Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Progressive Metal Pioneers?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedProgressive Metal Pioneers?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 56789 13>
Author
Message
Petrovsk Mizinski View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: December 24 2007
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 25210
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 10 2008 at 02:37
Originally posted by heyitsthatguy heyitsthatguy wrote:

1840's progressive metal is where its at
 
LMAO!
Back to Top
Petrovsk Mizinski View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: December 24 2007
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 25210
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 10 2008 at 03:02
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

as I said in my first post, if I had to chose one band as the ProgMetal pioneer (which is never ideal) it would have to be Maiden..  the band took the metal birthed by Sabbath, Priest and the Scorps and brought a progressive, semi-classical element to the structure of the music.. sure Rush had done heavy prog but never metal strictly speaking, and though I give huge credit to Metallica, Maiden predates them and had prog elements on their debut, whereas Kill 'em All was mainly thrash (not to say Metallica shouldn't be here, my stance on them has softened, but that's a different debate that's been had)


 
 
Ignoring completely the Metallica aspect - and overlooking the fact that KEA predates Queensryche's debut and contains progressive elements, and RTL kicks it's ass, progressively speaking, and is on at least a par with Dream Theater's debut... oh, I was going to ignore that Tongue
 
The "progressive semi-classical" elements may easily be found in the Scorp's and Priest's early music - both bands were into complex structures, but the Scorps focussed on the technical elements far more heavily than Priest, who focussed more on structuring.
 
They may also be found in Deep Purple and early Rainbow - who are more deserving of the "Prog Metal Pioneer" badge than Maiden.
 
Some of the complex structuring and twin-guitar work can also be traced directly back from Maiden to Thin Lizzy - whose "Johnny The Fox" album is a must-have.
 
I really don't think that Maiden deserve as many plaudits as they get in the Prog Metal development arena.
 
I'm not denying that there are aspects of Prog Metal in their music - but the facts as I see them are that Maiden are no more important in the development of Prog Metal than Metallica or Priest.
 
Come to think of it, Randy Rhoades was putting a whole load of amazing classical work into the music he was helping to write for Ozzy - and, with a significant chunk of Uriah Heep featuring on his early albums, Ozzy is a strong contender too.
 
 
...sits back and watches blue touch paper burn... Evil%20Smile


I'm not convinced, and that argument seems more to do with the pioneers of tech guitar playing than progmetal as an entity (though the two are related)..  I firmly agree about Randy Rhoads though, and I personally think Diary is an incredibly progressive album, but Ozzy was a songwriter first, a lover of melody and lyricism, and didn't usually focus his music on the instrumentalism found in more progressive artists

..in fact, in the Bay Area metal scene in the early 80s, I didn't really start hearing the term 'progrssive metal' used seriously until Maiden had appeared

 
Hence why I mentioned just the the song Diary Of A Madman. The whole album per se isn't progressive, but the song Diary Of A Madman is at the very least prog related, if not even straight out prog. As for Ozzy being a 'songwriter', Ozzy was not that greatly involved in the writing process actually, which is why the other members of the band, well particularly Bob Daisley and Lee Kerslake anyway, wanted the band to be called Blizzard of Ozz, because the bulk of the writing process was done by Randy And Bob Daisley and felt it wasn't just a solo project by Ozzy. Listen to a song like Diary of A Madman, and there is no way Ozzy had a great deal of input on it, it really is something that could only have been written by someone of high musical ability like Randy, perhaps possibly with Daisley in there.
 
As for your comment on the Bay Area scene and the term progressive metal being thrown around, you say it wasn't until Maiden appeared. The thing that is confusing me is, Maiden had well and truly appeared by 1981, wheras thrash was virtually unknown at that time, and Metallica's release, the No Life 'Till Leather demo tape had not been released until 1982 which was a seminal recording in thrash metal history, so I'm not sure how your argument works there.
 
