Forum Home Forum Home > Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements > Help us improve the site
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - What happened to TOP 100???
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedWhat happened to TOP 100???

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 89101112 15>
Author
Message
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 11 2007 at 18:14
Originally posted by heyitsthatguy heyitsthatguy wrote:

sorry, but after seeing that the top RIO/Avant album is an album with ONLY ONE RATING, I can't help but think PA reaaaaaally f**ked up with this oneThumbs%20Down
Eh? The top RIO/Avant album is Zappa's Hot Rats - which album were you looking at?
What?
Back to Top
heyitsthatguy View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 17 2006
Location: Washington Hgts
Status: Offline
Points: 10094
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 11 2007 at 18:18
Originally posted by darqdean darqdean wrote:

Originally posted by heyitsthatguy heyitsthatguy wrote:

sorry, but after seeing that the top RIO/Avant album is an album with ONLY ONE RATING, I can't help but think PA reaaaaaally f**ked up with this oneThumbs%20Down
Eh? The top RIO/Avant album is Zappa's Hot Rats - which album were you looking at?


guess they already ironed out that kink LOL I don't even remember the name but it was number one...I"m still not a huge fan of the new system though


Back to Top
clarke2001 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 14 2006
Location: Croatia
Status: Offline
Points: 4160
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 11 2007 at 18:20
Originally posted by heyitsthatguy heyitsthatguy wrote:

sorry, but after seeing that the top RIO/Avant album is an album with ONLY ONE RATING, I can't help but think PA reaaaaaally f**ked up with this oneThumbs%20Down


Yes, it's hard to believe some ratings...On this chart (Top RIO albums from 1993), I'm the only only person who reviewed album no. 14 (Yoshide) and I gave it 1 star. How it could be above some albums reviewed more than once, with 2 and 3 stars?

Nos. 3, 4 and 5 are albums not rated at allConfused
Back to Top
Hercules View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 14 2007
Location: Near York UK
Status: Offline
Points: 7024
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 11 2007 at 18:37
Hmm, well I see how the algorithm works OK and it's too open to extreme views and manipulation by people who try to push their own favourite bands up the ratings. Looking at a small sample of albums, the mean rating with a review is always much higher than without a review.

My advice would be to adopt the ice skating method of removing (say) the highest 5 and lowest 5 reviews for each album and averaging the rest. This will cut the incentive for the fanboys and spoilers to try to give extreme ratings to manipulate the chart.

But I still thinks it's pants and needs scrapping.
A TVR is not a car. It's a way of life.
Back to Top
yargh View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 04 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 421
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 11 2007 at 18:43
Originally posted by Hercules Hercules wrote:



My advice would be to adopt the ice skating method of removing (say) the highest 5 and lowest 5 reviews for each album and averaging the rest. This will cut the incentive for the fanboys and spoilers to try to give extreme ratings to manipulate the chart.

But I still thinks it's pants and needs scrapping.
 
Though this is a sound idea under normal circumstances, it does not make any sense on a scale that permits only 5 grades.  Hopefully, this site will eventually go to a 10 or 15 point scale. 
Back to Top
rattlehead View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: July 11 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 2
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 11 2007 at 19:49
Originally posted by Tichy Tichy wrote:

It's the silliest Top100 I've ever seen. Even when Atom Heart Mother was No. 1, it's better, at least funny and obvious to be fixed soon:)
 
Who is SBB, only 28 people voted for it, how could it be found a place in a Top List, I'm not talking about music quality, lyrics or songs. It's not the best 100 list, I don't argue that who's the best or how could WYWH be the best album in prog history, even though it's not a prog album at all (at least not fully-qualified)
 
This is Top 100 list, it's not for progressive rock listeners, but for prog newbies. They want to learn much more about progressive rock or are suggested by a friend, check out the progarchives and wonder who's the most populer albums and bands: Bacamarte, SBB, Focus, PFM? (Don't piss off, I love the last two of them, but these groups are not a starting point or the most known samples)
 
And why are all the polls about Genesis, Yes, Jethro Tull, Pink Floyd, ELP, VDGG; because we know them better and want to discuss about them, even their worst albums. Is there anyone to see or remember a Bacamarte or SBB poll? Because they are not popular, 500 people did not vote for their albums, 200 people did not review their album, I don't know maybe %80 of progarchives visitors did not listen it. I don't care about how SBB, etc. are musically great, they did not left a mark, were not discussed or unfairly criticised, their name were not heard from who did not know what the prog is. So the list must be changed soon, because it's meaningless now and don't forget that this list Top 100, not the best 100. And how can ELP almost out of it?
 
 

You’re complaining about the list of 100 top albums because bands which are not very popular and significant such as SBB or Bacamarte are in the top of the list among Floyds, Genesis, Yes, Crimson, etc.

