Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
video vertigo
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 17 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1930
|
Topic: Best of the US President's The Finals Posted: March 10 2007 at 23:40 |
After eliminating those with just 0,1 or 2 votes who is the best that remains?
Edited by video vertigo - March 10 2007 at 23:41
|
"The rock and roll business is pretty absurd, but the world of serious music is much worse." - Zappa
|
|
rileydog22
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 24 2005
Location: New Jersey
Status: Offline
Points: 8844
|
Posted: March 11 2007 at 00:45 |
Abe Lincoln! The man united the North and South, the most difficult task ever put before a president.
|
|
|
stonebeard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
|
Posted: March 11 2007 at 14:18 |
To hard to choose fairly. Who knows how the country would have faired without Washington in the beginning, or with Lincoln during the war?
|
|
|
JJLehto
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
|
Posted: March 11 2007 at 18:14 |
REAGAN!?!?
That is tough, but I have to say Lincoln.
|
|
Equality 7-2521
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
|
Posted: March 11 2007 at 19:13 |
^
Reagen is one of the best up there. You should wonder how someone as disgusting as Clinton landed himself on there.
Washington and Jefferson are my two favorite presidents, but Washington
did so much simply in terms of the precedents he set for the office and
what he symbollically meant to the country.
|
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
|
thellama73
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: May 29 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8368
|
Posted: March 11 2007 at 22:41 |
I am a total Reaganaut. Reagan and Thatcher are the ultimate power couple.
It was hard to not to vote for Jefferson though. "The government which governs least, governs best."
Edited by thellama73 - March 11 2007 at 22:42
|
|
|
Forgotten Son
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 13 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1356
|
Posted: March 12 2007 at 00:44 |
Equality 7-2521 wrote:
^
Reagen is one of the best up there. You should wonder how someone as disgusting as Clinton landed himself on there. |
I'm sure they all have/had skeletons in the closet of some sort or another.
|
|
BroSpence
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 05 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 2614
|
Posted: March 12 2007 at 01:49 |
THEOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
|
|
Pnoom!
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 02 2006
Location: OH
Status: Offline
Points: 4981
|
Posted: March 12 2007 at 13:12 |
rileydog22 wrote:
Abe Lincoln! The man united the North and South, the most difficult task ever put before a president. |
No he didn't...
He only got elected in half the country... even after the war, the south hated him... they only went along with them because they lost the civil war...
A great president, but...
I choose good old George for beating up on the "other" George and getting me a country.
|
|
ClemofNazareth
Special Collaborator
Prog Folk Researcher
Joined: August 17 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4659
|
Posted: March 12 2007 at 17:27 |
Reagan?! Did any American over the age of 30 vote on this guy? Don't get me started on the apostasy known as revisionist history....
FDR was the man! Led this country honorably through two of the most trying periods in our history - WWII and the Great Depression, much of it from a wheelcair, and did it with grace and dignity.
|
"Peace is the only battle worth waging."
Albert Camus
|
|
cookieacquired
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 23 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 911
|
Posted: March 12 2007 at 19:10 |
My vote's got to go for Teddy
|
|
|
Equality 7-2521
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
|
Posted: March 12 2007 at 23:57 |
ClemofNazareth wrote:
Reagan?! Did any American over
the age of 30 vote on this guy? Don't get me started on the
apostasy known as revisionist history....
He swept 49 states. I'm pretty sure he had plenty of voters over the age of 30. And since when does age play an importance.
FDR was the man! Led this country honorably
through two of the most trying periods in our history - WWII and the
Great Depression, much of it from a wheelcair, and did it with grace
and dignity.
|
No comments on FDR as I don't feel like arguing about him.
|
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
|
bhikkhu
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 06 2006
Location: A² Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 5109
|
Posted: March 12 2007 at 23:59 |
ClemofNazareth wrote:
Reagan?! Did any American over the age of 30 vote on this guy? Don't get me started on the apostasy known as revisionist history....
|
I'm not a big Ronny fan either. I think I was the only one in my Fraternity that voted for Mondale.
Anyway, my vote goes for Abe. He took a lot of crap, and managed to change the course of history.
|
|
|
video vertigo
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 17 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1930
|
Posted: March 13 2007 at 00:13 |
Democrats 2 Republicans 11
seems about right to me.
|
"The rock and roll business is pretty absurd, but the world of serious music is much worse." - Zappa
|
|
JJLehto
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
|
Posted: March 13 2007 at 00:53 |
bhikkhu wrote:
ClemofNazareth wrote:
Reagan?! Did any American over the age of 30 vote on this guy? Don't get me started on the apostasy known as revisionist history....
|
I'm not a big Ronny fan either. I think I was the only one in my Fraternity that voted for Mondale.
