Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
BaldFriede
Prog Reviewer
Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10261
|
Posted: March 01 2007 at 16:10 |
The T wrote:
It had almost the same impact as “Ich bin ein Berliner” (which, by the way, is wrong: the current expression would’ve been “Ich bin Berliner”).
|
Not true; you can say both. Only "Ich bin ein Berliner" has a funny side to it too, because "Berliner" is also the German name for a kind of doughnut with jelly filling.
Edited by BaldFriede - March 01 2007 at 16:12
|
BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.
|
|
Padraic
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
|
Posted: March 01 2007 at 16:58 |
|
|
Equality 7-2521
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
|
Posted: March 01 2007 at 16:59 |
inpraiseoffolly wrote:
None of these. George Washington.
If he had wanted, he could have been president for life.
However, he found that unethical, and decided to allow others to make
America a true democracy.
What an American in the ideal sense of the word.
Micky better give him a few clappies. |
He's my favorite president too, but the poll asked who's the best modern president, not who's the best president.
|
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
|
BroSpence
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 05 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 2614
|
Posted: March 08 2007 at 21:33 |
They've all pretty much sucked. Especially in terms of foreign policy.
|
|
pianoman
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 28 2007
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 793
|
Posted: March 08 2007 at 21:39 |
BroSpence wrote:
They've all pretty much sucked. Especially in terms of foreign policy. |
Well said
Kennady is good with me though.
|
|
IVNORD
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 13 2006
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1191
|
Posted: March 09 2007 at 08:24 |
BroSpence wrote:
They've all pretty much sucked. Especially in terms of foreign policy. |
By this criteria one really has to go with the least harmful one. Add domestic economy to foreign policy and the high vote Clinton has received here is totally unwarranted.
|
|
BroSpence
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 05 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 2614
|
Posted: March 10 2007 at 20:20 |
Clinton's strategy for foreign policy was pretty much what Carter's was only it worked a tiny bit better. Meaning it still sucked. Everyone since Carter has had about the same roll in policy. Bush jr. is even taking an approach like Carter after realizing his early neo-isolationist and other strategies worked even worse. Kennedy's problem was everything he set up failed.
Nixon was awful too for obvious reasons. During the '68 elections he told the leader of S. Vietnam (before a peace signing with the North, setup by Johnson) that he would get him a better deal. S. Vietnam pulled out of the treaty signing and Nixon won the election and then blew up Cambodia.
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.