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65625
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 10 2008 at 03:16
^ my point is that Maiden were doing 'progressive metal' before Metallica had even recorded, making them a pioneer of the form.. Metallica didn't start getting progressive till well after Maiden had tipped the balance

interesting about Daisley's perspective on Diary, but I have to say the idea that Ozzy "was not that greatly involved in the writing process" is beyond rational credibility--  of course Randy wrote the bulk of the chord progressions, that's one of the things a great guitarist does in rock, but it simply is not believable Ozzy was somehow not involved in almost every aspect of both those amazing records ..and BTW, I think most of Diary is highly progressive, but ultimately it was a brilliant pop album more than it was progmetal








Edited by Atavachron - April 10 2008 at 03:19
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 10 2008 at 04:26
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

^ my point is that Maiden were doing 'progressive metal' before Metallica had even recorded, making them a pioneer of the form.. Metallica didn't start getting progressive till well after Maiden had tipped the balance
 
Not entirely convinced - "Number of the Beast" (1982) is hardly a progressive album - at least, no more so than Black Sabbath's "Heaven and Hell" (1980). If you're saying Maiden "tipped the balance" with their earlier albums, then I kinda get your drift, but "Beast" was a regressive step. Don't get me wrong - it's a superb album, but none of the tracks hold a candle to some of the earlier material - in terms of progressive music. It's my favourite Maiden album, but it ain't very progressive. The world needed a band like Metallica in 1982, because MSG were about the only band doing anything really interesting in metal WRT to progressive music.
 
"Piece of Mind" (1983) isn't particularly progressive either - "Kill 'Em All" (1983) is leagues ahead in terms of introducing new techniques and a new approach to metal. It also sports the strongest evolutionary approach to form (which is the strongest link to progressive music) in that while the structures are only long because they're a bit drawn out in places, the method Metallica used to develop and transform riffs and fragments of riffs is all over the album - it was a natural way for them to write, and holds perfectly with the composed/improvised core of Progressive Rock. It perfectly consolidated the somewhat tangential approach of Priest, and the simpler song-oriented structures of Metallica's peers (Megadeth, et al).
 
1984 is even more interesting - "Powerslave" contains some of Maiden's finest chart hits, such as "Aces High" and "2 Minutes to Midnight" alongside the sprawling meandering mess that is "Rime...". That piece annoyed me a bit at the time, as it reminded me of Raven's "Run Silent, Run Deep" on their "All For One" album (1983), except with added filler. Yes it's long. Yes it has lots of sections. But it's based on riffs that are oh-so-similar, and I've yet to listen to it all the way through, as I always find something more interesting to do.
 
Compare and contrast with "Ride the Lightning", which is in a different dimension altogether, every song containing interesting structures, from "For Whom The Bell Tolls", with it's minimalist and hugely dramatic approach, each riff idea leeching from the others in a way that turns Sabbath up to 11, to the title track and its structures that compete well with later Prog Metal tracks such as "Pull Me Under" in terms of complexity.
 
There's no doubt in my mind that at this point at least, Metallica were way ahead of Maiden in terms of progressive music. I need to listen to later Maiden albums - but it's hard to imagine anything that can compete with "Master of Puppets" or "...And Justice For All". Personally I think Metallica win by several miles - but it's impossible for me to comprehend how anyone could think Maiden were more progressive, especially as they essentially stuck to the same ideas and sonic textures - especially in terms of rhythm.
 
 
The other point is that Priest pioneered the form LONG before Maiden, and one could easily consider some of UFO or the Scorps early material as prototype Prog Metal. Even Thin Lizzy should come under consideration - not to mention Skid Row.
 
 
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:


interesting about Daisley's perspective on Diary, but I have to say the idea that Ozzy "was not that greatly involved in the writing process" is beyond rational credibility--  of course Randy wrote the bulk of the chord progressions, that's one of the things a great guitarist does in rock, but it simply is not believable Ozzy was somehow not involved in almost every aspect of both those amazing records ..and BTW, I think most of Diary is highly progressive, but ultimately it was a brilliant pop album more than it was progmetal

 
 
The one thing I would add is that it's Rhoads' solo playing that's been an inspiration on some parts of the Prog Metal genre - and Classical influenced Metal (for want of a better term) - by which I mean Malmsteen and all the Yngwie wannabes - and the heroes like Jason Becker (not wishing to tar all shredders with the same brush).
 
