Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Bands, Artists and Genres Appreciation
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - NO!!!!!!!!!! ELP sells out..
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedNO!!!!!!!!!! ELP sells out..

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345>
Author
Message
rileydog22 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: August 24 2005
Location: New Jersey
Status: Offline
Points: 8844
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 16 2007 at 23:55
Originally posted by Chameleon Chameleon wrote:

Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

Originally posted by rileydog22 rileydog22 wrote:

Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

Originally posted by heyitsthatguy heyitsthatguy wrote:

if they had to do it for any drink, Dr. Pepper was by far the best choice they could've made


pfffff...  Diet Coke my friend.


Diet Coke blows.  Diet Pepsi kicks its sorry little ass. 


AngryLOL


diet pepsi with lime rules though Thumbs%20Up
 
*spills diet coke in lap*


*spills diet pepsi in Micky's lap*

Woops, sorry about that. 

Back to Top
moreitsythanyou View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: April 23 2006
Location: NYC
Status: Offline
Points: 11682
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 16 2007 at 23:57
Originally posted by 1800iareyay 1800iareyay wrote:

Agreed with riley/Ivan's post. ELP sold out long ago. Hell, Love Beach was a sellout album before Re-Works. I'm willing to forgive songs that appear on ads when a band doesn't have the rights to their own music, but to my knowledge ELP's own Manticore label owns the rights, so they put their music on air. BIll Hicks had an excellent rant on the sacrifice of artistic credibility that comes with selling out to ads. I could never hope to come close to the fire and accuracy of his diatribe, so check it out to sum things up nicely.
Personally, I'd keep ELP on the artistic roll call. They weren't spokespeople, just someone used their song. And they're way more creative than Jay Leno Wink
<font color=white>butts, lol[/COLOR]

Back to Top
KoS View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 17 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Points: 16310
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 17 2007 at 00:00
Originally posted by moreitsythanyou moreitsythanyou wrote:

Originally posted by 1800iareyay 1800iareyay wrote:

Agreed with riley/Ivan's post. ELP sold out long ago. Hell, Love Beach was a sellout album before Re-Works. I'm willing to forgive songs that appear on ads when a band doesn't have the rights to their own music, but to my knowledge ELP's own Manticore label owns the rights, so they put their music on air. BIll Hicks had an excellent rant on the sacrifice of artistic credibility that comes with selling out to ads. I could never hope to come close to the fire and accuracy of his diatribe, so check it out to sum things up nicely.
Personally, I'd keep ELP on the artistic roll call. They weren't spokespeople, just someone used their song. And they're way more creative than Jay Leno Wink
I'd consider it selling out if ELP, was selling it in person, like Jessica Simpson for Pizza Hut. Bill was targeting those people.


Edited by king of Siam - September 17 2007 at 00:00
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 17 2007 at 00:04
Originally posted by rileydog22 rileydog22 wrote:

Originally posted by Chameleon Chameleon wrote:

Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

Originally posted by rileydog22 rileydog22 wrote:

Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

Originally posted by heyitsthatguy heyitsthatguy wrote:

if they had to do it for any drink, Dr. Pepper was by far the best choice they could've made


pfffff...  Diet Coke my friend.


Diet Coke blows.  Diet Pepsi kicks its sorry little ass. 


AngryLOL


diet pepsi with lime rules though Thumbs%20Up
 
*spills diet coke in lap*


*spills diet pepsi in Micky's lap*

Woops, sorry about that. 


hahahha.. happens all the time like today ... found an album review on the internet that instead of saying hard rock ....said hard cock.... whoops.....  I did spill my diet coke laughing so hard.
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
KoS View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 17 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Points: 16310
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 17 2007 at 00:05
That's an awesome Freudian slip.LOL
Back to Top
chopper View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 13 2005
Location: Essex, UK
Status: Online
Points: 20030
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 17 2007 at 07:48
Originally posted by salmacis salmacis wrote:

This isn't new, I'm afraid, Micky!! 'Karn Evil 9 1st Impression Part II' was used as the theme tune for ghastly UK game show 'The Generation Game' presented by the irksome 'comedian' (and ELP fan...) Jim Davidson. AFAIK, they recorded a special version for the show in the 1990s...
Carl Palmer actually appeared on the Generation Game. The contestants had to play his drum solo from Tocatta. Or something like that.
 
btw, I think the version of Karn Evil 9 used as the theme tune is the one from the live album "The Show That Never Ends".
Back to Top
A B Negative View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 02 2006
Location: Methil Republic
Status: Offline
Points: 1594
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 17 2007 at 10:46
Scotland's national news programme used Fanfare for the Common Man as its theme music in the late 70s and early 80s.
"The disgusting stink of a too-loud electric guitar.... Now, that's my idea of a good time."
Back to Top
chopper View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 13 2005
Location: Essex, UK
Status: Online
Points: 20030
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 17 2007 at 11:48
That doesn't count as it's not an ELP song in the first place.
Back to Top
A B Negative View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 02 2006
Location: Methil Republic
Status: Offline
Points: 1594
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 17 2007 at 11:51
So it's not selling out if you play someone else's music? Makes me feel better about the time I played Country & Western for money... Wink
"The disgusting stink of a too-loud electric guitar.... Now, that's my idea of a good time."
Back to Top
debrewguy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 30 2007
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3596
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 17 2007 at 12:39
Originally posted by bluetailfly bluetailfly wrote:

Originally posted by Shakespeare Shakespeare wrote:

I wouldn't really consider that selling out...........
 
Just out of curiosity, what would you consider it?

IF I happened to be an ELP fan watching the game, I would consider it a great excuse to quaff a cold one in celebration. Of course, If I was one of those prog elitists who believe that this music is best kept out of sight & hearing range from the masses so as not to disarm us of one of the illusions that lead us to think that we are superior because of our artistic tastes.
Get over it folks. I'm sure some of the "appalled" would just as readily whine that only the stereotypical classic 4/4 time caveman rock  (BTO RULES, MAN !) is used in such instances when many of our prog idols have compositions that would easily fit into the spirit of things due to the lyric matter & music.AngryAngryAngry

.
"Here I am talking to some of the smartest people in the world and I didn't even notice,” Lieutenant Columbo, episode The Bye-Bye Sky-High I.Q. Murder Case.
Back to Top
salmacis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member

Content Addition

Joined: April 10 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 3928
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 17 2007 at 13:11

This is not all that unusual, no, can't say it bothers me either way. Rick Wakeman's 'Arthur' was apparently also used as the theme tune to 'Election Night' coverage in the UK. Allegedly, it was also used as the theme for a Cuban soap opera (when Wakeman played there the crowd erupted into applause when the opening riff kicked in, and this was apparently the reason) and I've seen it used on a trailer for a poor Kung Fu movie too.

Heck, I even heard Jethro Tull's 'We Used To Know' used in UK soap 'Hollyoaks' earlier in the year!!!LOL
Back to Top
VanderGraafKommandöh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Malaria
Status: Offline
Points: 89372
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 17 2007 at 22:16
Originally posted by salmacis salmacis wrote:

This isn't new, I'm afraid, Micky!! 'Karn Evil 9 1st Impression Part II' was used as the theme tune for ghastly UK game show 'The Generation Game' presented by the irksome 'comedian' (and ELP fan...) Jim Davidson. AFAIK, they recorded a special version for the show in the 1990s...


I wondered why that theme tune sounded familiar!

I wasn't thinking of The Generation Game though, I was thinking of that another gameshow that is similarly irksome.
Back to Top
Zargus View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 08 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 3491
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 19 2007 at 20:18
In one thread everyone whonders why no one likes prog, in another thread everyone blame a prog band for selling out caus 1 of thiere songs got played on the TV.. sigh.
Back to Top
bluetailfly View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 28 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1383
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 19 2007 at 22:56

These responses that are along the lines of, “get over it, the band is just putting prog rock out there to turn on a new generation of fans” are missing the point. That’s not why the band’s is doing it. They're doing it for money and in turn allowing a corporation to use their music to sell a product. Turning on new fans or any similar rationalization is a side benefit of it; but that’s not the reason their doing it.

 

ELP didn’t use the music for Dr. Pepper ads when BSS came out. Nor did they for a long time after that. And there was a reason for that. They didn’t want their music associated with Dr. Pepper or any other food product advertisement. And I think that’s because they believed that the music’s cultural importance as prog rock art wasn’t commensurate with junk food advertising. And I believe they were right in not allowing it to be used in that way. However, times changed and they changed their minds and decided that now it was okay to do it. I don’t like that decision. I value that music and believe they sold the music and its cultural legacy short.

 

I know I don’t own the music. I’m aware of that. ELP can do what they want with it. It’s their right. I just don’t like serious music used in this way--whether it’s Beethoven’s Ninth or Close to the Edge or A Plague of Lighthouse Keepers or Reich’s Trains or Karn Evel 9. I believe it undermines the credibility of the art and artists involved.

 
We’re inundated with this type of thing in our society today, so it's sometimes difficult to perceive how advertising is cheapening and trivalising serious art when it's juxtaposed with a product Madison Avenue is trying to sell you. It’s one of the reasons I try to avoid being exposed to advertising as much as possible.

 

This Dr. Pepper ad is only one instance, so it’s easy to dismiss. But I guess what I’m responding to here is that I don’t like the potential trend. I wouldn’t appreciate the prog rock classics being used to sell Frito’s and Slim Jims.

Edited by bluetailfly - September 20 2007 at 00:42
"The red polygon's only desire / is to get to the blue triangle."
Back to Top
debrewguy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 30 2007
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3596
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 24 2007 at 19:07
Originally posted by bluetailfly bluetailfly wrote:

These responses that are along the lines of, “get over it, the band is just putting prog rock out there to turn on a new generation of fans” are missing the point. That’s not why the band’s is doing it. They're doing it for money and in turn allowing a corporation to use their music to sell a product. Turning on new fans or any similar rationalization is a side benefit of it; but that’s not the reason their doing it.

 

ELP didn’t use the music for Dr. Pepper ads when BSS came out. Nor did they for a long time after that. And there was a reason for that. They didn’t want their music associated with Dr. Pepper or any other food product advertisement. And I think that’s because they believed that the music’s cultural importance as prog rock art wasn’t commensurate with junk food advertising. And I believe they were right in not allowing it to be used in that way. However, times changed and they changed their minds and decided that now it was okay to do it. I don’t like that decision. I value that music and believe they sold the music and its cultural legacy short.

 

I know I don’t own the music. I’m aware of that. ELP can do what they want with it. It’s their right. I just don’t like serious music used in this way--whether it’s Beethoven’s Ninth or Close to the Edge or A Plague of Lighthouse Keepers or Reich’s Trains or Karn Evel 9. I believe it undermines the credibility of the art and artists involved.

 
We’re inundated with this type of thing in our society today, so it's sometimes difficult to perceive how advertising is cheapening and trivalising serious art when it's juxtaposed with a product Madison Avenue is trying to sell you. It’s one of the reasons I try to avoid being exposed to advertising as much as possible.

 

This Dr. Pepper ad is only one instance, so it’s easy to dismiss. But I guess what I’m responding to here is that I don’t like the potential trend. I wouldn’t appreciate the prog rock classics being used to sell Frito’s and Slim Jims.

 I used to be stringently anti-ad rock. But then I mellowed out. Mostly because I realized that for most intelligent people, the music played during an ad is not the determining factor when it comes to making purchases. Cadillac can use the entire Zep canon in their ads, I still will not buy one of their cars. Er, well, maybe mostly 'cause I couldn't afford oneLOL
"Here I am talking to some of the smartest people in the world and I didn't even notice,” Lieutenant Columbo, episode The Bye-Bye Sky-High I.Q. Murder Case.
Back to Top
Garion81 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 22 2004
Location: So Cal, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4338
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 27 2007 at 12:41

Your all assuming ELP has any rights of refusal over such things.  I am sure like many other 70's musicians they do not own rights to the song nor does the band get any royalties except as songwriters.  There was a Subaru commercial using Dust in the Wind last year and the band Kansas had no say in its use.  It was all Sony and they received all the royalties and fees for its use except of a small royalty to Kerry Livgren as the songwriter.