Anyway, my vote goes for Abe. He took a lot of crap, and managed to change the course of history. |
Glad some others share my feeling of Reagan. Cant find too many.
Edited by JJLehto - March 13 2007 at 00:53
|
|
BroSpence
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 05 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 2614
|
Posted: March 13 2007 at 03:30 |
I agree with you. Reagan was horse sh*t. He did not end the cold war. He is given way too much credit. After 8 years of ruling, he still never got that Oscar.
|
|
ClemofNazareth
Special Collaborator
Prog Folk Researcher
Joined: August 17 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4659
|
Posted: March 13 2007 at 06:32 |
Equality 7-2521 wrote:
ClemofNazareth wrote:
Reagan?! Did any American over the age of 30 vote on this guy? Don't get me started on the apostasy known as revisionist history....
He swept 49 states. I'm pretty sure he had plenty of voters over the age of 30. And since when does age play an importance.
FDR was the man! Led this country honorably through two of the most trying periods in our history - WWII and the Great Depression, much of it from a wheelcair, and did it with grace and dignity.
|
No comments on FDR as I don't feel like arguing about him.
|
You misunderstood the comment. I said I doubted very many American ProgArchives members currently over the age of 30 voted for Reagan as "Best U.S. President". And in this case - yes, age would be critically important, since we're talking about those of us who lived through Reagan's America and experienced that administration first-hand.
And really, don't be obtuse - anyone who has even run for local dogcatcher will tell you that voters' ages matter very much to politicians. The reasons are quite simple: there are far more people aged 30-90+ than there are 18-29; the percentage of older people who vote is much higher than that of young people; older people are more likely to have large amounts of money to donate to candidates; and perhaps most importantly, older people are more likely to be land/home owners, small businessmen, or civic leaders, and therefore are more useful to politicians who want to leverage their local influence.
|
"Peace is the only battle worth waging."
Albert Camus
|
|
IVNORD
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 13 2006
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1191
|
Posted: March 13 2007 at 08:58 |
BroSpence wrote:
Reagan was horse sh*t. He did not end the cold war. He is given way too much credit. After 8 years of ruling, he still never got that Oscar.
|
He did not end the cold war, true, but his policy accelerated the downfall of the USSR. That’s probably the only positive factor of his bloated budget deficit. I was perplexed when he claimed he would cut taxes and increase defense spending during the 1980 campaign as the two things seemed to be mutually exclusive. And 6 years later we got it – a tax break and a huge bill. But at least it was put to good use as the arms race destroyed the soviet economy
|
|
Equality 7-2521
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
|
Posted: March 13 2007 at 12:18 |
ClemofNazareth wrote:
Equality
7-2521 wrote:
ClemofNazareth wrote:
Reagan?! Did any
American over the age of 30 vote on this guy? Don't get me
started on the apostasy known as revisionist history....
He swept 49 states. I'm pretty sure he had plenty of voters over the age of 30. And since when does age play an importance.
FDR was the man! Led this country honorably
through two of the most trying periods in our history - WWII and the
Great Depression, much of it from a wheelcair, and did it with grace
and dignity.
|
No comments on FDR as I don't feel like arguing about him.
|
You misunderstood the comment. I said
I doubted very many American ProgArchives members currently
over the age of 30 voted for Reagan as "Best U.S. President". And
in this case - yes, age would be critically important, since we're
talking about those of us who lived through Reagan's America and
experienced that administration first-hand.
From the way you phrased what you said, it didn't sound like that. Sorry, my mistake.
And really, don't be obtuse - anyone who has even run for local
dogcatcher will tell you that voters' ages matter very much to
politicians. The reasons are quite simple: there are far
more people aged 30-90+ than there are 18-29; the percentage of older
people who vote is much higher than that of young people; older people
are more likely to have large amounts of money to donate to candidates;
and perhaps most importantly, older people are more likely to be
land/home owners, small businessmen, or civic leaders, and therefore
are more useful to politicians who want to leverage their local
influence.
You misunderstood me. I was saying since when
does age matter in regards to the validity of an opinion, not in the
regards of obvious demographic information.
|
|
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
|
thellama73
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: May 29 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8368
|
Posted: March 13 2007 at 16:30 |
I also doubt the people voting for Washington or Lincoln were alive during their presidencies.
|
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.