Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Regressive archives???
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedRegressive archives???

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 8>
Author
Message
Wanorak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 09 2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 4574
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Regressive archives???
    Posted: July 29 2007 at 05:21
From the reviews of certain albums in the last few weeks you'd think these were the Regressive Rock Archives!!
The way alot of people think; the only good progressive rock is stuff that sounds like it was recorded in 1973 or with neo-prog 1983! I mean poor Phil Collins, Trevor Rabin, Billy Sherwood, Steve Hogarth or anyone else who dares to make prog more listenable, melodic or accessible! To Begin with Genesis only became a great musical band after Peter Gabriel left; the same with Marillion after Fish left. Both groups started putting out more consistent, more powerful and Yes more diverse albums after their (FAR Too) fabled leaders left.

As for Yes, both Trevor Rabin and Billy Sherwood were shots in the arm for a tired, unmotivated group stuck in the seventies! Both Big Generator and Open your eyes are very strong albums with lots of melody, great guitar work and much stronger vocal harmonies and Yes heaven forbid some more accessible poppy songs.

Must be nice for all the prog musical wannabes to sit back and pick apart great musicians for trying to stay alive and relevant in the music industry. Some of you must start bands and see how long you last.

Progressive rock must change with the times and diversify to stay alive; especially when the music industry is in horrific shape right now. Sorry if I offended anyone but some people are just stuck in the past and not open to change.

N.B Marillion's Afraid of Sunlight is their Masterpiece! I played it for a friend who hates prog and he loves it. He said said it was transcendant and so far above most music he has heard! Also, I understand Marillion themselves think it's their best album, sorry Fish and his Script(though I love that album also). Afraid of Sunlight proves that sometimes subtlety IS a good thing, you have to listen to the nuances of that alum to fully appreciate it.

Edited by Wanorak - July 29 2007 at 05:41
A GREAT YEAR FOR PROG!!!
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 29 2007 at 05:43
Originally posted by Wanorak Wanorak wrote:

The way alot of people think; the only good progressive rock is stuff that sounds like it was recorded in 1973 or with neo-prog 1983!

some people are just stuck in the past and not open to change.



some are, but most here are not... sorry to disappoint you


Back to Top
Rocktopus View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 02 2006
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 4202
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 29 2007 at 05:48
Its when progbands tries to become more accessible they become unlistenable to me. Then I'd much rather choose listening to real popgroups like ABBA or The Carpenters.

.
Over land and under ashes
In the sunlight, see - it flashes
Find a fly and eat his eye
But don't believe in me
Don't believe in me
Don't believe in me
Back to Top
Mandrakeroot View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member

Italian Prog Specialist

Joined: March 01 2006
Location: San Foca, Friûl
Status: Offline
Points: 5851
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 29 2007 at 05:50
Well... I am totally sincere. I prefer the DT "When The Dream And Day Unite" , "Falling Into Infinity" or "A Change Of Seasons" to "Images And Words" or "Awake". But I think also that the "90120" Of Yes is a good album. And Banco, PFM and New Trolls in 80's has produced good albums. Ange "La Gare De Troyes" is good album... A perfect mix between Symphonic, Neo and New Wave (like "90120").

Well... For me one of the best all time Prog album is the compilation "Parisienne Walkways" by Gary Moore.

More of my 5 stars are because today those albums are equal to in the years of published. But i relised my vote in a scale of 10. That divided in two (a scale of 5) becomes misleading.

And yes... I think that, without rethorical point of view, one album acquires or it loses value with the to pass of the years, of the new outgoing ...  Of the new fashions. 

How many they have uncovered Yes with "90120", Genesis and Gabriel after their division? A lot of persons... Too persons!!!

Because it is true "Prog Rock" isn't a clear name if not compared to the years, to the fashions... Because are Prog Rock Elvis Presley, Fats Domino or Chuck Berry in 50's, The Shadows, The Who, The Cream or Jimy Hendrix in 60's like Yes, PFM, New Trolls or King Crimson, ELP in 70's, Asia, GTR, Marillion or IQ in 80's, Ars Nova, Nuova Era, Dream Theater in 90's, Conqueror, Faveravola or Ex Vagus in 90's!!! And Yes, Genesis, PFM, New Trolls or Banco in 80's arenn't Prog? For me yes. But in compare to the fashions of the period. 
Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 29 2007 at 05:50
I think you'll find a good balance of reviews here. Yes, some people do have the views you describe, and it is only right that they should be able to express their opinions.
 