So what? I don’t understand what’s wrong or inappropriate with it. Ratings are ratings…

Furthermore I suppose you’ve never heard any piece of SBB’s music, nevertheless you have just visited SBB site on Progarchives and you voted 1 star for their most popular album "Memento z banalnym tryptykiem" just because you don’t like the fact it is so high. The same with Bacamarte. This is not fair !!

You’re complaining about the list, but through people like you these ratings are indeed completely meaningless and don’t make sense at all (regardless of rating system) !!!


Edited by rattlehead - July 11 2007 at 20:06
Back to Top
Dirk View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 1043
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 11 2007 at 20:08
^Wow he really did that, what a pathetic action. It's really sad that people can rate albums without supporting their views with arguments, otherwise people like Tichy could be dealt with in the review abuse thread.

Edited by Dirk - July 11 2007 at 21:09
Back to Top
andu View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 27 2006
Location: Romania
Status: Offline
Points: 3089
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 11 2007 at 20:15
I like the new top 100: it's got two Romanian albums, one at #31 and the other at #98. Sweet... Big%20smile
Back to Top
Dirk View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 1043
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 11 2007 at 21:08
Indeed, another band that i had never  heard of, just listened to the samples and they sound truly  great Thumbs%20Up , i'll see if i can find some music of them. 

For me the new top 100 is really more interesting than the old one, i've some sympathy though for others who claim that popularity should be included. It seems indeed a bit odd to me that Images and words and Scenes from DT have vanished from top 100 and that the only ELP album is on position 98.

I don't think there's an objective  right and wrong  here, it's just a question of diversity versus popularity. I have to admit that much as i like the Bacamarte album for instance i don't think it's more important than ELP or the best albums from DT and that's the impression that's given now.


Back to Top
1800iareyay View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: November 18 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2492
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 11 2007 at 21:16
That's the postitive of the new list, I'll get a few new bands out of it before things settle down. I don't see why this is such a big deal. If people really want to have a top 100 GREATEST (not most popular) list, why don't we submit lists to a thread of top 50 albums and some unfortunate soul can average them. Before any of you get to excited, please realize that this will not happen. I do not have the heart to ask an admin to devote his or her valuable time to such a pointless endeavor. Just deal with it.
Back to Top
Soul Dreamer View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 17 2005
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 997
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 11 2007 at 21:49
I for one am very opposed to this move. The first reason is the reason of continuity. There is no way you can compare the lists as they are now with the lists as they were for example 3 months ago or 1 year ago. So any threads comparing chart positions now with e.g. a year ago (there is one running right now, the one about "mathematically determined greatest prog bands" or something in that vein) are rendered useless.
 
Second, the algorithm is not stable, or produces "crazy" results.
I was checking the list for 2007 and came across this:
position: 58 rating 3.53 (2 entries)
position: 59 rating 3.53 (2 entries)
position: 60 rating 3.72 (7 entries)
position: 61 rating 3.68 (5 entries)
 
The same happens between 69 and 72. I stopped checking there. How can an album with a rating of 3.72 and 7 entries be lower than an album with rating 3.53 and 2 entries??? It just doesn't make any sense.
As long as this kind of bugs (because that MUST be a bug) are not solved, why implement something like that??? 
To be the one who seeks so I may find .. (Metallica)
Back to Top
greenback View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: August 14 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3300
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 11 2007 at 23:14
the most interesting thing in the new algoritm without the 30ish number of reviews minimum would be that the 5 stars average rated albums would pass the test of time: such perfect ratings imply very low number of reviews, so that an accessible top 100 made of nearly 5 stars avg rating albums would bring curiosity to prog fans and force them to listen and review those albums. however, the new algoritm does not exactly work that way. I see a global incoherence, since it seems to not take very much in consideration the test of time and since the number of ratings and the average rating itself are absolutely nor sorted: the former cubic fonction-logarithm product was more convenient and representative.
[HEADPINS - LINE OF FIRE: THE RECORD HAVING THE MOST POWERFUL GUITAR SOUND IN THE WHOLE HISTORY OF MUSIC!>
Back to Top
bluetailfly View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 28 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1383
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 11 2007 at 23:24
You go, Rattlehead! Clap
"The red polygon's only desire / is to get to the blue triangle."
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 12 2007 at 00:26
Originally posted by nuncjusz nuncjusz wrote:

I don't believe what I'm seeing. Images and Words are now #128, and Scenes from a Memory #178!!! Dear God...

Amazingly, LIVE Scenes from New York are now at #12...
 
ConfusedConfusedConfused
 
I would rather see NO DT in the top100 than a live album... live album with not so many ratings.... Well, this isn't about DT anyway... this is about albums with few reviews taking the top spots... this is about the top-100 being not what it used to be (not that it was perfect anyway) but I still think that, as quality is not easy to measure in an objective way, we can at least go for quality+popularity, which is more real.
 
I'm sorry, maybe I'm not being that objective... But now this top-100 looks so fake, so... distant, so only-for-obscure-prog-collectors....
 
