Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - British Prog is the best??
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedBritish Prog is the best??

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 34567 10>
Author
Message
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 16 2008 at 22:32
Honestly, I would place:
 
1.- Kansas
2.- Anglagard
3.- PFM
4.- Focus
5.- Banco del Mutuio Soccorso
6.- Le Orme
7.- Triana
8.- Bacamarte
9.- Petrus Castrus
10.- Par Lindh Project
 
Against any almost British band except Genesis, and they are in exactly the same level, the problem ois that many people judge Kansas for Dust in  the Wind, and most of the people who do this, haven't heard Song For America or Leftoverture.
 
Iván
            
Back to Top
tszirmay View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: August 17 2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 6673
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 16 2008 at 22:55
This is kind of a funny thread because rock music in general was motored by the British Invasion anyway and the subsequent prog wave (1969-1975) was essentially but not uniquely composed of British bands, as Italy, France, Germany, Holland had equally vibrant interest in this cultured form of Rock music. In fact, Montreal was a huge stepping stone for Euro bands into the American market. Pink Floyd, Genesis, Yes, King Crimson, Tull, made their entries through French Canada  with bands such as Supertramp and Gentle Giant drawing HUGE crowds at a time when they were piddling everywhere else! What perhaps has been unclear is that it spread like wildfire (especially post -Woodstock) as everyone was looking for a new trip! But prog is essentially a borderless form of music unlike most other forms. PA has members that cover the globe , pretty much. Even Tierra del Fuego!LOL 

Edited by tszirmay - June 16 2008 at 23:01
I never post anything anywhere without doing more than basic research, often in depth.
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65266
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 16 2008 at 23:25
Originally posted by tszirmay tszirmay wrote:

This is kind of a funny thread because rock music in general was motored by the British Invasion anyway 


Not to get into chicken and egg territory, but since rock is an art form native to the United States, I think we know what motored what, and it depends what you mean by 'British Invasion', which was only an invasion if you didn't live in Britain..  the 'invasion' may have been the creatively and commercially dominant form for a good while - and even that's debatable when you consider artists as Santana, CSN&Y, Hendrix, Doors, Janis, BS&T, Iron Butterfly, Airplane, Joni Mitchell, Simon&Garfunkel..  (I'm sorry, did you say American rock wasn't influential? ;)  - but it didn't really influence progressive rock like the Anglo/American underground scenes did  .. in fact much Prog was a movement against the simpler blues/rock formats of Cream, Stones, Who, Beatles, Zeppelin, was it not?





Edited by Atavachron - June 16 2008 at 23:34
Back to Top
tszirmay View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: August 17 2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 6673
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 16 2008 at 23:44
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Originally posted by tszirmay tszirmay wrote:

This is kind of a funny thread because rock music in general was motored by the British Invasion anyway 


Not to get into chicken and egg territory, but since rock is an art form native to the United States, I think we know what motored what, and it depends what you mean by 'British Invasion', which was only an invasion if you didn't live in Britain..  the 'invasion' may have been the creatively and commercially dominant form for a good while - and even that's debatable when you consider artists as Santana, CSN&Y, Hendrix, Doors, Janis, BS&T, Iron Butterfly, Airplane, Joni Mitchell, Simon&Garfunkel..  (I'm sorry, did you say American rock wasn't influential? ;)  - but it didn't really influence progressive rock like the Anglo/American underground scenes did  .. in fact much Prog was a movement against the simpler blues/rock formats of Cream, Stones, Who, Beatles, Zeppelin, was it not?