Mind you, the less said about Quiet Riot the better... Tongue
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65625
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 10 2008 at 04:42
Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

^ my point is that Maiden were doing 'progressive metal' before Metallica had even recorded, making them a pioneer of the form.. Metallica didn't start getting progressive till well after Maiden had tipped the balance
 
Not entirely convinced - "Number of the Beast" (1982) is hardly a progressive album - at least, no more so than Black Sabbath's "Heaven and Hell" (1980). If you're saying Maiden "tipped the balance" with their earlier albums, then I kinda get your drift, but "Beast" was a regressive step.


 - oh absolutely, I speak of the first two, particularly Killers but both could easily be seen as progressive metal (though perhaps not ProgMetal yet)

Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:


- "Kill 'Em All" (1983) is leagues ahead in terms of introducing new techniques and a new approach to metal. It also sports the strongest evolutionary approach to form (which is the strongest link to progressive music) in that while the structures are only long because they're a bit drawn out in places, the method Metallica used to develop and transform riffs and fragments of riffs is all over the album - it was a natural way for them to write, and holds perfectly with the composed/improvised core of Progressive Rock.


- that's a fair perspective, I agree about it being natural for them to gravitate toward longer compositions
 
Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:


There's no doubt in my mind that at this point at least, Metallica were way ahead of Maiden in terms of progressive music. I need to listen to later Maiden albums - but it's hard to imagine anything that can compete with "Master of Puppets" or "...And Justice For All". Personally I think Metallica win by several miles - but it's impossible for me to comprehend how anyone could think Maiden were more progressive, especially as they essentially stuck to the same ideas and sonic textures - especially in terms of rhythm.


- true, unfortunately Maiden stopped their progressive movement whereas Metallica began notching it up.. but that doesn't negate the structural breakthroughs and implications of those first two Maiden albums, credit must be given even if the band was eventually outdone


 
 

Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 10 2008 at 08:33
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

unfortunately Maiden stopped their progressive movement whereas Metallica began notching it up.. but that doesn't negate the structural breakthroughs and implications of those first two Maiden albums, credit must be given even if the band was eventually outdone
 
I'm still not completely convinced about "structural breakthroughs and implications" - I rather feel that this was simply taking Priest's earlier excursions to a more tailored conclusion.
 
I'll definitely go back to these albums and re-listen (always a pleasure!), but albums like "Sad Wings..." and particularly "Sin After Sin" and "Killing Machine" ("Hell Bent for Leather" in the US), thanks in no small way to Simon Philips, are packed with structuring and technique ideas that, while not perfectly executed, are what I would call the breakthrough point.
 
Just me trying to get to the root of it as usual - I actually find your comments very helpful for homing in on the "important questions" Wink


Edited by Certif1ed - April 10 2008 at 08:35
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
Easy Money View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10680
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 10 2008 at 12:47
I'm probably not near the expert on metal as you guys, but in considering the Maiden/Metallica debate there is something that is hard to define, I guess you could call it "emotional tone" or something.

I remember when Master of Puppets first came out, I was really suprised to hear this serious, introspective and melancholic tone in the music that really reminded me of the progressive rock I enjoyed as a youth in the early 70s. At that time, I had not heard music that serious since the decline of the early progressive bands. "Master ..." deals with post-teen angst in a way that recalls Quadrophenia, The Lamb ... and much of Black Sabbath and even The Strawbs and some of earlier Moody Blues etc. I don't recall Maiden having a similar impact, just my 2 cents yawl.

