Reviews discussion - Progressive Rock Music Forum

Toccata, once the improvements to the site have been completed, registration will be mandatory for submitting reviews. At the moment, reviews can still be submitted without being registered. Those which are submitted by unregistered memebrs do not show a forum name in the reviewer name, the name appearing in black.

Last chance Psycho, reveal yourself and defend your reviews or they will be deleted.

TRoTZ wrote:

For me it's a big surprise listening to such an outragious and unfoundable accusation by you Trickster. I started to participate in progarchives as an official prog reviewer 2 years before you did, so I can't see how you know me so much to profer such serious attacks. I had my own reasons for not posting or making reviews for such a long time, and I don't need to give you those explanations. I will give them immediately to the site administrators, if they request. If I want to post reviews, I post them, could it be 1, 2 or 5 stars! No problem at all! I have no need in creating a paralel character. I see no purpose on that. And in some pshycospace album reviews, by the way, I have them reviewed to, and you'll see that, at least in one, I have a totally opposite opinion.

In fact, I respected you and still want to respect you. Your reviews, in my view, are very correct, the other day I was glad to see, for instance, that you were the only reviewer to state that Flower King's new album was regressive.

Hope this is no more than a misunderstanding. Cheers.

Sorry, didn't mean to accuse you of anything, just "friendly" humour (that people have complained about since I joined in February

). I guess the fact that we do not interact in the forums much explains why you are not very familiar with my usual tongue-in-cheek-with-own-self style.

I apologise that you I didn't add a "kidding" tag somewhere in that post.

Last chance Psycho, reveal yourself and defend your reviews or they will be deleted.

Okay, I admit it, it is me!

He sure caused a lot of reaction.

sig

seeing already "counter-examples" such as five star reviews, I begin to think that nothing too bad is about his first examples of "what I don't like" and "what I don't consider valorous" (even if it happens to be the case of classic albums, powerful music et caetera. Embarrassed

)

Angelo wrote:

How is it possible for me to read all his reviews?

Try searching for his name in the search box ;-)

i just did that... it seems like all his reviews bellow 3 stars are gone.

Easy Livin wrote:

Cheers guys, more copies identified through the info provide. All now removed.

You should also remove the "reviewers".

"Music is much like f**king, but some composers can't climax and others climax too often, leaving themselves and the listener jaded and spent."

Charles Bukowski

We are, in a certain way, inviting him to register and come here to talk with us.

It's very easy to bash bands and albums protected by a disguise. Let's see if he unveils his face!

Guigo

~~~~~~

One of his reviews is not that bad.

Edited by The T - December 21 2006 at 20:02

The T wrote:

DREAM THEATER — Scenes From A Memory Metropolis Part II
Review by Deepslumber (Rafal)

1 stars It was the first DT album I heard. And I got to say this - if this is prog than prog is dead, if this is metal than it's not so good either. I don't like prog metal bands (beside just few), and for me Dream Theater is just terrible. The songs are long, but who cares? No feelling in this, no emotions, only playing. Perfectly playing, even too perfectly. One of the song titles of this album describes it well. Fatal Tragedy. Album like this are killing prog. Don't buy this album!

Is there an actual REVIEW anywhere? Just ramblings about how this is the end of prog and his dislike for the album, but where's the opinion? I think this is too low on content;

Give the dude some slack, but monitor his reviews.

I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT

hey, I got a new subject.

Inpraiseoffolly has by now 101 reviews, all linked to a reviewer page of his own and with the profile link active (meaning he used his ID, his e-mail, his profile to stand by to his reviews signature).

an example:

YES — Close to the Edge

Review by >> inpraiseoffolly

just today he reviewed two more albums but without a profile link connection

MAHAVISHNU ORCHESTRA — Birds of Fire
Review by >> inpraiseoffolly

is it good to have two kind of signatures? why not link these two new ones to his known profile as well?

Edited by Ricochet - December 22 2006 at 04:04