Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - What is so wrong with Prog metal
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedWhat is so wrong with Prog metal

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 14>
Author
Message
thetick View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: December 06 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 35
Direct Link To This Post Topic: What is so wrong with Prog metal
    Posted: June 02 2006 at 14:57
I read a lot of prog forums on the web and I get the same thing over and over, prog metal sucks blah blah blah. The whole point of prog is to take music to a level that usually takes a focused ear to appreciate. The music that Dream Theater makes blows away ANYTHING being produced in the "rock" realm today. Would you rather listen to Nickelback or Disturbed? Most of the bands mentioned in these discussions are not even together anymore (e.g. Genesis, ELP, Floyd). It takes serious talent to play DT, Synphony X, Dali's Dilemma, Shadow Gallery , etc. and many of the musicians that play now could hang with the musicians of the golden days of prog. I would even argue that DT is doing more to further prog than most of the neo-synphonic-classic prog bands are.  They did concepts album, long songs and make mince-meat out of odd time more than most other prog bands out there. If you don't like heavy guitars just say so and be done with it. But to dismiss bands like DT just because they may be more popular than some obscure French band is silly. Yes and Rush are more mainstream than DT is! Now I will tell you I am a huge fan of Rsh (it's how I learned to play drums), Yes (How awesome is Close to the Edge and The Gates of Delerium) and Jethro Tull. However, I can't stand Genesis. I think they are boring. I listened to several of their CD's and nearly fell asleep. To me Marillion isn't much better. I think a lot of the discussion of which type of prog is better stems from the demographic viewpoint of the writer. I am 34 and grew up on heavy metal but still love Rush, Yes Floyd and Tull. I am a card-carrying member of the prog-snob community and I find it silly that people who like prog just dismiss other who happen to like a "different-kind" of prog. The moral of the story is kids, "Can't we all just get along?" Prog to me is my outlet from the crap being played in the real world. Let's just appreciate to musicianship and creative outlet prog gives to all of us. But I know if we did that there would be no reason for forums. So let the flaming begin.Smile
Handing sanity to a faceless mind
I step though the void into this blind
Memory where I see life, death and purity
Clocks dream tolls endlessly
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2006 at 14:57
Oh no....here we go again!
Back to Top
The Lost Chord View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 23 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1907
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2006 at 15:01
The whole point of prog is to take music to a level that usually takes a focused ear to appreciate
i just dont like bands that are blatantly TRYING to be "prog"...annoys me
Back to Top
Padraic View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2006 at 15:03
My feeling is that there are probably more fans of prog metal here than detractors.
thetick, don't worry, you will find plenty of prog metal friends here.
people, let's try to not turn this into a big flamefest. Stern Smile
Back to Top
thetick View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: December 06 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 35
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2006 at 15:05
I admit that some of the Enlish bands of the 70's were ahead of their time and didn't really know what they were doing in terms of creating a new genre of music, what is the point of having a musical influence (mine is Peart and Protnoy) if you can't expound on it. Dream Theater took the composition aspects of Yes and made them heavy. So by your logic any band that sound remotely like aonther is "trying" too hard. There are an infinite number of bands that copied the blues bands from the 30's 40's and 50's (i.e. Led Zeppelin) but they were not being judged the way you are judign DT. People knew they took blues to a heavier place.
Handing sanity to a faceless mind
I step though the void into this blind
Memory where I see life, death and purity
Clocks dream tolls endlessly
Back to Top
A'swepe View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: December 08 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 590
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2006 at 15:07
If you are in fact a "card carrying member of the prog snob comminuty", you should understand how some people don't like prog-metal.
 
Personally, I love DT - in small doses. There's no denying their talent, or their devotion to their craft. It's not all about how many notes you can play in one measure.
 
Prog-metal has its place, as does 70's era symphonic prog.  There are tons of bands who no longer make music together who still enjoy a large audience. Doesn't make the music any less valid.
 
Part of the problem is the "Prog-Snob" attitude. You either like it or you don't. Some people like to express their opinion more that others.
 
I'm not disagreeing with you, this is just my opinion, for what its worth.
David - Never doubt in the dark that which you believe to be true in the light.
http://www.myspace.com/aardvarktxusa - Instrumental rock
http://www.soundclick.com/aardvarktxusa
Back to Top
thellama73 View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 29 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8368
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2006 at 15:08
There is nothing "so wrong" with prog metal. I just don't like it. Particularly the vocals, which seem to me to be without character. But then I haven't listened to all that much of it, so I'm not the best judge.
Back to Top
The Wizard View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 18 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 7341
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2006 at 15:11
Nothing, I just haven't been exposed to it.
Back to Top
thetick View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: December 06 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 35
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2006 at 15:11
I don't get the number of notes being played argument. Last time I looked Rick Wakeman was a classically trained pianist. That guys fingers moved quicker than anyone elses back in the day. Same for Patrick Moraz. They did classical style solos. Its funny because Jordan Rudess get cud for moving his fingers too fast whan at the time Rick Wakeman was praised for it.
Handing sanity to a faceless mind
I step though the void into this blind
Memory where I see life, death and purity
Clocks dream tolls endlessly
Back to Top
Teaflax View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 26 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1225
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2006 at 15:15
The problem with Prog Metal, by and large, is that the songs contained within the technical riffing and soloing (which can often be quite good) are quite pedestrian Metal songs. They use Rock/Blues templates, and personally, I'm just not interested in that, because I find it a genre of music that has been explored, worked over and played so much that there's virtually nothing left to do within that framework. There are exceptions, of course (Eleven come to mind), but on the whole...it's just terribly boring.


Edited by Teaflax - June 02 2006 at 15:16
Back to Top
eddietrooper View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 27 2006
Location: Spain
Status: Offline
Points: 940
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2006 at 15:21
I'm 32 and I have been a classic symphonic prog lover since I was 16. All those years I didn't like Dream Theater and the rest of prog-metal stuff, as it was too heavy for my taste. But nowadays I'm a bit tired of listening always the same groups and I've realized that prog-metal bands are the real innovators of the genre. I love regressive bands like Spock's Beard or The Flower Kings, but I have to admit that Dream Theater, Opeth, etc. have something newer and exciting to offer. I forced myself to listen to them and now, after I have got used to their heavy approach, I love their music.
Back to Top
Teaflax View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 26 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1225
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2006 at 15:27
Nota bene: I have absolutely no problem with the heaviness. I grew up on Metallica, Motörhead, Megadeth, Therapy? and others, coming from a hardcore Punk background (Black Flag and Flipper are still abnds I enjoy a great deal).

I like me a good aggressive thrash, but as soon as it turns into Blues, I'm out.

Back to Top
thetick View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: December 06 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 35
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2006 at 15:33
Originally posted by Teaflax Teaflax wrote:

Nota bene: I have absolutely no problem with the heaviness. I grew up on Metallica, Motörhead, Megadeth, Therapy? and others, coming from a hardcore Punk background (Black Flag and Flipper are still abnds I enjoy a great deal).

I like me a good aggressive thrash, but as soon as it turns into Blues, I'm out.



I really don't understand the blues thing. I played blues for several years and trust me it is nothing like DT Shadow Gallery or Dali's Dilemma. I have a fair amount of musical knowledge and I don't understand the melodic make-up of DT songs. They use classical chord structures with wierd church mode scales all the time. Rush's first album is blues and they had a smattering of bluesey tunes scattered on their fist couple albums (I think I'm going bald to name one).
Handing sanity to a faceless mind
I step though the void into this blind
Memory where I see life, death and purity
Clocks dream tolls endlessly
Back to Top
Trickster F. View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 10 2006
Location: Belize
Status: Offline
Points: 5308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2006 at 15:58
Nothing's wrong with Prog Metal, besides the fact that most people don't realize there are more than two damn representatives of it!
 
 -- Ivan
sig
Back to Top
KeleCableII View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: December 30 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 275
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2006 at 16:03
Originally posted by Teaflax Teaflax wrote:


The problem with Prog Metal, by and large, is that the songs contained
within the technical riffing and soloing (which can often be quite
good) are quite pedestrian Metal songs. They use Rock/Blues templates,
and personally, I'm just not interested in that, because I find it a
genre of music that has been explored, worked over and played so much
that there's virtually nothing left to do within that framework. There
are exceptions, of course (Eleven come to mind), but on the whole...it's
just terribly boring.


I think I'm the same. Besides Pain of Salvation, Opeth, Ayreon, and some others, I just find the genre boring. A lot of it sounds the same as others' work.
    
Back to Top
Aaron View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 08 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 395
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2006 at 16:14

i used to like DT and other prog metal bands, but the only album i think i would consider playing nowadays is Angra's Holy Land, it was a nice blend of metal/hard rock and progressive music, but honestly i guess i don't really hear it as a metal album like a used to

metal is progressive in it's own way, you have many unique styles ranging from black to death to doom to epic to power to classic to folk to speed and so on, now there are these bands releasing these "progressive" albums that just lack the power that metal should have, metal is known for it's w**kery, it doesn't need any more but that's all you get
 
Aaron
Back to Top
salmacis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member

Content Addition

Joined: April 10 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 3928
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2006 at 16:15
It's the technique in prog metal for me that proves its strength and simultaneously, its weakness. Nobody can deny that the musicians are of an extremely high quality, but the often repeated statement of how there's too much noodling and not enough songwriting are my sentiments, really. The main criticism I have of it (at least the albums I've heard) is that it's pretty relentless and there's not enough subtlety. I like music with a bit of variation but too much of the genre I've heard is too flamboyant and not enough light and shade that all the 70s, and imo, 80s bands had.
Whilst I enjoy listening to the albums when they are on, after them I remember very little (this genre's not alone- I have the same issue with jazz- but not jazz rock, which I adore). Dream Theater have at least grown in my appreciation a heck of a lot and in turn, so may the other bands of the genre like Symphony X etc., but after about a year of trying, most bands do very little for me indeed. I therefore wouldn't say I didn't like 'prog metal', but I prefer other sub-genres to it at the moment.
Back to Top
Aaron View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 08 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 395
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2006 at 16:20

name some prog metal bands that lack technique and focus on songwriting, i would actually like to check bands like that out

Aaron
Back to Top
Fritha View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 10 2005
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 471
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2006 at 16:21
IMO there is nothing wrong with prog-metal in general and I'm actually enthusiastically
checking out this genre properly at the moment, having bought two records (Opeth: Blackwater Park and Novembre: Materia) earlier this week. I really enjoy both of them, and this coming from somebody who is otherwise a big fan of the 'lighter' prog sound like jazz-rock tinged Canterbury and other early 70s UK-based prog. (Of course, I was initially lured into prog by some classic Rush records so perhaps it's not that big of a surprise that I find myself drawn to the more metallic edge of prog as well!) 
 
Maybe a lot of the people, who listen to traditional prog -OR avant-garde prog- get uncomfortable with the 'thickness' of the music; there doesn't seem to be a lot of 'space' in prog-metal (you know, musically "mute" points or whatever it could be called -my mastery of the English language is failing me here, lol) thus making it perhaps sound too monotonous and one-sided -and thus emotionally void- to many. But my knowledge of prog-metal is severely limited at this point so this is all just speculating on my part... All I know is that I personally find this extreme thickness of musical textures just a wonderful challenge to tackle. 
 
I'm afraid I was introduced to prog-metal with absolutely the wrong record to begin with; Images & Words by Dream Theater, which, to be honest, did nothing to make me want to explore prog-metal any further at the time... It just kind of conformed all the stereotypes I had been reading about prog-metal Wink But then early this year I bought Lateralus by Tool and it certainly triggered an interest for a more menacing, heavy prog sound. So now that I have found a more encouraging starting point on my own, I will definitely be adding more prog-metal albums in my collection. (A warning for those who are thinking about going down this path: it seems like you can very easily get addicted to this stuff...! Shocked Big smile)
 
Welcome to the darker side of prog, I say! Thumbs Up 
I was made to love magic
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 02 2006 at 16:23
There's nothing wrong with Prog Metal - but there is a certain minority of Prog Metal fans that don't seem to understand that other people have different tastes.

I'm not getting at anyone in particular here - it's just something that's apparent to all:

This particular type thinks that Prog metal is the most complex music ever (which it isn't), that using 4/4 or any other common time signature - and using any scale or arpeggio that's either minor pentatonic or dorian is a sure sign of pop music (which it isn't either).

Obviously, a piece using Phrygian mode scales in 13/8 with counter rhythms in 23/16 is this type's ideal - but personally speaking, I rarely listen to music for things like this.

And I enjoy listening to Stravinsky's "Rite of Spring"

It takes serious talent to create music like Pink Floyd's - in fact, only Pink Floyd have managed it. Simple music that uses space intelligently and within elaborately extended compositions and develops slowly is very hard to write - or everyone would do it.

I agree that bands should not be prejudiced against because of their audience or popularity - but the type of Prog Metal fan I described (and many Prog fans too, come to that) will do exactly that. It's sickening that bands get judged on their image instead of their music - but it happens.

It is all about the MUSIC and musicianship - as the original post rightly says.


    

Edited by Certif1ed - June 02 2006 at 16:25
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 14>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.279 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.