Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - I'm tired of (most) 79 minute albums!
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedI'm tired of (most) 79 minute albums!

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 456
Author
Message
SgtPepper67 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 17 2007
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 530
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 28 2007 at 15:47
Totally agree with that.

I also got tired of 80 minutes albums most of the times. That's probably why I can't get into newer prog bands, I like some stuff by Spock's Beard or Neal Morse for example but they're albums are too long I got tired and put some other music. I know in the 70's an LP couldn't last more than 60 minutes but anyway most of the albums by the great classic bands hold my atention during the 40 or 50 minutes they last and I can listen to them from the start to the end.

In the end the love you take is equal to the love you made...
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 28 2007 at 16:01
Originally posted by ghost_of_morphy ghost_of_morphy wrote:

Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

Originally posted by ghost_of_morphy ghost_of_morphy wrote:

 
And I still think that albums were more likely to include substandard material back in the Vinyl Age.  


had to read that twice to make sure I read that correctly...

more likely?.... more likely that trying to expand finite musical ideas into 75 or 80 minute album rather than 40 or 45
that doesn't make sense on the face of it..

care to ellaborate?  You have me curious there LOL
 
Yep, I'll elaborate.   Back in the vinyl age, unless you were a big name hell-bent on producing yourself, you were signed to a multiple album contract by one of the big 5 record companies.  Music sales were album oriented and became even more so with the decline of the 45 in the '70's, but still the main exposure of a successful band's work remained FM radio singles.  This led to a situation where a band's sales of 8-10 songs were really determined in a large part by the success of three or four songs.  Throw in the insane pressure to release albums as quickly as possible that prevailed in the first half of the '70's and the last half of the '60's and you get a lot of crap included.  Of course, a lot of you will object to the word crap, so let's just politely call them tracks that seemed like a good idea at the time.
 
About two decades ago, various factors (the rise of independent artists, the rise of urban music, cheap recording, and the internet), began chipping away at the traditional album production and distribution methods.  Groups that followed the old model found those albums marginalized.  Pressure grew on groups to increase the quality of the whole album.
 
Although I can think of a lot of examples, these changes probably had less of an effect on prog, which was album oriented and bucking the FM oriented scene to begin with.  Stil, I imagine that a close examination of what was released in the '70's compared to what is released today will show that album quality has indeed improved.
Originally posted by darqdean darqdean wrote:

^ but this is a Prog site and we are discussing Prog albums, hence through-out the 70s from a Prog perspective, albums were the be all and end all of producing music. Few Progs band released singles and they had no effect on album sales. A Prog band would not put substandard material on an album to fill-up space because it would go against the whole ethos of producing the album in the first place.



exactly

Morphy -   we are discussing prog... as far as what other artists were doing?... it doesn't pertain to the conversation.  Nice post though.. for a general music site.

Dean -  reading your post, the part I bolded... an album comes immediately to mind.  Some think Yes were guilty of doing just that... others.. see it completely differently.  What do you think.  To some it is a the most glaring example of doing just what you say prog bands would not do.. which.. I agree completely with you that they wouldn't.  Anderson and Howe were not  just throwing sh*t on the wall to fill 2 Lp's... but unbelievable ...some do actually think they did.  That the driving concern.. was not the music... creating a sonic painting.. but meerly trying to fill out the album from a limited pot of musical ideas. 

So what do you think Dean.. is TFTO the 'classic' equilvalent to the chronal outrages heeped upon us by modern prog groups. LOL


Edited by micky - November 28 2007 at 16:03
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 28 2007 at 17:47
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

Dean -  reading your post, the part I bolded... an album comes immediately to mind.  Some think Yes were guilty of doing just that... others.. see it completely differently.  What do you think.  To some it is a the most glaring example of doing just what you say prog bands would not do.. which.. I agree completely with you that they wouldn't.  Anderson and Howe were not  just throwing sh*t on the wall to fill 2 Lp's... but unbelievable ...some do actually think they did.  That the driving concern.. was not the music... creating a sonic painting.. but meerly trying to fill out the album from a limited pot of musical ideas. 

So what do you think Dean.. is TFTO the 'classic' equilvalent to the chronal outrages heeped upon us by modern prog groups. LOL
Ha. Got me. LOL
 
I missed Tales From Topographic Oceans when it first came out because I couldn't afford it on my meager apprentice's pay. So for me it came after Relayer, not Close To The Edit Edge, which I think set me up better to take an instant liking to it, eventhough by then it's notoriety of being pretentious and inpenitrable was well known, but it didn't - it took a while.
 
I think it is paced and balanced perfectly, I don't like pieces of music that are crammed full of musical ideas that don't link together, I like ones that grow and develop - at a minimalistic level that's what Phillip Glass and Steve Reich do, at a more complex level that's what Mike Oldfield did on his pastoral pieces and that's what Tangerine Dream do best, damit - that's even what Echoes is all about.
 
And I think that TFTO achieves that, whether by accident or design I'm not sure - is the "padding" a band bereft of ideas or is it a carefully crafted aural landscape (echoing Roger Dean's cover painting, which is also a "constructed" landscape collaged together from different ideas from himself and each band member) - I'm inclined to think it is the later, I think Anderson and Howe (and Eddie Offord) are wise enough and sharp enough to realise that, but I honestly don't think it matters either way because it works.
 
If you're setting off for a marathon you don't want to do the whole thing at a frantic sprint, so if TFTO were the equivalent of an 80 minute Gates of Delirium then I think listener fatigue would have set in very rapidly and all the critisisms would be justified, but as it is you don't get that (at least I don't, but maybe I have an abnormally high attention span). Stick this on your iPod and play it from beginning to end without the unwanted excercise-break where you have to get up and flip over the LP or change the CD and it can keep your attention without your mind wandering anywhere excpet where the music takes you, especially with the up-lift you get from hearing Nous Sommes du Soleil at the end of the journey.
 
My only crit of the whole thing is for the remastered CD - the two extra versions of Dance and Ancient are unnecessary and spoil Ritial's perfect ending.
 
So to answer your question (finally!) Yes No - modern bands seem to take this as the blue-print of what not to do, whereas it should be the master-plan of how to do things right.


Edited by darqdean - November 28 2007 at 18:03
What?
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 28 2007 at 23:06
Originally posted by darqdean darqdean wrote:

Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

Dean -  reading your post, the part I bolded... an album comes immediately to mind.  Some think Yes were guilty of doing just that... others.. see it completely differently.  What do you think.  To some it is a the most glaring example of doing just what you say prog bands would not do.. which.. I agree completely with you that they wouldn't.  Anderson and Howe were not  just throwing sh*t on the wall to fill 2 Lp's... but unbelievable ...some do actually think they did.  That the driving concern.. was not the music... creating a sonic painting.. but meerly trying to fill out the album from a limited pot of musical ideas. 

So what do you think Dean.. is TFTO the 'classic' equilvalent to the chronal outrages heeped upon us by modern prog groups. LOL
Ha. Got me. LOL
 
I missed Tales From Topographic Oceans when it first came out because I couldn't afford it on my meager apprentice's pay. So for me it came after Relayer, not Close To The Edit Edge, which I think set me up better to take an instant liking to it, eventhough by then it's notoriety of being pretentious and inpenitrable was well known, but it didn't - it took a while.
 
I think it is paced and balanced perfectly, I don't like pieces of music that are crammed full of musical ideas that don't link together, I like ones that grow and develop - at a minimalistic level that's what Phillip Glass and Steve Reich do, at a more complex level that's what Mike Oldfield did on his pastoral pieces and that's what Tangerine Dream do best, damit - that's even what Echoes is all about.
 
And I think that TFTO achieves that, whether by accident or design I'm not sure - is the "padding" a band bereft of ideas or is it a carefully crafted aural landscape (echoing Roger Dean's cover painting, which is also a "constructed" landscape collaged together from different ideas from himself and each band member) - I'm inclined to think it is the later, I think Anderson and Howe (and Eddie Offord) are wise enough and sharp enough to realise that, but I honestly don't think it matters either way because it works.
 
If you're setting off for a marathon you don't want to do the whole thing at a frantic sprint, so if TFTO were the equivalent of an 80 minute Gates of Delirium then I think listener fatigue would have set in very rapidly and all the critisisms would be justified, but as it is you don't get that (at least I don't, but maybe I have an abnormally high attention span). Stick this on your iPod and play it from beginning to end without the unwanted excercise-break where you have to get up and flip over the LP or change the CD and it can keep your attention without your mind wandering anywhere excpet where the music takes you, especially with the up-lift you get from hearing Nous Sommes du Soleil at the end of the journey.
 
My only crit of the whole thing is for the remastered CD - the two extra versions of Dance and Ancient are unnecessary and spoil Ritial's perfect ending.
 
So to answer your question (finally!) Yes No - modern bands seem to take this as the blue-print of what not to do, whereas it should be the master-plan of how to do things right.


not much to say but....

