What happened to TOP 100??? |
Post Reply | Page <1 89101112 15> |
Author | |||
Dean
Special Collaborator Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: July 11 2007 at 18:14 | ||
Eh? The top RIO/Avant album is Zappa's Hot Rats - which album were you looking at?
|
|||
What?
|
|||
heyitsthatguy
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 17 2006 Location: Washington Hgts Status: Offline Points: 10094 |
Posted: July 11 2007 at 18:18 | ||
guess they already ironed out that kink I don't even remember the name but it was number one...I"m still not a huge fan of the new system though |
|||
|
|||
clarke2001
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: June 14 2006 Location: Croatia Status: Offline Points: 4160 |
Posted: July 11 2007 at 18:20 | ||
Yes, it's hard to believe some ratings...On this chart (Top RIO albums from 1993), I'm the only only person who reviewed album no. 14 (Yoshide) and I gave it 1 star. How it could be above some albums reviewed more than once, with 2 and 3 stars? Nos. 3, 4 and 5 are albums not rated at all |
|||
Hercules
Prog Reviewer Joined: June 14 2007 Location: Near York UK Status: Offline Points: 7024 |
Posted: July 11 2007 at 18:37 | ||
Hmm, well I see how the algorithm works OK and it's too open to extreme views and manipulation by people who try to push their own favourite bands up the ratings. Looking at a small sample of albums, the mean rating with a review is always much higher than without a review.
My advice would be to adopt the ice skating method of removing (say) the highest 5 and lowest 5 reviews for each album and averaging the rest. This will cut the incentive for the fanboys and spoilers to try to give extreme ratings to manipulate the chart. But I still thinks it's pants and needs scrapping. |
|||
A TVR is not a car. It's a way of life.
|
|||
yargh
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 04 2005 Status: Offline Points: 421 |
Posted: July 11 2007 at 18:43 | ||
Though this is a sound idea under normal circumstances, it does not make any sense on a scale that permits only 5 grades. Hopefully, this site will eventually go to a 10 or 15 point scale.
|
|||
rattlehead
Forum Newbie Joined: July 11 2007 Status: Offline Points: 2 |
Posted: July 11 2007 at 19:49 | ||
You’re complaining about the list of 100 top albums because bands which are not very popular and significant such as SBB or Bacamarte are in the top of the list among Floyds, Genesis, Yes, Crimson, etc. So what? I don’t understand what’s wrong or inappropriate with it. Ratings are ratings… Furthermore I suppose you’ve never heard any piece of SBB’s music, nevertheless you have just visited SBB site on Progarchives and you voted 1 star for their most popular album "Memento z banalnym tryptykiem" just because you don’t like the fact it is so high. The same with Bacamarte. This is not fair !! Edited by rattlehead - July 11 2007 at 20:06 |
|||
Dirk
Forum Senior Member Joined: August 11 2005 Location: Netherlands Status: Offline Points: 1043 |
Posted: July 11 2007 at 20:08 | ||
^Wow he really did that, what a pathetic action. It's really sad that people can rate albums without supporting their views with arguments, otherwise people like Tichy could be dealt with in the review abuse thread.
Edited by Dirk - July 11 2007 at 21:09 |
|||
andu
Forum Senior Member Joined: September 27 2006 Location: Romania Status: Offline Points: 3089 |
Posted: July 11 2007 at 20:15 | ||
I like the new top 100: it's got two Romanian albums, one at #31 and the other at #98. Sweet...
|
|||
Dirk
Forum Senior Member Joined: August 11 2005 Location: Netherlands Status: Offline Points: 1043 |
Posted: July 11 2007 at 21:08 | ||
Indeed, another band that i had never heard of, just listened to the samples and they sound truly great , i'll see if i can find some music of them.
For me the new top 100 is really more interesting than the old one, i've some sympathy though for others who claim that popularity should be included. It seems indeed a bit odd to me that Images and words and Scenes from DT have vanished from top 100 and that the only ELP album is on position 98. I don't think there's an objective right and wrong here, it's just a question of diversity versus popularity. I have to admit that much as i like the Bacamarte album for instance i don't think it's more important than ELP or the best albums from DT and that's the impression that's given now. |
|||
1800iareyay
Prog Reviewer Joined: November 18 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2492 |
Posted: July 11 2007 at 21:16 | ||
That's the postitive of the new list, I'll get a few new bands out of it before things settle down. I don't see why this is such a big deal. If people really want to have a top 100 GREATEST (not most popular) list, why don't we submit lists to a thread of top 50 albums and some unfortunate soul can average them. Before any of you get to excited, please realize that this will not happen. I do not have the heart to ask an admin to devote his or her valuable time to such a pointless endeavor. Just deal with it.
|
|||
Soul Dreamer
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 17 2005 Location: Netherlands Status: Offline Points: 997 |
Posted: July 11 2007 at 21:49 | ||
I for one am very opposed to this move. The first reason is the reason of continuity. There is no way you can compare the lists as they are now with the lists as they were for example 3 months ago or 1 year ago. So any threads comparing chart positions now with e.g. a year ago (there is one running right now, the one about "mathematically determined greatest prog bands" or something in that vein) are rendered useless.
