Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Developments which changed course of prog history
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedDevelopments which changed course of prog history

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 5>
Poll Question: Which of these developments most affected the course of prog history?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
42 [21.54%]
10 [5.13%]
62 [31.79%]
9 [4.62%]
12 [6.15%]
45 [23.08%]
2 [1.03%]
1 [0.51%]
12 [6.15%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 06 2008 at 20:41
Here's and interesting question:
What does it really matter which of these developments most affected the course of prog history?

Interesting selection of options though.  A few more slots that could have been filled in the poll as others have pointed out.  I'm not surprised that the number one option is the most picked.  Early events often tend to have effects on the course of things that tend to spread out farther although they can be diluted in the spreading out.

I'm going to have to abstain. LOL


Edited by Slartibartfast - May 06 2008 at 20:42
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
Dr. Prog View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 29 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 306
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 06 2008 at 20:49
Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:

Here's and interesting question:
What does it really matter which of these developments most affected the course of prog history?

 
 
it matters because I am interested in hearing people's views on the matter. Is that good enough? Why does anyone put any poll up?
 
For instance, I am surprised that people right now are picking Lake joining ELP, and not more people picking Gilmour joining Floyd.
 
So I guess chalk it up to curiousity. Its part of my human nature.
Back to Top
The Quiet One View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 16 2008
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 15745
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 06 2008 at 20:57
Surely Greg's..
How about Hackett's arrival to Genesis?
Wakeman's arrival to Yes? Or Howe's?
Maybe Gilmour is another good chance, but adding Syd on the note, really don't think that'll work.
Rabin joining Yes?
..
Back to Top
laplace View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 06 2005
Location: popupControl();
Status: Offline
Points: 7606
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 06 2008 at 20:59
Damo Suzuki joining Can. huge repercussions.
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 06 2008 at 22:04
Originally posted by Dr. Prog Dr. Prog wrote:

Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:

Here's and interesting question:
What does it really matter which of these developments most affected the course of prog history?

 
 
it matters because I am interested in hearing people's views on the matter. Is that good enough? Why does anyone put any poll up?
 
For instance, I am surprised that people right now are picking Lake joining ELP, and not more people picking Gilmour joining Floyd.
 
So I guess chalk it up to curiousity. Its part of my human nature.


Well, of course, curiosity isn't allowed.  To be technically correct Lake didn't join ELP, the three coagulated together.  And of course we all know, Gilmore rose through the ranks by assassination.  Oh, wait, he didn't kill Syd?  Nevermind.  Back to the original question, it just really doesn't seem to be something quantifiable.  Always fun to try though, eh?

Perhaps a better question for you, is there a common thread to all these events?


Edited by Slartibartfast - May 06 2008 at 22:07
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
Chris S View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 09 2004
Location: Front Range
Status: Offline
Points: 7028
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 06 2008 at 22:15
Definitely Gabriel leaving Genesis. Phil Collins went on as front man to make 4-6 excellent additional studio albums with Genesis ( or at least up until end of Duke) So thanks PG for leaving!!!!!!
 
Not detracting from PG solo work or the classics he did with Genesis eitherApprove
<font color=Brown>Music - The Sound Librarian

...As I venture through the slipstream, between the viaducts in your dreams...[/COLOR]
Back to Top
debrewguy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 30 2007
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3596
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 06 2008 at 22:26
The BBC's insistence on not playing american rock n roll, and instead relying on classical music, english music hall, and trad jazz.
"Here I am talking to some of the smartest people in the world and I didn't even notice,” Lieutenant Columbo, episode The Bye-Bye Sky-High I.Q. Murder Case.
Back to Top
Dr. Prog View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 29 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 306
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 06 2008 at 22:35
Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:

Originally posted by Dr. Prog Dr. Prog wrote:

Originally posted by Slartibartfast Slartibartfast wrote:

Here's and interesting question:
What does it really matter which of these developments most affected the course of prog history?

 
 
it matters because I am interested in hearing people's views on the matter. Is that good enough? Why does anyone put any poll up?
 
For instance, I am surprised that people right now are picking Lake joining ELP, and not more people picking Gilmour joining Floyd.
 
So I guess chalk it up to curiousity. Its part of my human nature.


Well, of course, curiosity isn't allowed.  To be technically correct Lake didn't join ELP, the three coagulated together.  And of course we all know, Gilmore rose through the ranks by assassination.  Oh, wait, he didn't kill Syd?  Nevermind.  Back to the original question, it just really doesn't seem to be something quantifiable.  Always fun to try though, eh?

Perhaps a better question for you, is there a common thread to all these events?
 
it isn't quantifiable. If it was, somebody would have already measured it, and there would be no reason to do a poll or discuss it.
 
A common thread? I don't know, but I was struck by how many of these particular events occurred at the height or close to the peak of the group's success, ie Bruford, Gabriel, Fripp folding KC in 74 etc. Walking out when things are going bad is easy, its a lot tougher to do it when things are going relatively well.
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 06 2008 at 22:37
I'd go with different options, includimng one by Cacho:
 
  1. Hackett joining Genesis: The IMO best keyboard - guitar ensemble was born
  2. Mike Oldfield releasing Tubular Bells: A 19 years old kid taking that risk is amazing.
  3. Jethro Tull switching from Blues to some sort opf Folk/Symphonic Prog
  4. Moraz replacing Wakeman for Relayer: A one in a kind album was released and proved a band can change, still I like CTTE more, but Relayer is outstandibng
  5. Wetton replacing Lake: Proved that anybody can be replaced.

Iván 

            
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 06 2008 at 23:29
Just will reply to the musical issues, the rest can be ignored.
 
1.- The question published is "Events which changed course of Prog History", and I gave my options to that question, as I did in 100 previous ocasions with no problem, threads are free to evolve, nobody owns a thread, just starts it..
 
2.- I consider more essential the creation of Hackett - Banks sound than other events.
 
3.- Replacing is taking the place, Moraz took the place of Wakeman for one album that was different to all previous releases in style and sound, I believe it was trascendental and it's a replacement.
 
4.- Even when Haskell and Boz Burell occupied the vocalist place in King Crimson, the band was searching for a replacement as strong as Greg , because nobody really was able to match him (I wrote this exact phrase a long time ago in this forum).
 
5.- I believe Tull switching of genres and Mike Oldfield Tubular bells, changed the history of Prog as the question is posted.
 
BTW: There was not one album between Lake and Wetton, there were 3 albums (Lizard, Earthbound and Islands) and not one but two vocalists in between.
 
Iván


Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - May 06 2008 at 23:34
            
Back to Top
VanderGraafKommandöh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Malaria
Status: Offline
Points: 89372
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 06 2008 at 23:47
I think you mean 2 albums, Iván.

Lizard with Gordon Haskell
Islands with Boz Burrell

After that came Larks' Tongues in Aspic with John Wetton.

Unless you're including the live album Earthbound, which in this situation, I presume you are. Wink

Edit: I didn't see your edit. LOLEmbarrassed


Edited by James - May 06 2008 at 23:48
Back to Top
Dr. Prog View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 29 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 306
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 06 2008 at 23:56
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Just will reply to the musical issues, the rest can be ignored.
 
1.- The question published is "Events which changed course of Prog History", and I gave my options to that question, as I did in 100 previous ocasions with no problem, threads are free to evolve, nobody owns a thread, just starts it..
 
2.- I consider more essential the creation of Hackett - Banks sound than other events.
 
3.- Replacing is taking the place, Moraz took the place of Wakeman for one album that was different to all previous releases in style and sound, I believe it was trascendental and it's a replacement.
 
4.- Even when Haskell and Boz Burell occupied the vocalist place in King Crimson, the band was searching for a replacement as strong as Greg , because nobody really was able to match him (I wrote this exact phrase a long time ago in this forum).
 
5.- I believe Tull switching of genres and Mike Oldfield Tubular bells, changed the history of Prog as the question is posted.
 
BTW: There was not one album between Lake and Wetton, there were 3 albums (Lizard, Earthbound and Islands) and not one but two vocalists in between.
 
Iván
 
 
No, the poll question very clearly states which of these developments most affected prog history, and specifically lists those developments. As you know, all that does not fit into the subject heading, which is why the question and specific choices are then typed out. And no, replacing someone is not the same as succeeding someone.
For instance, Tony Kaye was replaced by Steve Howe---they asked Kaye to move on. Wakeman quit, and then Moraz came in as his successor, but not his replacement. Its a subtle, but crucial distinction.
 
All the other stuff is your opinion, that's all well and good, its just irrelevant to this poll. And you are right, there were multiple albums between Lake and Wetton, making your last poll suggestion even more irrelevant and false.
 
