Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Which Band Should Not Be on Progarchives?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedWhich Band Should Not Be on Progarchives?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 2345>
Poll Question: Which Band Should Not Be on Progarchives?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
13 [14.77%]
34 [38.64%]
6 [6.82%]
22 [25.00%]
1 [1.14%]
12 [13.64%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 10 2006 at 08:14
Originally posted by Cheesecakemouse Cheesecakemouse wrote:

Andrew Lloyd Webber under various artists his name on this website degenerates the reputation of prog, the Beatles IMHO are on shakey ground on this website as well.


With all due respect, both of those statements are utter rubbish.

Have you heard the Lloyd Webber album in question?

What about it "degenerates the reputation of prog"?

It's better than a great deal of Prog Rock albums that I've heard, and although it's not going to be to everyone's taste, there's absolutely no denying its Progginess and the enormous technical credibility of the music and musicians involved.

Or can you actually back up your statement with anything other than opinion?


And as for your comment on the Beatles, what shakey ground would that be?

Their place in Prog's history seems pretty solid to me.
    

Originally posted by Kord Kord wrote:

(...) Radiohead are pop industrial rock



You just made that up

I fail to see what's "Pop" about Kid A or Amnesiac - even the rock is minimal - and I hear nothing industrial in their music at all.

So three more inappropriate adjectives could not have been chosen

Edited by Certif1ed - August 10 2006 at 08:17
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21381
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 10 2006 at 08:19
Maybe he listened to My Iron Lung and the song name's kind of industrial-ish.LOL
2024 Release Poll

Listened to:
Back to Top
King of Loss View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 21 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Status: Offline
Points: 16752
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 10 2006 at 11:55
just listen to Rhapsody Wacko
Back to Top
philippe View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 14 2004
Location: noosphere
Status: Offline
Points: 3597
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 10 2006 at 11:56

very hard question...they are all "mistakes" here.

 

Back to Top
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 10 2006 at 12:01

Yes, many...I think about Queen I.E, which is too commercial IMO. But there's far worst: loads of atrocious metal/trash bands.
    

Edited by oliverstoned - August 10 2006 at 12:01
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 10 2006 at 17:07
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

Maybe he listened to My Iron Lung and the song name's kind of industrial-ish.

    
Just like "Under the Iron Sea" by Keane - which is clearly an industrial rock album...

and Iron Maiden, - that great industrial band...
    

Edited by Certif1ed - August 10 2006 at 17:08
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
Rocktopus View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 02 2006
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 4202
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 11 2006 at 04:05
These are the really questionable of the ones I've heard:

Rhapsody
Triumph
Lacrimosa
Nightwish

Stating that Radiohead is about as prog as the Bay City Rollers if you've actually heard their albums, is just crazy. I think both Queen and Deep Purple has enough relevant albums in their early years. Just like ELO has.




Over land and under ashes
In the sunlight, see - it flashes
Find a fly and eat his eye
But don't believe in me
Don't believe in me
Don't believe in me
Back to Top
Markus View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: July 23 2006
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 32
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 17 2006 at 06:19
RhapsodyShocked power metalSmile
Back to Top
Cheesecakemouse View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: New Zealand
Status: Offline
Points: 1751
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 17 2006 at 06:22
Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

[QUOTE=Cheesecakemouse] Andrew Lloyd Webber under various artists his name on this website degenerates the reputation of prog, the Beatles IMHO are on shakey ground on this website as well.


With all due respect, both of those statements are utter rubbish.

Have you heard the Lloyd Webber album in question?

What about it "degenerates the reputation of prog"?

It's better than a great deal of Prog Rock albums that I've heard, and although it's not going to be to everyone's taste, there's absolutely no denying its Progginess and the enormous technical credibility of the music and musicians involved.

Or can you actually back up your statement with anything other than opinion?


And as for your comment on the Beatles, what shakey ground would that be?

Their place in Prog's history seems pretty solid to me. 
    

