Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
R o V e R
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 13 2005
Location: India
Status: Offline
Points: 2747
|
Topic: Timing in Music Posted: September 12 2006 at 03:11 |
Hi Prog Folks
Most of the people in here, Allways talk about timing in music,
4 to 5, 7 to 8
I have no clue ( Signature time & stuff)
Please educate me in this area,
So that i can enjoy more..
Thanks
|
|
Vodkagunblast
Forum Newbie
Joined: July 28 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 39
|
Posted: September 12 2006 at 04:27 |
Well you see, most western music is comprised of "beats" which are organized into "measures".
Beats are the pulse of the song, meaning...when you tap your foot to what the "average" pulse of a song that your listening to.
A measure is a collection of beats, usually thought of as a brief phrase of music which can be extended, but are used so a musician can keep track of his or her place in a score.
This is usually illustrated in notation as what looks like a mathematical fraction; 2/4, 3/4. 4/4, 5/4 etc.
The top number in the fraction is how many beats are in a measure of music. The bottom number is what type of subdivision each beat is. Generally the bottom number is some sort of even multiple of 4.
Most pop music/ "danceable music" is written in 4/4, or standard time. Music like this you can easily discern, because it is very simple to find a downbeat and count evenly like this.
1,2,3,4. 1,2,3,4. 1,2,3,4. 1,2,3,4.
Other common times include 3/4
1,2,3. 1,2,3. 1,2,3. 1,2,3.
and 2/4
1,2. 1,2. 1,2.
Progressive music often uses less conventional time sigs that use smaller subdivision beats or which place emphasis on beats that ordinarily wouldn't be considered strong, giving the music an off balance sort of quality or one of transition, movement, etc.
Time sigs like 7/8, 5/4, 6/8, 9/8, and some much stranger occasionally show up in many artists songs.
Take for example Supper's Ready by Genesis, and the section "Apocalypse in 9/8" which features the reoccuring pattern of:
(1,2,3) (4,5,) (6,7,8,9.)
Note that there are 9 total beats, (3+2+4) and that each subdivison must be counted as an 8th note, because it's hard to count 4.5/4.
Sorry for the crap explanation, but hopefully that will help you figure it out.
Edited by Vodkagunblast - September 12 2006 at 04:40
|
|
MuzikLuva
Forum Groupie
Joined: April 22 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 81
|
Posted: September 12 2006 at 04:35 |
Hey Vodagunblas,
My compliments on the time signature explanation.
Extremely well thought out and explained. Not many non-musicians
understand the differences. Hell, I'll bet there are a ton of
musicians out there who don't know the difference.
|
|
Vodkagunblast
Forum Newbie
Joined: July 28 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 39
|
Posted: September 12 2006 at 04:38 |
|
|
R o V e R
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 13 2005
Location: India
Status: Offline
Points: 2747
|
Posted: September 12 2006 at 16:42 |
Need more examples , please
|
|
Vodkagunblast
Forum Newbie
Joined: July 28 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 39
|
Posted: September 12 2006 at 20:11 |
Hmm...well. This might help.
Ok, in western notated music there are different varieties of note lengths. Starting with a whole note, then half, then quarter, then 8th, etc... going down to 64th notes, typically. (Those are rare.)
In 4/4, there are four (top number) quarter notes (bottom number) in a measure.
If one were to place a whole note in a 4/4 measure it would hold four counts, and be the only note that was in the measure, as it takes up the space of the four quarter notes that are allowed in the measure. (four quarter notes make one whole, two halves, Eight 8ths, etc.)
Downbeats, which are generally the rhythmic weight of a piece, come on the first note of a measure. Each count is of the same length, equally subdivided, more emphasis is just given on each down beat. In pop music often the emphasis is given on one and three.
In four four, (4/4) this is usually counted as something like:
ONE two three four | ONE two three four | ONE two three four.
3/4
ONE two three | ONE two three | ONE two three. (3/4 is known as a "waltz" in classical theory)
SO on and so forth.
Time signatures that aren't even are often grouped into smaller packages, if you will. Like the afforementioned supper's ready example I gave, it's often easier to count in more normal, though shorter sub-measure length phrases that add up to the desired count (in supper's ready, 9 8th notes)
For Example
In 7/8, one might count
ONE Two Three Four Five Six Seven | ONE Two Three Four Five Six Seven
Or one could count
ONE two ONE two ONE two three.| ONE two ONE two ONE two three.
(Note that there are 7 total counts per measure)
|
|
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
|
Posted: September 13 2006 at 03:35 |
Don't forget that this doesn't apply to time sigs like 6/8 or 9/8, which are not simple time but compound time.
In 6/8, for example, you don't count 6 beats to the bar, but 2, and the feeling is of triplet motion - so you would count ONE (two three) TWO (two three) to get the compound effect.
