Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Can we put Rush in the super prog category?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedCan we put Rush in the super prog category?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 12131415>
Author
Message
Mategra View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 23 2004
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 592
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 07 2006 at 07:36
I'm sick and tired of all this Rush-fanboyism. That's one of the reasons why I don't visit Prog Archives that much these days.
Back to Top
StyLaZyn View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 22 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4079
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 07 2006 at 10:06
Originally posted by Mategra Mategra wrote:

I'm sick and tired of all this Rush-fanboyism. That's one of the reasons why I don't visit Prog Archives that much these days.


Would you rather have Genesis-fanboyism?
    
Back to Top
StyLaZyn View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 22 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4079
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 07 2006 at 10:10
Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:


    
Note that Queen are actually in Prog-Related - ie, somehow not considered a Prog band.

However, in my opinion, that is wrong, and Queen should be categorised as pure Prog for at least 5 of their albums - which should be enough to qualify.



Queen is definitely Progressive to me. Even though they don't dabble in odd-time sigs, the type of music they had written and the musicianship they exhibited at a minimum makes them proto-Prog.
    
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 07 2006 at 10:39
Originally posted by Mategra Mategra wrote:

I'm sick and tired of all this Rush-fanboyism. That's one of the reasons why I don't visit Prog Archives that much these days.
 
If any discussion about a band constitutes fanboyism then there's alot of it going on here at the archives.
 
 
BTW Cert, nice points you laid out. I disagree, but still an interesting read.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
Tony R View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: July 16 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 11979
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 07 2006 at 13:46
Originally posted by erik neuteboom erik neuteboom wrote:

No Prog Rock after 1978, Tony R?



Just listen to what these bands (out of my head) created after 1978: Bacamarte/Ange/Twelfth Night/Ozric Tentacles/Edhels/Nemo ...


And some bands started as clones but managed to create an own sound like .. Rush, Anekdoten, Porcupine Tree... to name a few.


To me their music doesn't sound regressive, it's (very) distinctive progressive music, not mainly based upon the Seventies prog!



You havent read all my post Erik or you would not make the points you do.
I am saying that "Prog Rock" was a monicker associated with certain bands over a relatively short period of time. The term was invented to describe the type of music Yes,Genesis et al were playing specifically as a way of pidgeon-holing them.
My memory seems to recall that Art Rock was the big umberella genre that Prog Rock sat BENEATH,now this situation has been reversed...

That is why Marillion and IQ ETC who were heavily influenced by Genesis (amongst others)but came after the "golden era" were called Neo-Prog isnt it?
    
    

Edited by Tony R - August 07 2006 at 13:49
Back to Top
erik neuteboom View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: July 27 2005
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 7659
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 07 2006 at 14:28

Fellow Rush die-hard Tony R, I have read your entire story in your post, I am only reacting on the last prhase about no progrock after 1978, it's also not meant personally because you quote something and there I react on, that's all.

Indeed, in the early Eighties neo-prog was the new mainly Genesis inspired prog rock movement, speerheaded by Marillion and followed by me from the very first moment in 1982, even Rush was second best at that moment for me Wink ...

Back to Top
Tony R View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: July 16 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 11979
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 07 2006 at 14:33
Originally posted by erik neuteboom erik neuteboom wrote:

Fellow Rush die-hard Tony R, I have read your entire story in your post, I am only reacting on the last prhase about no progrock after 1978, it's also not meant personally because you quote something and there I react on, that's all.


Indeed, in the early Eighties neo-prog was the new mainly Genesis inspired prog rock movement, speerheaded by Marillion and followed by me from the very first moment in 1982, even Rush was second best at that moment for me [IMG]height=17 alt=Wink src="http://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley2.gif" width=17 align=absMiddle> ...


    I wasnae taking it personally my friend.
I am merely saying that Rush are Prog Rock because they were accepted as Prog Rock band between 1976 and 1979.Whether history decides that their credentials should be scrutinised and re-assessed doesnt alter the fact that they belong in that category.This is aimed at those that think Rush should be in Prog-Related that's all.To move Rush into Prog-related would be an historical innacuracy...
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 07 2006 at 16:19
Just like moving Gentle Giant into "Art Rock" along with Roxy Music, I feel...
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
Tony R View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: July 16 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 11979
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 07 2006 at 18:22
Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

Just like moving Gentle Giant into "Art Rock" along with Roxy Music, I feel...


But GG arent Symphonic..
    
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 07 2006 at 20:22
Originally posted by Tony R Tony R wrote:

 
    I wasnae taking it personally my friend.
I am merely saying that Rush are Prog Rock because they were accepted as Prog Rock band between 1976 and 1979.Whether history decides that their credentials should be scrutinised and re-assessed doesnt alter the fact that they belong in that category.This is aimed at those that think Rush should be in Prog-Related that's all.To move Rush into Prog-related would be an historical innacuracy...



for all the joshing I do... I couldn't agree more... 
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
Arsillus View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 26 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 7374
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 07 2006 at 20:24
Originally posted by Mategra Mategra wrote:

I'm sick and tired of all this Rush-fanboyism. That's one of the reasons why I don't visit Prog Archives that much these days.


