The Intelligent People's Thread

I guess I better stick to intelligent posts.

Earlier today I saw someone who looked exactly like Kate Bush might have looked as a 36-year-old! I'm still on fire.

I have the intelligence and power to be able to make the sky construct skyscrapers.

And now for something completely different. I need opinions of intelligent people on the following issue:

I've been writing a book of poems to become famous, rich, and loved by many (girls). In its present form it's divided into five (5) parts. Four (4) of them have a concept, one (1) of them doesn't:

I. Concept (several poems that form a story)
II. Concept (several poems with similar themes)
III. Concept (several poems with similar themes)
IV. No concept (several crappy poems with nothing to do with each other)
V. Concept (one long poem divided in several parts)

Here's what I want to ask:
1. Does it seem gay or repetitive if the word "garden" appears in most of the poems in part I of the book?
2. Does it seem unintelligent if some of the poems clearly imply to the theories of Erich von Däniken?
3. Does it seem childish if some of the poems are based on comparing certain parts of the human body to certain parts of the house (in a relatively non-erotic way)?
4. Does the fact that part IV doesn't have a concept at all make the whole book seem unfinished?
5. Does the fact that all of the poems in part IV are bad make the other parts look better than they really are?
5. Does it seem pretentious to refer to Wittgenstein?
6. Who would win in a fight: Chuck Norris or Steven Seagal?

So you think it's a bad book if there are other words than garden in it? 

Doesn't anyone care about my garden? If so, I'll plant it as I wish.

keiser willhelm wrote: Vompatti wrote: 6. Who would win in a fight: Chuck Norris or Steven Seagal? Magma.

Silly. Just silly. Stephen Hawking's mind would have them all screaming in fear. Or mine for that matter. But the consequences of using it in such a violent situation is beyond imagination.

LinusW wrote: keiser willhelm wrote: Vompatti wrote: 6. Who would win in a fight: Chuck Norris or Steven Seagal? Magma. Silly. Just silly. Stephen Hawking's mind would have them all screaming in fear. Or mine for that matter. But the consequences of using it in such a violent situation is beyond imagination.

Oh, come on. Stephen Hawking's IQ is much less than half what mine would be if they'd only got the damn IQ test questions right in the first place. I mean, I could use my mind in such a situation without reprisal, but then I wouldn't have the energy left to fend off the women attracted by my giant brain.

Since nobody cares
about my book of poems,
how good it will be
and how many times the word 'garden' will appear in it,
I decided to leave it
as it was
and send it to the people
who will publish it
and give me money.
Then I'll write another one
where the word 'garden' doesn't appear
at all.
Instead there are words like
'singularity', 'stratosphere' and 'coffee'.
Then I'll write another one
with words like
'sip', 'moan' and 'frolick'.
If I get enough money
and write enough poems
I have a chance of becoming
almost as good as Bukowski.
I'm already better than Shakespeare.

^ I know, I wrote it.  

And the best is yet to come, said the granny at the hospice facility. 

^ You realize that updating the member list would mean reading or at least browsing through the whole 33 pages of this nonsen... um, intelligence?