Forum Home Forum Home > Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements > Help us improve the site
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - What happened to TOP 100???
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedWhat happened to TOP 100???

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 12131415>
Author
Message
bluetailfly View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 28 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1383
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 13 2007 at 13:25
^^ Oh, I don't take the list that seriously, I'm just surprised that ELP, a band most prog critics rate very highly has such a poor showing here.
 
Of course it's my opinion (?) Not sure where you're coming from there.
 
To me, it's interesting that ELP has fallen so low, when their music was rated as highly as Yes, Crimson, Floyd, Tull (higher than Tull ;) in the golden age of prog.
 
That's my point.
"The red polygon's only desire / is to get to the blue triangle."
Back to Top
progismylife View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2006
Location: ibreathehelium
Status: Offline
Points: 15535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 13 2007 at 13:28
Originally posted by bluetailfly bluetailfly wrote:

^^ Oh, I don't take the list that seriously, I'm just surprised that ELP, a band most prog critics rate very highly has such a poor showing here.
 
Of course it's my opinion (?) Not sure where you're coming from there.
 
To me, it's interesting that ELP has fallen so low, when their music was rated as highly as Yes, Crimson, Floyd, Tull (higher than Tull ;) in the golden age of prog.
 
That's my point.


Sorry it's just I get sick and tired of seeing the same "why isn't my favorite band number 1 on the top 100 list" and I mistook your post for one of them Embarrassed

 I see what you mean about ELP.
Back to Top
greenback View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: August 14 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3300
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 13 2007 at 14:03

 

now this is what gives f(x,y) = log(x)*y^3

 http://static.rateyourmusic.com/images/one?id=271875&size=f

 



Edited by greenback - July 13 2007 at 14:40
[HEADPINS - LINE OF FIRE: THE RECORD HAVING THE MOST POWERFUL GUITAR SOUND IN THE WHOLE HISTORY OF MUSIC!>
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21134
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 13 2007 at 17:46
Originally posted by greenback greenback wrote:

Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

Originally posted by greenback greenback wrote:


total_score = log(f)*g^3  =  log(number_of_ratings+1)*weighted_avg_rating^3
 
the last thing would simply consist in making a top 100 only according to this "total_score" value.
 
i'm curious how the output (top 100) would look like!
 


That would be ... my algorithm, which had been in place right until the recent changes!Big%20smile
 
didn't you only used a non-weighted avg rating?


Yeah ... I forgot whom I was talking to. Since I have no intention to engage in a hair splitting contest, I'll end it here.Wink
Back to Top
andu View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 27 2006
Location: Romania
Status: Offline
Points: 3089
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 13 2007 at 17:59
"You are through with the past, but the past ain't through with you!" Wink
Back to Top
Sofagrisen View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie


Joined: January 18 2007
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 45
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 13 2007 at 18:38
Originally posted by greenback greenback wrote:

now this is what gives f(x,y) = log(x)*y^3

http://static.rateyourmusic.com/images/one?id=271875&size=f


That is art!

Edited by Sofagrisen - July 13 2007 at 18:39
Back to Top
greenback View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: August 14 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3300
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 13 2007 at 18:48
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

Originally posted by greenback greenback wrote:

Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

Originally posted by greenback greenback wrote:


total_score = log(f)*g^3  =  log(number_of_ratings+1)*weighted_avg_rating^3
 
the last thing would simply consist in making a top 100 only according to this "total_score" value.
 
i'm curious how the output (top 100) would look like!
 


That would be ... my algorithm, which had been in place right until the recent changes!Big%20smile
 
didn't you only used a non-weighted avg rating?