There is no doubt that some of the names you mention took the bands in new directions, so inevitably some fans did not go with them, while others were picked up along the way.
 
Personally, I don't agree with your observations that Yes and Genesis improved after key members left, I think you are perhaps just using a controversial statement to make a point there. I enjoy "Big generator" a lot for example, but in my opinion "Open your eyes" was simply not a very good album. It's not a question of the style the band adopted there (although it wasn't really a Yes album was it?), it just wasn't very good.
 
There is plenty of discussion on the site about modern prog, so I don't think it's a case of people simply living in the past. Where I would agree though is that it is ironic that given the name (and it is just a name) of the genre, many of us are so averse to the the significant changes of style the major bands went through during their careers.
 
Back to Top
Ricochet View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 27 2005
Location: Nauru
Status: Offline
Points: 46301
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 29 2007 at 05:57
I have nothing against more melodic, natural prog; in fact, when it happens that a band plays in such a way that's pleasing and charming, then everything's connected to a good success - and an enjoyable music.

Progressive rock, otherwise, is so diverse, that if you don't know what to choose or to like, you're lost. Indeed, there are bands with melodic and artistic senses, while others are keen to things like hard music, energy and alternative rock, experimental or improvisation, composition or jam....and all these are part of the progressive movemented; and all these cannot call the other ones regressive impulse or influence.

If it's about change and modern music, the same thing happens. Some bands do flower up to an accessible progressive music, to a melodic or a songwriting quality, to a nice rock feeling; while others complicate even more the spice and the needle of progressive art.

A word of advice though: you can't say classic movements or clearly influential moments of progressive rock are regressive or are over-judged. For a fact, Genesis and Yes play a mixture called pop-prog starting the 80s, not a form of melodic progressive rock which makes the classic stuff regressive. Marillion with Hogarth turns, indeed, to a lot of melodic, alternative (later on) and sugary artistic movements; but there's hardly a regressive thing in what happened when Fish was vocalist.

Hope it helps see that you can be a fan of what you want, without telling another fan of another kind that he's got things all wrong, or that his type of proffered music is close-minded or regressive.

(oh, to tell you truth, I really love H Marillion, despite the general rumor being that they've lost it completely and played like melodic nuts; but I don't like Afraid Of Sunlight at all Embarrassed)


Edited by Ricochet - July 29 2007 at 05:58
Back to Top
Rocktopus View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 02 2006
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 4202
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 29 2007 at 06:04
Originally posted by Wanorak Wanorak wrote:



N.B Marillion's Afraid of Sunlight is their Masterpiece! I played it for a friend who hates prog and he loves it. He said said it was transcendant and so far above most music he has heard! Also, I understand Marillion themselves think it's their best album, sorry Fish and his Script(though I love that album also). Afraid of Sunlight proves that sometimes subtlety IS a good thing, you have to listen to the nuances of that alum to fully appreciate it.


I couldn't care less about what you, you're proghating friend or Marillion thinks. I like a lot of new and old, real progressive music way beyond anything Marillion ever released.
Over land and under ashes
In the sunlight, see - it flashes
Find a fly and eat his eye
But don't believe in me
Don't believe in me
Don't believe in me
Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 29 2007 at 06:28
Originally posted by Wanorak Wanorak wrote:

From the reviews of certain albums in the last few weeks you'd think these were the Regressive Rock Archives!!
The way alot of people think; the only good progressive rock is stuff that sounds like it was recorded in 1973 or with neo-prog 1983! I mean poor Phil Collins, Trevor Rabin, Billy Sherwood, Steve Hogarth or anyone else who dares to make prog more listenable, melodic or accessible! To Begin with Genesis only became a great musical band after Peter Gabriel left; the same with Marillion after Fish left. Both groups started putting out more consistent, more powerful and Yes more diverse albums after their (FAR Too) fabled leaders left.

As for Yes, both Trevor Rabin and Billy Sherwood were shots in the arm for a tired, unmotivated group stuck in the seventies! Both Big Generator and Open your eyes are very strong albums with lots of melody, great guitar work and much stronger vocal harmonies and Yes heaven forbid some more accessible poppy songs.

Must be nice for all the prog musical wannabes to sit back and pick apart great musicians for trying to stay alive and relevant in the music industry. Some of you must start bands and see how long you last.

Progressive rock must change with the times and diversify to stay alive; especially when the music industry is in horrific shape right now. Sorry if I offended anyone but some people are just stuck in the past and not open to change.

N.B Marillion's Afraid of Sunlight is their Masterpiece! I played it for a friend who hates prog and he loves it. He said said it was transcendant and so far above most music he has heard! Also, I understand Marillion themselves think it's their best album, sorry Fish and his Script(though I love that album also). Afraid of Sunlight proves that sometimes subtlety IS a good thing, you have to listen to the nuances of that alum to fully appreciate it.


I agree with some of your points in principle, people should be closed minded to prog in it's many modern forms. However, there will always be people who are unable to digest modern prog, and those who can not cope with 'golden era' prog. You cant force people to like prog metal or whatever, if the sounds and songs simply dont appeal to their ears.

What counts for good music is a matter of opinion, and you appear to be stating as fact that Genesis and Marillion were only good 'musically' after Gabriel and Fish, respectively left those bands. How do you mean 'musically? If by that you mean their musicianship improved, then yes you're probably right, but did they get better? Did their songs get better? That is entirely a matter of opinion. I do think overall there is a good balance of reviews and opinions expressed in this forum.
Back to Top
erik neuteboom View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: July 27 2005
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 7659
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 29 2007 at 06:36
I am a huge fan of the Seventies Classic Prog, for me it's the best, the most adventurous and most elaborate music ever made (especially 70-77 Genesis) but I don't have the idea that most progheads on this site hail The Seventies and nail post-Seventies, almost every day I notice many progheads who write positive about bands like Tool, The Mars Volta, Dream Theater, Blind Guardian, Ayreon, and Porcupine Tree, all post Nineties prog bands. Perhaps it's 60/40?
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 29 2007 at 06:45
Everyone has an opinion which they are perfectly entitled to. Personnaly, I think Genesis suffered from Gabriel and Hackett's departure, but feel that Marillion improved once Fish moved on.
 
But the archives are not regressive - they are what they say they are: Archives - repositories of all things progressive, old and new.
 
Of course there will be more focus on older stuff, because that is what most if us have in common - not everyone has heard Kayo Dot - but we've all heard at least one Yes song so it is pure mathematics that deems will will talk about the "golden era" more but it is not an indication of a general trend. If you don't like the old stuff then ignore it and concentrate on what you do like - it's all here and every page is equally accessible.
What?
Back to Top
Terra Australis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 03 2006
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 809
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 29 2007 at 06:47
Originally posted by Wanorak Wanorak wrote:


The way alot of people think; the only good progressive rock is stuff that sounds like it was recorded in 1973 or with neo-prog 1983!


Good music is good music no matter what name it has or when it was recorded!!
Allomerus. Music with progressive intent.

http://allomerus.bandcamp.com
Back to Top
Mandrakeroot View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member

Italian Prog Specialist

Joined: March 01 2006
Location: San Foca, Friûl
Status: Offline
Points: 5851
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 29 2007 at 06:49
Originally posted by erik neuteboom erik neuteboom wrote:

I am a huge fan of the Seventies Classic Prog, for me it's the best, the most adventurous and most elaborate music ever made (especially 70-77 Genesis) but I don't have the idea that most progheads on this site hail The Seventies and nail post-Seventies, almost every day I notice many progheads who write positive about bands like Tool, The Mars Volta, Dream Theater, Blind Guardian, Ayreon, and Porcupine Tree, all post Nineties prog bands. Perhaps it's 60/40?


