Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Bands, Artists and Genres Appreciation
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Syd Barrett... what makes him a legend?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedSyd Barrett... what makes him a legend?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>
Author
Message
el dingo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 08 2008
Location: Norwich UK
Status: Offline
Points: 7053
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2008 at 04:17
Couldn't agree more. Piper still gets dragged out at least once a year and still sounds great every time.
 
Astronomy affects my sensibilities in a totally different way to, say, Echoes, but I'd still put it in my top half dozen Floyd tracks.
 
As punters, I think we're lucky to have two distinct Floyd sounds and I enjoy both.
 
My only regret is I was too young (just) to see the Syd era band.
It's not that I can't find worth in anything, it's just that I can't find worth in enough.
Back to Top
Rocktopus View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 02 2006
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 4202
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2008 at 04:25
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

 
Was he really a genius? Was he a talented guy that people adore only, as with many rock stars, because he died young? Answers would be appreciated.


 Hey! He died two years ago. I hope I live to be older than 60, but its not considered dying young.

I don't know how you approach listening to Piper or what you expect. It was released in 1967. Released the same summer as Seargent Pepper (but much more radical), and Its certainly more cuttinge edge than Days of Future Passed.

As I said, virtually all spacerock/krautrock is in depth to Interstellar Overdrive (and Astronomy Domine), and to me the rest of PF's debut, the early singles (and his two soloalbums, which you probably enjoy even less) etc... is wonderfully playful, catchy and great fun. Just some of the best psychedelic pop ever recorded.
Over land and under ashes
In the sunlight, see - it flashes
Find a fly and eat his eye
But don't believe in me
Don't believe in me
Don't believe in me
Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2008 at 07:36
Piper was revolutionary stuff. Barrett was a massive influence on many musicians and songwriters, I'm sure, but I'll always have a problem with banding the tern 'genius' around, with regard to most rock stars from any era, living or dead.

It's not clear to me, even as a Floyd fan, exactly what the nature of Barretts genius was. As much as I enjoy Piper, Barretts departure from the band was the best thing that could have happened imo.
Back to Top
Vibrationbaby View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 6898
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2008 at 10:19
Genius ? I`m not going to copy out the definition of the word from the Oxford Dictionary because I wouldn`t apply it to any rock star. But if anyone was the "genius" behind Floyd it was Gilmour, creative, modest and he has a collection of old aeroplanes that I would like to have for myself
Back to Top
el dingo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 08 2008
Location: Norwich UK
Status: Offline
Points: 7053
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2008 at 11:05
If the aeroplane situation counts, does that mean you like Gary Numan as well?
 
PS I understand Mr Gilmour has several Ferraris too - I've paid for at least a wing mirror on one of them over the years thru royalties.
 
Only joking - I agree with you and the guy is utterly brilliant. Any style you like, he delivers. Still think Nile Song is a classy heavy track and even Biding My Time ain't too bad in its way. On an Island is superb.
It's not that I can't find worth in anything, it's just that I can't find worth in enough.
Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2008 at 11:21
Originally posted by Vibrationbaby Vibrationbaby wrote:

Genius ? I`m not going to copy out the definition of the word from the Oxford Dictionary because I wouldn`t apply it to any rock star. But if anyone was the "genius" behind Floyd it was Gilmour, creative, modest and he has a collection of old aeroplanes that I would like to have for myself


I agree.

..about Gilmour...not the aeroplanes... Dont get wrong, I love them, but I guess they're pretty high maintenance.
Back to Top
Vibrationbaby View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 6898
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2008 at 11:28
Actually he sold the company, Intrepid Aviation, and then the collection which included  a lot of classic fighters was sold off. Apparently he wasn`t too crazy about the business aspect  which was necessary in maintaining the costs of keeping the planes in the air. I think he still has one or two left that he keeps as toys to go barnstorming around the English countryside every now and then. I don`t know much about Numan except that he owned a Harvard and at one point flew it as part of some civilian demonstration team.
Back to Top
el dingo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 08 2008
Location: Norwich UK
Status: Offline
Points: 7053
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2008 at 12:22
Numan's not worth knowing about musically in my opinion.
 