Edited by Easy Money - April 10 2008 at 12:54
Help the victims of the russian invasion:
http://www.jazzmusicarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=28523&PID=130446&title=various-ways-you-can-help-ukraine#130446
Back to Top
salmacis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member

Content Addition

Joined: April 10 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 3928
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 10 2008 at 13:21
As ever, I find it hard to add much to what Certif1ed said. For my money, though, here are the albums I personally would nominate as being influential to progressive metal;
 
Judas Priest- Sad Wings Of Destiny (still their best album, IMHO)
Rainbow- Rainbow Rising (it's this album that I think links most closely to bands like Dream Theater and perhaps more obviously, Symphony X)
Budgie- Never Turn Your Back On A Friend (check out those long form compositions like 'Breadfan' and 'Parents'; their albums are often somewhat inconsistent, however...as an aside, Metallica covered 'Breadfan')
Rush- 2112 (well, the title track anyway)
Diamond Head- Lightning To The Nations (this lot influenced Metallica, and check out a track like 'Am I Evil' with its quotes from Holst's 'Planets' and the guitar duelling in 'Lightning To The Nations' itself)
Metallica- Ride The Lightning (this is their best album, IMHO), Master Of Puppets, And Justice For All (though I've always found this one a bit over-complicated and poorly produced, personally)
Black Sabbath- Volume 4, Sabbath Bloody Sabbath, Sabotage (they went way beyond the sound of their first three albums on these, IMHO)
 
I think Iron Maiden had a definite influence from progressive rock, myself, and in turn had one on the early prog metal acts too. Almost every album they put out has one track which bears its influence clearly to varying degrees (save 'No Prayer For The Dying' which, coincidentally or not, I find to be their weakest album by miles!). It is Iron Maiden and the Judas Priest of 'Dreamer Deceiver' I can hear most clearly in Queensryche's sound, for example. So much so, in fact, that I find it odd that people object to Iron Maiden's inclusion here under 'prog related' and accept Queensryche readily...though I'm usually loathe to use that 'X is here, so should Y be' argument.
 
The band I think that carries on where acts like Sabbath left off with the approach on that Volume 4/Sabbath Bloody Sabbath/Sabotage period is probably Opeth, but also have elements of Camel and Genesis in their sound too. I can also hear the influence of thrash bands like Metallica and Slayer on Mastodon, alongside the 70s progressive rock influences. I personally find the path these two acts have taken rather preferable to, say, Symphony X and Dream Theater (I like DT a lot sometimes, I must point out, but quality control is an issue for me where these are concerned) as I think they tap into the dark, malevolent strain that bands like Sabbath had early on more effectively and are far better when it comes to all-round dynamics and subtlety too. Pain Of Salvation approach it sometimes too, IMHO.
 
It's probably that subtlety issue I have with Symphony X and Dream Theater; their idea of subtlety means to do an AOR-style ballad IMHO, which is different from mine. Perhaps it's because I grew up hearing the more English, folk-tinged pastoral sounds of Genesis, Yes, Floyd, Camel, Caravan et al. and I find that rather lacking in some prog metal bands.


Edited by salmacis - April 10 2008 at 13:34
Back to Top
Statutory-Mike View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 15 2008
Location: Long Island
Status: Offline
Points: 3737
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 10 2008 at 14:55
Originally posted by salmacis salmacis wrote:

As ever, I find it hard to add much to what Certif1ed said. For my money, though, here are the albums I personally would nominate as being influential to progressive metal;
 
Judas Priest- Sad Wings Of Destiny (still their best album, IMHO)
Rainbow- Rainbow Rising (it's this album that I think links most closely to bands like Dream Theater and perhaps more obviously, Symphony X)
Budgie- Never Turn Your Back On A Friend (check out those long form compositions like 'Breadfan' and 'Parents'; their albums are often somewhat inconsistent, however...as an aside, Metallica covered 'Breadfan')
Rush- 2112 (well, the title track anyway)
Diamond Head- Lightning To The Nations (this lot influenced Metallica, and check out a track like 'Am I Evil' with its quotes from Holst's 'Planets' and the guitar duelling in 'Lightning To The Nations' itself)
Metallica- Ride The Lightning (this is their best album, IMHO), Master Of Puppets, And Justice For All (though I've always found this one a bit over-complicated and poorly produced, personally)
Black Sabbath- Volume 4, Sabbath Bloody Sabbath, Sabotage (they went way beyond the sound of their first three albums on these, IMHO)
 