For me the "golden era Prog" is the best (not only the Italian Prog) but maybe because is the first Prog that I listen to. But I think that Dream Theatre is a band that is able well (and it has to) to to be drawn near the big bands of the past.

Well: I hate the concept of Post Rock. But I respect the Post Rock bands, the people that love the Post Rock... Like i have maximum respect for Yes, Genesis, PFM, Banco, Ange, Mew Trolls that in 80's has produced a simple POP albums. Because if an Italian song songwriter 1.000.000.000 miles distant to Prog like Sergio Caputo is a big fan of Jethro Tull (it affirmed that without rain it would have done a surprise during the concert of the Tull...  That it had desire to play a song with Tull?) it means that it isn't mattering the played musical genre but the message transmitted!!!


Edited by Mandrakeroot - July 29 2007 at 06:51
Back to Top
fuxi View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: March 08 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 2461
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 29 2007 at 08:20
Originally posted by Wanorak Wanorak wrote:

From the reviews of certain albums in the last few weeks you'd think these were the Regressive Rock Archives!!


You exaggerate. Most people here are in favour of change, but in a progressive direction (stylistically speaking), not in a pop direction.

Personally speaking, I really admire post-1980 King Crimson. They've done some pop things, but mostly weird noisy things. But they've kept changing: truly audacious! As regular loungers may know, I'm also a great Bill Bruford fan. The things Bill has done in the past ten years sound rather different from what he did before that, although there are similarities with his earlier fusion albums. He has really kept developing his music.

By the way, most people prefer 1970s albums by the likes of Yes and Genesis simply because they sound more adventurous and more ambitious than later albums by the same bands.

I agree that Genesis were playing better than ever when PG left. But most reviewers have nothing but praise for TRICK OF THE TAIL or WIND AND WUTHERING...
Back to Top
Finnforest View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Offline
Points: 17241
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 29 2007 at 09:26
Thank you Fuxi for saying if perfectly.   I LOVE TONS of NEW music, but that still doesn't make Big Generator a great album.  Or Invisible touch a great progressive song. 

And I don't think that pointing that out necessarily makes one "regressive."  That's a very wide and unfair generalization and I'll leave it at that.  Cheers! Smile
...that moment you realize you like "Mob Rules" better than "Heaven and Hell"
Back to Top
febus View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: January 23 2007
Location: Orlando-Usa
Status: Offline
Points: 4312
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 29 2007 at 10:07
This is somehow quite difficult for a kid back then in 1972 growing up liking CLOSE TO THE EDGE and TFTO to get enamored 25 years later with OPEN YOUR EYES. Especially this album,it is definitely a bad choice.
 
Doesn't mean i dislike all what YES has come with since; look at my ratings :THE LADDER gets 4 stars and MAGNIFICATION no less than 5 stars.
 
I have nothing against prog bands going pop; you know what , i like ASIA, i know it's a no-no here on PA, but i always like WETTON voice and his knack at creating good melodies, so i am buying everything from him since, even if i wish sometimes he gets more ''adventurous''.
 
I don't cry about 90125; it got 3 stars from me; there are good songs and there will always be neww good songs coming in the future.
 
But do i expect a band coming with something like MOON IN JUNE or LIZARD (the suite) in the future; sadly no!!!!
 
The laws of the market are quite rigid and strict nowadays: give the customer what they want,  a product that can be promoted and appeal to the masses. The little neighborhood music store has all but vanished completely leaving big chains selling CDS between TVS and computers, when it is not vaccum cleaners. No room, no time and no money to promote the little adventurous musician.
 
 
The album representing my avatar SOFT MACHINE 4 went #.......9 in sales in France when it came out; what would happen today if it was released in 2007?
 
No there is nothing wrong with pop, but as long as it's good pop, which OPEN YOUR EYES never was.
 
QUOTE''Must be nice for all the prog musical wannabes to sit back and pick apart great musicians for trying to stay alive and relevant in the music industry. Some of you must start bands and see how long you last. ''

 
Also this part of your mail is kind of aggressive for a newcomer to tell us we are all crumbling dinosaurs.
Have a wonderful prog day.
 


Edited by febus - July 29 2007 at 10:11
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 29 2007 at 10:16
Originally posted by darqdean darqdean wrote:

Everyone has an opinion which they are perfectly entitled to. Personnaly, I think Genesis suffered from Gabriel and Hackett's departure, but feel that Marillion improved once Fish moved on.
 
But the archives are not regressive - they are what they say they are: Archives - repositories of all things progressive, old and new.
 
Of course there will be more focus on older stuff, because that is what most if us have in common - not everyone has heard Kayo Dot - but we've all heard at least one Yes song so it is pure mathematics that deems will will talk about the "golden era" more but it is not an indication of a general trend. If you don't like the old stuff then ignore it and concentrate on what you do like - it's all here and every page is equally accessible.


well said Clap
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
richardh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 29285
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 29 2007 at 10:31
Originally posted by Wanorak Wanorak wrote:

From the reviews of certain albums in the last few weeks you'd think these were the Regressive Rock Archives!!
The way alot of people think; the only good progressive rock is stuff that sounds like it was recorded in 1973 or with neo-prog 1983! I mean poor Phil Collins, Trevor Rabin, Billy Sherwood, Steve Hogarth or anyone else who dares to make prog more listenable, melodic or accessible! To Begin with Genesis only became a great musical band after Peter Gabriel left; the same with Marillion after Fish left. Both groups started putting out more consistent, more powerful and Yes more diverse albums after their (FAR Too) fabled leaders left.

As for Yes, both Trevor Rabin and Billy Sherwood were shots in the arm for a tired, unmotivated group stuck in the seventies! Both Big Generator and Open your eyes are very strong albums with lots of melody, great guitar work and much stronger vocal harmonies and Yes heaven forbid some more accessible poppy songs.

Must be nice for all the prog musical wannabes to sit back and pick apart great musicians for trying to stay alive and relevant in the music industry. Some of you must start bands and see how long you last.

Progressive rock must change with the times and diversify to stay alive; especially when the music industry is in horrific shape right now. Sorry if I offended anyone but some people are just stuck in the past and not open to change.

N.B Marillion's Afraid of Sunlight is their Masterpiece! I played it for a friend who hates prog and he loves it. He said said it was transcendant and so far above most music he has heard! Also, I understand Marillion themselves think it's their best album, sorry Fish and his Script(though I love that album also). Afraid of Sunlight proves that sometimes subtlety IS a good thing, you have to listen to the nuances of that alum to fully appreciate it.
 
Putting aside your highly subjective views in your first para of what you consider to be great music I think you are suggesting that prog in general is elitist and out of touch with the mainstream. Well I agree! ..and all the better for it IMHO . Most people here are prog fans and want to listen to and talk about 'prog'.. not about prog bands putting out commercial sounding music to improve the state of their bank balances.
Back to Top
Chicapah View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 14 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8238
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 29 2007 at 10:42
Regressive?  Not in the least.  I'm an older member who thought that progressive rock died in the 80s after all the greats either broke up, retired or succumbed to the MTV virus.  When I found this site a year and a half ago it opened up a whole new world to me that I didn't know existed and I've discovered many, many modern bands and artists carrying the prog banner that I would not have known about to this day.
"Literature is well enough, as a time-passer, and for the improvement and general elevation and purification of mankind, but it has no practical value" - Mark Twain
Back to Top
magnus View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 19 2006
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 865
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 29 2007 at 10:45
Is it regressive thinking Trespass, Nursery Cryme, Foxtrot and Selling England by the Pound generally are far superior to all the other Genesis albums?
The scattered jigsaw of my redemption laid out before my eyes
Each piece as amorphous as the other - Each piece in its lack of shape a lie
Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 29 2007 at 10:48
Originally posted by magnus magnus wrote:

Is it regressive thinking Trespass, Nursery Cryme, Foxtrot and Selling England by the Pound generally are far superior to all the other Genesis albums?


It's neither regressive or progressive thinking. It's just an expression of opinion. Many would probably disagree with you.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 8>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 1.262 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.