Second, the algorithm is not stable, or produces "crazy" results.
I was checking the list for 2007 and came across this:
position: 58 rating 3.53 (2 entries)
position: 59 rating 3.53 (2 entries)
position: 60 rating 3.72 (7 entries)
position: 61 rating 3.68 (5 entries)
The same happens between 69 and 72. I stopped checking there. How can an album with a rating of 3.72 and 7 entries be lower than an album with rating 3.53 and 2 entries??? It just doesn't make any sense.
As long as this kind of bugs (because that MUST be a bug) are not solved, why implement something like that???
|
|||
To be the one who seeks so I may find .. (Metallica)
|
|||
greenback
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: August 14 2004 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 3300 |
Posted: July 11 2007 at 23:14 | ||
the most interesting thing in the new algoritm without the 30ish number of reviews minimum would be that the 5 stars average rated albums would pass the test of time: such perfect ratings imply very low number of reviews, so that an accessible top 100 made of nearly 5 stars avg rating albums would bring curiosity to prog fans and force them to listen and review those albums. however, the new algoritm does not exactly work that way. I see a global incoherence, since it seems to not take very much in consideration the test of time and since the number of ratings and the average rating itself are absolutely nor sorted: the former cubic fonction-logarithm product was more convenient and representative.
|
|||
[HEADPINS - LINE OF FIRE: THE RECORD HAVING THE MOST POWERFUL GUITAR SOUND IN THE WHOLE HISTORY OF MUSIC!>
|
|||
bluetailfly
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 28 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1383 |
Posted: July 11 2007 at 23:24 | ||
You go, Rattlehead!
|
|||
"The red polygon's only desire / is to get to the blue triangle."
|
|||
The T
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 16 2006 Location: FL, USA Status: Offline Points: 17493 |
Posted: July 12 2007 at 00:26 | ||
I would rather see NO DT in the top100 than a live album... live album with not so many ratings.... Well, this isn't about DT anyway... this is about albums with few reviews taking the top spots... this is about the top-100 being not what it used to be (not that it was perfect anyway) but I still think that, as quality is not easy to measure in an objective way, we can at least go for quality+popularity, which is more real.
I'm sorry, maybe I'm not being that objective... But now this top-100 looks so fake, so... distant, so only-for-obscure-prog-collectors....
I guess it will work fine in the end.. just please, at least take the LIVE and EP and DVD's OUT of the list....
|
|||
|
|||
Eetu Pellonpaa
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: June 17 2005 Location: Finland Status: Offline Points: 4828 |
Posted: July 12 2007 at 03:27 | ||
I'll second this!
|
|||
Easy Livin
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: February 21 2004 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 15585 |
Posted: July 12 2007 at 03:58 | ||
I can't remember the details offhand MIke. You have a far greater knowledge than I do of how these things work. I do recall though that the current algorithm was similar to the one you worked out for the previous listing, and that seems to be borne out by the similarities in the results.
|
|||
Asphalt
Forum Senior Member Joined: July 07 2006 Status: Offline Points: 456 |
Posted: July 12 2007 at 04:29 | ||
Am I the only one to find a strange coincidence between Easy Livin's laid-back attitude towards the new algorithm, his avatar and the current no. 1 in TOP100?
Seriously though, if the new TOP100 has a redeeming quality, that must be its fun. With the constant change in positions and mind-numbing rises and falls, its bound to be at least entertaining if not accurate. This doesn't mean I like it or that it makes sense to me, but rather that I'm taking the deicision to change the algorithm a permanent one, regardless of what we say, and I'm trying to get used to it. |
|||
Easy Livin
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: February 21 2004 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 15585 |
Posted: July 12 2007 at 04:38 | ||
The title also explains why I don't actually understand the algorithm!
|
|||
Dirk
Forum Senior Member Joined: August 11 2005 Location: Netherlands Status: Offline Points: 1043 |
Posted: July 12 2007 at 06:12 | ||
Popularity is a dangerous thing as a yardstick, consider this, in the non prog world Britney Spears is more popular than Tori Amos, who makes the better music. I think i know the answer but it's subjective. Now compare Bacamarte with for instance DT, again i think i know the answer, again it's subjective. About Bacamarte being obscure, i don't think so. When i was at a meeting with sympho prog lovers this album was discussed and almost everybody knew it. Even more a band like PFM, every sympho lover will know them. I've never heard myself though of Phoenix and S.B.B which fall outside the Sympho genre, something new and interesting well loved by at least some people here,i checked out Phoenix, they're very good. Stil no Scenes and Images and word in top 100 is a bit odd, so i do agree with you to a point that popularity must have some say, but not as much as in the past. Looking at top 100 now i'd have missed DT (i didn't know them before i came here, still looking at the forums only once, this would have been corrected ). |
|||
Seyo
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: May 08 2004 Location: Bosnia Status: Offline Points: 1320 |
Posted: July 12 2007 at 07:52 | ||
That's interesting, because on my PC this album, with one 1-star rating, has average mark of 3 stars...!!!???
|
|||
Post Reply | Page <1 89101112 15> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |