Worst USA President

 

in war or any time you send troops anyplace, you will have those who act on their own. they did catch the ones who did the murders in haditha and give them a military trial, if i am correct? that is different from sending a federal swat team to visit residents in texas, an american state, and killing them because they legally owned guns. it would be the equivalent of the political leader of england sending military men into tyne and wear to serve a warrant or the political leader of norway sending troops into telemark to check on child welfare. this happened at least three times in the usa under the illustrious clinton. he sent troops into waco to first apprehend koresh on a fedral offense, a show of arms that went drastically bad for clinton's stormtroopers. he had every opportunity afforded him to handle it peacefully-koresh jogged and frequently left the compound, which they could have arrested him at any time, plus, a sheriff who knew koresh offered to go to the compound and talk him into coming to them and turning himself in. they refused to do any of it, showed up with a swat team and then got angry because a united states citizen defended himself. they used him shooting federal agents-who shot at him first without provocation-and the guise of child abuse-a state level crime-to justify what they did. i have read accounts and seen documentary footage that put delta force troops on the scene, plus there's the well-known footage of the tank-all federal crimes to use against united states citizens-to help kill-not arrest-koresh and his lot. the use of such troops and weapons can be authorized only on a level that the president was aware of it, being the commander in chief. this is a far different situation than troops in a foreign land acting on their own and in direct violation of orders or laws during a time of hostilities. another such incident occurred at ruby ridge, in which a man's wife and child-two people who offered no bodily harm to federal swat officers-were murdered by federal agents in order to demoralise the gun owners into giving up. the third was when a cuban father wanted to have his son back and the family of his wife refused. at first, the clinton administration put their faith into the state family courts, the legal deciding body of family disputes in florida, thinking the court would decide for the father. when it did not, clinton sent in a federal swat team to go against the wishes of a state court decision and kidnap the child. could you imagine this going on in england? or norway? or the netherlands?

 

and that still does not explain why clinton and his staff had thousands of fbi raw data files on political opponents, former republican staff, potential candidates should a republican president come in or others they deemed republicans critical off clinton. a raw data file is information collected, whether true or not, during investigations or background checks. it is all put in these files in order to keep information organized and is not meant to be seen by eyes outside the fbi. yet clinton had an ex-bar bouncer and a private investigator and others not authorized having access to these files that were retrieved and illegally kept in the white house offices. furthermore, there are accounts of clinton and his staff authorizing irs audits and pressuring the fbi into investigating the fired staff of the white house travel office and anyone he deemed a political opponent or critic.