Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Best US President
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedBest US President

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345>
Poll Question: Which modern USA President was the best?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
5 [11.63%]
5 [11.63%]
1 [2.33%]
1 [2.33%]
2 [4.65%]
1 [2.33%]
7 [16.28%]
1 [2.33%]
19 [44.19%]
1 [2.33%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message
stonebeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 02 2007 at 21:34
Originally posted by Arrrghus Arrrghus wrote:

The problem with liberals is that they don't get anything done. Conservatives get stuff done, but the stuff isn't always what's is best.

On one hand, we have idealists, and the other we have people who get the job done.

Frankly, we need a comprimise. That's why I'm a moderate. I think we need stuff done, but the wishy-washy nature of today's political correctness gets in the way. As my wise father says, "I will respect you in the work place and in economic endeavours, but I'll be damned if the color of your skin or whether or not you piss sitting down or standing up or what is your sexual preference give you an advantage over the next guy."

My father is talking about the ridiculous need to overcompensate (affirmative action, anyone). Political correctness just gets in the way.


You know why liberals haven't gotten "anything done" with the Bush administration? Because they've been in the minority in the House and Senate for 6 years. It's hard to get your agenda on the table when the other party dominates the process. And why did Republicans get stuff done? Because they were in control.
Back to Top
Scapler View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 18 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 2567
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 02 2007 at 21:40
Originally posted by video vertigo video vertigo wrote:

Originally posted by progismylife progismylife wrote:


Originally posted by video vertigo video vertigo wrote:

Originally posted by progismylife progismylife wrote:


Originally posted by video vertigo video vertigo wrote:

I'm surprised Ford is being voted for, he was the only president in history to never become elected president.
He was the only president to never be elected for anything. And he did a good job considering he didn't really ask for it.

Makes me glad Bush is alive and not going to be impeached or resign, he's not a good president but look who's next in line
Who?


the vice president is next in line to the president. Currently the vice president is Dick Cheney
    


Pray to God if they both go and good ol' Nancy Pelosi gets a chance to screw with the country even more than is currently being done


Bassists are deadly
Back to Top
Arrrghus View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 21 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5296
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 02 2007 at 21:44
Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:

Originally posted by Arrrghus Arrrghus wrote:

The problem with liberals is that they don't get anything done. Conservatives get stuff done, but the stuff isn't always what's is best.

On one hand, we have idealists, and the other we have people who get the job done.

Frankly, we need a comprimise. That's why I'm a moderate. I think we need stuff done, but the wishy-washy nature of today's political correctness gets in the way. As my wise father says, "I will respect you in the work place and in economic endeavours, but I'll be damned if the color of your skin or whether or not you piss sitting down or standing up or what is your sexual preference give you an advantage over the next guy."

My father is talking about the ridiculous need to overcompensate (affirmative action, anyone). Political correctness just gets in the way.


You know why liberals haven't gotten "anything done" with the Bush administration? Because they've been in the minority in the House and Senate for 6 years. It's hard to get your agenda on the table when the other party dominates the process. And why did Republicans get stuff done? Because they were in control.


What agenda? Even with power they're disorganized and trying as hard as they can to be dipsh*ts.
    
Back to Top
stonebeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 02 2007 at 21:46
Originally posted by Arrrghus Arrrghus wrote:

Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:

Originally posted by Arrrghus Arrrghus wrote:

The problem with liberals is that they don't get anything done. Conservatives get stuff done, but the stuff isn't always what's is best.

On one hand, we have idealists, and the other we have people who get the job done.

Frankly, we need a comprimise. That's why I'm a moderate. I think we need stuff done, but the wishy-washy nature of today's political correctness gets in the way. As my wise father says, "I will respect you in the work place and in economic endeavours, but I'll be damned if the color of your skin or whether or not you piss sitting down or standing up or what is your sexual preference give you an advantage over the next guy."

My father is talking about the ridiculous need to overcompensate (affirmative action, anyone). Political correctness just gets in the way.


You know why liberals haven't gotten "anything done" with the Bush administration? Because they've been in the minority in the House and Senate for 6 years. It's hard to get your agenda on the table when the other party dominates the process. And why did Republicans get stuff done? Because they were in control.


What agenda? Even with power they're disorganized and trying as hard as they can to be dipsh*ts.
    


I'll give you an answer when you start to sound deserving of an answer (ie not calling people dipsh*ts).
    
    

Edited by stonebeard - January 02 2007 at 21:47
Back to Top
stonebeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 02 2007 at 22:03
Originally posted by Scapler Scapler wrote:

Pray to God if they both go and good ol' Nancy Pelosi gets a chance to screw with the country even more than is currently being done

    Are you just saying that because she's a democrat or because she would be a bad president? Back it up if the second option applies.
Back to Top
Peter View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: January 31 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 9669
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 02 2007 at 23:57
Originally posted by Arrrghus Arrrghus wrote:



Along with John Paul, Gorbachev deserves a LOT of credit for ending the Cold War. (If anything, Reagan deserves very little credit at all).
    

