Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
akin
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 06 2004
Location: Brazil
Status: Offline
Points: 976
|
Posted: January 19 2007 at 06:46 |
Hackett in Genesis was not that good mainly because he didn't have many
spots as the band was keyboard driven. But man, check his solo stuff.
The classical songs are fantastic.
Petrucci is all about speed. When he comes to do something different,
he does weak arrangements for the DT ballads. Ok, he is quite good in
the album with Rudess, but he is not near doing something that is
really "kick ass".
So Hackett wins by a mile.
|
|
Guests
Forum Guest Group
|
Posted: January 19 2007 at 08:33 |
I would like to add to my earlier comments. If it were just about technique then my favourite guitarists would be Vai, Petrucci, Satriani etc. That's not, however, what music is to me. Where I can admire spectacular artistry, it often leaves me cold. What I want from a guitarist is passion and something which moves me - you know, the shiver up the spine moment. I'm still not taking sides though!
|
|
Mr. Sanchez
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 11 2006
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 156
|
Posted: January 19 2007 at 09:04 |
Hahaha... I love these polls..
Petrucci is just a Guitarist, Hackett is a musician.
Personal preference is the winner here.
|
It's Calling Me Back To My Home.
|
|
Abstrakt
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 18 2005
Location: Soundgarden
Status: Offline
Points: 18292
|
Posted: January 19 2007 at 09:08 |
It's like comparing Light to dark, sun to moon, apple to banana....
|
|
markosherrera
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 01 2006
Location: World
Status: Offline
Points: 3252
|
Posted: January 19 2007 at 09:12 |
Hackett,I listen all his work in Genesis,GTR ,and like solist ,he is better than Petrucci
|
|
Machinemessiah
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 02 2005
Location: Santiago, Chile
Status: Offline
Points: 594
|
Posted: January 19 2007 at 10:22 |
Mr. Sanchez wrote:
Hahaha... I love these polls..
Petrucci is just a Guitarist, Hackett is a musician.
Personal preference is the winner here.
|
Totally agreed, and my personal taste whispers me........
HACKETT!
|
|
MadcapLaughs84
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 21 2006
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 658
|
Posted: January 19 2007 at 13:40 |
I think their styles are totally different, John Petrucci in fact is far more technical than Hackett, but in compositions, Petrucci has also more elements to come with. Still, Stevie is a great guitar player.
|
|
|
chessman
Prog Reviewer
Joined: December 01 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 974
|
Posted: January 19 2007 at 18:03 |
Of course, the two are chalk and cheese, and Petrucci can play a million notes a nanosecond.
But Hackett is a musician, through and through, a master songwriter, and plays the guitar the way he wants to, without feeling the need to throw in as many notes as possible.
He is my favourite guitarist,
Petrucci is just another talented player.
|
|
progadicto
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 19 2005
Location: Chile
Status: Offline
Points: 4316
|
Posted: January 19 2007 at 19:22 |
Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:
Hackett, more trascendental, skilled, complete and versatile.
IMO no contest.
|
Totally agree... the perfect description... Petrucci is good in his own stuff. Nothing against him. But I really think Hackett is one of the most trascendental musicians of the last decades. Inffluential when he was on Genesis and very inffluential in his solo career...
|
... E N E L B U N K E R...
|
|
Floydian42
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 13 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 846
|
Posted: January 19 2007 at 20:08 |
Hackett of course
|
|
KoS
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 17 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Points: 16310
|
Posted: January 19 2007 at 20:10 |
Hackett, duh!
|
|
Dr. Occulator
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 04 2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 628
|
Posted: January 19 2007 at 20:11 |
Did you actually think Petrucci had a chance in a poll like this?
|
My Doc Told Me I Have Doggie Head.
|
|
1800iareyay
Prog Reviewer
Joined: November 18 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2492
|
Posted: January 19 2007 at 20:21 |
Hackett is the better musician, though Petrucci is much better technically
|
|
Forgotten Son
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 13 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1356
|
Posted: January 20 2007 at 06:31 |
Hackett. He's the better composer on both electric and acoustic guitar, he's more versatile and, though Petrucci destroys him on the electric when it comes to pure technical skill, Hackett is more skilled on acoustic guitar. I'd say Hackett has much better phrasing that Petrucci on both instruments, also.
|
|
TheLamb
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 18 2005
Location: Israel
Status: Offline
Points: 416
|
Posted: January 20 2007 at 08:21 |
Both are top of the scale musicians.
Completly different though. Let's just say... I don't like comparing... But when I do, my moto is "Only compare two musicians that would try out for the same band (if it was making auditions for an empty position or something) if they were interested".
No need to compare between Petrucci and Hackett
|
|
|
Cygnus
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 12 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 520
|
Posted: January 20 2007 at 08:23 |
srbruno wrote:
Hackett defintly had a very strong influence on guitarists that cxame after him...but in the case of mere skill and overall talent i think Petrucci takes it away. He has all the skill Hackett has and more.. i think hackett may write a little bit better than Petrucci but again skill wise Petrucci wins in my eyes.. |
Such as???Petrucci by far...
|
|
el böthy
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 27 2005
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 6336
|
Posted: January 20 2007 at 13:24 |
Fripp pwns them all with one hand, while he takes his tea with the other one
|
"You want me to play what, Robert?"
|
|
The T
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
|
Posted: January 20 2007 at 14:26 |
The odd thing is, if Petrucci and Hackett met, I'm sure they would praise each other, and Petrucci would revere H as a master, but not one of them would consider himself above the other. Just Petrucci would see H as one of his mentors, of the examples he followed. Like when you see DT with Yes in some video and pictures, you can almost TELL the admiration this man has for Howe. And you can tell the respect Howe has for this young (well, not so young anymore) wizard.
A better poll would be: Hackett vs Billy Joe Amstrong
or Myung vs Sid Vicious or Portnoy vs MickPointer or Collins vs Agalloch's drummer
|
|
|
Moatilliatta
Prog Reviewer
Joined: December 01 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3083
|
Posted: January 20 2007 at 14:40 |
I really don't why people only view Petrucci's stuff as "all about speed" or how he just plays fast techincal stuff and that's it. I think his solo's and riffs and all that always are powerful/emotional/meaningful/melodic. He doesn't just play fast to show that he is fast. The notes are all carefully chosen and played at the certain speed for some reason.
However, as a sole composer he is quite poor. Dream Theater is made possible by the collaboration of all the players, who are all musical genious/virtuosos. Petrucci's solo stuff is rather weak. It only boasts some cool riffs and amazing solos, but there really is no sentimental value to it. Rudess' however is virtuosic, creative, diverse, and memorable. He is probably more responsible for the quality of their duet album.
However, both are great guitarists. Hackett as a solo composer is better than Petrucci, but strictly as a guitarist I think Petrucci could slaughter anyone in a contest. I love both.
|
|
The T
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
|
Posted: January 20 2007 at 14:41 |
|
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.