LOL Relax, its just my opinion.



  
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 17 2006 at 06:48
I'd still like to understand why anyone would hold those rather mystifying opinions.
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
Cheesecakemouse View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: New Zealand
Status: Offline
Points: 1751
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 17 2006 at 06:50
Because I'm a mystifying guy.



  
Back to Top
MattiR View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: March 02 2006
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 1200
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 17 2006 at 07:53
Queen
Back to Top
NutterAlert View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 07 2005
Location: In transition
Status: Offline
Points: 2808
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 17 2006 at 09:36
Deep Purple - boring. Richie Blackmore sticking his guitar into a camera at Cal Jam because he knew Emerson's flying piano was better than anything they could come up with. Saw them again recently Zzzzzzzzzzzz. About as progressive as my hemaroids.
 
Queen - do me a favour..why do people rate this mediocre rip off group.
 
Radiohead. OK - or should I say totally unique and brilliant. No, just OK.
 
Don't know the rest i'm sad to say...
 
 
 
 
Proud to be an un-banned member since 2005
Back to Top
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 17 2006 at 09:38

Yes, all the bands listed at the beggining of the thread plus many more!!
Back to Top
Silhouette View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie


Joined: August 17 2006
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 84
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 17 2006 at 09:54
I don't think Rhapsody is progressive at all.
Silhouette

Profile @ Last.fm
Back to Top
Cheesecakemouse View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: New Zealand
Status: Offline
Points: 1751
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 17 2006 at 20:30
Originally posted by Cheesecakemouse Cheesecakemouse wrote:

Because I'm a mystifying guy.
 
But seriously my reason for the Beatles on shaky ground is the fact that they are included but artists like Miles Davis and John Coltrane are excluded. Davis invented fusion and Coltrane's work was avant garde and had an effect on the psychie of a lot of prog musicians. Come to think of it if the Beatles are here Stochausen should be. I think having the Beatles here opens a whole can of worms and creates a lot of inconsistencies on the website. I have nothing against their music I';ve owned a couple of their albums.
 



  
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 17 2006 at 20:39
Originally posted by NutterAlert NutterAlert wrote:

Deep Purple - boring. Richie Blackmore sticking his guitar into a camera at Cal Jam because he knew Emerson's flying piano was better than anything they could come up with. Saw them again recently Zzzzzzzzzzzz. About as progressive as my hemaroids.
 
Queen - do me a favour..why do people rate this mediocre rip off group.
 
Radiohead. OK - or should I say totally unique and brilliant. No, just OK.
 
Don't know the rest i'm sad to say...
 
 
 
 



hahhahahhaha... stupid me thought Blackmore was just pissed off LOL
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
WaywardSon View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 23 2006
Location: Brazil
Status: Offline
Points: 2537
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 17 2006 at 20:41
Originally posted by NutterAlert NutterAlert wrote:

Deep Purple - boring. Richie Blackmore sticking his guitar into a camera at Cal Jam because he knew Emerson's flying piano was better than anything they could come up with. Saw them again recently Zzzzzzzzzzzz. About as progressive as my hemaroids.
 
Have you seen the DVD 72/73?
If you saw them recently, Ritchie Blackmore wasnīt the guitarist. He hasnīt been in the band for the last ten years! 
Queen - do me a favour..why do people rate this mediocre rip off group.
Listen to Queen 2 
 
Radiohead. OK - or should I say totally unique and brilliant. No, just OK.
 
Don't know the rest i'm sad to say...
 
 
 
 
Back to Top
Leningrad View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 15 2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 7991
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 17 2006 at 21:04

Don't get me wrong, Deep Purple are a fantastic band. Just never saw what was so proggy about em'.

Back to Top
WaywardSon View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 23 2006
Location: Brazil
Status: Offline
Points: 2537
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 17 2006 at 21:08

^^^^

Their first three albums...over to Micky to explain
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 2345>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.180 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.