British Prog is the best?? |
Post Reply | Page <1 45678 10> |
Author | ||
fuxi
Prog Reviewer Joined: March 08 2006 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 2459 |
Posted: June 17 2008 at 04:15 | |
I hope you'll forgive me if you really like Kansas. I've tried many times to enjoy their music (as I'm always on the lookout for good symphonic bands) and on their 'classic' albums, well, the instruments sound good but the music is totally spoiled for me by (a) the proto-AOR way of singing; (b) the lyrics, which are far too earnest and solemn. I really don't enjoy lyricists who preach and moralise; that's why I find most of Yes' output in the past thirty (!) years unbearable, as well as much of the output of Spock's Beard, the Flower Kings and, yes, the Tangent.
When it comes to 1970s North American prog, I much prefer Happy the Man and also Zappa, whose ONE SIZE FITS ALL is one of the greatest symphonic (!) prog masterpieces. Now is British prog "the best"? Ivan clearly doesn't think so (always excepting Genesis), but he mainly focuses on symphonic prog. Other members have pointed out that the classic prog scene in Italy, Germany and other countries was just as varied and original as in the U.K., and I am willing to believe them. I've heard quite a few superb German bands, I'm discovering more and more Italian ones (thanks to Progarchives!), and they're lots of fun. But in some cases I wonder: aren't you thinking with your head, instead of your heart? Ghostrider, if I'm not mistaken, you wrote the classic Italian scene was just as impressive as the British. But if I look at your list of reviews, among 36 albums you awarded the maximum number of stars, only 8 are non-British! Doesn't that tell you enough? In the end, it remains a matter of taste. If you generally happen to enjoy non-British acts more than British bands, well, then so be it. I personally grew up with Yes, Genesis, Gentle Giant, Jethro Tull, and a whole range of Canterbury bands. They played a major role in forming me (hope that doesn't sound pompous), and for me their humour (erm, little humour in classic Yes, of course...) and colourfulness will probably remain unmatched. (By the way, this doesn't mean I haven't yet discovered any music beter than theirs - far from it.) As for today's prog scene, it can't be denied it's much more alive OUTSIDE the U.K. As I've said many times, Kenso (Japanese) and Discus (Indonesian) are my favourite prog bands from the last two decades. They're really as good as any other prog I can think of. And don't start telling me they're not 'proper' prog! Kenso, for example, may play "fusion", but they're full of influences from classic prog acts like Steve Hackett and Brand X. The Scandinavians, too, are doing better than the Brits. And I've come to realise I know too little about the Latin American prog scene. But that doesn't mean British prog is dead. As I mentioned before, I find it especially heartening to see how influence from the Canterbury Scene is getting more and more pronounced in all kinds of British experimental jazz. It looks as if a whole generation of enthusiastic jazzers (mainly in their thirties and forties) are now incorporating influences from the Soft Machine, Egg and other bands they first heard several decades ago. And they have their own small, independent labels to release albums on. Something's definitely stirring there! |
||
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 08 2004 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 7559 |
Posted: June 17 2008 at 03:04 | |
^That whole area is very interesting; How Rock and Roll lost the Roll...
I'd tentatively put it down to the Garage/Beat bands of the time, again, we're talking about the UK and US primarily, but there was a strong European scene too, of course.
A whole new area to explore - the Beatles were just the most popular band - not strictly Garage, but their fusion of skiffle (brought to the UK from the US by Lonnie Donegan) with Mersey Beat, and highly individual interpretations of classics really did put them in a league of their own in the early 1960s, and, of course, they toured extensively, especially (famously) in Germany.
As to synthesisers, the Brits and Europeans were deeply involved too - I mentioned Delia Derbyshire above - and they weren't a particularly new thing; The Clavecin Électrique, built in France in 1761 has the honour of being the first documented synth, and a Swiss guy made a kind of electronic piano in 1867, 9 years before Elisha Grey created the musical telegraph in the US, and nearly 40 years before Cahill's instrument (the first significant electronic instrument) was unveiled.
It's true, though, that the real development of the synth was in the US in the mid 1960s - and it's also true that The Monkees were among, if not the first to use a Moog, on Pisces, Aquarius, Capricorn & Jones Ltd.
As for Prog, I agree that the Brits were most prominent, and undoubtedly first (it's difficult to hear the influence of, say, "Freak Out" on Prog in general) - although it's a close call;
It's a Beautiful Day and Eclection (both 1968) share many musical similarities (in terms of progressive techniques and approaches), but only Eclection branded themselves as Progressive Rock on the album blurb.