Likewise, 7/8 is a compound time - hence the feeling of three beats in Vodkagunblasts's example, but it's known as irregular compound time, because the third "beat" is longer than the first two.
7/4, however, is simple time.
An example of 7/4, so you understand the difference, is "Money" by Pink Floyd. It gets a little complicated, as certain beats are obviously accented - but if you compare this with "Dance on a Volcano" by Genesis, which is in 7/8, you can tell the difference quite easily.
I don't think "Apocalypse in 9/8" (the section in "Supper's Ready" that Vodkagunblast is referring to) is in 9/8 - I think it's in 9/4 for that reason
Edited by Certif1ed - September 13 2006 at 04:29
|
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
|
|
Bob Greece
Prog Reviewer
Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Greece
Status: Offline
Points: 1823
|
Posted: September 13 2006 at 03:58 |
Vodkagunblast wrote:
Take for example Supper's Ready by Genesis, and the section "Apocalypse in 9/8" which features the reoccuring pattern of: (1,2,3) (4,5,) (6,7,8,9.) |
Couldn't 9/8 also be (1,2,3) (4,5,6) (7,8,9)?
|
|
|
R o V e R
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 13 2005
Location: India
Status: Offline
Points: 2747
|
Posted: September 13 2006 at 04:12 |
My God
|
|
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
|
Posted: September 13 2006 at 04:27 |
Bob Greece wrote:
Vodkagunblast wrote:
Take for example Supper's Ready by Genesis, and the section "Apocalypse in 9/8" which features the reoccuring pattern of: (1,2,3) (4,5,) (6,7,8,9.) |
Couldn't 9/8 also be (1,2,3) (4,5,6) (7,8,9)? |
Since 9/8 is compound time, its "proper" use is exactly that - three lots of triplets.
|
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
|
|
Vodkagunblast
Forum Newbie
Joined: July 28 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 39
|
Posted: September 13 2006 at 04:57 |
haha, "my god"
Sorry to confuse you man.
Musical theory is really just a bunch of math and counting. Geometry and such.
Yeah I forgot the bit about compound time...but I mean, it's really just a label more or less. I didn't want to get too mega in depth but I guess it's hard to know how far one should go... Considering Mr. Rover never really gave an example of the knowledge he required. We could theoretically just keep going forever and ever explaining in finer and finer detail.
I really wouldn't mind...music theory is fun
|
|
sularetal
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 24 2005
Location: Greece
Status: Offline
Points: 264
|
Posted: September 17 2006 at 07:03 |
Certif1ed wrote:
Bob Greece wrote:
Vodkagunblast wrote:
Take for example Supper's Ready by Genesis, and the section "Apocalypse in 9/8" which features the reoccuring pattern of: (1,2,3) (4,5,) (6,7,8,9.) |
Couldn't 9/8 also be (1,2,3) (4,5,6) (7,8,9)? | Since 9/8 is compound time, its "proper" use is exactly that - three lots of triplets. |
Yeah, the right thing would be to count like that "(1,2,3) (4,5,6) (7,8,9)" no matter what the accents are but in order to make it easier for the musicians they divide it depending on the accents cause its easier to say (1,2,3) (4,5,) (6,7,8,9.) than (ONE, two, three) (FOUR, five SIX) (seven, eight, nine). It's the same thing really....
|
|
EssentialFaris
Forum Groupie
Joined: July 26 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 48
|
Posted: September 18 2006 at 01:43 |
I'm in a music theory a.p. class, and I know meter signatures very well, but I always forget what certain terms like compound meter means, does it even matter? haha.
|
|
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
|
Posted: September 18 2006 at 03:04 |
EssentialFaris wrote:
I'm in a music theory a.p. class, and I know meter signatures very well, but I always forget what certain terms like compound meter means, does it even matter? haha. |
Of course it matters for the purposes of discussions like this.
If you don't understand the difference between simple and compound time, you could mistake metre for the time signature
Edited by Certif1ed - September 18 2006 at 03:05
|
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
|
|
R o V e R
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 13 2005
Location: India
Status: Offline
Points: 2747
|
Posted: September 18 2006 at 18:35 |
One of my favourite track by Rush is Cygnus-X1 from"Farewell to Kings"
i heard that there is nice timing in there,
if anybody could disuss about this one will be helpfull
thanks
|
|
Leningrad
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 15 2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 7991
|
Posted: September 18 2006 at 18:39 |
R o V e R wrote:
One of my favourite track by Rush is Cygnus-X1 from"Farewell to Kings" i heard that there is nice timing in there, if anybody could disuss about this one will be helpfull thanks |
The section of the song that starts at 3:36 is in 11/8.
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.