TOP 20 bug? |
Post Reply |
Author | |
Fitzcarraldo
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 30 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1835 |
Topic: TOP 20 bug? Posted: September 06 2004 at 11:13 |
MAX@, There appears to be something wrong with the TOP 20 rankings on the Home Page: PINK FLOYD's "Meddle" is currently ranked 7th and "Dark Side Of The Moon" is ranked 8th. However, the page for "Meddle" shows 14 stars from SPECIAL COLLABORATION plus 44 stars from PROG REVIEWER = 58 stars, while the page for "Dark Side Of The Moon" shows 15 stars from SPECIAL COLLABORATION plus 45 stars from PROG REVIEWER = 60 stars. So "Dark Side Of The Moon" should be ranked higher than "Meddle". Why isn't it? |
|
M@X
Forum & Site Admin Group Co-founder, Admin & Webmaster Joined: January 29 2004 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 4028 |
Posted: September 07 2004 at 23:16 |
Because some Collaborators rated the MEDDLE CDs but did not wrote a REVIEW (and the vote is calculated wheter there is a review or not) Should I use only the TEXT-ED review ? |
|
Prog On !
|
|
The Prognaut
Prog Reviewer Joined: April 14 2004 Location: Somewhere Else Status: Offline Points: 1492 |
Posted: September 08 2004 at 00:16 |
I think, all votes should count no matter if there's a review or not upon the album. It's like unspoken choice Land
|
|
break the circle
reset my head wake the sleepwalker and i'll wake the dead |
|
Easy Livin
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: February 21 2004 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 15585 |
Posted: September 08 2004 at 14:26 |
Personally, I would not rate an album without also reviewing it, where's the fun in that!? No problem with your method of calculation though Max, makes sense to me!
|
|
Fitzcarraldo
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 30 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1835 |
Posted: September 09 2004 at 08:48 |
In my opinion it would be better for Collaborators to post a review and for the TOP 20 to be based on the ratings for those only, i.e. only TEXT-ED review as MAX@ calls it. But seems from the above two posts that I'm in the minority (yet again!).
|
|
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 08 2004 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 7559 |
Posted: September 09 2004 at 09:00 |
You could start a poll... |
|
Fitzcarraldo
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 30 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1835 |
Posted: September 09 2004 at 10:08 |
Roger, wilco! |
|
Fitzcarraldo
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 30 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1835 |
Posted: September 11 2004 at 08:16 |
MAX@, As Certif1ed suggested, I ran a poll: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1583 and the majority voted for counting only those ratings that have an associated review, so may I suggest that you change the derivation of the Collaborators' TOP 20/50 to only take star ratings into account if there is an associated review? If you do agree to make the change, may I kindly request that you post in this thread just to let us know that you've made the change? Many thanks.
|
|
M@X
Forum & Site Admin Group Co-founder, Admin & Webmaster Joined: January 29 2004 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 4028 |
Posted: September 12 2004 at 08:55 |
Ok i've changed it ...
|
|
Prog On !
|
|
Post Reply | |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |