Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - vinyl with a natural intermission
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic Closedvinyl with a natural intermission

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
Ursinus View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: October 29 2006
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 9
Direct Link To This Post Topic: vinyl with a natural intermission
    Posted: November 10 2006 at 17:18
One topic that from point of view doesn't come up often enough is the physical concept of a vinyl. After all there were many bands who "played" with this physical factor which has become almost as a problem listening a CD. Think for example ELP's Tarkus or Yes's Close to the Edge without that sweet intermission which it takes to turn the record... or you can think it but from my point of view it breaks the concept of two albums in one.

If we take for example Tarkus as a case I think that we can all agree - at least roughly - that side B doesn't have anything to do with the story of Tarkus itself, on side A. For me it is rather disturbing to listen all in row simply because the song Tarkus leaves me cold... after I need a pause.

Of course you can create the intermission but how many of you have thought of this? I don't know and that's why I ask you. Am I alone with my stupid problem or what?
Back to Top
Guillermo View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 28 2004
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 814
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 10 2006 at 17:26
Yes. After listening to great Prog songs like "Close to the Edge", "The Gates of Delirium" and "Tarkus", the end of the musical piece on Side One gives the sense to the listener of an "intermission". The Side Two was the "second part of the show",with "lighter" songs, IMO.

Edited by Guillermo - November 10 2006 at 17:27
Avatar: Photo of Solar Eclipse, Mexico City, July 1991. A great experience to see. Maybe once in a lifetime.
Back to Top
Nipsey88 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: Kadath
Status: Offline
Points: 706
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 10 2006 at 18:33
Great Point.

I think that the advent of the CD has also caused bands to rethink the flow of the music in terms of this "natural" break when programming the song order. Look at The Lamb as an example: All 4 sides of the vinyl have a natural sounding musical break at the end of the side, so when listening to it in that format (as I first did) these changes actually add to the flow, creating 4 "movements" that really, for me at least, help to define the flow of the story, and therefore the work as a whole.

Now, when bands track the music, it is not to create an ebb and flow over 15-20 minutes, but over 60-75 minutes. What a drastic change in dynamic. I'm not sure its a bad thing necessarily (the ability to listen to Karn Evil 9 or the Allman's Mountain Jam as a seemless piece is righteous indeed), but I do think that creating a series of musical peaks and valleys throughout a work is in danger of becoming a lost art.

Just a thought...



Back to Top
Fitzcarraldo View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 30 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1835
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 10 2006 at 18:54
You raise a good point, Ursinus, but I think it very much depends on the album. I agree with your example "Tarkus", but I disliked the LP intermission and artificial break on "Brain Salad Surgery", "Thick As A Brick" and "The Story Of i", to name but three, and I prefer the CD versions.
    

Edited by Fitzcarraldo - November 10 2006 at 18:54
Back to Top
Intruder View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: May 13 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 2210
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 10 2006 at 20:56
It used to frazzle me after listening to vinyl for so long....I'd instinctively start toward the hi-fi after hearing the fade out of what would be side one of a certain album.  It was almost unnatural to hear side one glide into side two. 
 
Yeah, artists really used to record "sides" of music and, yeah, the CD does change the listening experience of recording from that era for better or worse.  But CD sure beats the hell out of 8-tracks and cassettes - I don't know how many classic rock songs I've burned into memory with the eight track skip as part of the song.
I like to feel the suspense when you're certain you know I am there.....
Back to Top
Lota View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 08 2005
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 178
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 10 2006 at 21:10
Bravo.......Clap really good topic, never thought that way before about vynil albums.
And In The End, The Love You Take, Is Equal To The Love You Make
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 10 2006 at 21:21
The thing that worries me is, just like you said the advent of NEW technology (CD) changed the way albums were made, today's new crap (IPOD and related s&&t) will cause albums to CEASE to exist, in favor of just SONGS.....
Back to Top
Cheesecakemouse View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: New Zealand
Status: Offline
Points: 1751
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 10 2006 at 21:25
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

The thing that worries me is, just like you said the advent of NEW technology (CD) changed the way albums were made, today's new crap (IPOD and related s&&t) will cause albums to CEASE to exist, in favor of just SONGS.....
 
No need to worry their will always be a market for albums and CDs, as long as weirdos like us are around buying them still.Wink



  
Back to Top
Nipsey88 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: Kadath
Status: Offline
Points: 706
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 10 2006 at 21:45
Originally posted by Cheesecakemouse Cheesecakemouse wrote:

Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

The thing that worries me is, just like you said the advent of NEW technology (CD) changed the way albums were made, today's new crap (IPOD and related s&&t) will cause albums to CEASE to exist, in favor of just SONGS.....
 
No need to worry their will always be a market for albums and CDs, as long as weirdos like us are around buying them still.Wink


Exactly. Never fear, doubters, there will always be a market for the almighty album...

Let your freak flag fly high fellow weirdos!


Back to Top
gong View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 07 2006
Location: Neutral Zone
Status: Offline
Points: 366
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 11 2006 at 01:58

IMO, with CDs we were to lose that nice size of album covers.Cry

Back to Top
flaxton View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: November 08 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 110
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 11 2006 at 10:03
how about vinyl albums that jump or get stuck. every time i hear blues variation from pictures at an exhibition i wait for it to stick, which it never does obviously on cd.
flaxton
Back to Top
creation_curve View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie


Joined: November 10 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 47
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 11 2006 at 21:45
The main problem with cd's is that they invented 70 minute album (give or take). With the exception of Klaus Sculze, most album sides lasted approx 20 mins, a we bit more, or  a wee bit less. Thus crap fillers was invented for cd's and i personally hate them, bonus studio/live tracks and demos. If they weren't good enough for the original then they should not be spun on us just because a cd holds more music. I love vinyl, and the intermission is/was part of vinyl, also it is better sound.
 
And, you don't need a bloody microscope to read to read the album notes, unlike cd's.
Back to Top
BePinkTheater View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 01 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1381
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 11 2006 at 22:44
I definitely think you have a point. And they should put some negative track in between to spereate when converting form vinyl to cd. But for the albums that were created for cd, i tihnk they are fine and most don't need that intermission.
 
However, some times ( or at least once...) they do make an intermission. By doing exactly what I mentioned, Sigur ros divides the first and second half of () with 35 seconds of negative track, to give that intermission feeling.
I love it
I can strangle a canary in a tin can and it would be really original, but that wouldn't save it from sounding like utter sh*t.
-Stone Beard
Back to Top
Ursinus View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: October 29 2006
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 9
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 12 2006 at 07:52
Signori, my intention wasn't to create a situation vinyl vs. cd but simply to point out that in the era of vinyls the bands considered this side A - side B concept as a possibity. Now in the era of cds there exist other possibilities and other problems as well. Still I think that vinyl as a format has it's advances over cds.

I agree that 70 minute album isn't just a positive invention: I think that some add-ons on old albums disturb the beauty of the whole in some cases and for new albums the problem is often that they add perhaps songs that ones couldn't pass because of the limit of time. I'm sure that in the 70s the bands composed as many songs as today but now the percent on album is higher. And if they really wanted to publish more there was always possibity to make it double. Of course there are cases and cases but but...

Then I've to say that I really miss the cover art... Ok, also here the way of doing covers has changed but still. Think for example Bitches Brew or Camel's first album... Well, enough to say that ones people knew some names of these artists... and nowadays?

"And how about vinyl albums that jump or get stuck?" Just treat them properly... and also cds need to be taken care of.

Well, I've to say that also cds have their advances... It could be a bit difficult to take a vinyl into the car... or when I have music on the background while doing something else...

I vote for negative tracks! Also Tool's Aenima has its intermission...

PS Do you remember in the 90s when cd started its invasion and the prices of vinyls dived? At the beginning I simply bought vinyls because the cost was one third; obviously now its contrary - too bad though.
Back to Top
prog4evr View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 22 2005
Location: Wuhan, China
Status: Offline
Points: 1455
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 16 2006 at 08:03
Originally posted by Fitzcarraldo Fitzcarraldo wrote:

You raise a good point, Ursinus, but I think it very much depends on the album. I agree with your example "Tarkus", but I disliked the LP intermission and artificial break on "Brain Salad Surgery", "Thick As A Brick" and "The Story Of i", to name but three, and I prefer the CD versions.
    
 
As I have said on other threads, Marillion's Childhood's End is really just one long prog suite with the necessary break for recording it on vinyl (in 1985) - less than 23 minutes on each side.  Perhaps even certain prog bands are happy they don't have to write just one song for the full 70-minute CD length, but other threads in this forum have discussed the length (or over-length) of some prog songs....
 
Back to Top
Vibrationbaby View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 6898
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 16 2006 at 14:28
I`m still living in the dark ages and most of my collection consists of vinyl. As Gong pointed out about the size of the vinyl covers. I miss that on the newer CDs. As for continuity there are a few albums that I welcomed on CD such as Grobschnitt`s Solar music Live. On the original pressing side one just cuts out on side one and then cuts in on side two. On the remastered CD you get the whole thing with no interuption plus an extra 13 minutes. There are some albums that are best appreciated in their original vinyl anolog form IMO and Tarkus is definitely one of them. Others would be Mike Oldfield`s Tubular Bells and  Crises which were written with two sides of a record in mind. Iguess it`s a matter of how old you are. many of you guys out there didn`t live through the vinyl era and only know albums such as TFTO and others as a single CD. Look at all the albums released on CD which have to add bonus tracks not only for commercial reasons  but for filler. Some albums from the 70`s barely ran over 30 minutes! Bands of the future will probably be writing albums for whatever the next format. There will be probably 3 hour albums who knows. Anyway I stick to my vinyl most of the time because I like watching the disc go around.
Back to Top
Froth View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 19 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 461
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 16 2006 at 20:35
I agree entirely. Many of my favourite albums are seperated into two 20 minuite suites and with CDs that isnt so apparent. Also, its interesting to see what a band can do when given just 40 mins to streach out, rather than CDs which can be anything from 30 to 80 mins. Having said this though, i fear for recorded music in general at the moment. CDs dont beat Vinyl, but the're alot better than all this ipod jive.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.158 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.