Yes -- and Solidarity leader Lech Walesa in Poland, too. Don't forget him (and Polish unionism as a whole) -- he was very important in providing the pressures for Gorby to react to.

I liked the way Reagan had the courage and foresight to significantly reduce the US nuclear arsenal (and thus Russia's), though.

Don't know that I'd give John Paul much credit, as I recall. I'd shake the hands of Walesa and Gorbachev first. Ermm


Edited by Peter Rideout - January 03 2007 at 00:06
"And, has thou slain the Jabberwock?
Come to my arms, my beamish boy!
O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!'
He chortled in his joy.
Back to Top
Peter View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: January 31 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 9669
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 03 2007 at 00:00
Anyway, I'm no American, and I'm far from being an expert on US politics, but I always liked Carter (though I know he had his faults, like all leaders and other mere humans).
"And, has thou slain the Jabberwock?
Come to my arms, my beamish boy!
O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!'
He chortled in his joy.
Back to Top
Empathy View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 30 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1864
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 03 2007 at 00:29
Originally posted by progismylife progismylife wrote:

Originally posted by video vertigo video vertigo wrote:

I'm surprised Ford is being voted for, he was the only president in history to never become elected president.


He was the only president to never be elected for anything. And he did a good job considering he didn't really ask for it.


I believe Ford was Speaker of the House before becoming President, so he was still an elected offical.

That said, some would say that the reason he had no ambition to become President was exactly why he was suited for the job.

"Why is the sea king of a hundred streams? Because it lies below them... If the sage would guide the people, he must serve with humility. If he would lead them, he must follow behind. In this way when the sage rules, the people will not feel oppressed..."

- Lao Tzu

My vote's for Eisenhower. In his farewell address to the nation in 1961, he warned about the growing danger of what he coined as the "military-industrial complex".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8y06NSBBRtY

Dire words that should have been heeded, long ago.

from Wikipedia:

"In the penultimate draft of the address, Eisenhower initially used the term military-industrial-congressional complex, and thus indicated the essential role that U.S. Congress plays in the propagation of the military industry. But, it is said, that the president chose to strike the word congressional in order to placate members of the legislative branch of the federal government."






Edited by Empathy - January 03 2007 at 00:37
Pure Brilliance:
Back to Top
Peter View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: January 31 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 9669
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 03 2007 at 00:56
Smile ^ Yep -- Eisenhower was a good'un too, in my books. A good man for the times, with obvious spine and integrity.

 I didn't know about his address warning about the growing power of the military-industrial complex.Clap 

(Now, joined with right-wing religion, it's in power.Unhappy)

Pretty impressive and courageous, especially from a former top general!
"And, has thou slain the Jabberwock?
Come to my arms, my beamish boy!
O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!'
He chortled in his joy.
Back to Top
Scapler View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 18 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 2567
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 03 2007 at 11:15
Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:

Originally posted by Scapler Scapler wrote:

Pray to God if they both go and good ol' Nancy Pelosi gets a chance to screw with the country even more than is currently being done

    Are you just saying that because she's a democrat or because she would be a bad president? Back it up if the second option applies.


The second option, I don't care about your party if you do a good job (Thus Kennedy as my second choice)

Pelosi disagrees with me however. She talks about bi-partisanship, but what she really means is Democrats win while Republicans sit there looking useless. Pelosi would completly ignore any idea coming from any Conservative, it doesn't matter how good it is. Pelosi would ruin the Presidency by becoming the most selfish, partisan President in history. Her idea of politics isn't promoting good ideas, but just making everyone else's good ideas look like crap.

Ouch
Bassists are deadly
Back to Top
Arrrghus View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 21 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5296
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 03 2007 at 13:19
Originally posted by Peter Rideout Peter Rideout wrote:



Originally posted by Arrrghus Arrrghus wrote:


Along with John Paul, Gorbachev deserves a LOT of credit for ending the Cold War. (If anything, Reagan deserves very little credit at all).
    
Yes -- and Solidarity leader Lech Walesa in Poland, too. Don't forget him (and Polish unionism as a whole) -- he was very important in providing the pressures for Gorby to react to.I liked the way Reagan had the courage and foresight to significantly reduce the US nuclear arsenal (and thus Russia's), though.Don't know that I'd give John Paul much credit, as I recall. I'd shake the hands of Walesa and Gorbachev first.

    

Oh! I've heard of him. Okay, I did some research... and you're absolutely right! Thanks!
Back to Top
Peter View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: January 31 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 9669
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 03 2007 at 13:33
Originally posted by Arrrghus Arrrghus wrote:

Originally posted by Peter Rideout Peter Rideout wrote:



Originally posted by Arrrghus Arrrghus wrote:


Along with John Paul, Gorbachev deserves a LOT of credit for ending the Cold War. (If anything, Reagan deserves very little credit at all).
    