Think early 80s, Tubeway Army, are Friends Electric. Nuff said.
 
Thanks for enjoyable banter.
It's not that I can't find worth in anything, it's just that I can't find worth in enough.
Back to Top
Vibrationbaby View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 6898
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2008 at 13:37
Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:

Originally posted by Vibrationbaby Vibrationbaby wrote:

Genius ? I`m not going to copy out the definition of the word from the Oxford Dictionary because I wouldn`t apply it to any rock star. But if anyone was the "genius" behind Floyd it was Gilmour, creative, modest and he has a collection of old aeroplanes that I would like to have for myself


I agree.

..about Gilmour...not the aeroplanes... Dont get wrong, I love them, but I guess they're pretty high maintenance.
  Not to mention the insurance on a Spitfire, Vampire or Hawker Hunter. Some ex-US marine pilot turned businessman just got the c/a for a Sea Harrier FSR I he purchased a few years ago for $ 1 million sans engines !
Back to Top
salmacis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member

Content Addition

Joined: April 10 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 3928
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2008 at 14:14
'Piper...' is a wonderful album that still sounds fresh and full of inventiveness IMHO, as do the singles of that era. Syd's solo stuff is- rather by necessity considering his desparate mental state, Gilmour was really lucky to get anything out of him at all- more scattershot but you can still definitely hear many traces of true magic in there, particularly on the debut.
 
However, it has become terribly fashionable for certain hipper-than-thou music journalists to sneer at everything Pink Floyd recorded after his departure for being 'self indulgent', 'pompous', 'humourless' et al (the usual insults aimed at prog). I saw a review of 'Piper's 3 disc set by the NME which expressed this exact viewpoint, sl*gging off everything they have ever recorded since 1967 and giving their Live8 performance a kicking. It's a shame that in order to (rightly) appreciate one thing, they feel the need to belittle another...very immature writing IMHO, but rather typical of NME.
 
There is also a breed of music journalist that is attracted to, for want of a better term, f**k-ups, perhaps epitomised by someone like Nick Kent who has an entire book of his pieces (I've read the Syd Barrett piece originally written for NME around 1974- he was very opposed to Floyd's 70s output, as an aside) called 'The Dark Stuff' which is based upon rock stars who have lost the plot. It's an unfortunate trend that shifts attention away from the actual music; of course, in the case of someone like Pete Doherty it's pretty much entirely dwarfed his entire musical output by now and I suspect, always will do.
 
Speaking personally here, I adore the Syd Barrett material, but I'm not sure there's one track in that period of the band which moves me personally as much as what the band did in the 1973-9 era (and also bits of 'Meddle', alongside the better parts of 'The Division Bell'). Their experiences with Barrett informed their later music to a direct extent. It's more 'mature', for want of a better term, and again, I think some rock journalists that dislikes the idea of music that is mature- I think it's seen as something which 'should' be immediate and visceral, not something one could say about much of Floyd's output post-Barrett IMHO.
 
PS: It's said by some that Barrett contributed some slide guitar to 'Remember A Day' but otherwise yes, only 'Jugband Blues' seems to have any involvement from Barrett on '..Saucerful...'. They attempted a single 'Scream Thy Last Scream'/'Vegetable Man' (the former had Nick Mason on heavily treated vocals) but this was never released. Though I think they should definitely be released, there's no question that these were fairly disturbing tracks and totally unsuitable for single release.


Edited by salmacis - October 15 2008 at 14:15
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2008 at 14:51
Originally posted by Rocktopus Rocktopus wrote:

Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

 
Was he really a genius? Was he a talented guy that people adore only, as with many rock stars, because he died young? Answers would be appreciated.


 Hey! He died two years ago. I hope I live to be older than 60, but its not considered dying young.

 
Well that's right... But musically, he died young...VERY young....
 
 
Back to Top
el dingo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 08 2008
Location: Norwich UK
Status: Offline
Points: 7053
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2008 at 15:40
Thank you Silmacis for your Nick Kent comment. Accuracy of the 100 per cent variety. You, not him.
 
The thoughts of a man in his old days are the deeds of a man in his prime. So NK has nothing to think about .
 
Adios amigo
It's not that I can't find worth in anything, it's just that I can't find worth in enough.
Back to Top
Andrew A. View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: May 13 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 22
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2008 at 19:53
Syd Barrett was a man who led the way in his era, and it's impossible to understand early Floyd without understanding the time and the scene. First of all, Barrett took the other Floyds away from doing R&B stuff and led them into the "underground" scene of swinging London where Pink Floyd became the "house" band of UFO, the hippest underground club of that era. This was the setting for happenings, the Beatles came to see them play, the Beat poets came to London, and the whole San Francisco Haight-Ashbury scene was transplanted to London, which briefly became one of the hippest places in the world. Along with the Soft Machine, Pink Floyd, led by Syd, were instrumental in developing psychedelic music, out of which progressive rock grew. But unlike the Softs, Syd also knew how to write commercial songs, with Arnold Layne and See Emily Play being relatively big hits, and putting psychedelia into the mainstream. However, Piper gave little indication of what they were like in their "home" of UFO - Interstellar Overdrive only giving a shadowy hint. Floyd made movie soundtracks at this time for key movies set in London, they were one of the first to present innovative light shows, and to present music in England that intended to recreate the sensation of an acid trip. Without Syd, the whole psychedelic scene might have died without leaving much of a trace. With Syd, Pink Floyd became a successful widely known band, "A Saucerful of Secrets" was created as an attempt to reproduce the sound without the main man, and prog rock replaced the long-form improv of that era with long-form compositions. Without the example of Interstellar Overdrive, prog might never have happened.
 
Syd's legacy may be limited, and he may not have been the greatest song-writer in the world, but he created music that in its day was bold and different, and his influence, in terms of what he enabled the Floyd to accomplish, is incalculable. Of course, the Floyd also had to work to overcome his legacy and prove they could do it without him, which they did - but his shadow loomed over them for years, as well as the dark shadow of what the music business did to him, and threatened to do to them as well.
Back to Top
Henry Plainview View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 26 2008
Location: Declined
Status: Offline
Points: 16715
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2008 at 20:40
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

The spectre of Syd the man dominates Floyd's later work, and it was his "vision" as a musician and talent as a writer that set them on the course in the first place.

You have to view these things in context - Piper is not a Prog album, essentially launched off the back of two psyche pop singles - it took psyche pop to extremes that no other band could match at the time in terms of direction and experimentation - in early 1967 most of their contemporaries were still recording blues-based beat music that had been given an eastern slant to create the psychedelic sound - Barrett didn't do that - he just took simple ideas and extrapolate them without thinking or planning. As a talent he was intuitive and natural - he was essentially a creative improviser both on stage and in the studio, using feedback and echo to create dissonance and "other-worldly" sounds and techniques borrowed from avant garde and musique concrete to modify instruments and studio equipment. The whimsy of the lyrics (which were fairly common psychedelic fare at the time) is in part subverted by chaotic almost unstructured nature of the music, none of which had been seen in a Pop record up until then... As I said, it's context - it is difficult to imagine now just how radical Astronomy Domine sounded to people in 1967 when they played the album for the first time.
 
By comparison Saucerful is practically Proto-Prog thanks mainly to the title track. Featuring only one Barrett track (which in itself is a stark contrast to his songs on Piper), the other songs are clearly influenced by his approach and even at times attempt to emulate what he was doing.
 
His two solo album are practically a documentary of a break-down, reflecting his fragility and the tenuous hold he had on reality at times, musically they are simpler than Piper, the intuitive talent is still there but molded into the (IMO) unnatural (for him) singer/songwriter form where inherent 'cleverness' of the lyrics is more prevalent than the musical genius.
 