And as I said, since my polls are obviously so deficient and so not up to your lofty and superior standards, my suggestion would be to create your own poll instead of seeing the need to constantly nitpick and completely try to change my poll options, which seems to be a pattern here. You obviously have such superior knowledge here, that I find it fascinating you would even bother with my silly little polls.
\
 
(by the way, how did the Fripp disbanding KC go from 9 votes to 37 so quickly? Is someone monkeying with the vote totals here?Confused)


Edited by Dr. Prog - May 07 2008 at 00:18
Back to Top
VanderGraafKommandöh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Malaria
Status: Offline
Points: 89372
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 07 2008 at 00:09
Deleted


Edited by James - May 07 2008 at 09:39
Back to Top
BroSpence View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 05 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 2614
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 07 2008 at 00:36
I voted for Fripp ending KC, but what about:

Greg Lake leaving KC, Keith Emerson ending the Nice, and Carl Palmer leaving Atomic Rooster to form ELP?
Back to Top
Rocktopus View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 02 2006
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 4202
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 07 2008 at 06:15
Originally posted by Dr. Prog Dr. Prog wrote:

 
(by the way, how did the Fripp disbanding KC go from 9 votes to 37 so quickly? Is someone monkeying with the vote totals here?Confused)


Because you allow multiple votes, and by that making the poll results pretty useless. The suggestion with the biggest nerdclick fanbase (who'll bother to vote again and again to see their heroes take the lead) always wins.

I usually disagree with whatever Ivan writes, but suggesting relevant stuff not included in a poll is half the fun and not irrelevant. It starts discussions and keeps threads alive for a couple of pages more. Sometimes its even a slightly interesting read.


Edited by Rocktopus - May 07 2008 at 06:26
Over land and under ashes
In the sunlight, see - it flashes
Find a fly and eat his eye
But don't believe in me
Don't believe in me
Don't believe in me
Back to Top
iguana View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 01 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 825
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 07 2008 at 07:54
EXCELLENT thread, doctor!

i cannot possibly voice an opinion as it will be just that (an opinion) but, as in regards
to your options, i'd choose steve hackett's departure from genesis. but, then, it may
of course always be a matter of choosing a change in prog for the better and/or
a change for the worse.

if the latter is applicable, i'd also go for the release of TFTO by YES, which proved to
be the joint nexus, peak, turning point and fateful seal for progressive rock.
plus the birth of the scapegoat and the laughing stock.
progressive rock and rural tranquility don't match. true or false?
Back to Top
sleeper View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 09 2005
Location: Entropia
Status: Offline
Points: 16449
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 07 2008 at 09:13
I dont think any of these developments had much affect on the development of prog as awhole. I went with the folding of KC in '74 because it was more of a portent of things to come, Fripp trying to prevent KC becoming an ineffectual dinosaure which to greater and lesser degrees started to happen to all the other major prog bands shortly afterwards (some notables held off for a few years though). The only real effect that I can see that the chopping and changing of band members had on the prog scene was the small changes made to the indavidual bands, because normally it wasnt the creative leader of the band that was moving on.   

Its been mentioned in here already but the forming of certain bands and the release of certain albums and the change in some peoples attitudes were infinitely bigger effects on the course of prog.  
Spending more than I should on Prog since 2005

Back to Top
Pnoom! View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: September 02 2006
Location: OH
Status: Offline
Points: 4981
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 07 2008 at 10:22
Quote Once Punk had come round, it actually breathed new life into prog (of a different kind though) and such bands like Massacre, This Heat and yes, even Marillion, were formed and a new resurgence of prog emerged in the 1980s.  It just wasn't referred to as prog at the time.
 
Oh certainly prog on the whole never died, as soon as it started fading out avant-prog peaked, and as soon as avant-prog started going down there was neo, but certainly symphonic prog took itself down.
Back to Top
Pnoom! View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: September 02 2006
Location: OH
Status: Offline
Points: 4981
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 07 2008 at 10:23
Originally posted by iguana iguana wrote:

if the latter is applicable, i'd also go for the release of TFTO by YES, which proved to
be the joint nexus, peak, turning point and fateful seal for progressive rock.
plus the birth of the scapegoat and the laughing stock.
 
That's what I said, minus the "peak" part.
Back to Top
VanderGraafKommandöh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Malaria
Status: Offline
Points: 89372
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 07 2008 at 10:33
Originally posted by Pnoom! Pnoom! wrote:

Quote Once Punk had come round, it actually breathed new life into prog (of a different kind though) and such bands like Massacre, This Heat and yes, even Marillion, were formed and a new resurgence of prog emerged in the 1980s.  It just wasn't referred to as prog at the time.
 
Oh certainly prog on the whole never died, as soon as it started fading out avant-prog peaked, and as soon as avant-prog started going down there was neo, but certainly symphonic prog took itself down.


Avant-prog has never started going down, in my opinion.  Neo-prog and avant-prog also have no correlation (in terms of listeners).  Infact, I'd go so far and say avant-prog never really peaked, well, not in the 1980s.  Sure, you had The Residents, Miriodor, Cartoon, PFS and many others but only really The Residents were popular.  I'd say avant-prog is more popular now (Zorn, Patton projects) than it ever has been.  Neo came from Symphonic but there was a gap from about 1976/77 to when the early 1980s where you have mostly New Wave, post-punk and No Wave and the Yes and Genesis pop (including Asia. Japan and others).
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 5>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.176 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.