Yes -- and Solidarity leader Lech Walesa in Poland, too. Don't forget him (and Polish unionism as a whole) -- he was very important in providing the pressures for Gorby to react to.I liked the way Reagan had the courage and foresight to significantly reduce the US nuclear arsenal (and thus Russia's), though.Don't know that I'd give John Paul much credit, as I recall. I'd shake the hands of Walesa and Gorbachev first.

    

Oh! I've heard of him. Okay, I did some research... and you're absolutely right! Thanks!
You're welcome!
 
Yeah, I lived through those turbulent, exciting times (I was 20 in 1980), and what was happening in Poland, prior to the dissolution of the Eastern Bloc and the USSR was very important, and very revolutionary. (I remember my older brother had a cool "Solidarnosc" poster on his bedroom wall.)
 
You have to hand it to Walesa, the Solidarity (Solidarnosc) movement, and the Polish people in general. It was amazing what they accomplished and got away with. (And Gorby didn't send in the Red Army to stomp them -- that was amazing, too.)
 
We never thought such sweeping changes would happen in our lifetimes, or so rapidly -- it was a thrilling time (like China's subsequent Tianamen Square, but with a much better outcome).
 
Ordinary people (like Walesa's miners) CAN make a big difference, when they stand united against oppression.Smile
 
 
 And the hated Wall comes down!


Edited by Peter Rideout - January 03 2007 at 13:37
"And, has thou slain the Jabberwock?
Come to my arms, my beamish boy!
O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!'
He chortled in his joy.
Back to Top
bhikkhu View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 06 2006
Location: A² Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 5109
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 03 2007 at 18:16
    Bill Clinton was actually a very good President. He eliminated the deficit (remember, we didn't have one at the end of the last administration). He also would have gotten healthcare for everyone. The Republicans had to stop it, just because it came from him.
Back to Top
Jared View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 06 2005
Location: Hereford, UK
Status: Online
Points: 19312
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 04 2007 at 10:48

I've gone for Ike... a decidedly steading influence on US Economics during your post-war boom time of 1952-60, besides his significant contribution to the war...Clap

Music has always been a matter of energy to me. On some nights I believe that a car with the needle on empty can run 50 more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio. Hunter S Thompson
Back to Top
rileydog22 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: August 24 2005
Location: New Jersey
Status: Offline
Points: 8844
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 05 2007 at 20:15
Lincoln was the greatest president our country ever had.  He had the toughest job ever placed on a leader of this president (uniting the North and South), and he did so spectacularly.  No other president has had to deal with anything close (the closest being the decision to drop the bomb on Hiroshima), and frankly, no one SHOULD be subjected to what he was.  

Back to Top
Man With Hat View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Jazz-Rock/Fusion/Canterbury Team

Joined: March 12 2005
Location: Neurotica
Status: Offline
Points: 166178
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 05 2007 at 23:46
JFK or Clinton.
Dig me...But don't...Bury me
I'm running still, I shall until, one day, I hope that I'll arrive
Warning: Listening to jazz excessively can cause a laxative effect.
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 06 2007 at 01:39
Of course best US president is a question that would get an obvious answer: Abraham Lincoln or, later, FD Roosevelt; but if this is about modern US presidents, I think Clinton has been the best. JFK could've been the one had he lived longer (had they allowed him to live longer, whoever "they" are) but of the remaining ones, Clinton left the country with a big surplus, an employment rate of great proportions, and specially, he was an harmonic figure abroad (in Latin america "che guevara"-fanatics hate whatever comes from US, but rational people liked Clinton, unlike today's chaotic excuse for a president who is hated everywhere). He had an intern perform something on him, so who cares? I prefer a president with a colorful private life but that helps me eat, feed and go to the doctor than a "moral authority" that helps his partners in the religious right and the oil companies feed, eat and FEAST upon the contituents.
Back to Top
markosherrera View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 01 2006
Location: World
Status: Offline
Points: 3252
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 06 2007 at 02:01
  Clinton is better of course than   Bush daddy and   Bush baby,.... better than     Nixon and Reagan I want Hillarius  Clinton or Nancy Pelosi   for   president and Bush for   presid..iary

Edited by markosherrera - January 06 2007 at 02:10
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 08 2007 at 20:25
Unlike my beautiful latin american lands, The US has been blessed with decent presidents (I don't mean perfect, but if you compare them with the wonders we elect down south, these look like charitable angels). Except Bush, all of them were pretty decent. Yes, Nixon was a crook, but at least he did ONE good thing (opened China).... and that one good thing put him MILES ahead of the current US president.
Back to Top
el böthy View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 27 2005
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 6336
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 08 2007 at 21:14
Ah Clinton...what a cool dudeLOL
"You want me to play what, Robert?"
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.191 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.