 
You are absolutely correct! I used the term "motored" and not "created" because american blues, jazz, gospel, rhythm 'n blues and soul were the sparkplug that fueled (that's the word) the Beatles, Who, Stones, Zeppelin, Cream, Kinks etc..... like you stated.  I also made the point that the rock explosion was worldwide and that prog in particular was borderless. Still is thankfully. We must also sadly remember that when corporations ran the industry , the US market was considered the Mecca of fame and fortune.  The US also provided the original synthesizer technology that would later be taken over by Japan. Best, no such thing , most prominent , perhaps the Brits have a slight claim there. But very wee, as they say.
I never post anything anywhere without doing more than basic research, often in depth.
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 17 2008 at 03:04
^That whole area is very interesting; How Rock and Roll lost the Roll...
 
I'd tentatively put it down to the Garage/Beat bands of the time, again, we're talking about the UK and US primarily, but there was a strong European scene too, of course.
 
A whole new area to explore - the Beatles were just the most popular band - not strictly Garage, but their fusion of skiffle (brought to the UK from the US by Lonnie Donegan) with Mersey Beat, and highly individual interpretations of classics really did put them in a league of their own in the early 1960s, and, of course, they toured extensively, especially (famously) in Germany.
 
As to synthesisers, the Brits and Europeans were deeply involved too - I mentioned Delia Derbyshire above - and they weren't a particularly new thing; The Clavecin Électrique, built in France in 1761 has the honour of being the first documented synth, and a Swiss guy made a kind of electronic piano in 1867, 9 years before Elisha Grey created the musical telegraph in the US, and nearly 40 years before Cahill's instrument (the first significant electronic instrument) was unveiled.
 
It's true, though, that the real development of the synth was in the US in the mid 1960s - and it's also true that The Monkees were among, if not the first to use a Moog, on Pisces, Aquarius, Capricorn & Jones Ltd.
 
As for Prog, I agree that the Brits were most prominent, and undoubtedly first (it's difficult to hear the influence of, say, "Freak Out" on Prog in general) - although it's a close call;
 
It's a Beautiful Day and Eclection (both 1968) share many musical similarities (in terms of progressive techniques and approaches), but only Eclection branded themselves as Progressive Rock on the album blurb.
 
Interestingly, Ecelection got their name because the band members were from all over Europe, and had different musical backgrounds. A fitting line-up for the (arguably) first Prog Rock band, and a strong indication that Prog was a European thing from its inception.
 
 
As for the best...
 
Well, without wanting to appear biased, it has to be us Brits - the sheer quantity of quality Prog albums we put out there in the early 1970s - the top 50 on this site kinda speaks for itself, as it's dominated by British Prog from that time - 90% of the top 10, as I write.
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
fuxi View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: March 08 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 2459
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 17 2008 at 04:15
I hope you'll forgive me if you really like Kansas. I've tried many times to enjoy their music (as I'm always on the lookout for good symphonic bands) and on their 'classic' albums, well, the instruments sound good but the music is totally spoiled for me by (a) the proto-AOR way of singing; (b) the lyrics, which are far too earnest and solemn. I really don't enjoy lyricists who preach and moralise; that's why I find most of Yes' output in the past thirty (!) years unbearable, as well as much of the output of Spock's Beard, the Flower Kings and, yes, the Tangent.

When it comes to 1970s North American prog, I much prefer Happy the Man and also Zappa, whose ONE SIZE FITS ALL is one of the greatest symphonic (!) prog masterpieces.

Now is British prog "the best"?

Ivan clearly doesn't think so (always excepting Genesis), but he mainly focuses on symphonic prog.

Other members have pointed out that the classic prog scene in Italy, Germany and other countries was just as varied and original as in the U.K., and I am willing to believe them. I've heard quite a few superb German bands, I'm discovering more and more Italian ones (thanks to Progarchives!), and they're lots of fun.

But in some cases I wonder: aren't you thinking with your head, instead of your heart? Ghostrider, if I'm not mistaken, you wrote the classic Italian scene was just as impressive as the British. But if I look at your list of reviews, among 36 albums you awarded the maximum number of stars, only 8 are non-British! Doesn't that tell you enough?