Rush? How about DT? They have more polls. Wink
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 07 2006 at 20:33
Originally posted by Arsillus Arsillus wrote:

Originally posted by Mategra Mategra wrote:

I'm sick and tired of all this Rush-fanboyism. That's one of the reasons why I don't visit Prog Archives that much these days.


Rush? How about DT? They have more polls. Wink


oh wow.. sure that poll  has been done... would be interesting... 'rush fan' v 'DT fan'
hahha.. yeah...  it's like the dilemma we Americans face every 4 years... both are evil and must have stakes driven through their hearts.. but in the end... you must choose and you end up finding that little something in one that that wins your vote.  Rush for Micky... at least I can listen to it and remember that before I started shaving and hit puberty.. I did love this group...
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
el böthy View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 27 2005
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 6336
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 07 2006 at 21:13
I guess they are in title to be along with Genesis, ELP, Crimson, Yes, Floyd and Jethro Tull... but as I am not the biggest Rush fan I must say that if they get to that category, we must take in consideration all the crap the band has released! I mean from Presto till now...its pretty bad music if you ask me...and then again I theink that their golden years are good...but not in the same level as Genesis, Yes or King Crimson so name a few...

But then again, they have sold so much and influecned so many, that I guess they deserve it...
"You want me to play what, Robert?"
Back to Top
Arsillus View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 26 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 7374
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 07 2006 at 21:18
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

Originally posted by Arsillus Arsillus wrote:

Originally posted by Mategra Mategra wrote:

I'm sick and tired of all this Rush-fanboyism. That's one of the reasons why I don't visit Prog Archives that much these days.


Rush? How about DT? They have more polls. Wink


oh wow.. sure that poll  has been done... would be interesting... 'rush fan' v 'DT fan'
hahha.. yeah...  it's like the dilemma we Americans face every 4 years... both are evil and must have stakes driven through their hearts.. but in the end... you must choose and you end up finding that little something in one that that wins your vote.  Rush for Micky... at least I can listen to it and remember that before I started shaving and hit puberty.. I did love this group...


LOL

Rush fans would win! Wink


Back to Top
erik neuteboom View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: July 27 2005
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 7659
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 08 2006 at 04:25
I have tried to appreciate Dream Theater but apart from some exciting moments on their DVD's (amazing interplay, sensational keyboard work) their music simply fails to keep my attention, for me it's a cascade of scale-acrobatics and it sounds too clinical too me. Rush since Presto also fails to keep my attention, that the only parallel Wink ..
Back to Top
Philéas View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 14 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 6419
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 08 2006 at 10:25
I find everyone bashing most of Rush's work after Presto. At least Roll the Bones was brilliant. Don't let the bit of rap (which is proffesionally written and skillfully executed) in the titletrack put you off. Wink

Edit: Fusing styles is progressive.


Edited by Philéas - August 08 2006 at 11:36
Back to Top
Raff View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 29 2005
Location: None
Status: Offline
Points: 24429
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 08 2006 at 16:42
Originally posted by Philéas Philéas wrote:

I find everyone bashing most of Rush's work after Presto. At least Roll the Bones was brilliant. Don't let the bit of rap (which is proffesionally written and skillfully executed) in the titletrack put you off. Wink

Edit: Fusing styles is progressive.


Hear, hear! ClapClapClap

As a matter of fact, I like all Rush albums after "Presto" - with "Counterparts" being a particular favourite of mine. And I do like "Roll the Bones"....Wink
Back to Top
Arrrghus View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 21 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5296
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 08 2006 at 16:45
Originally posted by Philéas Philéas wrote:


I find everyone bashing most of Rush's work after Presto. At least Roll
the Bones was brilliant. Don't let the bit of rap (which is
proffesionally written and skillfully executed) in the titletrack put
you off. 

Edit: Fusing styles is progressive.



So, are the Beastie boys progressive?
    
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 08 2006 at 17:01
Originally posted by Arsillus Arsillus wrote:

Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

Originally posted by Arsillus Arsillus wrote:

Originally posted by Mategra Mategra wrote:

I'm sick and tired of all this Rush-fanboyism. That's one of the reasons why I don't visit Prog Archives that much these days.


Rush? How about DT? They have more polls. Wink


oh wow.. sure that poll  has been done... would be interesting... 'rush fan' v 'DT fan'
hahha.. yeah...  it's like the dilemma we Americans face every 4 years... both are evil and must have stakes driven through their hearts.. but in the end... you must choose and you end up finding that little something in one that that wins your vote.  Rush for Micky... at least I can listen to it and remember that before I started shaving and hit puberty.. I did love this group...


LOL

Rush fans would win! Wink




hahha... of course you would.. WinkClap  They  are led by the greatest fanboy Admin  ever the grace they holy land of prog..  known of course as ProgArchives. LOLThumbs Up
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 08 2006 at 17:02
Originally posted by Ghost Rider Ghost Rider wrote:

Originally posted by Philéas Philéas wrote:

I find everyone bashing most of Rush's work after Presto. At least Roll the Bones was brilliant. Don't let the bit of rap (which is proffesionally written and skillfully executed) in the titletrack put you off. Wink

Edit: Fusing styles is progressive.


Hear, hear! ClapClapClap

As a matter of fact, I like all Rush albums after "Presto" - with "Counterparts" being a particular favourite of mine. And I do like "Roll the Bones"....Wink



I did really like Roll the Bones as well...
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 12131415>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.213 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.