Interestingly, Ecelection got their name because the band members were from all over Europe, and had different musical backgrounds. A fitting line-up for the (arguably) first Prog Rock band, and a strong indication that Prog was a European thing from its inception.
As for the best...
Well, without wanting to appear biased, it has to be us Brits - the sheer quantity of quality Prog albums we put out there in the early 1970s - the top 50 on this site kinda speaks for itself, as it's dominated by British Prog from that time - 90% of the top 10, as I write.
|
||
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
|
||
tszirmay
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: August 17 2006 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 6673 |
Posted: June 16 2008 at 23:44 | |
You are absolutely correct! I used the term "motored" and not "created" because american blues, jazz, gospel, rhythm 'n blues and soul were the sparkplug that fueled (that's the word) the Beatles, Who, Stones, Zeppelin, Cream, Kinks etc..... like you stated. I also made the point that the rock explosion was worldwide and that prog in particular was borderless. Still is thankfully. We must also sadly remember that when corporations ran the industry , the US market was considered the Mecca of fame and fortune. The US also provided the original synthesizer technology that would later be taken over by Japan. Best, no such thing , most prominent , perhaps the Brits have a slight claim there. But very wee, as they say.
|
||
I never post anything anywhere without doing more than basic research, often in depth.
|
||
Atavachron
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 65268 |
Posted: June 16 2008 at 23:25 | |
Not to get into chicken and egg territory, but since rock is an art form native to the United States, I think we know what motored what, and it depends what you mean by 'British Invasion', which was only an invasion if you didn't live in Britain.. the 'invasion' may have been the creatively and commercially dominant form for a good while - and even that's debatable when you consider artists as Santana, CSN&Y, Hendrix, Doors, Janis, BS&T, Iron Butterfly, Airplane, Joni Mitchell, Simon&Garfunkel.. (I'm sorry, did you say American rock wasn't influential? ;) - but it didn't really influence progressive rock like the Anglo/American underground scenes did .. in fact much Prog was a movement against the simpler blues/rock formats of Cream, Stones, Who, Beatles, Zeppelin, was it not? Edited by Atavachron - June 16 2008 at 23:34 |
||
tszirmay
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: August 17 2006 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 6673 |
Posted: June 16 2008 at 22:55 | |
This is kind of a funny thread because rock music in general was motored by the British Invasion anyway and the subsequent prog wave (1969-1975) was essentially but not uniquely composed of British bands, as Italy, France, Germany, Holland had equally vibrant interest in this cultured form of Rock music. In fact, Montreal was a huge stepping stone for Euro bands into the American market. Pink Floyd, Genesis, Yes, King Crimson, Tull, made their entries through French Canada with bands such as Supertramp and Gentle Giant drawing HUGE crowds at a time when they were piddling everywhere else! What perhaps has been unclear is that it spread like wildfire (especially post -Woodstock) as everyone was looking for a new trip! But prog is essentially a borderless form of music unlike most other forms. PA has members that cover the globe , pretty much. Even Tierra del Fuego!
Edited by tszirmay - June 16 2008 at 23:01 |
||
I never post anything anywhere without doing more than basic research, often in depth.
|
||
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 27 2004 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 19535 |
Posted: June 16 2008 at 22:32 | |
Honestly, I would place:
1.- Kansas
2.- Anglagard
3.- PFM
4.- Focus
5.- Banco del Mutuio Soccorso
6.- Le Orme
7.- Triana
8.- Bacamarte
9.- Petrus Castrus
10.- Par Lindh Project
Against any almost British band except Genesis, and they are in exactly the same level, the problem ois that many people judge Kansas for Dust in the Wind, and most of the people who do this, haven't heard Song For America or Leftoverture.