ClapClapClap

and you are 100% on the money...
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
Padraic View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 28 2007 at 23:19
Originally posted by darqdean darqdean wrote:

Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

Dean -  reading your post, the part I bolded... an album comes immediately to mind.  Some think Yes were guilty of doing just that... others.. see it completely differently.  What do you think.  To some it is a the most glaring example of doing just what you say prog bands would not do.. which.. I agree completely with you that they wouldn't.  Anderson and Howe were not  just throwing sh*t on the wall to fill 2 Lp's... but unbelievable ...some do actually think they did.  That the driving concern.. was not the music... creating a sonic painting.. but meerly trying to fill out the album from a limited pot of musical ideas. 

So what do you think Dean.. is TFTO the 'classic' equilvalent to the chronal outrages heeped upon us by modern prog groups. LOL
Ha. Got me. LOL
 
I missed Tales From Topographic Oceans when it first came out because I couldn't afford it on my meager apprentice's pay. So for me it came after Relayer, not Close To The Edit Edge, which I think set me up better to take an instant liking to it, eventhough by then it's notoriety of being pretentious and inpenitrable was well known, but it didn't - it took a while.
 
I think it is paced and balanced perfectly, I don't like pieces of music that are crammed full of musical ideas that don't link together, I like ones that grow and develop - at a minimalistic level that's what Phillip Glass and Steve Reich do, at a more complex level that's what Mike Oldfield did on his pastoral pieces and that's what Tangerine Dream do best, damit - that's even what Echoes is all about.
 
And I think that TFTO achieves that, whether by accident or design I'm not sure - is the "padding" a band bereft of ideas or is it a carefully crafted aural landscape (echoing Roger Dean's cover painting, which is also a "constructed" landscape collaged together from different ideas from himself and each band member) - I'm inclined to think it is the later, I think Anderson and Howe (and Eddie Offord) are wise enough and sharp enough to realise that, but I honestly don't think it matters either way because it works.
 
If you're setting off for a marathon you don't want to do the whole thing at a frantic sprint, so if TFTO were the equivalent of an 80 minute Gates of Delirium then I think listener fatigue would have set in very rapidly and all the critisisms would be justified, but as it is you don't get that (at least I don't, but maybe I have an abnormally high attention span). Stick this on your iPod and play it from beginning to end without the unwanted excercise-break where you have to get up and flip over the LP or change the CD and it can keep your attention without your mind wandering anywhere excpet where the music takes you, especially with the up-lift you get from hearing Nous Sommes du Soleil at the end of the journey.
 
My only crit of the whole thing is for the remastered CD - the two extra versions of Dance and Ancient are unnecessary and spoil Ritial's perfect ending.
 
So to answer your question (finally!) Yes No - modern bands seem to take this as the blue-print of what not to do, whereas it should be the master-plan of how to do things right.


What an outstanding post!  Clap
Back to Top
ghost_of_morphy View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: March 08 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2755
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 29 2007 at 12:06
Originally posted by darqdean darqdean wrote:

^ but this is a Prog site and we are discussing Prog albums, hence through-out the 70s from a Prog perspective, albums were the be all and end all of producing music. Few Progs band released singles and they had no effect on album sales. A Prog band would not put substandard material on an album to fill-up space because it would go against the whole ethos of producing the album in the first place.

 
That's it.  Just keep on telling yourself it was all the other guys.
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 29 2007 at 19:00
Originally posted by ghost_of_morphy ghost_of_morphy wrote:

Originally posted by darqdean darqdean wrote:

^ but this is a Prog site and we are discussing Prog albums, hence through-out the 70s from a Prog perspective, albums were the be all and end all of producing music. Few Progs band released singles and they had no effect on album sales. A Prog band would not put substandard material on an album to fill-up space because it would go against the whole ethos of producing the album in the first place.

 
That's it.  Just keep on telling yourself it was all the other guys.
Give some examples of Prog fillers and I just might.
What?
Back to Top
rileydog22 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: August 24 2005
Location: New Jersey
Status: Offline
Points: 8844
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 29 2007 at 19:02
Robert and David of King Crimson acknowledge that The Mincer was filler.  

Back to Top
jimmy_row View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 11 2007
Location: Hibernation
Status: Offline
Points: 2601
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 29 2007 at 19:12

"filler" doesn't necessarily have to be bad: Ritchie Blackmore and Ian Gillan have willingly acknowledged that Smoke on the Water was "filler" (they needed just one more song to round out Machine Head)...I do prefer to avoid the term though, due to the negative connotation it has gained.  I think that someone should know what they are talking about before they throw the word around...I've seen people call a track filler simply because they don't like it or it doesn't "fit in" - what's relevant is the artists intention in including said track.  A track that seems out of context could very well be intended as such (Are You Ready Eddy?), it is up to the artists in that regard.  And at the same time, a track meant to pad out a record could very well be a good one (Smoke on the Water).

Signature Writers Guild on strike
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 456

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.176 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.