most unwanted popgroups/artists on PA - Progressive Rock Music Forum

I'm very surprised to see the number of votes for, or rather against, The Beatles and Radiohead. The Beatles are the one band that influenced all of the prog pioneers (name an exception if you can!), and they wrote quite a few prog songs themselves. (Are those who voted them really serious or just taking the p**s, anyway?)

And to even suggest Mike Oldfield should go... yeah right LOL

Santana. For having only made a few albums that are some-what progressive or for that matter, good. It was the other musicians on those albums that MADE them good. Which makes sense considering Santana's lack of...guitar ability and know-how. The other choices make much more sense to stay here.

Originally posted by jammun

C'mon, how are The Beatles pulling over 20%? Have you all no sense of history? Without them none of the other bands, nor any on this site other than perhaps good ol' Miles now causing much gnashing of teeth over in the fusion category, would even exist as a recording enterprise. The Beatles success encouraged, or in fact demanded, that record companies (those who wanted to stay in business anyway) invest in rock and roll, which allowed the rock spectrum to expand almost exponentially.

Go give a quick listen to the American Graffiti soundtrack. (BTW, very enjoyable music on it.) But if you think that prog was somehow going to crawl out of THAT primordial ooze you are mistaken.

PROPS PROPS PROPS TOOOOOO YOU.

Edited by BroSpence - August 26 2008 at 23:48

who cares? progressive music is terrible anyway

My Last.fm

sul·fur·ous adj

violent temper or in being emotionally charged and containing many swearwords or blasphemies (literary)

Encarta® World English Dictionary

Tongue

Slartibartfast wrote:

Atavachron wrote:

^ yes, how easily we forget that Prog ruled the world at one point, however briefly.. heck, Passion Play was #1 on the US charts for a time, does that make it a pop record? ...maybe so Shocked

I did not know PP made #1, weird. LOL

I know, it's almost hard to imagine

why is she sulfurous.. gas problem?

Whoever voted for Roxy Music's exclusion = your doorbell will ring and a sulfurous , sexily-clad siren will grab you by the scruff of your neck, plant a wet kiss on your nose and proceed to whip you senseless while listening to the Bogus Man on a loop ! The proggiest sex you ever had! hahahaha

I never post anything anywhere without doing more than basic research, often in depth.

rushfan4 wrote:

^ We need to make room for the compromise band Beatallica.

Didn't they write 'And Justice for Paul'.

Edited by Easy Money - August 19 2008 at 17:01

^ We need to make room for the compromise band Beatallica.

There are many, many more bona fide prog acts who I like far less than anyone on this list yet, somehow, it doesn't spoil my enjoyment of this site.

Don't like a certain band? Then don't read about them, don't spitefully review their albums, don't start negative threads and polls, find something better to do with your time.

"The disgusting stink of a too-loud electric guitar.... Now, that's my idea of a good time."

Poll Question: which commercial bands would we like to disappear from the site ?
Poll Choice	Votes	Poll Statistics
10 CC	1	[0.41%]
Black Sabbath	12	[4.90%]
The Beatles	48	[19.59%]
David Bowie	8	[3.27%]
Deep Purple	2	[0.82%]
Doors	19	[7.76%]
Iron Butterfly	1	[0.41%]
Iron Maiden	23	[9.39%]
Jean Michel Jarre	3	[1.22%]
Jefferson Airplane	2	[0.82%]
Kate Bush	1	[0.41%]
Led Zeppelin	5	[2.04%]
Mike Oldfield	0	[0.00%]
Moody Blues	0	[0.00%]
Muse	14	[5.71%]
Procol Harum	0	[0.00%]
Queen	25	[10.20%]
Radiohead	55	[22.45%]
Rainbow	2	[0.82%]
Roxy Music	1	[0.41%]
ELO	3	[1.22%]
Santana	2	[0.82%]
Supertramp	2	[0.82%]
Talk Talk	3	[1.22%]
The Who	13	[5.31%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Post Reply	Page 12 3 7 >