Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > Tech Talk
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Stereophile and progressive rock
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedStereophile and progressive rock
 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308 		Direct Link To This Post Topic: Stereophile and progressive rock
    Posted: April 16 2006 at 04:55



http://www.stereophile.com/



Edited by oliverstoned
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21566 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 16 2006 at 05:31

Nice website! I don't mean to start an argument here, but you should have a look at this article, oliver:

http://stereophile.com/mediaservers/406olive/
Release Polls

Listened to:
Back to Top
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 16 2006 at 05:45
They even have a "computer audio" section...


http://www.stereophile.com/computeraudio/
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21566 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 16 2006 at 05:50
They admit that listening to ripped audio CDs in a computer environment is possible for audiophiles, that's all I ask.
Release Polls

Listened to:
Back to Top
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 16 2006 at 06:28
There are good and bad reviewers/articles of course
Back to Top
Mikerinos View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Planet Gong
Status: Offline
Points: 8890 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 16 2006 at 10:47
Awesome site, thanks Oliver.
Back to Top
mystic fred View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 13 2006
Location: Londinium
Status: Offline
Points: 4252 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 16 2006 at 10:59
fascinating site, oliver, one i will browse again from time to time.SmileClap
Prog Archives Tour Van
Back to Top
Sacred 22 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 24 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 1509 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 25 2006 at 05:09
http://www.uhfmag.com/
 
This audio mag I find to be a little less ad driven than Stereophile and it cators to people who have limited budgets as well as the rich.
So much of what is reviewed in Stereophile is influenced heavily by big money IMHO.
 
This is not to say that Stereophile is a "bad" magazine.
They publish little or nothing about progressive rock though. Most audio publications fall into this catagory. More classical and jazz driven with the typical mainstream rock/pop stuff thrown in to keep some of the mid aged folks who still listen to rock happy.
 
Trouble is, most rock recordings are really bad, where as jazz and classical recordings tend to be a bit better (sound reproduction wise). Sure, there are exceptions to the rule, but........................
Back to Top
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 25 2006 at 05:49
"Trouble is, most rock recordings are really bad, where as jazz and classical recordings tend to be a bit better (sound reproduction wise). Sure, there are exceptions to the rule, but........................"

That's very true. And it's there that vintage vynil wons.
Back to Top
mystic fred View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 13 2006
Location: Londinium
Status: Offline
Points: 4252 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 03 2006 at 02:40
Originally posted by oliverstoned oliverstoned wrote:

"Trouble is, most rock recordings are really bad, where as jazz and classical recordings tend to be a bit better (sound reproduction wise). Sure, there are exceptions to the rule, but........................"

That's very true. And it's there that vintage vynil wons.
 
i notice the early beatles and rock'n'roll recordings seem very clear, they used simple studio set-ups using very few  microphones. this may also be true for jazz and classical recordings too, some modern multi-track recordings seem over-produced and flat, maybe they try to squeeze too many layers in?
there's a lot to be said for less complicated studio set-ups, look what deep purple achieved on the rolling stones mobile in a corridor and various halls, and led zeppelin's john bonham achieving a fantastic drum sound in the stairwell at headley grange, and some live recordings such as clapton's "unplugged" achieved great results. could "less" actually mean "more"..?
Prog Archives Tour Van
Back to Top
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 03 2006 at 06:26
Yes, the studio's acoustic is another issue.

In the last Stereophile paper magazine, there's an article about a Dina Crawl recording session and it's said that more and more artists, thanks (?) to digital home studio, tend to record at home with a very poor result, because of bad acoustic. So, the studio's acoustic is also very important in the result.

And yes, The Clapton is very good sounding.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.203 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.