Forum Home Forum Home > Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements > Help us improve the site
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - New Prog?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedNew Prog?

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
jetson View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: December 22 2007
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 76
Direct Link To This Post Topic: New Prog?
    Posted: April 28 2008 at 12:39
I guess many of you have seen this article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_prog
...

Whow

I don't understand, new prog should be a new sub genre here in PA?
Some bands listed in the article are already in our prog related section, so, is new prog another way of saying prog related?

Also, there is the term post prog, should it be listed in the post rock section?

What dou you guys think?


(I don't know if this topic belongs to this category, escuse me if it isn't so Wink . )



Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 28 2008 at 14:15
I think the term 'Prog Related' is good enough to describe bands like Muse and Coheed & Cambria. I see no need for yet another category.
Back to Top
stonebeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 28 2008 at 14:18
Muse is not prog. At all. I can maybe possibly conceive of them being Prog Related, but only barely.
Back to Top
The Hemulen View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 31 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 5964
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 28 2008 at 15:24
Utter balls. Let's hope the mainstream music journalists don't ever latch onto the term as it could have disasterous repurcussions. It really does seem as though any rock band with the presence of mind to compose a song or two in something other than 4/4 immediately have the term 'prog' thrust upon them, usually with ridiculous qualifiers to absolve and apologise for using the word at all.

I'm usually in favour of wikipedia and I don't like to see articles getting pulled on a whim (an article on the artistic group Post-NeoAbsurdism, in which I am heavily involved got removed in less than twenty-four hours due to apparently being 'made up'!) but this is just an utterly pointless, factually inept attempt to classify a bunch of barely progressive rock groups as prog, for reasons I shall never truly fathom.
Back to Top
jetson View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: December 22 2007
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 76
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 28 2008 at 15:27
Maybe the genre was made upby those mainstream bands fans that wanted to take their music more seriously.
LOL

Back to Top
stonebeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 28 2008 at 15:33
Glancing over the article, which hardly includes enough info to really be more than a little stub of an idea, I think I understand where they are getting at, but honestly I think a better descriptor for this "genre" would be Diluted Alterna-prog. PRR are about as prog as DSOTM era Floyd, which is to say not much, but one can see why it's included with Prog. I imagine dredg is in this "genre" as well, but I don't think, by PA's standards, they're beyond Prog Related--meaning essentially interesting alternative rock, with maybe a concept and some time shifts.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.313 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.