Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
SgtPepper67
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 17 2007
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 530
|
Posted: November 28 2007 at 15:47 |
Totally agree with that.
I also got tired of 80 minutes albums most of the times. That's probably why I can't get into newer prog bands, I like some stuff by Spock's Beard or Neal Morse for example but they're albums are too long I got tired and put some other music. I know in the 70's an LP couldn't last more than 60 minutes but anyway most of the albums by the great classic bands hold my atention during the 40 or 50 minutes they last and I can listen to them from the start to the end.
|
In the end the love you take is equal to the love you made...
|
|
micky
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
|
Posted: November 28 2007 at 16:01 |
ghost_of_morphy wrote:
micky wrote:
ghost_of_morphy wrote:
And I still think that albums were more likely to include substandard material back in the Vinyl Age.
|
had to read that twice to make sure I read that correctly...
more likely?.... more likely that trying to expand finite musical ideas into 75 or 80 minute album rather than 40 or 45
that doesn't make sense on the face of it..
care to ellaborate? You have me curious there
|
Yep, I'll elaborate. Back in the vinyl age, unless you were a
big name hell-bent on producing yourself, you were signed to a multiple
album contract by one of the big 5 record companies. Music sales were
album oriented and became even more so with the decline of the 45 in
the '70's, but still the main exposure of a successful band's work
remained FM radio singles. This led to a situation where a band's
sales of 8-10 songs were really determined in a large part by the
success of three or four songs. Throw in the insane pressure to
release albums as quickly as possible that prevailed in the first half
of the '70's and the last half of the '60's and you get a lot of crap
included. Of course, a lot of you will object to the word crap, so
let's just politely call them tracks that seemed like a good idea at
the time.
About two decades ago, various factors (the rise of independent
artists, the rise of urban music, cheap recording, and the internet),
began chipping away at the traditional album production and
distribution methods. Groups that followed the old model found those
albums marginalized. Pressure grew on groups to increase the quality
of the whole album.
Although I can think of a lot of examples, these changes probably
had less of an effect on prog, which was album oriented and bucking the
FM oriented scene to begin with. Stil, I imagine that a close
examination of what was released in the '70's compared to what is
released today will show that album quality has indeed improved.
|
darqdean wrote:
^ but this is a Prog site and we are
discussing Prog albums, hence through-out the 70s from a Prog
perspective, albums were the be all and end all of producing music. Few
Progs band released singles and they had no effect on album sales. A
Prog band would not put substandard material on an album to fill-up
space because it would go against the whole ethos of producing the
album in the first place. |
exactly
Morphy - we are discussing prog... as far as what other artists
were doing?... it doesn't pertain to the conversation. Nice post
though.. for a general music site.
Dean - reading your post, the part I bolded... an album comes
immediately to mind. Some think Yes were guilty of doing just
that... others.. see it completely differently. What do you
think. To some it is a the most glaring example of doing just
what you say prog bands would not do.. which.. I agree completely
with you that they wouldn't. Anderson and Howe were not just throwing sh*t on the wall to
fill 2 Lp's... but unbelievable ...some do actually think they
did. That the driving concern.. was not the music... creating a
sonic painting.. but meerly trying to fill out the album from a limited
pot of musical ideas.
So what do you think Dean.. is TFTO the 'classic' equilvalent to the chronal outrages heeped upon us by modern prog groups.
Edited by micky - November 28 2007 at 16:03
|
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: November 28 2007 at 17:47 |
micky wrote:
Dean - reading your post, the part I bolded... an album comes immediately to mind. Some think Yes were guilty of doing just that... others.. see it completely differently. What do you think. To some it is a the most glaring example of doing just what you say prog bands would not do.. which.. I agree completely with you that they wouldn't. Anderson and Howe were not just throwing sh*t on the wall to fill 2 Lp's... but unbelievable ...some do actually think they did. That the driving concern.. was not the music... creating a sonic painting.. but meerly trying to fill out the album from a limited pot of musical ideas.
So what do you think Dean.. is TFTO the 'classic' equilvalent to the chronal outrages heeped upon us by modern prog groups.
|
Ha. Got me.
I missed Tales From Topographic Oceans when it first came out because I couldn't afford it on my meager apprentice's pay. So for me it came after Relayer, not Close To The Edit Edge, which I think set me up better to take an instant liking to it, eventhough by then it's notoriety of being pretentious and inpenitrable was well known, but it didn't - it took a while.
I think it is paced and balanced perfectly, I don't like pieces of music that are crammed full of musical ideas that don't link together, I like ones that grow and develop - at a minimalistic level that's what Phillip Glass and Steve Reich do, at a more complex level that's what Mike Oldfield did on his pastoral pieces and that's what Tangerine Dream do best, damit - that's even what Echoes is all about.
And I think that TFTO achieves that, whether by accident or design I'm not sure - is the "padding" a band bereft of ideas or is it a carefully crafted aural landscape (echoing Roger Dean's cover painting, which is also a "constructed" landscape collaged together from different ideas from himself and each band member) - I'm inclined to think it is the later, I think Anderson and Howe (and Eddie Offord) are wise enough and sharp enough to realise that, but I honestly don't think it matters either way because it works.
If you're setting off for a marathon you don't want to do the whole thing at a frantic sprint, so if TFTO were the equivalent of an 80 minute Gates of Delirium then I think listener fatigue would have set in very rapidly and all the critisisms would be justified, but as it is you don't get that (at least I don't, but maybe I have an abnormally high attention span). Stick this on your iPod and play it from beginning to end without the unwanted excercise-break where you have to get up and flip over the LP or change the CD and it can keep your attention without your mind wandering anywhere excpet where the music takes you, especially with the up-lift you get from hearing Nous Sommes du Soleil at the end of the journey.
My only crit of the whole thing is for the remastered CD - the two extra versions of Dance and Ancient are unnecessary and spoil Ritial's perfect ending.
So to answer your question (finally!) Yes No - modern bands seem to take this as the blue-print of what not to do, whereas it should be the master-plan of how to do things right.
Edited by darqdean - November 28 2007 at 18:03
|
What?
|
|
micky
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
|
Posted: November 28 2007 at 23:06 |
darqdean wrote:
micky wrote:
Dean - reading your post, the part I
bolded... an album comes immediately to mind. Some think Yes were
guilty of doing just that... others.. see it completely
differently. What do you think. To some it is a the most
glaring example of doing just what you say prog bands would not do..
which.. I agree completely with you that they wouldn't. Anderson
and Howe were not just throwing sh*t on the wall to fill 2
Lp's... but unbelievable ...some do actually think they did. That
the driving concern.. was not the music... creating a sonic painting..
but meerly trying to fill out the album from a limited pot of musical
ideas.
So what do you think Dean.. is TFTO the 'classic' equilvalent to the chronal outrages heeped upon us by modern prog groups.
|
Ha. Got me.
I missed Tales From Topographic Oceans when it first came out
because I couldn't afford it on my meager apprentice's pay. So for me
it came after Relayer, not Close To The Edit Edge,
which I think set me up better to take an instant liking to it,
eventhough by then it's notoriety of being pretentious and inpenitrable
was well known, but it didn't - it took a while.
I think it is paced and balanced perfectly, I don't like pieces of
music that are crammed full of musical ideas that don't link together,
I like ones that grow and develop - at a minimalistic level that's
what Phillip Glass and Steve Reich do, at a more complex level
that's what Mike Oldfield did on his pastoral pieces and that's
what Tangerine Dream do best, damit - that's even what Echoes is all
about.
And I think that TFTO achieves that, whether by accident or design
I'm not sure - is the "padding" a band bereft of ideas or is it a
carefully crafted aural landscape (echoing Roger Dean's cover painting,
which is also a "constructed" landscape collaged together from
different ideas from himself and each band member) - I'm inclined to
think it is the later, I think Anderson and Howe (and Eddie Offord)
are wise enough and sharp enough to realise that, but I honestly don't
think it matters either way because it works.
If you're setting off for a marathon you don't want to do the
whole thing at a frantic sprint, so if TFTO were the
equivalent of an 80 minute Gates of Delirium then I
think listener fatigue would have set in very rapidly and all the
critisisms would be justified, but as it is you don't get that (at
least I don't, but maybe I have an abnormally high attention span).
Stick this on your iPod and play it from beginning to end without the
unwanted excercise-break where you have to get up and flip over the LP
or change the CD and it can keep your attention without your mind
wandering anywhere excpet where the music takes you, especially with
the up-lift you get from hearing Nous Sommes du Soleil at the end of the journey.
My only crit of the whole thing is for the remastered CD - the two
extra versions of Dance and Ancient are unnecessary and spoil Ritial's
perfect ending.
So to answer your question (finally!) Yes No -
modern bands seem to take this as the blue-print of what not to do,
whereas it should be the master-plan of how to do
things right. |
not much to say but....
and you are 100% on the money...
|
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
|
Padraic
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
|
Posted: November 28 2007 at 23:19 |
darqdean wrote:
micky wrote:
Dean - reading your post, the part I bolded... an album comes immediately to mind. Some think Yes were guilty of doing just that... others.. see it completely differently. What do you think. To some it is a the most glaring example of doing just what you say prog bands would not do.. which.. I agree completely with you that they wouldn't. Anderson and Howe were not just throwing sh*t on the wall to fill 2 Lp's... but unbelievable ...some do actually think they did. That the driving concern.. was not the music... creating a sonic painting.. but meerly trying to fill out the album from a limited pot of musical ideas.
So what do you think Dean.. is TFTO the 'classic' equilvalent to the chronal outrages heeped upon us by modern prog groups.
|
Ha. Got me.
I missed Tales From Topographic Oceans when it first came out because I couldn't afford it on my meager apprentice's pay. So for me it came after Relayer, not Close To The Edit Edge, which I think set me up better to take an instant liking to it, eventhough by then it's notoriety of being pretentious and inpenitrable was well known, but it didn't - it took a while.
I think it is paced and balanced perfectly, I don't like pieces of music that are crammed full of musical ideas that don't link together, I like ones that grow and develop - at a minimalistic level that's what Phillip Glass and Steve Reich do, at a more complex level that's what Mike Oldfield did on his pastoral pieces and that's what Tangerine Dream do best, damit - that's even what Echoes is all about.
And I think that TFTO achieves that, whether by accident or design I'm not sure - is the "padding" a band bereft of ideas or is it a carefully crafted aural landscape (echoing Roger Dean's cover painting, which is also a "constructed" landscape collaged together from different ideas from himself and each band member) - I'm inclined to think it is the later, I think Anderson and Howe (and Eddie Offord) are wise enough and sharp enough to realise that, but I honestly don't think it matters either way because it works.
If you're setting off for a marathon you don't want to do the whole thing at a frantic sprint, so if TFTO were the equivalent of an 80 minute Gates of Delirium then I think listener fatigue would have set in very rapidly and all the critisisms would be justified, but as it is you don't get that (at least I don't, but maybe I have an abnormally high attention span). Stick this on your iPod and play it from beginning to end without the unwanted excercise-break where you have to get up and flip over the LP or change the CD and it can keep your attention without your mind wandering anywhere excpet where the music takes you, especially with the up-lift you get from hearing Nous Sommes du Soleil at the end of the journey.
My only crit of the whole thing is for the remastered CD - the two extra versions of Dance and Ancient are unnecessary and spoil Ritial's perfect ending.
So to answer your question (finally!) Yes No - modern bands seem to take this as the blue-print of what not to do, whereas it should be the master-plan of how to do things right. |
What an outstanding post!
|
|
ghost_of_morphy
Prog Reviewer
Joined: March 08 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2755
|
Posted: November 29 2007 at 12:06 |
darqdean wrote:
^ but this is a Prog site and we are discussing Prog albums, hence through-out the 70s from a Prog perspective, albums were the be all and end all of producing music. Few Progs band released singles and they had no effect on album sales. A Prog band would not put substandard material on an album to fill-up space because it would go against the whole ethos of producing the album in the first place. |
That's it. Just keep on telling yourself it was all the other guys.
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: November 29 2007 at 19:00 |
ghost_of_morphy wrote:
darqdean wrote:
^ but this is a Prog site and we are discussing Prog albums, hence through-out the 70s from a Prog perspective, albums were the be all and end all of producing music. Few Progs band released singles and they had no effect on album sales. A Prog band would not put substandard material on an album to fill-up space because it would go against the whole ethos of producing the album in the first place. |
That's it. Just keep on telling yourself it was all the other guys. |
Give some examples of Prog fillers and I just might.
|
What?
|
|
rileydog22
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 24 2005
Location: New Jersey
Status: Offline
Points: 8844
|
Posted: November 29 2007 at 19:02 |
Robert and David of King Crimson acknowledge that The Mincer was filler.
|
|
|
jimmy_row
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 11 2007
Location: Hibernation
Status: Offline
Points: 2601
|
Posted: November 29 2007 at 19:12 |
"filler" doesn't necessarily have to be bad: Ritchie Blackmore and Ian Gillan have willingly acknowledged that Smoke on the Water was "filler" (they needed just one more song to round out Machine Head)...I do prefer to avoid the term though, due to the negative connotation it has gained. I think that someone should know what they are talking about before they throw the word around...I've seen people call a track filler simply because they don't like it or it doesn't "fit in" - what's relevant is the artists intention in including said track. A track that seems out of context could very well be intended as such (Are You Ready Eddy?), it is up to the artists in that regard. And at the same time, a track meant to pad out a record could very well be a good one (Smoke on the Water).
|
Signature Writers Guild on strike
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.