Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > Music and Musicians Exchange
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - 1000000 of bits, 0 tunes.
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic Closed1000000 of bits, 0 tunes.

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
clarke2001 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 14 2006
Location: Croatia
Status: Offline
Points: 4160
Direct Link To This Post Topic: 1000000 of bits, 0 tunes.
    Posted: April 26 2008 at 02:50
Hi my fellow musicians.

Did you ever experienced a similar problem? I'm playing a guitar for 15 years, keys for almost ten years, I'm also playing bass, mandolin and a few other instruments.

I'm not very good at playing but I'm not too bad neither.

I'm composing music...all kinds of music - that will, hopefully, see the lite of the day one day.

Although I prefer prog, and prog is my first passion, and passion of my bandmates too, I regret because I don't have sufficient songwriting skills. That is, I'm not able to make a song (a simple song, if necessary) from beginnig to end. I'm always practicing, making new ideas ranging from pseudo-classical - folksy - jazz(y) to avangarde and straight rock & blues-rock. But all these ideas, no matter how developed they might be, are just IDEAS. Not complete tunes. After years of playing, this started to get on my nerves. I'm not able to make a song. I had millions of ideas, passages, patterns, chord progressions, enough for 10 hours of music, but in my whole musical path I've made like ...5 or 6 songs !?

Did you ever experienced a similar problem, and how do you cope with it?

When I'm doing my music, I try not to be boring. People with various tastes say they like it. My prog loving bandmates like it, which is really comforting. I'm also writing poetry, from free-form modern poems to heroic crown of sonnets; I published some of my works, receiving positive feedback from both public and the critics.

But I'm not able to make a song.

I must say - I prefer consistency over technicality, my first love is prog; but not prog for the sake of being prog; rather give me a simple Leonard Cohen tune anytime.

Sorry for the longish lament, but I needed this. I would really appreciate your comments and possible solutions.

Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 28 2008 at 03:14

A music professor I once studied under came up with this for those periods in which composition flows like dry treacle;

"If you are a composer, compose".
 
Although that may seem trite, it's advice I've always followed.
 
Currently, I have something like 100 started pieces in my 5-year project under the Certif1ed handle, of which about 20 have made it into actual songs. There are a few hundred short jam fragments.
 
The way I apply the advice above is to try to complete the outline structure of something in a single session - if I'm completely out of ideas on structure (ie, most of the time), then I cobble together something with a standard song structure - that way at least there is a complete set of ideas, created in the same session (so it should theoretically flow as a composition).
 
Instrumentals are the hardest thing to write, unless you have an absolutely clear vision already (and who does when they go into the studio?) - so I always try to start from a set of lyrics. Once you have a melody you like, a piece can often "write itself", as happened to me with "Strange" (http://www.myspace.com/Certif1ed).
 
Once we'd laid down the intro, and v1/ch/v2/ch structure, it wa like being possessed - I have no idea where any of the material came from, it felt like it was sleeting down from space or something.
 
And that sums it up.
 
Writer's block happens to all artists - it's only when you completely let your imagination go and just get on with the job of composing without imposing judgement or trying to force ideas that it all happens.
 
So get back into the studio and compose Thumbs%20Up!
 
 
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
N Ellingworth View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 17 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1324
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 28 2008 at 03:49
I have a lot of problems turning ideas into full songs, I normally only come up with one riff and I can't think of anything to add to it, since I can't sing or write lyrics I play entirely instrumental music. I suspect that the problems I have trying to write what could be viewed as regular songs are the reason why I've started playing mainly ambient music which allows me to get away with extending a simple idea to a 20 minute long jam which is mostly effects. When I'm in the mood to play something heavy I end up playing stuff that sounds like a Sunn O))) rip off since I apply the same techniques. Wink

I have a feeling that if I were to really think about it I might be able to write a decent song or two but I'm having far to much fun simply mucking around with effects.
Back to Top
chopper View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 13 2005
Location: Essex, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 20029
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 28 2008 at 09:03
Perhaps you could find a collaborator to help you turn these ideas into songs? There are different types of talents here - I know people who can write songs but can't play instruments very well, others can come up with the instrumental bits but can't put them into songs. Put them together and off you go!
Back to Top
clarke2001 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 14 2006
Location: Croatia
Status: Offline
Points: 4160
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 28 2008 at 09:50
Thanks. Well, I do have my companions ( myspace.com/kwadratnodnoll ) and they are doing more or less the same...we're not very disciplined..but the results are decent, I guess. The only problem is, the process could be very slow.
Back to Top
The Pessimist View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 13 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 3834
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 28 2008 at 14:13
I often find that the best way to compose is to get a simple melody and build on it. As soon as you have the melody, wrap chrods around it to set the mood, create a B and C idea on top of your original A idea (preferably quite diverse in comparison) and once youve done all that you can quite easily develop ideas and an arrangement of your choice, for example changing the B section from 4/4 into a 9/8 time signature, or transposing your A into a different key, naming the new section D. There are many roads to travel down but with this method i find you can let your imagination off the leash completely. You can have as many parts as you like, ranging a song from 3 minutes to 35 minutes, you are in complete control and generally speaking the more changes you have, the more interesting the song becomes. It depends entirely on what you are after in a song.