In the end, it remains a matter of taste. If you generally happen to enjoy non-British acts more than British bands, well, then so be it. I personally grew up with Yes, Genesis, Gentle Giant, Jethro Tull, and a whole range of Canterbury bands. They played a major role in forming me (hope that doesn't sound pompous), and for me their humour (erm, little humour in classic Yes, of course...) and colourfulness will probably remain unmatched. (By the way, this doesn't mean I haven't yet discovered any music beter than theirs - far from it.)

As for today's prog scene, it can't be denied it's much more alive OUTSIDE the U.K. As I've said many times, Kenso (Japanese) and Discus (Indonesian) are my favourite prog bands from the last two decades. They're really as good as any other prog I can think of. And don't start telling me they're not 'proper' prog! Kenso, for example, may play "fusion", but they're full of influences from classic prog acts like Steve Hackett and Brand X.

The Scandinavians, too, are doing better than the Brits. And I've come to realise I know too little about the Latin American prog scene.

But that doesn't mean British prog is dead. As I mentioned before, I find it especially heartening to see how influence from the Canterbury Scene is getting more and more pronounced in all kinds of British experimental jazz. It looks as if a whole generation of enthusiastic jazzers (mainly in their thirties and forties) are now incorporating influences from the Soft Machine, Egg and other bands they first heard several decades ago. And they have their own small, independent labels to release albums on. Something's definitely stirring there!
Back to Top
Raff View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 29 2005
Location: None
Status: Offline
Points: 24429
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 17 2008 at 04:25
Just for the record: the reason why I have mostly reviewed British albums is that, on a merely personal level, I tend to enjoy British bands more. However, this has NOTHING to do with British prog bands being objectively 'better' (provided such a thing can be proved in the arts).
 
My first taste of prog came through the great Italian bands of the Seventies, and I discovered British prog only a few years later, through some friends of mine. After a number of years spent listening almost exclusively to music performed in the English language, in recent times I have rediscovered Italian prog bands thanks to their # 1 fan here (not to mention future husband). Since he has a vast collection of RPI CDs, in the future I will very probably review at least some of them.
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 17 2008 at 04:45
Originally posted by Ghost Rider Ghost Rider wrote:

Just for the record: the reason why I have mostly reviewed British albums is that, on a merely personal level, I tend to enjoy British bands more. However, this has NOTHING to do with British prog bands being objectively 'better' (provided such a thing can be proved in the arts).
 
 
 
"Best" requires qualification, as in Best in what way?
 
It can be objectively proven, as long as you have set criteria in advance.
 
 
Example statement, "Gentle Giant are the best at using contrapuntal styles of writing".
 
 
Here, I've set the criteria being measured as contrapuntal writing - which can be objectively proven by identifying the different contrapuntal styles and devices, and how they are used.
 
To do this, obviously, requires a working knowledge of Counterpoint - here's a start. It's a simple concept, with complex possibilities and ways to measure it, especially when it comes to the "how they are used" bit.
 
For counterpoint, Bach is widely held to be one of the best benchmarks, and through a thorough understanding of what Bach did, we can assess other examples of counterpoint on the same terms - ie, we're not particularly interested to see someone rehashing Bach, but if the principles are used in a new way, then that can be interesting.
 
We can infer from this single measurement that, if complexity is a prized attribute of Prog, then Gentle Giant exceed and are therefore a suitable candidate for "Best" from this perspective, since counterpoint can be horrendously complex.
 
 
We can use other ways of measuring complexity too, of course - depending on what aspect of the music we are examining - and using a suitable benchmark. There's no point in restricting yourself, since music is limitless, but benchmarks are as good a way as any.
 
You can't measure objectively unless you have some degree of objective understanding in the first place - and you cannot truly understand how it is done (you might even believe that it is not possible) until you've truly explored and understood the principles.
 
But you can get ideas through simple study.
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
BaldJean View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: May 28 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10387
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 17 2008 at 07:53
Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

Originally posted by Ghost Rider Ghost Rider wrote:

Just for the record: the reason why I have mostly reviewed British albums is that, on a merely personal level, I tend to enjoy British bands more. However, this has NOTHING to do with British prog bands being objectively 'better' (provided such a thing can be proved in the arts).
 
 
 
"Best" requires qualification, as in Best in what way?
 
It can be objectively proven, as long as you have set criteria in advance.
 
 
Example statement, "Gentle Giant are the best at using contrapuntal styles of writing".
 
 
Here, I've set the criteria being measured as contrapuntal writing - which can be objectively proven by identifying the different contrapuntal styles and devices, and how they are used.
 
To do this, obviously, requires a working knowledge of Counterpoint - here's a start. It's a simple concept, with complex possibilities and ways to measure it, especially when it comes to the "how they are used" bit.
 
For counterpoint, Bach is widely held to be one of the best benchmarks, and through a thorough understanding of what Bach did, we can assess other examples of counterpoint on the same terms - ie, we're not particularly interested to see someone rehashing Bach, but if the principles are used in a new way, then that can be interesting.
 
We can infer from this single measurement that, if complexity is a prized attribute of Prog, then Gentle Giant exceed and are therefore a suitable candidate for "Best" from this perspective, since counterpoint can be horrendously complex.
 
 
We can use other ways of measuring complexity too, of course - depending on what aspect of the music we are examining - and using a suitable benchmark. There's no point in restricting yourself, since music is limitless, but benchmarks are as good a way as any.
 
You can't measure objectively unless you have some degree of objective understanding in the first place - and you cannot truly understand how it is done (you might even believe that it is not possible) until you've truly explored and understood the principles.
 
But you can get ideas through simple study.

Van der Graaf Generator were no slouches either when it came to counterpoint, by the way. "Meurglys III, the Songwriter's Guild" actually begins as a fugue, for example. and there is an abundance of counterpoint in Peter Hammill's opera "The Fall of the House of Usher", the album which in my opinion sets the benchmark for counterpoint in prog.
another good example for counterpoint is the "Bolero" part in King Crimson's "Lizard"


Edited by BaldJean - June 17 2008 at 08:01


A shot of me as High Priestess of Gaia during our fall festival. Ceterum censeo principiis obsta
Back to Top
fuxi View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: March 08 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 2459
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 17 2008 at 08:11
Originally posted by Ghost Rider Ghost Rider wrote:

Just for the record: the reason why I have mostly reviewed British albums is that, on a merely personal level, I tend to enjoy British bands more. However, this has NOTHING to do with British prog bands being objectively 'better' (provided such a thing can be proved in the arts).


Not an easy matter. I enjoy Haydn's symphonies more than Mahler's, so for me, obviously Haydn is a greater composer than Mahler! (Of course Haydn's also written superb string quartets, oratorios, masses etc., which Mahler hasn't.) On the other hand, my sister-in-law is married to a conductor, who really loves heavy romantic stuff, especially Mahler and Tchaikovsky. In his view, Haydn is probably just a minor composer... Don't we all think this way?
Back to Top
Valdez View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 17 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 699
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 17 2008 at 11:39
I'm from California and my ears and my brain tell me British prog has been, by far, way ahead of the rest of the world  with German prog following a close second.  I personally do not care for much of the Italian slant but I know it's in the upper leagues.  Some good stuff coming from West of the Rockies lately too.
https://bakullama1.bandcamp.com/album/sleepers-2024

Back to Top
Valdez View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 17 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 699
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 17 2008 at 13:38
Originally posted by tszirmay

This is kind of a funny thread because rock music in general was motored by the British Invasion anyway.
 
