus the 1st Concerto, which has grown to me incredibly, some Waltzes, etc...)


Edited by Ricochet - November 09 2008 at 16:46
Back to Top
The Pessimist View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 13 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 3834
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 09 2008 at 17:35
Originally posted by Ricochet Ricochet wrote:

Originally posted by kibble_alex kibble_alex wrote:

Originally posted by Ricochet Ricochet wrote:

Originally posted by kibble_alex kibble_alex wrote:

Originally posted by Ricochet Ricochet wrote:

Suites are so (17)50s, it's just a long piece.


Long pieces are so 40s! Op.0 i take it?


Op. 220, as the catalogue number will be inversely proportion with the chronological factor. Wink

(in English, I have 219 pieces left to write in my lifetime...Tongue)


May i make a suggestion for your next masterpiece?

BTW Ricochet, have you listen to my youtube link? I think you may like it


You may inspire me. Wink

Just checked it now. You received 5 stars so far, wow! LOL
It just happens that, tomorrow, I shall play Brahms' Variations On A Theme by Paganini, 1st book in a class recital.

(I'm quite into Brahms lately...I've got these Variations in my repertoire for two years now, might move on to those on an Aria by Haydn soon, plus the 1st Concerto, which has grown to me incredibly, some Waltzes, etc...)


How about a piano piece that have chords that stretch over two octaves in each hand (no arpeggiating) called

"Go On Then Brahms, Have a Crack At That"

I think it will be recognised as highly innovative in the classical world, don't you agree?

Of course, I'm not mocking my favourite composer in a spiteful way

What are your opinions on my video from a fellow pianist's perspective? And I love the Paganini variations, I even prefer them to Liszt's versions.
"Market value is irrelevant to intrinsic value."

Arnold Schoenberg
Back to Top
The Pessimist View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 13 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 3834
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 11 2008 at 18:57
Anyone going to rescue this thread before it disappears from sight? Surely this can't be all the classical fans on PA
"Market value is irrelevant to intrinsic value."

Arnold Schoenberg
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 2345>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.189 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.