I think Iron Maiden had a definite influence from progressive rock, myself, and in turn had one on the early prog metal acts too. Almost every album they put out has one track which bears its influence clearly to varying degrees (save 'No Prayer For The Dying' which, coincidentally or not, I find to be their weakest album by miles!). It is Iron Maiden and the Judas Priest of 'Dreamer Deceiver' I can hear most clearly in Queensryche's sound, for example. So much so, in fact, that I find it odd that people object to Iron Maiden's inclusion here under 'prog related' and accept Queensryche readily...though I'm usually loathe to use that 'X is here, so should Y be' argument.
 
The band I think that carries on where acts like Sabbath left off with the approach on that Volume 4/Sabbath Bloody Sabbath/Sabotage period is probably Opeth, but also have elements of Camel and Genesis in their sound too. I can also hear the influence of thrash bands like Metallica and Slayer on Mastodon, alongside the 70s progressive rock influences. I personally find the path these two acts have taken rather preferable to, say, Symphony X and Dream Theater (I like DT a lot sometimes, I must point out, but quality control is an issue for me where these are concerned) as I think they tap into the dark, malevolent strain that bands like Sabbath had early on more effectively and are far better when it comes to all-round dynamics and subtlety too. Pain Of Salvation approach it sometimes too, IMHO.
 
It's probably that subtlety issue I have with Symphony X and Dream Theater; their idea of subtlety means to do an AOR-style ballad IMHO, which is different from mine. Perhaps it's because I grew up hearing the more English, folk-tinged pastoral sounds of Genesis, Yes, Floyd, Camel, Caravan et al. and I find that rather lacking in some prog metal bands.
 
I agree with you in the sense that the only prog metal song on 2112 is 2112 itself..you can't really call any of the other tracks heavey..although they still are all bloody brilliant
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 10 2008 at 15:05
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

as I said in my first post, if I had to chose one band as the ProgMetal pioneer (which is never ideal) it would have to be Maiden..  the band took the metal birthed by Sabbath, Priest and the Scorps and brought a progressive, semi-classical element to the structure of the music.. (...)

 
 
(...)
 
The "progressive semi-classical" elements may easily be found in the Scorp's and Priest's early music - both bands were into complex structures, but the Scorps focussed on the technical elements far more heavily than Priest, who focussed more on structuring.
 
They may also be found in Deep Purple and early Rainbow - who are more deserving of the "Prog Metal Pioneer" badge than Maiden.
 
Some of the complex structuring and twin-guitar work can also be traced directly back from Maiden to Thin Lizzy - whose "Johnny The Fox" album is a must-have.
 
I really don't think that Maiden deserve as many plaudits as they get in the Prog Metal development arena.
 
I'm not denying that there are aspects of Prog Metal in their music - but the facts as I see them are that Maiden are no more important in the development of Prog Metal than Metallica or Priest.
 
Come to think of it, Randy Rhoades was putting a whole load of amazing classical work into the music he was helping to write for Ozzy - and, with a significant chunk of Uriah Heep featuring on his early albums, Ozzy is a strong contender too.
 
(...)


I'm not convinced, and that argument seems more to do with the pioneers of tech guitar playing than progmetal as an entity (though the two are related)..  (...)

..in fact, in the Bay Area metal scene in the early 80s, I didn't really start hearing the term 'progrssive metal' used seriously until Maiden had appeared


 
 
Apologies for the long quote - just trying to keep it all in context. I've made subtle edits to make the flow easier to follow.
 
I think you make a very good point about pioneers of tech guitar - it's easy to get mired in that single thread, and I tried to stick to bands/musicians who also had progressive ideas WRT form/structure - as that is my #1 criteria for "measuring" Progressive music.
 
There must be other elements of Prog Metal that haven't been explored and would be helpful in getting to the root of the music - what about Prog Metal bands that don't heavily rely on guitar technique or complex forms?
 
As I'm not familiar with a very broad spectrum of PM bands, it'd be helpful to find some other criteria to trace back.
 
 
 
 
Originally posted by HughesJB4 HughesJB4 wrote:

 
While certainly Scorpian, Deep Purple and Rainbow were instrumental in the development of heavy metal, the fact remains Fates Warning and Queensryche, two bands considered to be real pioneers of prog metal , were influenced largely by Iron Maiden, while Michael WIlton of Queensryche cites Maiden, Priest, UFO as big influences. Perhaps you may be right in that Maiden takes too much credit, take into account Fates Warning, Queensryche released their first albums prior to the release of Master Of Puppets (of course before that, Metallica had Kill 'Em All and RTL, none of which quite had the progressiveness of MoP) and Dream Theater were already jamming and doing covers of Iron Maiden in Berklee College of music suggest that Maiden must have been pretty damn influential, more than you give them credit for. At this stage, Voivod was only really in their thrash metal phase, so while somewhat pioneering, perhaps not to the same extent as the others.
Of course later in the decade, after Master of Puppets and various other thrash metal bands starting to play around with greater technicality and progressiveness in their song structures, we began to really see the formation of a somewhat more modern prog metal, such as the somewhat thrash metal influenced Dream Theater.
Ozzy Osbourne, while largely known for being on the more commericial side of metal (same say he isn't even metal), during the Randy Rhoads period we had some songs that really began to step outside the usual song structures and of Randys grounding in classical music theory allowed him to move outside pentatonicism and incorporate the Aeolian and Harmonic minor scales and various arppegios into rock/metal.
While hardly a prog artist overall, during the Randy Rhoads period there is always one song that has stuck out at me that really suggests prog metal, and that is Diary Of A Madman. It has a fairly complex structure, moves through various time signatures and some very unusual chords not commonly used in heavy metal at the time, certainly far beyond the usual root 5 voicingscommonly used in Iron Maiden records at the time. Arguably, this one song (released on the 1981 album Diary Of a Madman) was more progressive than anything Iron Maiden had done up to that point in time (by 1981 had released two albums, just some info for those not in the know).
 
 
Again, some great points here - but "Influential" isn't necessarily a good yardstick - in fact, in terms of Progressive music, influence can be a handicap. I for one hear at least as much Metallica influence in Dream Theater's music as Iron Maiden or Yes - perhaps even more so.
 
As I said earlier, although Queensryche - and Fates Warning - were commonly known as Progressive Metal bands back in the 1980s (although I never heard Iron Maiden being referred to as such!), I have been absolutely mystified as to how they aquired the accolade, hearing neither complexity nor innovation in their music, rather technical superiority in some aspects - which is not the same thing.
 
You seem to back up my points about UFO and Priest rather nicely though - thanks for that.
 
I've never tried to analyse "Diary" - I'm always more attracted to "Mr Crowley" for the obvious reasons, and "I Don't Know" as one of the earliest ever thrash metal pieces ("Exciter" by Priest was the first, as far as I'm aware). Rhoads was a great innovator - I'll certainly be tearing that one to pieces when I get home!
 
 
What other aspects of Prog Metal do you think we should be tracing back, apart from guitar techniques and formal complexity?


Edited by Certif1ed - April 10 2008 at 15:07
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65625
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 10 2008 at 16:33
perhaps my perspective is slightly different--  as the NWOBHM began hitting the U.S. West Cost, the San Francisco metal scene was also peaking, and the two began to interface by about 1982.. we had much local metal (Exodus, Metallica, Testament) but we also had a new form that was emerging, and people, mostly musicians, were calling it 'progressive metal'   ..this was just a handful of bands that never really were successful and a tiny local following - bands as Anvil Chorus, Blind Illusion, Bleu Food, Vienna - the one band at that time we all could point to as being both metal and progressive was Maiden and until real ProgMetal had formed with Voivod and others, there wasn't really such thing as progmetal..  for technically skilled heavy rock you had Priest and Rush but very little between the two.. Maiden bridged that gap and for a brief time, were progressive metal when most fans wanted either trad. Metal or trad, Prog


Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65625
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 10 2008 at 19:08
Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

What other aspects of Prog Metal do you think we should be tracing back, apart from guitar techniques and formal complexity?


notably higher ambition, musical competency and musicological/historical understanding in rock and roll..  as I've said many times on this forum without too much shame, I believe Brian Wilson was the grandfather of progressive rock music, the first popular artist to truly take rock seriously, to record it with greater care and with an emphasis on modern technologies, infuse other musics with authenticity, not to mention a major move toward experimentalism and avant garde, i.e. Smiley Smile (1967)   ..other influences may point at the earlier heavy psych bands as well






Edited by Atavachron - April 10 2008 at 22:35
Back to Top
StyLaZyn View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 22 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4079
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 10 2008 at 20:18
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

Originally posted by StyLaZyn StyLaZyn wrote:

Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

^ how about  proto prog jazz as well LOL

Brubeck anyone?...  don't tell me he wouldn't fit here.  Name a prog fan that doesn't enjoy Time Out for example... on it's merits at least.. overexposure being another matter. Not to mention it's influence on popular music.. and prog.


I have never heard that tune. Actually the only Brubeck I know is Take 5.




Time out is the album the song Take Five is from....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_Out_(album)

every prog fan... music fan ... should have that album. 




Off Topic.....
OK, I just picked up that Brubeck and listened to it today. Good stuff. And I am convinced that Blue Rondo a la Turk must be done in the Progressive Metal fashion. I searched YouTube and ELP did a version, but I would love to hear (don't shoot me) Dream Theater give it a go.

Back to Top
BigHairyMonster View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 08 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 115
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 10 2008 at 23:12
Well, if we must insist upon playing with boxes...

Why is it that we need an exact time, date, band an album to refer to as the beginning of prog metal.  I don't believe that this is the case.  Rather, I think several earlier attempts at odd-meter time signatures and heavy riffage contributed to the eventual first prog metal release. 

Odd-Meter - The Beatles, Touch, Brubeck, and numerous others contributed odd signatures to numerous songs early on...but were not necessarily very heavy.  However, I would mark "Helter Skelter" and "Revolution" as having a very big eventual influence on Metal.

Heavy - Black Sabbath, Deep Purple, Judas Priest and others were heavy but not necessarily playing in odd-meters.  DP did use an orchestra very early on, and I would mark this as an influence.

While I would agree that there is a definite starting point timewise for what is popularly known as progressive metal genre (just as there were several metal bands that existed before the Heavy Metal tag came into regular usage), and several bands that were successful (Queensryche, Rush, Dream Theatre, etc.), I believe that there were several other notable moments that many here are overlooking:

Comments have been made regarding Rainbow Rising.  This to me is a classic prog-metal album.  Yes, it is metal...we were calling it metal when it was released.

Led Zeppelin - A band that has been tossed around with the hard rock/metal tag forever.  They never put out a prog-metal album, but the had numerous prog-metal moments scattered about.

Sir Lord Baltimore - Who?  Only the first metal band.  Heavy riffage with the rare odd-meter here and there.

Blue Cheer - Vincebus Eruptus is ripping riff metal, with occasional odd-meter.

Queen II - Yep, Queen.  This to me is one of the earliest albums that fits my mind's idea of prog metal...not the entire album, but a good 75% of it.

Alice Cooper's Muscle Of Love - Again another good candidate for this class for the heavy riffage and unusual arrangements and rhythmic shifts.