Measured by the profound effect his 'disappearance' from the scene had on the band itself, this is also reflected in mystique that was built up around him by the fans. This is partly due to the loss of what could have been if the talent had not been damaged and partly because he was a tragic and relatively high-profile (in the underground scene at least) casualty of the psychedelic drug culture of the time.
This is pretty much it. I got the CD Pink Floyd and Friends (from CVS LOL), and listening to the extended versions of Interstellar Overdrive and Nick's Boogie, compared to Fleetwood Mac and Angel of the Morning covered by someone or other, it is shocking how radically different they were from their contemporaries. Of course, these days it isn't as impressive. I always wanted to hear the 30 minute version of Interstellar Overdrive that they used to play, but nobody ever recorded it. :(
Originally posted by salmacis salmacis wrote:

Though I think they should definitely be released, there's no question that these were fairly disturbing tracks and totally unsuitable for single release.
Both of those are on the Shine On's rarities CD, but I'm not aware of any other place to get them, unfortunately.


Edited by Henry Plainview - October 15 2008 at 20:45
if you own a sodastream i hate you
Back to Top
Valdez View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 17 2005
Location: United States
Status: Online
Points: 722
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2008 at 21:58
Someone once said that if Syd had stayed on in Pink Floyd they would all be playing banjo's and jews harps. 
https://bakullama1.bandcamp.com/album/sleepers-2024

Back to Top
Yorkie X View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 1049
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 16 2008 at 05:30
Same thing that made Elvis the King of Rockin Roll and Lady di the most beautiful woman in the world bought to you by the Pepsi company who gave such hits like M&M as sure as the Madonna divorce wedding rings sales that news mongers clammer down at fox studios . The world is bullsh#t nothing is real nothing is valid its only talk  elephant talk   boooo haha  Wink
Back to Top
Petrovsk Mizinski View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: December 24 2007
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 25210
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 16 2008 at 05:38

Syd Barrett... what makes him a legend?


Some did mention the fact his dead, right?
Instant legend status for dying.












Tongue


Edited by HughesJB4 - October 16 2008 at 05:40
Back to Top
MaidenMadness View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: February 28 2006
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Status: Offline
Points: 16
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 16 2008 at 08:41
i consider the piper to be one of the greatest pf albums ever. up there with their 70ties stuff. i love that album but it has very different sound compared to everything post barrett era.

i agree that his tragic story added to his cult status, however to contribute his cult status only or even mostly to that imo is wrong. pf is syd's child. roger, david, nick and richard only took it to its greatest heights, but it was syd who started it all, it was syd who installed the wish for constant experimenting trying out different things. as someone wrote before without syd pink floyd would have never become anything more than just another meaningless band who played r&b. pink floyd was different from mainstream music of the time because syd wanted to be different. without syd there would have been any meddle, animals, wish you were here, the wall, dark side of the moon simply because without syd other pf members would have never moved away from r&b.

however he also had negative impact as well, since in the early days syd took the most prominent role other band members just took a backseat. syd writting all the songs and lyrics never forced roger to get actively involved in utilizing his potential to write awesome lyrics.

syd's departure is the main event in history of pink floyd since it forced others to get more involved in creating the music.

Back to Top
Vibrationbaby View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 6898
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 16 2008 at 10:27
Originally posted by Valdez Valdez wrote:

Someone once said that if Syd had stayed on in Pink Floyd they would all be playing banjo's and jews harps. 
Yeah. Good point  "what if" ? his solo material wasn`t anything to write home about. I think he enjoyed gardening more than music after he lost his head. And you have to also wonder "what if" Syd wasn`t taking lethal doses of LSD when he wrote all that "legendary" music. Don`t get me wrong I really dig that first album but Floyd created enough "legendary" music without him. They could have been singing about a head of cabbage or Gimour`s dog that died when he was 7 years old on Wish You Were Here. I`m not bashing Syd at all here but I`m sure that whatever was left of his brain when Wish You Were Here came out it probably was wondering why all the bru ha ha?


Edited by Vibrationbaby - October 16 2008 at 10:29
Back to Top
Abstrakt View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 18 2005
Location: Soundgarden
Status: Offline
Points: 18292
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 16 2008 at 10:52
I wonder the same. I don't really like the barret-style songs.
The only good ones from 66-68 is "Interstellar Overdrive" & "Astronomy Domine", imo.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.152 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.