![]() |
Reviews discussion |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 3536373839 182> |
Author | ||||||
glass house ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: June 16 2005 Location: Netherlands Status: Offline Points: 4986 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
I agree with Stoney and my namesake. So 1 stands, the other 2 can be deleted. All of the reviews are very poorly written.
Edited by glass house - May 12 2007 at 14:31 |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
tuxon ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: September 21 2004 Location: plugged-in Status: Offline Points: 5502 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
The three identical reviews are not reviews of the albums. the duplication only reflects his stand on Rush in general and have no relation to the individual albums as such.
they shouldn't be allowed, if it had been only one review with that content it wouldn't be a problem, but you can't see one of the three as separate from the others.
|
||||||
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
progismylife ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: October 19 2006 Location: ibreathehelium Status: Offline Points: 15535 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
They seem to be fanboy reviews as well.
Edited by progismylife - May 12 2007 at 14:35 |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
tuxon ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: September 21 2004 Location: plugged-in Status: Offline Points: 5502 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
That shouldn't be an issue, fans have the right to speak their mind.
![]() |
||||||
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
progismylife ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: October 19 2006 Location: ibreathehelium Status: Offline Points: 15535 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
Yes but does your favorite band have all masterpiece albums? and besides: 8 - Before assigning a star rating to an album, you should ensure you understand what the differing numbers of stars mean. Please use "one" and "five star" ratings very sparingly -- most albums you dislike will have at least some positive qualities, and not every album that you enjoy will be a perfect "masterpiece of prog". |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
tuxon ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: September 21 2004 Location: plugged-in Status: Offline Points: 5502 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
My favourite bands have all masterpiece albums, that's why i like them so much.
|
||||||
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
progismylife ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: October 19 2006 Location: ibreathehelium Status: Offline Points: 15535 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
So every album by your favorite band is perfect?
Even I wouldn't go that far.... |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
stonebeard ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: May 27 2005 Location: NE Indiana Status: Offline Points: 28057 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
Come on, Ben! An album doesn't have to be perfect to warrant a 5-star review. Our system for rating is a bit flawed, but that stuff is hard to change.
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Easy Livin ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: February 21 2004 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 15585 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
Still interested to hear other views here. I can see both sides, so your opinions are helpful.
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Snow Dog ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 23 2005 Location: Caerdydd Status: Offline Points: 32995 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
No..Ben is right....An album doesn't have to be perfect, but the pros must outweigh the cons considerably.
For example, I would give Brain Salad Surgery 5 stars, despite the presence of non 5 star tracks, because the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. And the good parts outweigh any shortcomings significantly.
imo
![]() But what Tuxon has said is just plain daft. ![]() Edited by Snow Dog - May 12 2007 at 19:14 |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
tuxon ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: September 21 2004 Location: plugged-in Status: Offline Points: 5502 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
![]() It's not daft, but I hate it when my opinions are presented as facts.
My opinions are not objective, they are entirely subjective and completely right for they are mine. There's no need to agree with me, but you can't say my opinions are daft just because your subjective opinion isn't in agreement with mine.
|
||||||
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Snow Dog ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 23 2005 Location: Caerdydd Status: Offline Points: 32995 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
Can't your opinion be daft in my opinion?
![]() |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
salmacis ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Content Addition Joined: April 10 2005 Status: Offline Points: 3928 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
I think those Rush reviews should get deleted, EL. They seem to take potshots at a certain demographic of Rush fans and are hardly insightful reviews- how can they be when the same sentence has been written with what amounted to an 'insert album here' section each time. It's subjective, of course, but I strongly dislike 'fanboy' reviews as well. My depiction of a 'fanboy' review is one that dolls out the 5 stars to an album without any real justification/explanation for it and most of the time, filled with an abundance of superlatives. No problem with 5 stars being given to an album that has the odd duff track but as has been said, the pros should outweigh the cons, imho. |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Tony R ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: July 16 2004 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 11979 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
I think we have to be more parsimonious when deciding whether to keep reviews of albums not released yet...
..who would get an advanced copy?
1) A DJ (not noted as reviewers but their egos wouldnt allow them to submit a poor review surely)
2) Someone/site picked out by the publicity agent or record label as a reviewer.
in the case of 2) let's just consider the psychology....you are chosen to review an album do you
a) write the best possible review, going into detail about everything from production, the tracks, musicians, historical context and potential impact
or b) submit this:
![]() it doesnt take a Sherlock Holmes.
Ok, I am not saying this should apply to every review, just reviews of albums not released at the time of posting..
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
MikeEnRegalia ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21615 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
^ I can't see the big problem with this review ... of course it's not very professional so it's unlikely that the reviewer belongs to a circle of people which would be chosen by a record company to receive promo copies of new albums.
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Atkingani ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: October 21 2005 Location: Terra Brasilis Status: Offline Points: 12288 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
Just moved your post to this forum, Erik. Let's wait if some discussion will arise.
I was just wandering if in an imaginary PunkArchives someone using the nickname Punkie or Punker could say similar things to "Never Mind The Bollocks" or "London Calling".
![]() |
||||||
Guigo
~~~~~~ |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
erik neuteboom ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() Joined: July 27 2005 Location: Netherlands Status: Offline Points: 7659 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
Atkingani, imagine my contributions as the new reviewer Punker:
"shine on your crazy diamond is nothing but a poor song with boring use of synthesizers and too mellow use of guitars"
"Close to the edge is the most overrated epic, it's no more than drugs-driven over-ambitious crap with irritating self-indulgence on keyboards and guitar"
"The Musical Box is a typical symphonic prog song that lacks tension and ends with hysterical screams by the over-sensitive singer Peter Gabriel with his childish lyrics"
... you can add more if you like but it's the way Progger is writing about classic prog albums ![]() Edited by erik neuteboom - May 13 2007 at 12:03 |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
tuxon ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: September 21 2004 Location: plugged-in Status: Offline Points: 5502 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
Sure it can, but you can't state as a fact that my opinion is daft
![]() My opinion was there to express that other people's opinions can't be critisised if these opinions are genuine.
If someone believes all Rush albums are worth 5 stars, who are we to say he is wrong, it's his opinion and that should be fine with us. The same for people who don't consider KC Court of the crimson King a masterpiece, or consideres Genesis albums to be very weak.
it's all opinion and if you can't deal with people having different opinions, how can you expect honoust ratings. Fans and bashers should get more freedom to express their likes and dislikes openly and uncensored, without constantly being called fanboy's or not worthy of writing on a progressive rock site.
We need both sides of the medaillion to keep a balance between objective analisis and subjective reasons, personally i prefer subjective reasons for liking a band than an objective analysis, for that may reflect on quality, but not on beauty.
The problem with the Rush reviews is that it aren't album reviews, but band reviews, and those should be a part of the album review, but the review has to be specifically adressing the album, which didn't happen. therefor they should be deleted, and the writer should be informed asking for a more album specific review to replace the faulted review. But it's the review that's wrong, not his opinion.
|
||||||
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Snow Dog ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 23 2005 Location: Caerdydd Status: Offline Points: 32995 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
But I didn't state it as a fact. You are now stating that the statement is a fact. It never was a fact. Thats a fact.
It was an opinion............imo.
![]() |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Tony R ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: July 16 2004 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 11979 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
you two are far worse than I'll ever be....
BTW that inspiration came to me MKB
![]() |
||||||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 3536373839 182> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |