Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > Proto-Prog and Prog-Related Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Genre Jumping
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedGenre Jumping

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
rushfan4 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 22 2007
Location: Michigan, U.S.
Status: Offline
Points: 66290
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Genre Jumping
    Posted: September 29 2007 at 17:24
An interesting point was brought up on a Coheed and Cambria thread regarding the difficulty for a band that starts out as a non-prog/prog-related band to get recognized on PA for their progginess if they later begin to create more progressive music.  Such a band is still deemed prog-related or not at all prog.  Whereas, our heroes of prog, Rush, Yes, Genesis, Jethro Tull, etc... started progressive and then in their later years, depending on your individual point of view, lost their progginess and yet they will forever be categorized as progressive. 
 
If a bands first 6 albums are prog and their last 6 albums are pop they might still be considered Eclectic Prog, but what if it were the other way around?  If their first 6 albums are pop and then they see the light and their next 6 albums are prog can they ever overcome their first 6 albums to become Eclectic Prog, or should they just be happy to even get a mention on Prog-Related?
 
I am not familar with Coheed and Cambria and cannot comment on their progginess or lack thereof, but to use them as an example, if their next album comes out and it is Tales of Topographical Mountains, or The Lamb Got Up And Went to the Yankees' Game Because It Didn't Want to Get Run Over By A Red Barchetta on Broadway what would the chances be that they would be moved from Prog-Related to Eclectic Prog or Crossover Prog.  Any chance, or have they been pigeon-holed to prog related because of their first albums?  Just curious.  Don't you just love hypothetical questions?
 
P.S.  I don't want this thread to be a bash PA and the Collabs thread or a bash Coheed and Cambria thread.  I am hoping that this will help us PA users to better understand what a difficult job the Special Collabs have when it comes to trying to categorize these progressive bands and their tendencies to be all over the map over the course of their lengthy careers. 
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21206
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2007 at 17:42
"Eclectic Prog" does not mean that the discography of an artist contains prog and non prog albums ... it's for artists which released albums from different prog genres or are inherently eclectic in style (it's impossible to say whether they're symphonic or avant for example).

As for moving bands from prog-related to prog: I think such a move would be justified if one of these bands releases one fully progressive album.Smile
Back to Top
Raff View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 29 2005
Location: None
Status: Offline
Points: 24429
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2007 at 03:15
I am in perfect agreement with Rushfan's post, and I thank him for his civil, helpful tone. The debate going on in the Collabs section often hinges upon this same issue, though unfortunately it is quite difficult to find an agreement about the best way to proceed.

However, this seems to be a particularly thorny issue when the band of artist in question is very high-profile. A few weeks ago it came up in the case of a very well-known band that is currently in Proto-Prog, and is not very likely to be moved from there any time soon because of the huge backlash it would cause among members. The case of Coheed and Cambria is probably a bit less controversial, since they are not as well-known as the band I have been talking about.

In any case, my own impression is that a lot of our reactions are based on the fact that many famous acts bear a sort of  'tag', which is very hard to shrug off. To make myself clearer, if a band is known as heavy metal, there will be lots of people who will refuse the idea of their being prog, even if half of their output is such.
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2007 at 19:14
Originally posted by Ghost Rider Ghost Rider wrote:

I am in perfect agreement with Rushfan's post, and I thank him for his civil, helpful tone. The debate going on in the Collabs section often hinges upon this same issue, though unfortunately it is quite difficult to find an agreement about the best way to proceed.

However, this seems to be a particularly thorny issue when the band of artist in question is very high-profile. A few weeks ago it came up in the case of a very well-known band that is currently in Proto-Prog, and is not very likely to be moved from there any time soon because of the huge backlash it would cause among members. The case of Coheed and Cambria is probably a bit less controversial, since they are not as well-known as the band I have been talking about.

In any case, my own impression is that a lot of our reactions are based on the fact that many famous acts bear a sort of  'tag', which is very hard to shrug off. To make myself clearer, if a band is known as heavy metal, there will be lots of people who will refuse the idea of their being prog, even if half of their output is such.


I know... it really makes no sense to me... we add artists if they did one prog album since this is a prog site.. not a career retrospective site or even a general music site. It's a frickin prog site.  We classify artists based on their music... yet continue to insist that some bands can't be put in a subgenre.. .because they aren't 'known' as prog.  What the hell do we have experts and teams  for if all you have to do is see whether a band.. is KNOWN as prog or not.  LOL  Hell of a way to run a site...


Edited by micky - October 01 2007 at 19:17
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
chamberry View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 24 2005
Location: Puerto Rico
Status: Offline
Points: 9008
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 01 2007 at 19:22
At the rate Circle's going I think I'll have to propose them to the Crossover genre. Tongue

Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 02 2007 at 03:32
It's an interesting point. We would look to our genre teams to adopt any such bands if they felt they warranted such a move.
 
The majority of bands classified as Prog Related and all those classified as Proto Prog have been around for a long time though, so the extent of their prog credentials should be well established.
Back to Top
toolis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 26 2006
Location: MacedoniaGreece
Status: Offline
Points: 1678
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 02 2007 at 04:18

well, my dear friend Rushfan4, in this site the criterias for adding or changing a band/artist's genre are:

1. classicality (e.g Rush, Yes, Genesis)
2. popularity (Iron Maiden)
3.
4. popular demand (Coheed & Cambria)

while other bands suggested to the proper thread wait in line until all popular, all time fave bands are added...

God, it's good to be back!!!

3. deleted for disguised personal attack.




Edited by Tony R - October 02 2007 at 07:50
-music is like pornography...

sometimes amateurs turn us on, even more...



-sometimes you are the pigeon and sometimes you are the statue...
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.141 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.