Yeah ... I forgot whom I was talking to. Since I have no intention to engage in a hair splitting contest, I'll end it here.Wink
 
well, maths are not a subjective field where personal taste matters!
math is pure science, and there should not have any confrontation, on the contrary.
 
usually, I do not discuss maths with people because they don't understand, but you seem to have a good background in maths. after all, life's boring without maths!
[HEADPINS - LINE OF FIRE: THE RECORD HAVING THE MOST POWERFUL GUITAR SOUND IN THE WHOLE HISTORY OF MUSIC!>
Back to Top
greenback View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: August 14 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3300
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 13 2007 at 18:50
Originally posted by Sofagrisen Sofagrisen wrote:

Originally posted by greenback greenback wrote:

now this is what gives f(x,y) = log(x)*y^3

http://static.rateyourmusic.com/images/one?id=271875&size=f


That is art!
 
yep...maybe math art rock.
[HEADPINS - LINE OF FIRE: THE RECORD HAVING THE MOST POWERFUL GUITAR SOUND IN THE WHOLE HISTORY OF MUSIC!>
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21134
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 14 2007 at 05:08
Originally posted by greenback greenback wrote:

Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

Originally posted by greenback greenback wrote:

Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

Originally posted by greenback greenback wrote:


total_score = log(f)*g^3  =  log(number_of_ratings+1)*weighted_avg_rating^3
 
the last thing would simply consist in making a top 100 only according to this "total_score" value.
 
i'm curious how the output (top 100) would look like!
 


That would be ... my algorithm, which had been in place right until the recent changes!Big%20smile
 
didn't you only used a non-weighted avg rating?


Yeah ... I forgot whom I was talking to. Since I have no intention to engage in a hair splitting contest, I'll end it here.Wink
 
well, maths are not a subjective field where personal taste matters!
math is pure science, and there should not have any confrontation, on the contrary.
 
usually, I do not discuss maths with people because they don't understand, but you seem to have a good background in maths. after all, life's boring without maths!


What I meant was that the essence of your proposal was:

total_score = f1(x, y) = log(x)*y^3

my own formula was a bit different, but it can be described as

total_score = f2(x, y) = log(x*a+b)*y^c

And M@x's current formula is something like

total_score = f3(x, y) = (X*Y + x*y)/(X+x)   ; X=avg(x)  and Y = avg(y)


now, if we compare f1, f2 and f3, does it really matter to know how x and y are calculated?Wink




Back to Top
greenback View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: August 14 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3300
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 14 2007 at 13:27
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

Originally posted by greenback greenback wrote:

Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

Originally posted by greenback greenback wrote:

Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

Originally posted by greenback greenback wrote:


total_score = log(f)*g^3  =  log(number_of_ratings+1)*weighted_avg_rating^3
 
the last thing would simply consist in making a top 100 only according to this "total_score" value.
 
i'm curious how the output (top 100) would look like!
 


That would be ... my algorithm, which had been in place right until the recent changes!Big%20smile
 
didn't you only used a non-weighted avg rating?


Yeah ... I forgot whom I was talking to. Since I have no intention to engage in a hair splitting contest, I'll end it here.Wink
 
well, maths are not a subjective field where personal taste matters!
math is pure science, and there should not have any confrontation, on the contrary.
 
usually, I do not discuss maths with people because they don't understand, but you seem to have a good background in maths. after all, life's boring without maths!


What I meant was that the essence of your proposal was:

total_score = f1(x, y) = log(x)*y^3

my own formula was a bit different, but it can be described as

total_score = f2(x, y) = log(x*a+b)*y^c

And M@x's current formula is something like

total_score = f3(x, y) = (X*Y + x*y)/(X+x)   ; X=avg(x)  and Y = avg(y)


now, if we compare f1, f2 and f3, does it really matter to know how x and y are calculated?Wink




 
we should ask him the exact formula and compute a 3-D plot assuming all the votes are equally weighted for simplification...
[HEADPINS - LINE OF FIRE: THE RECORD HAVING THE MOST POWERFUL GUITAR SOUND IN THE WHOLE HISTORY OF MUSIC!>
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21134
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 14 2007 at 13:38
Incidentally: I just implemented the weighted avg on my website too ... I like it! You can check it out here: http://progtology.com/home/charts.xhtml ... in the list the "normal" average is displayed, but the entries are sorted using the weighted avg. The cool thing is: For each chart only the albums displayed in the list are used for the calculation of the total weight (avg n_ratings, avg avg_rating).