Iván
|
||
|
||
Utah Man
Forum Senior Member Joined: November 14 2007 Location: Utah Status: Offline Points: 1014 |
Posted: June 16 2008 at 17:37 | |
Agree Cert ... But the Brits + other Europeans had the uncanny ability - as they still do to this day - to take a US entity and make it better... . Edited by Utah Man - June 16 2008 at 17:38 |
||
mickstafa
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 24 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 236 |
Posted: June 16 2008 at 17:36 | |
Most of my albums, prog and non prog, come from the motherland (England). So yeah, I agree. For me, music from the UK is generally superior. "Generally" being the key word here!
|
||
Utah Man
Forum Senior Member Joined: November 14 2007 Location: Utah Status: Offline Points: 1014 |
Posted: June 16 2008 at 17:28 | |
Agree... Yes the Brits "popularized" Progressive, but also: 1. I think Americans generally are a "Pop" music oriented society...period. 2. The U.S. Music Industry / Record Label issue I believe has little to do with American Prog not being "as good as " Non-American. . . |
||
Atavachron
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 65268 |
Posted: June 16 2008 at 15:45 | |
yes, thanks for the confirmation |
||
mrcozdude
Forum Senior Member Joined: July 25 2007 Location: Devon,UK. Status: Offline Points: 2078 |
Posted: June 16 2008 at 14:07 | |
1960-1979 was great for British Prog,then i pretend the eighties and nineties didnt exist then straight to present day prog in the us i mean come on John Zorn & Patton!
I certainly think the mentioned bands was based more on popularity then actual quality. |
||
fuxi
Prog Reviewer Joined: March 08 2006 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 2459 |
Posted: June 16 2008 at 12:30 | |
Baldfriede, vielen Dank!
Fuxi |
||
BaldFriede
Prog Reviewer Joined: June 02 2005 Location: Germany Status: Offline Points: 10261 |
Posted: June 16 2008 at 10:55 | |
Try Guru Guru's Känguru; one of their very best albums. Also "Wolf City" by Amon Düül 2 (all of the first few albums of Amon Düül 2 are great though, but "Wolf City" probably is the best start). And try Embryo's "Rocksession", another great album. The Cosmic Jokers might perhaps not appeal to you, although they are not exactly along the lines of Klaus Schulze and Tangerine Dream, even though Schulze plays with them. But they really rock, and if you want to know what Krautrock is really about I highly recommend "Galactic Supermarket" or their first self-titled album. They are not as "boring" as Tangerine Dream or Klaus Schulze (take that with a grain of salt please; I don't consider those artists to be boring at all, at least not the early albums). That's just for starters; I could give you a much longer list. Edited by BaldFriede - June 16 2008 at 12:44 |
||
BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue. |
||
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 08 2004 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 7559 |
Posted: June 16 2008 at 10:02 | |
Most of it happened in the US
- Alan Watts album "Is This It", which is probably the first psychedelic album (released in 1962) was released in the US - although, admittedly, Alan was a British expat.
- The Holy Modal Rounders (US bizarre folk act) wrote the first song with "psychedelic" in the title, in 1964.
- Bob Dylan went electric at the Newport Folk Festival in 1965. This coming together of folk and electric was the kick-start for psychedelia - suddenly, anything was possible.
- The Warlocks (later the Grateful Dead) were the house band at the Electric Kool-Aid Acid Tests later in 1965, and set up in Haight Asbury.
- Jefferson Airplane opened the "Matrix" club in 1966, around which a huge underground psychedelic scene evolved.
- In 1966, the Byrds released 8 Miles High, arguably the first psychedelic single.
- The Byrds, Dylan and the Beatles met up, in the US and the Beatles released Revolver on their return to England. The influence from the US is unmistakable, even though Revolver is indisputably a Beatles album through and through, with a strong psychedelic edge.
- Also in 1966, Delia Derbyshire helped organise the first Million Volts Sound and Light Rave in Newbury, Berkshire. At a later event in this series (early in 1967), Paul McCartney unveiled the legendary "Carnival of Light" - his subsequently unheard electronic piece. Some of these electronic pieces were extraordinarily psychedelic, and made synths very much the things to have in bands.
- I'm still trying to find a decent British "pure" psychedelic album that predates "Hapshash and the Coloured Coat featuring The Human Host and the Heavy Metal Kids" (1967).
British rockers Art were the behind the scenes force, and came from the legendary scene that, without doubt, was at the very root of Prog Rock.
Pink Floyd's "Piper..." doesn't really fit the bill - or any bill, come to that. It's psychedelic, in a big way, but it's progressive too - and pop and rock music to boot.
But the latter dates from 1967 - the height of psychedelia, not its inception.
It seems quite clear that UK Prog arose from UK Psychedelia/Underground, which in turn arose from US Psych - and the Folk, Blues and Jazz scenes before that. Most of these musical types originated in the US - or Africa, if you want to be pedantic about it.
|
||
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
|
||
Passionist
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 14 2005 Location: Finland Status: Offline Points: 1119 |
Posted: June 16 2008 at 05:16 | |
The best thing that comes from England must be the Canterbury Scene. Apart from that, I must say I prefer nordic prog and eastern European prog. I'm a huge fan of Hungarian and Polish prog, jazz and alternative, and I love their pronounciation of English in their music. Also, it's no secret, that in ym most favourite bands there are the Flower Kings, Wigwam, Tasavallan Presidentti, Haikara etc... almost 50% nordic power, then of course the must-listen-to from Britain.
In that sense though, there isn't one proghead that hasn't listened to Genesis, Yes, J-Tull and all that stuff. Britain gave birth to a beautiful movement, and thusly, though not my favourite, surely the best place to play prog-rock :) /me listens to PRR, Porcupine Tree, Genesis, Jethro Tull, Yes, King Crimson, Peter Gabriel, Marillion, and everything else at the same time! |
||
Rocktopus
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 02 2006 Location: Norway Status: Offline Points: 4202 |
Posted: June 16 2008 at 05:00 | |
No. Its not an insult, Pink Pangolin wanted to make a controversial post, and my reply is totally relevant. Ghost Rider wrote exactly the same thing as me, minus the ignorance comment. But no matter how insulting it sounds, the ignorance part is very often the key. The british 70's prog might very well be the "best" (they are absolutely not the leading current), but there's no real contest if you compare it with the US, now is it (who lost the because they often sound cheesy)? He must have noticed by now that many think that Germany, Italy and France could actually compete. Big difference between not agreeing with someone and simply not knowing. I guess I know how I come off. I'm just honest, and I couldn't care less what you think you know about me. Its not easy to spot your own country's cultural ignorance. From what other places than North-America or UK could you find any person saying something outrageous like: "No offence folks, but I don't like bands that sing in a foreign language"? No offence indeed. (I know the topicstarter hasn't written this). |
||
Over land and under ashes
In the sunlight, see - it flashes Find a fly and eat his eye But don't believe in me Don't believe in me Don't believe in me |
||
fuxi
Prog Reviewer Joined: March 08 2006 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 2459 |
Posted: June 16 2008 at 04:47 | |
Baldfriede, which Krautrock albums do you personally recommend? I would dearly like to explore the genre a little further, and I could just start with the top titles on Progarchives, but I know you've got excellent taste, so I'd be grateful for your advice... P.S. As I mentioned earlier, I already know Can, Kraan and Neu - but also Novalis, Jane, Kraftwerk, Popol Vuh and (of course!) Udo Lindenberg. It's the rest of the Krautrock Scene I'm wondering about. (Perhaps I should add that the "cosmic synths" of Tangerine Dream and Klaus Schulze do not appeal to me.) Thanks in advance for your help! |
||
KeleCableII
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 30 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 275 |
Posted: June 16 2008 at 00:54 | |
Did the Krautrock bands know about the English prog bands, and vice versa? I always considered the two (Krautrock and I guess English Symphonic) to be two separate scenes of progressive rock. Under the same name but not of the same movement. Am I wrong?
Edited by KeleCableII - June 16 2008 at 00:54 |
||
Atavachron
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 65268 |
Posted: June 15 2008 at 22:22 | |
American Psychrock may not have turned into Prog, but U.S. Psych as a genre (i.e. the bands I've mentioned) was one of the main building blocks of the English Underground movement. European Spacerock is kind of a separate deal, it drew from many sources and I don't really see the relevance ..the term 'psychedelic rock' has been sorta twisted out of shape over the decades, becoming a catch-all for any 'trippy' or 'spacey' music but this just isn't the case, and history must be observed
Edited by Atavachron - June 15 2008 at 22:23 |
||
Hawkwise
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 31 2008 Location: Ontairo Status: Offline Points: 4119 |
Posted: June 15 2008 at 22:08 | |
Byrds, Grateful Dead (then called Warlocks), Jefferson Airplane, Big Brother, but nothing from that turned to Prog did it ? American so called Psychedelic scene turned into Main stream Music AOR and Country Rock
unlike in the UK where the scene moved into Prog and Space Rock , oh the Underground scene in London in the UFO club with the likes of Floyd Soft Machine and the Nice etc etc was around the same time as the so called American Psychedelic scene was it Not ? Edited by Hawkwise - June 15 2008 at 22:11 |
||
|
||
Post Reply | Page <1 45678 10> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |