Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Shakespeare
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 18 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 7744
|
Posted: August 23 2007 at 20:19 |
andu wrote:
^ You can set up the Windows updates to happen exactly when you want them to... which of course doesn't make Windows safer than Mac's own, but I just wanted to correct that factual error.
|
I didn't say that! All I said was that when updating for Macs, you can do 4 or 5 updates at a time, and then restart once for all of them, whereas on a PC, you have to restart 4 or 5 times for 4 or 5 updates.
|
|
andu
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 27 2006
Location: Romania
Status: Offline
Points: 3089
|
Posted: August 23 2007 at 20:28 |
Shakespeare wrote:
andu wrote:
^ You can set up the Windows updates to happen exactly when you want them to... which of course doesn't make Windows safer than Mac's own, but I just wanted to correct that factual error.
| I didn't say that! All I said was that when updating for Macs, you can do 4 or 5 updates at a time, and then restart once for all of them, whereas on a PC, you have to restart 4 or 5 times for 4 or 5 updates.
|
What exactly didn't you say? 'cause I wasn't putting any words in your mouth (again I tell you that). And again I'm telling you you're wrong: you can download whatever downloads you need for your Windows, and install (hence restart) all of them at once. Or you can download and install them, and make one restart for all of them whenever you want. Maybe you use a different Windows than I - myself I have XP SP2.
|
|
Shakespeare
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 18 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 7744
|
Posted: August 23 2007 at 20:33 |
andu wrote:
Shakespeare wrote:
andu wrote:
^ You can set up the Windows updates to happen exactly when you want them to... which of course doesn't make Windows safer than Mac's own, but I just wanted to correct that factual error.
| I didn't say that! All I said was that when updating for Macs, you can do 4 or 5 updates at a time, and then restart once for all of them, whereas on a PC, you have to restart 4 or 5 times for 4 or 5 updates.
|
What exactly didn't you say? 'cause I wasn't putting any words in your mouth (again I tell you that). And again I'm telling you you're wrong: you can download whatever downloads you need for your Windows, and install (hence restart) all of them at once. Or you can download and install them, and make one restart for all of them whenever you want. Maybe you use a different Windows than I - myself I have XP SP2.
|
\ .....When I started with this new computer, I had a slew of updates for
every program, and I had to do a restart for each individually, I couldn't find a way to do them all with 1 restart. On my mac, when I
went through the same process, the huge list of updates only required 1
restart. That's all I'm saying.
But whatever, it's not a big deal. It's not like that one aspect would make one better than the other, anyway. I don't really care...let's let this discussion die, it's not going anywhere anyway, we're both just repeating ourselves.
|
|
stonebeard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
|
Posted: August 23 2007 at 20:37 |
My friend got a Mac laptop before college, and he took it everywhere he went with our friends. Everywhere. And he was on it all the time, practically. I believe it took his soul, much in the way the Aborigines of Australia believe photographs can take your soul. For this reason, I suggest a PC.
Edited by stonebeard - August 23 2007 at 20:38
|
|
|
andu
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 27 2006
Location: Romania
Status: Offline
Points: 3089
|
Posted: August 23 2007 at 20:38 |
Wait, did you mean OS (system) updates, or program updates? Anyway, it's mostly the same for program updates too - you don't need to restart after each program updated, it only says the update will take effect only after restart (which is actually only a precaution, usually the update effects apply even before the restart).
|
|
andu
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 27 2006
Location: Romania
Status: Offline
Points: 3089
|
Posted: August 23 2007 at 20:42 |
|
|
rileydog22
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 24 2005
Location: New Jersey
Status: Offline
Points: 8844
|
Posted: August 24 2007 at 00:23 |
bhikkhu wrote:
There is really one basic question that needs to be asked. Are you a big fan of viruses, spyware (and the prigrams you need to have constantly running to combat this) , and freeze-ups? |
Oh man; it's incredible how inconvenient it is to run AdAware and Spybot once a week. I can honestly say I've never had a problem with viruses or spyware, and that anybody with a fully-functioning brain can quite easily avoid problems without any inconvenience.
|
|
|
bhikkhu
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 06 2006
Location: AČ Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 5109
|
Posted: August 24 2007 at 01:07 |
rileydog22 wrote:
bhikkhu wrote:
There is really one basic question that needs to be asked. Are you a big fan of viruses, spyware (and the prigrams you need to have constantly running to combat this) , and freeze-ups? | Oh man; it's incredible how inconvenient it is to run AdAware and Spybot once a week. I can honestly say I've never had a problem with viruses or spyware, and that anybody with a fully-functioning brain can quite easily avoid problems without any inconvenience. |
I just find it counterproductive. On my old PC, I had to have three programs in constant operation. If I didn't, the freeze-ups would be even more frequent (in other words, it happened anyway). With the Mac, I don't have to run any protective software, and it never freezes.
|
|
|
N Ellingworth
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 17 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1324
|
Posted: August 24 2007 at 03:04 |
Window Vista has done a lot to improve PC security as the built in firewall is very good. You don't need to run an anti-virus program like Norton which hogs your computer's resources, instead go for one like Avast which is barely noticable and finally don't use Internet Explorer as it's full of holes for Viruses and Spyware to get through, Firefox and Opera are much bettter options for web browsing.
|
|
rileydog22
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 24 2005
Location: New Jersey
Status: Offline
Points: 8844
|
Posted: August 24 2007 at 03:40 |
I generally defend PC's, but I just can't find it in my heart to defend Vista. It's the same as XP, except they uglified the color scheme, killed the Run menu and Telnet ( ), made the start menu less convenient, and added a few security fixes that they probably could have just put in a Windows Update (and that are unnecessary if you have anti-virus software, which everyone should). That hardly seems worth paying the money for an upgrade. I'm just fine with XP, thanks.
Edited by rileydog22 - August 24 2007 at 03:41
|
|
|
Shakespeare
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 18 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 7744
|
Posted: August 24 2007 at 16:48 |
And, besides, PC stole ideas from Mac OS X for Vista.
|
|
bhikkhu
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 06 2006
Location: AČ Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 5109
|
Posted: August 24 2007 at 21:54 |
Shakespeare wrote:
And, besides, PC stole ideas from Mac OS X for Vista.
|
Vista was Windows playing catch-up with OSX. Now that it has finally arrived, Apple is about to unveil Leopard.
Oh, and I don't know why we didn't mention this before, but if you absolutely can't live without Windows, there are Intel-Macs.
Edited by bhikkhu - August 24 2007 at 21:57
|
|
|
1800iareyay
Prog Reviewer
Joined: November 18 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2492
|
Posted: August 24 2007 at 21:58 |
I love my new mac. That is my technical input.
|
|
Padraic
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
|
Posted: August 24 2007 at 22:09 |
bhikkhu wrote:
Shakespeare wrote:
And, besides, PC stole ideas from Mac OS X for Vista.
|
Vista was Windows playing catch-up with OSX. Now that it has finally arrived, Apple is about to unveil Leopard.
Oh, and I don't know why we didn't mention this before, but if you absolutely can't live without Windows, there are Intel-Macs.
|
I did mention this before. And besides, Linux FTW!!
Edited by NaturalScience - August 24 2007 at 22:09
|
|
rileydog22
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 24 2005
Location: New Jersey
Status: Offline
Points: 8844
|
Posted: August 24 2007 at 22:38 |
I've barely used it (booted a couple of times in Ubuntu and Knoppix in order to move around some system files Windows wouldn't let me touch), but I can't help but love Linux. It's just so awesome that everything is non-profit and open-sourced, put together for free by the warm-hearted coders of the world.
|
|
|
Padraic
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
|
Posted: August 24 2007 at 22:50 |
rileydog22 wrote:
I've barely used it (booted a couple of times in Ubuntu and Knoppix in order to move around some system files Windows wouldn't let me touch), but I can't help but love Linux. It's just so awesome that everything is non-profit and open-sourced, put together for free by the warm-hearted coders of the world.
|
I've been running Linux at work (previous job, and now at my new one) for the past five years. I've most been running Redhat/Fedora, but now I'm sold on Ubuntu. Linux has made great strides in that time - used to be you had to edit config files just to get your damn monitor to work properly, but with the latest Ubuntu on my laptop, everything "just works" (including wireless, which used to be a real PITA). For those who don't need the PC for a lot of games and/or specialized apps, I heartily recommend Ubuntu.
|
|
bhikkhu
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 06 2006
Location: AČ Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 5109
|
Posted: August 24 2007 at 22:58 |
|
|
|
Shakespeare
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 18 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 7744
|
Posted: August 24 2007 at 23:00 |
Loser
|
|
rileydog22
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 24 2005
Location: New Jersey
Status: Offline
Points: 8844
|
Posted: August 24 2007 at 23:06 |
And, if I'm not mistaken, Windows 1.0 borrowed quite heavily from the Apple Lisa operating system. So it could be argued that Microsoft has been stealing ideas from Apple ever since Microsoft was founded.
|
|
|
Shakespeare
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 18 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 7744
|
Posted: August 25 2007 at 16:51 |
rileydog22 wrote:
I've barely used it (booted a couple of times in Ubuntu and Knoppix in order to move around some system files Windows wouldn't let me touch), but I can't help but love Linux. It's just so awesome that everything is non-profit and open-sourced, put together for free by the warm-hearted coders of the world.
|
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.