 
Sorry but it's the other way around... ask any of the British "Invaders"  who their influences were and you will find Little Richard,  Chuck Berry , Bill Haley,  Carl Perkins,  even Elvis.  These ROCK artists were the ones they were listening to in their early teens.  What the Brits did to good ol' rock n' roll  was to "Civilise" it by bringing schooled musical training into the equation,  more intelligent and introspective lyrics, even "STRINGS" for crying out loud.  The Brits took rock and prettied it up quite a bit. Made it better IMO.
https://bakullama1.bandcamp.com/album/sleepers-2024

Back to Top
fuxi View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: March 08 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 2459
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 17 2008 at 15:24
Originally posted by Valdez Valdez wrote:

Originally posted by tszirmayThis is kind of a funny thread because rock music in general was motored by the British Invasion anyway.
 

 

Sorry but it's the other way around... ask any of the British "Invaders"  who their influences were and you will find Little Richard,  Chuck Berry , Bill Haley,  Carl Perkins,  even Elvis.  These ROCK artists were the ones they were listening to in their early teens.  What the Brits did to good ol' rock n' roll  was to "Civilise" it by bringing schooled musical training into the equation,  more intelligent and introspective lyrics, even "STRINGS" for crying out loud.  The Brits took rock and prettied it up quite a bit. Made it better IMO.


Weren't there loads of strings on Phil Spector's most spectacular hit singles? And didn't Bob Dylan show those British invaders how to write clever lyrics? Few prog lyrics are as intelligent or as memorable as Chuck Berry's, anyway...
Back to Top
Valdez View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 17 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 699
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 17 2008 at 16:34
Spector ... Pure Pop  http://www.spectropop.com/hspector2.html
Dylan... Folk 
Chuck Berry ...Rock and roll (i'll give ya that one... "My Ding-a-ling ... everybody sing!")


Edited by Valdez - June 17 2008 at 17:25
https://bakullama1.bandcamp.com/album/sleepers-2024

Back to Top
Pnoom! View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: September 02 2006
Location: OH
Status: Offline
Points: 4981
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 17 2008 at 16:50
Originally posted by Ghost Rider Ghost Rider wrote:

Just for the record: the reason why I have mostly reviewed British albums is that, on a merely personal level, I tend to enjoy British bands more. However, this has NOTHING to do with British prog bands being objectively 'better' (provided such a thing can be proved in the arts).
 


Well one of the most important "objective" criteria is influence and in that regard, the British are objectively better than every other prog scene except maybe the Germans, and that's only if you count influence on non-prog music.
Back to Top
Cifrocco View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: May 15 2007
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 19
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 17 2008 at 19:02
My collection has mostly English prog bands, so in my opinion they're the best obviously.
 
Peter Hammill / Van Der Graaf Generator
Genesis
Yes
Pink Floyd
King Crimson
 
Marillion
Arena
Fish
 
Then I have all of Rush and Neil Young, too.
Back to Top
Failcore View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 27 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 4625
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 17 2008 at 20:43
The crux of the matter is that in the 70s you could be a prog band and still put food on the table if you were in the UK, but not in the US. Maybe it was the industry; maybe Americans have inferior genetic code. I tend to think you're a bigoted moron if subscribe to the second one.
Back to Top
Valdez View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 17 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 699
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 17 2008 at 20:49
I'm certain that no-one thinks for a minute that Americans have inferior genetic code. lol.
After all most of us are descended from Brits not much more than 200 years ago.  Fuxi could be my cousin.
 
I'm sure it was the industry and the economy and the "Accents".
https://bakullama1.bandcamp.com/album/sleepers-2024

Back to Top
Failcore View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 27 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 4625
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 17 2008 at 21:11
Well that's how I see some people act. I mean I know our leader is not the best Smile, but geez. I've even read some arguments before saying how we are descended from the dregs of British society that came over to America, so we "obviously" have an inferior gene pool. I've heard the same sh*t about Australia too.


Edited by Deathrabbit - June 17 2008 at 21:13
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65266
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 17 2008 at 21:16
this is a music discussion guys, let's keep politics OUT of it, please..  and I think it's been shown in this thread the enormous contributions and impact music from the U.S. has had
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 34567 10>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.171 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.