Big%20smile
Back to Top
Evandro Martini View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 08 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 183
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 15 2007 at 16:10
As I've said before, ELP's problem is that the ratings are always to albums, and they didn't manage to create a masterpiece-rate album.
"You’ll never make any money playing music that people can’t sing.” Keith Emerson's father
Back to Top
Rocktopus View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 02 2006
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 4202
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 15 2007 at 18:46
^I think ELP's problem is that their music hasn't aged well.
Over land and under ashes
In the sunlight, see - it flashes
Find a fly and eat his eye
But don't believe in me
Don't believe in me
Don't believe in me
Back to Top
bluetailfly View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 28 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1383
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 15 2007 at 22:46
Originally posted by Evandro Martini Evandro Martini wrote:

As I've said before, ELP's problem is that the ratings are always to albums, and they didn't manage to create a masterpiece-rate album.
 
Hmmm...not sure how you arrived at this conclusion. Most prog critics and, I think, most knowledgable golden age prog fans are in agreement that Brain Salad Surgery is a prog masterpiece by most accepted definitions of that term. Actually, it's not even my favorite ELP album, but there's no doubt in my mind that it belongs in a list of top ten prog masterpieces, and that includes prog metal and neo-prog.
 
Of course it always boils down to one's opinion, but I think it's safe to say that BSS is a prog masterpiece (as is their first album and Tarkus, imho, and these of course are more debateable as to their masterpiece status).
 
My question to you would be, what defines your concept of prog masterpiece? Include some examples as well, if you would, so I can tell where your coming from. Smile
"The red polygon's only desire / is to get to the blue triangle."
Back to Top
bluetailfly View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 28 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1383
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 15 2007 at 22:56
Originally posted by Rocktopus Rocktopus wrote:

^I think ELP's problem is that their music hasn't aged well.
 
Wow, I completely disagree with this. Having just gone through a mini-ELP phase (due to the fact that I am reading Macan's "Endless Enigma" (excellent ELP critical assessment, btw), I have been listening to their LPs again.
 
And I am blown away by how fresh and exciting they still sound sound. Aside from the awesome performances by ELP, even the production values are excellent and still sound excellent today.
 
Granted, if one is not used to keyboard centered prog, it will take a bit of getting used to. When their albums came out in the seventies (I'm thinking of the debut), I remember being rather taken aback at how challenging and offputting some of their pieces were at first (e.g., Three Fates), but the more you listened to it, the more it paid off.
 
To me, ELP are one of the founding fathers of prog. Like Yes, Genesis, Crimson, Floyd (and maybe Tull, I don't know, I have personal issues that I'm wrestling with regarding Tull), their music is the best prog ever recorded, bar none. Smile
"The red polygon's only desire / is to get to the blue triangle."
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65245
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 15 2007 at 22:59
^ completely agree with both your posts.. nice work
Back to Top
Tales View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie


Joined: December 29 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 98
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 15 2007 at 23:15
Originally posted by Evandro Martini Evandro Martini wrote:

As I've said before, ELP's problem is that the ratings are always to albums, and they didn't manage to create a masterpiece-rate album.
 
Brain Salad Surgery was critically said to be the greatest prog album of all time in a recent edition of  the very respectable US collectors mag 'Goldmine'.
Back to Top
Tales View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie


Joined: December 29 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 98
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 15 2007 at 23:19
Originally posted by Rocktopus Rocktopus wrote:

^I think ELP's problem is that their music hasn't aged well.
Emerson was using keyboards light years ahead of his contempories, as was Palmer with his electronic drum kit.
 
It's bands like Magma & ealry Genesis that sounds very, very dated, both musically and production.
Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 16 2007 at 04:08
As this thread is in the "Help us improve the site" section, could you stick to discussing the mechanics of the Top 100 here.
 
Discussions about the merits, longevity etc. of the music are better placed in the music sections.
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 16 2007 at 12:48

Perhaps a more representative chart of our most popular titles would be one computed from our personal top 10's.

 

That is, if we could list our top ten favorite albums in our profiles (rated 10 down to 1), with the one (and only) proviso was that they had to be listed in the PA. The chart would then be made from those scores - with no weightings. This would benefit three fold:

  1. It would show what we really liked.
  2. It would weed-out all the fanboy and hateboy nonsense.
  3. It would allow us to see what each other liked individually.
What?
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 12131415>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.137 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.