I guess it will work fine in the end.. just please, at least take the LIVE and EP and DVD's OUT of the list....
Back to Top
Eetu Pellonpaa View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 17 2005
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 4828
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 12 2007 at 03:27
Originally posted by chopper chopper wrote:

I still believe that proto-prog and prog-related acts should not be included.
 
I'll second this! Smile
Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 12 2007 at 03:58
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

Originally posted by Easy Livin Easy Livin wrote:

The number of reviews and the ratings are the only factors taken into account for the algorithm.
 
The weighting simply give more emphasis to reviews by Prog reviewers and Collaborators, and to ratings which include a written review. This was done in response to the general distaste for ratings without reviews.


I'm curious ... how does the number of reviews affect the ranking? It seems like it was removed completely ... the average is the only thing that counts now.
 
I can't remember the details offhand MIke. You have a far greater knowledge than I do of how these things workEmbarrassed. I do recall though that the current algorithm was similar to the one you worked out for the previous listing, and that seems to be borne out by the similarities in the results.
Back to Top
Asphalt View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 07 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 456
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 12 2007 at 04:29
Am I the only one to find a strange coincidence between Easy Livin's laid-back attitude towards the new algorithm, his avatar and the current no. 1 in TOP100? Tongue

Seriously though, if the new TOP100 has a redeeming quality, that must be its fun. With the constant change in positions and mind-numbing rises and falls, its bound to be at least entertaining if not accurate. LOL This doesn't mean I like it or that it makes sense to me, but rather that I'm taking the deicision to change the algorithm a permanent one, regardless of what we say, and I'm trying to get used to it.
Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 12 2007 at 04:38
 LOLThe title also explains why I don't actually understand the algorithm!Embarrassed
Back to Top
Dirk View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 1043
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 12 2007 at 06:12
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

Originally posted by nuncjusz nuncjusz wrote:

I don't believe what I'm seeing. Images and Words are now #128, and Scenes from a Memory #178!!! Dear God...

Amazingly, LIVE Scenes from New York are now at #12...
 
ConfusedConfusedConfused
 
I would rather see NO DT in the top100 than a live album... live album with not so many ratings.... Well, this isn't about DT anyway... this is about albums with few reviews taking the top spots... this is about the top-100 being not what it used to be (not that it was perfect anyway) but I still think that, as quality is not easy to measure in an objective way, we can at least go for quality+popularity, which is more real.
 
I'm sorry, maybe I'm not being that objective... But now this top-100 looks so fake, so... distant, so only-for-obscure-prog-collectors....
 
I guess it will work fine in the end.. just please, at least take the LIVE and EP and DVD's OUT of the list....


Popularity is a dangerous  thing as a yardstick, consider this, in the non prog world Britney Spears is more popular than Tori Amos, who makes the better music. I think i know the answer but it's subjective.

Now compare Bacamarte with for instance DT, again i think i know the answer, again it's subjective.

About Bacamarte being obscure, i don't think so. When i was at a meeting with sympho prog lovers this album was discussed and almost everybody knew it. Even more a band like PFM, every sympho lover will know them. I've never heard myself though of Phoenix and S.B.B which fall outside the Sympho genre, something new and interesting well loved by at least some people here,i checked out Phoenix, they're very good.

Stil no Scenes and Images and word in top 100 is a bit odd, so i do agree with you to a point that popularity must have some say, but not as much as in the past. Looking at top 100 now i'd have missed DT (i didn't know them before i came here, still looking at the forums only once, this would have been corrected LOL).
Back to Top
Seyo View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 08 2004
Location: Bosnia
Status: Offline
Points: 1320
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 12 2007 at 07:52
Originally posted by darqdean darqdean wrote:

Originally posted by Sckxyss Sckxyss wrote:

Originally posted by M@X M@X wrote:

Yes , there is been a upgrade to the algo , it's now based on the more adequate weighted average calculation (more info here : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weighted_average )
 
;-) Any comments sor far ?
What exactly is it weighted on? And, I don't see how an album with one rating of 4 stars could get an average rating of 3.46. Could you explain more? I'm curious about exactly how this is calculated.
I don't care either way about the chart positions (obviously I like to see Floyd do well, but that's personal bias), however as a technical-type person I am intrigued by the maths behind the algorithm.
 
I haven't a clue how the weightings are done but I have a feeling that the weighting is based upon the ratings of other albums by the same artist.
 
Take a look at this: QUATERMASS "The Long Road"  a single 190-word review by a non-colaborator/reviewer giving it a 1-star rating, yet the total is 3.51.
 
The only way I can see this occuring is if the 3.66 rating for Quatermass's previous album is taken into concideration. Confused
 
This would explain CTTE sudden drop from the top three.
 
 
That's interesting, because on my PC this album, with one 1-star rating, has average mark of 3 stars...!!!???
ConfusedThumbs%20Down
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 89101112 15>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.234 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.