 
Before you accuse research.  Wink


"What are you going to do when that damn thing rusts?"
Back to Top
rileydog22 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: August 24 2005
Location: New Jersey
Status: Offline
Points: 8844
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 27 2007 at 18:39
Except that ELP had formed their own record label by 1973, thus they had all rights to everything from Tarkus on.  

Edited by rileydog22 - September 27 2007 at 18:40

Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 27 2007 at 22:27
Originally posted by Garion81 Garion81 wrote:

Your all assuming ELP has any rights of refusal over such things.  I am sure like many other 70's musicians they do not own rights to the song nor does the band get any royalties except as songwriters.  There was a Subaru commercial using Dust in the Wind last year and the band Kansas had no say in its use.  It was all Sony and they received all the royalties and fees for its use except of a small royalty to Kerry Livgren as the songwriter.

 
Before you accuse research.  Wink
 
No Garion, that's not correct (I had to disagree with you for one time at least LOL)
 
Once a few years ago I made a whhole post about the USA and British law of copyright and the issue is not so simple.
 
The copyright is owned by the author for a perid that may extend to 67 or 70 years after his death, the song is credited to the author, and only the names who appear beside the song, own the music and lyrics.
 
Quote
 
 

Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988

1988 CHAPTER 48

8 Published editions

(1) In this Part “published edition”, in the context of copyright in the typographical arrangement of a published edition, means a published edition of the whole or any part of one or more literary, dramatic or musical works.

 
9 Authorship of work

(1) In this Part “author”, in relation to a work, means the person who creates it.

(...).
 
13 Duration of copyright in sound recordings and films

(1) Copyright in a sound recording or film expires—

(a) at the end of the period of 50 years from the end of the calendar year in which it is made, or

(b) if it is released before the end of that period, 50 years from the end of the calendar year in which it is released.

.

This is UK but in USA is 67 years if I'm not wrong.
 
But not everything is so esomple, the publisher must have siome rights, so the publisjher is entitled to be the copyright holder for a term of 25 years after the date of publication.
 
Quote 15 Duration of copyright in typographical arrangement of published editions

Copyright in the typographical arrangement of a published edition expires at the end of the period of 25 years from the end of the calendar year in which the edition was first published.

In other words, during the first 25 years, the publisher has several rights on the recording, but that term expires (again, this is the UK Law for the case of ELP, but the one in USA is almost identical) and returns to the Owner.
 
That's why Fragile Copyright appears
 
UK November 1, 1971 Atlantic LP/CS
US January 4, 1972 Atlantic LP/CS/8T SD/CS/TP7211
 
In other words Atlantic was owner of the Fragikle songs copyright in 1971 and 1972
 
But if you check Keys to Ascention released in 1996 the copyright of Roundaboutt from Fragile appears:
 
© 1971 Yessongs / Topographic Music, Ltd / Rondor Music (London) Ltd.

So after 25 years exactly, the rights returned to Yes.

So most surely ELP has the right over their songs.

Iván


 
 
            
Back to Top
rileydog22 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: August 24 2005
Location: New Jersey
Status: Offline
Points: 8844
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 27 2007 at 22:31
Ivan, they've actually had rights to their songs the whole time: They founded Manticore Records before the release of Tarkus, and released all of their material since then on the label.  They run the record label, so they had rights to the songs since they were written.  Everything from Love Beach to soda commercials to those godawful remixes has been entirely their fault, not contractual obligations or money-hungry record executives.  

Back to Top
Dim View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: April 17 2007
Location: Austin TX
Status: Offline
Points: 6890
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 27 2007 at 22:32
ELP ownes manticore?
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.191 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.