Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all.
Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Cheesecakemouse
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 05 2006
Location: New Zealand
Status: Offline
Points: 1751
|
Posted: January 17 2008 at 17:29 |
fuxi wrote:
I like the very latest reaction to the article originally posted; it appeared online yesterday or so:
"Funny how people criticize prog. Upper middle class? Hello? Joe Strummer was the son of a diplomat. While neither Jon Anderson or Rick Wakeman of Yes were rich growing up.
Irreleveant? If that was true there would be no one buying their records today.
White Boys? Hendrix was going to join ELP if he hadn't died (and growing up he was far poorer than those punk bands. Also all the fusion bands were multinational (fusion is a subgenre of prog, there are loads of asian prog bands.Do any black punk bands exist? Punk is pretty much white.
Illusionary? I could argue that the punk bands pseudo lower class image and pretending to be tough was illusionary. After all the Pistols in truth were just a boy band created by McClaren and not a real lower class group.
Get your facts straight."
Cheesecakemouse, I guess it's by you; I agree with every word.
There's nothing 'masturbatory' about the best prog albums. Just the opposite: they're vibrant, witty, entertaining and sparkling with life.
|
You caught me red handed
|
|
flickfan82x
Forum Newbie
Joined: January 31 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 11
|
Posted: February 01 2008 at 15:25 |
That's a pretty clever statement.
|
|
Mike Giles
Forum Newbie
Joined: February 08 2008
Location: Canada, Québec
Status: Offline
Points: 30
|
Posted: February 11 2008 at 23:31 |
Punk sucks, its a fact!
|
Nothing he's got, he really needs. Twenty first century schizoid man.
|
|
MoreBarlow
Forum Newbie
Joined: November 23 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 12
|
Posted: March 02 2008 at 03:32 |
Progressive rock couldn't be politics. You'd either have to get rid of Mahavishnu Orchestra, Gentle Giant, and Yes, or else make everything an oligarchy!
|
|
ExittheLemming
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 19 2007
Location: Penal Colony
Status: Offline
Points: 11415
|
Posted: June 09 2008 at 00:43 |
ClemofNazareth wrote:
Here's an analogy that might help you see party conferences for what they are - party politics is just like prog rock.
Both
are pompous self-referential masturbatory activities undertaken by
mostly middle-class white boys, which are meaningless and irrelevant to
most people.
Though its fans and practitioners believe what
they're doing is important and look down upon those who fail to
appreciate this, the truth is that anyone with genuine intellect or
taste is wholly alienated from the process.
Leaders' speeches or
policy initiatives are like 20-minute guitar solos. They are not
intended to connect with the outside world, or with facts and ideas,
but are merely ways to impress the cognoscenti for a short while. (...)
Read more: http://stumblingandmumbling.typepad.com/stumbling_and_mumbling/2007/09/politics-as-pro.html
Although I do detect a 'twinkle in the eye of ClemofNazareth' here, as an analogy it is precisely on the nail. The vehemence of the responses merely confirms this, and if we wish to continue to delude ourselves that 'prog/PA' is NOT the 'intellectual property' of cosy and well educated white idiots then dream on progbuddys....
|
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.