Edited by kibble_alex - April 28 2008 at 14:16
"Market value is irrelevant to intrinsic value."

Arnold Schoenberg
Back to Top
clarke2001 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 14 2006
Location: Croatia
Status: Offline
Points: 4160
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 29 2008 at 07:18
Originally posted by kibble_alex kibble_alex wrote:

I often find that the best way to compose is to get a simple melody and build on it. As soon as you have the melody, wrap chrods around it to set the mood, create a B and C idea on top of your original A idea (preferably quite diverse in comparison) and once youve done all that you can quite easily develop ideas and an arrangement of your choice, for example changing the B section from 4/4 into a 9/8 time signature, or transposing your A into a different key, naming the new section D. There are many roads to travel down but with this method i find you can let your imagination off the leash completely. You can have as many parts as you like, ranging a song from 3 minutes to 35 minutes, you are in complete control and generally speaking the more changes you have, the more interesting the song becomes. It depends entirely on what you are after in a song.


Yes, that's precisely what I'm doing. I'm just developing it too much.

On the other hand, the replies here kinda encouraged me (thanks) and...I hope I'm moving into the right direction!

Back to Top
The Pessimist View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 13 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 3834
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 29 2008 at 11:34
Originally posted by clarke2001 clarke2001 wrote:

Originally posted by kibble_alex kibble_alex wrote:

I often find that the best way to compose is to get a simple melody and build on it. As soon as you have the melody, wrap chrods around it to set the mood, create a B and C idea on top of your original A idea (preferably quite diverse in comparison) and once youve done all that you can quite easily develop ideas and an arrangement of your choice, for example changing the B section from 4/4 into a 9/8 time signature, or transposing your A into a different key, naming the new section D. There are many roads to travel down but with this method i find you can let your imagination off the leash completely. You can have as many parts as you like, ranging a song from 3 minutes to 35 minutes, you are in complete control and generally speaking the more changes you have, the more interesting the song becomes. It depends entirely on what you are after in a song.


Yes, that's precisely what I'm doing. I'm just developing it too much.

On the other hand, the replies here kinda encouraged me (thanks) and...I hope I'm moving into the right direction!



If you start with simplicity, you can't go far wrong, a lot of the prog greats have a simple outline to them, with a whole lota crazy progressive sh*t in the middle.
"Market value is irrelevant to intrinsic value."

Arnold Schoenberg
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 29 2008 at 12:25
Originally posted by kibble_alex kibble_alex wrote:

I often find that the best way to compose is to get a simple melody and build on it. As soon as you have the melody, wrap chrods around it to set the mood, create a B and C idea on top of your original A idea (preferably quite diverse in comparison) and once youve done all that you can quite easily develop ideas and an arrangement of your choice, for example changing the B section from 4/4 into a 9/8 time signature, or transposing your A into a different key, naming the new section D. There are many roads to travel down but with this method i find you can let your imagination off the leash completely. You can have as many parts as you like, ranging a song from 3 minutes to 35 minutes, you are in complete control and generally speaking the more changes you have, the more interesting the song becomes. It depends entirely on what you are after in a song.
 
Indeed - form is probably the most useful and important, yet most overlooked aspect of music.
 
When you consider that "A Saucerful of Secrets" has a 4-part structure that was architecturally designed by the 3 architecture students in the group, it shows that even an apparently rigid structure can give way to some incredibly organic music.
 
If you have loads of ideas, why not assign them letters and place them in a pleasing order - perhaps spelling a word. Abracadabra is a good one, as it has repeats the A sections and even ends on A (obviously, the R section maps to E in this case).
 
You may need to write some linking music between the passages - but it's a good way to recycle those stray ideas that don't currently have a home.
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
The Pessimist View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 13 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 3834
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 30 2008 at 12:25
Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

Originally posted by kibble_alex kibble_alex wrote:

I often find that the best way to compose is to get a simple melody and build on it. As soon as you have the melody, wrap chrods around it to set the mood, create a B and C idea on top of your original A idea (preferably quite diverse in comparison) and once youve done all that you can quite easily develop ideas and an arrangement of your choice, for example changing the B section from 4/4 into a 9/8 time signature, or transposing your A into a different key, naming the new section D. There are many roads to travel down but with this method i find you can let your imagination off the leash completely. You can have as many parts as you like, ranging a song from 3 minutes to 35 minutes, you are in complete control and generally speaking the more changes you have, the more interesting the song becomes. It depends entirely on what you are after in a song.
 
Indeed - form is probably the most useful and important, yet most overlooked aspect of music.
 
When you consider that "A Saucerful of Secrets" has a 4-part structure that was architecturally designed by the 3 architecture students in the group, it shows that even an apparently rigid structure can give way to some incredibly organic music.
 
If you have loads of ideas, why not assign them letters and place them in a pleasing order - perhaps spelling a word. Abracadabra is a good one, as it has repeats the A sections and even ends on A (obviously, the R section maps to E in this case).
 
You may need to write some linking music between the passages - but it's a good way to recycle those stray ideas that don't currently have a home.


"Architechture is frozen music"

Fantastic quote, but who the hell said it dammit...
"Market value is irrelevant to intrinsic value."

Arnold Schoenberg
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 30 2008 at 13:25
That rather depends on the music itself - form doesn't have to be rigid, it's the composer/performer's friend.
 
In fact, there is no such thing as free form - every piece has a form, and form can decide how interesting the piece is, how dramatic it is, and so on.
 
The opposite of frozen is gaseous... Tongue
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
The Pessimist View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 13 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 3834
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 01 2008 at 11:15
Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

That rather depends on the music itself - form doesn't have to be rigid, it's the composer/performer's friend.
 
In fact, there is no such thing as free form - every piece has a form, and form can decide how interesting the piece is, how dramatic it is, and so on.
 
The opposite of frozen is gaseous... Tongue


I would say it's plasmic actually
"Market value is irrelevant to intrinsic value."

Arnold Schoenberg
Back to Top
Statutory-Mike View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 15 2008
Location: Long Island
Status: Offline
Points: 3737
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 04 2008 at 00:32
Originally posted by clarke2001 clarke2001 wrote:

Hi my fellow musicians.

Did you ever experienced a similar problem? I'm playing a guitar for 15 years, keys for almost ten years, I'm also playing bass, mandolin and a few other instruments.

I'm not very good at playing but I'm not too bad neither.

I'm composing music...all kinds of music - that will, hopefully, see the lite of the day one day.

Although I prefer prog, and prog is my first passion, and passion of my bandmates too, I regret because I don't have sufficient songwriting skills. That is, I'm not able to make a song (a simple song, if necessary) from beginnig to end. I'm always practicing, making new ideas ranging from pseudo-classical - folksy - jazz(y) to avangarde and straight rock & blues-rock. But all these ideas, no matter how developed they might be, are just IDEAS. Not complete tunes. After years of playing, this started to get on my nerves. I'm not able to make a song. I had millions of ideas, passages, patterns, chord progressions, enough for 10 hours of music, but in my whole musical path I've made like ...5 or 6 songs !?

Did you ever experienced a similar problem, and how do you cope with it?

When I'm doing my music, I try not to be boring. People with various tastes say they like it. My prog loving bandmates like it, which is really comforting. I'm also writing poetry, from free-form modern poems to heroic crown of sonnets; I published some of my works, receiving positive feedback from both public and the critics.

But I'm not able to make a song.

I must say - I prefer consistency over technicality, my first love is prog; but not prog for the sake of being prog; rather give me a simple Leonard Cohen tune anytime.

Sorry for the longish lament, but I needed this. I would really appreciate your comments and possible solutions.

 
I share the same EXACT problem. I am only at the age of 15 right now so I am hoping that it's just a phase. I think of so many great ideas and riffs, then I record them on a tape recorder I've got, I've got about 3-4 hours worth of riffs and ideas on there. I just can't get them to flow really.
 
I listen to a band like Porcupine Tree and I wonder how Steven Wilson does it. It doesn't have to be complex at all but it's amazing.
 
I want to be like that, both in a SW/Porcupine Tree songwriting sense, and also a more technical BTBAM/DT sense.
 
It's a work in progress for me and I have no way of dealing with it yet. Hopefully it will pass.
Back to Top
clarke2001 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 14 2006
Location: Croatia
Status: Offline
Points: 4160
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 08 2008 at 10:22
A BIG THANK YOU Hugfor everyone here!

It seems I gained some self-confidence, and your replies helped as well..

I wrote a tune yesterday. Decent, if not too original, orwellian lyrics, three chords (four in bridge). A complete tune.Smile A verse or two are bit clumsy and need some polishing perhaps.

It could be more "progelitized" if necessary, we'll see. My girlfriend was humming it all day long yesterday.Smile

So, again, a big thanks!






Edited by clarke2001 - May 08 2008 at 10:23
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.153 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.