It is rather sad that after 7 pages of this thread that Captain Beyond was only briefly mentioned.  If there was one album that fully qualifies as a defining starting point for Prog Metal, their debut would be it.  As heavy as any Sabbath or Priest album, with the blues sensibility of Zeppelin, and with odd-meter that was as complex as anything Crimson was doing at the time, this is a sadly overlooked gem...probably as important to the development of prog metal as Time Out was to jazz.

One other sadly overlooked prog metal gem is III Sides To Every Story by Extreme.  Possibly the greatest lost prog-metal album of the 1990s.

Of course, this is all just my opinion...but in my world that is all that matters.Big%20smile


Big Hairy Monster's debut CD
"View" coming soon!
www.bighairymonster.com
Back to Top
jammun View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 14 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3449
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 10 2008 at 23:25

Voyage of the Beagle, I say.  When did those early Sabbath/Deep Purple/Led Zep riffs evolve into Master of Puppets?  There's your answer.

Back to Top
KrakAtack View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 06 2008
Location: San Diego
Status: Offline
Points: 165
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 11 2008 at 02:07
Originally posted by StyLaZyn StyLaZyn wrote:

I just stopped over to the Progressive Nation website, which is an excellent idea, but I was a bit taken back by Dream Theater being called Progressive Metal Pioneers. Not that they don't play a huge part in this genre, but I always felt Progressive Metal had roots in the mid-70's to early 80's.
 
Thoughts? Is this statement a marketing tool?
 
 




You have the great Dave Brubeck. I have had the police show up several times when I lived in the burbs and Take 5 was emanating from my Bose 901's at 1000 watts per channel.....lol
Back to Top
The Whistler View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: August 30 2006
Location: LA, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 7113
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 11 2008 at 02:29
Has anyone mentioned Iron Butterfly?
"There seem to be quite a large percentage of young American boys out there tonight. A long way from home, eh? Well so are we... Gotta stick together." -I. Anderson
Back to Top
KrakAtack View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 06 2008
Location: San Diego
Status: Offline
Points: 165
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 11 2008 at 02:34

Budgie- Never Turn Your Back On A Friend (check out those long form compositions like 'Breadfan' and 'Parents'; their albums are often somewhat inconsistent, however...as an aside, Metallica covered 'Breadfan')


Metallica also covered Crash Course in Brain Surgery and In For The Kill. Budgie definitely takes a lot of points as one of the pioneers. Of course there were many other groups who contributed bits and pieces to the prog heavy metal uprising.....Check out MC5 - High Time, Spontaneous Combustion, Armageddon, Eloy, Hawkwind, Golden Earring, Man, Uriah Heep, Pink Fairies, King Crimson, Mahogany Rush, Lucifer's Friend, Stray, Iron Butterfly, some early Scorpions with Uli John Roth and even some Taste songs.......and, of course, Blue Oyster Cult.........

http://krakatack.googlepages.com/heavyrockgroups

The%20image%20“http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/0/07/Lucifersfriend.jpg”%20cannot%20be%20displayed,%20because%20it%20contains%20errors.


Some man clips:
http://www.dekeleonard.com/media/devilsgloves.mp3
http://www.dekeleonard.com/media/7171551.mp3


Back to Top
The Whistler View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: August 30 2006
Location: LA, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 7113
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 11 2008 at 02:36
Jethro Tull was wrapped up in the whole Sabbath/Purple/Led Head scene too ya know...big influence on Iron Maiden as well.
"There seem to be quite a large percentage of young American boys out there tonight. A long way from home, eh? Well so are we... Gotta stick together." -I. Anderson
Back to Top
KrakAtack View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 06 2008
Location: San Diego
Status: Offline
Points: 165
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 11 2008 at 02:52
I forgot Alice Cooper......Some great proto prog metal songs on Love It To Death and Killer.........also Arthur Brown, Kingdom Come(both Arthurs and the other one), Vanilla Fudge, and I have dozen's of little known groups which I will have to look at again to put their names here........
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 56789 13>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.443 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.