Forum Home Forum Home > Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements > Report errors & omissions here
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - McDonald and Giles to Canterbury?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedMcDonald and Giles to Canterbury?
 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Chus View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: Venezuela
Status: Offline
Points: 1991 		Direct Link To This Post Topic: McDonald and Giles to Canterbury?
    Posted: January 26 2007 at 14:12
Just wandering through my profile "reviewing my reviews" (pun intended ) and while looking at the McDonald and Giles page I noticed it was under Art Rock. I don't know much about Canterbury but their first (and only) album sounds more like Caravan than King Crimson. Should they be moved?
Jesus Gabriel
Back to Top
Witchwoodhermit View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 23 2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 871 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 26 2007 at 17:38
Could be. I recently bought McDonald and Giles. Great album, but I thought it sounded very much like Stackridge. They are under Canterbury I believe.
Here I'm shadowed by a dragon fig tree's fan
ringed by ants and musing over man.
Back to Top
Chus View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: Venezuela
Status: Offline
Points: 1991 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 26 2007 at 18:52
look on the Art Rock list that's what surprised me; they are not that eclectic (probably because they only released one official album)
Jesus Gabriel
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 26 2007 at 19:01
Originally posted by Chus Chus wrote:

look on the Art Rock list that's what surprised me; they are not that eclectic (probably because they only released one official album)



neither are bands like Rush and scores of others.... Art Rock is .. like we say in the Art Rock Team Bar and Lounge... the SPCA of prog.  Lots of cute cuddly prog bands just waiting for a home.  Many are eclectic..  many are not. If it doesn't fit anywhere else.. and they are prog.. we get them.
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 26 2007 at 19:02
I'll bring this up to the team and see if they should be moved..
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
Chus View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: Venezuela
Status: Offline
Points: 1991 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 26 2007 at 19:14
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:


Originally posted by Chus Chus wrote:

look on the Art Rock list that's what surprised me; they are not that eclectic (probably because they only released one official album)



neither are bands like Rush and scores of others.... Art Rock is ..
like we say in the Art Rock Team Bar and Lounge... the SPCA of
prog.  Lots of cute cuddly prog bands just waiting for a
home.  Many are eclectic..  many are not. If it doesn't fit
anywhere else.. and they are prog.. we get them.


The "orphanage" of prog, you say?

Thanks for the consideration
       
Jesus Gabriel
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 26 2007 at 19:16
Originally posted by Chus Chus wrote:

Originally posted by micky micky wrote:


Originally posted by Chus Chus wrote:

look on the Art Rock list that's what surprised me; they are not that eclectic (probably because they only released one official album)



neither are bands like Rush and scores of others.... Art Rock is ..
like we say in the Art Rock Team Bar and Lounge... the SPCA of
prog.  Lots of cute cuddly prog bands just waiting for a
home.  Many are eclectic..  many are not. If it doesn't fit
anywhere else.. and they are prog.. we get them.


The "orphanage" of prog, you say?

Thanks for the consideration
       


hahahha.. yeah ..something like that hahaha

no problem though.. I put it to the attention of Raffaella whose the team's Canterbury expert with a link to the thread. She'll get back to you on this.
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
Fassbinder View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: May 27 2006
Location: My world
Status: Offline
Points: 3497 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 27 2007 at 01:15

In my opinion (which nobody cares about) McDonald & Giles belongs to Art Rock category, quite clearly.

Michael Giles' solo album, Progress, may be considered as Canterbury, although I think it fits more the JR/F subgenre.
Back to Top
Raff View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 29 2005
Location: None
Status: Offline
Points: 24429 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 27 2007 at 01:28
I don't really think that would be a good move, though I don't know the album. The Canterbury sound is an odd phenomenon, limited in space and time, which had imitators in places other than England (notably with Picchio dal Pozzo and Supersister), but is also very different to pinpoint as an actual 'sound'.

Besides, King Crimson are not the only band included in Art Rock. The category as it is now mainly means 'eclectic', though I suppose a redefinition is in order. As to the matter of Rush... I'm afraid someone is just asking to be kicked out of the team ASAP.LOL
Back to Top
Chus View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: Venezuela
Status: Offline
Points: 1991 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 27 2007 at 22:02
it has clear indication IMO... you should give it a few listens and you'll probably hear what I'm hearing and the reason the move should be considered. Specially in their song "Suite In C" or "Birdman", which contain some free-jazz segments.. the whole mood of the album is jazzy as well
 
 EDIT: I understand that "Canterbury" was referring to the place the event occurred.. but well the guys were from England and I think they had some sort of connection


Edited by Chus - January 27 2007 at 22:12
Jesus Gabriel
Back to Top
bhikkhu View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 06 2006
Location: AČ Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 5109 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 27 2007 at 23:50
I do have it, and it does sound like a canterbury influenced version of crimson. I just don't think it is truly of the genre.
a.k.a. H.T.

http://riekels.wordpress.com
Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 28 2007 at 11:54
I think Ghost Rider's post is spot on. Canterbury is a bit different to the other sub-genres, in that it tends to have a defined membership.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.113 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.