| Author |
 Topic Search  Topic Options
|
Lord Qwerty 
Forum Groupie
Joined: February 07 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 82
|
 Posted: February 17 2006 at 13:57 |
|
Lord Qwerty did no such thing, vile urchin!! *edits all posts to hide his shame*
|
|
Lord Qwerty is remarkably pretentious.
|
 |
Winter Wine
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 12 2005
Location: Ireland
Status: Offline
Points: 1140
|
Posted: February 17 2006 at 14:02 |
 Codis wrote:
Love the new sig WinterWine!  |
Thank you, I thought of it while listening to Topographic Oceans.
Just kidding 
|
|
My computer's broke
|
|
Legoman
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 21 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 306
|
Posted: February 17 2006 at 14:09 |
ken4musiq wrote:
Lord Qwerty wrote:
Well, everyone else was
questioning the validity of other bands, so Lord Qwerty felt like
taking the time to focus on a band he doesn't really feel matches the
criteria of 'Progressive'. After all, they were never as innovative and
diverse as the Beatles, as emotionally charged as Radiohead, or as
influential as Deep Purple. (There are EASILY a hundred metal bands for
every prog band). That, and they are FAR less consistent than any of
the aforementioned bands. Also, this is the band that popularized
the notion that you had be a vituoso (Whatever that means!) to be
considered a 'progressive' musician. These are my technical and moral
reasons why I do not consider Yes to be a progressive band.
Therefore, I believe that they should be removed from Prog Archives immediately.
|
LQ I am glad to see you have a sense of humor. But I don't
think Yes should be the next to go. Jethro Tull has already been
eliminated. I think ELP should be next, followed by Pink Floyd,
King Crimson, Yes, Gentle Giant, VDGG leaving Genesis the only
true progressive rock band. |
Hahaha. I am glad to see that everyone has a sense of humor
today. Gentle Giant could never ever be considered a non-prog
band. They are pactically in the definition. Hahaha.
I love the Giant...
Anyway, I am glad that Lord Qwerty decided to say something about Yes
because I have always sort of felt that way. I mean, I like them,
I think they are progressive but not as much as a lot of other bands
and definately not deserving of the number 1 album of all time.
THAT'S WHY THEY DON'T HAVE IT ANYMORE! Way to go, Thick as a
Brick. <3
|
|
vogre
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 14 2005
Location: Israel
Status: Offline
Points: 189
|
Posted: February 17 2006 at 14:11 |
|
Nah. Yes have never been prog. Actually prog didn't ever exist. It's
all about illusions of complex time signatures and pseudo-classical
tunes that particular type of people have while listening to the music
of some weird rock bands that were rejected by the society.
|
|
Tony Fisher
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 30 2005
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 967
|
Posted: February 17 2006 at 14:19 |
|
The only REALLY progressive band was The Wombles. The added drama, costumes and did away with proper instruments completely.
Add them immediately!
|
|
Easy Livin
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585
|
Posted: February 17 2006 at 14:28 |
|
As this thread appears to be for amusement only, I've moved it to "Just for fun".
|
|
chamberry
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 24 2005
Location: Puerto Rico
Status: Offline
Points: 9008
|
Posted: February 17 2006 at 14:28 |
this topic is priceless!
|
|
|
|
mission4prog
Forum Newbie
Joined: February 17 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 25
|
Posted: February 17 2006 at 14:28 |
Yes, is definately.
The Beatles, however...what's the deal with that?
m4p
|
|
"The hypocrites are slandering the sacred halls of Truth."
|
|
Winter Wine
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 12 2005
Location: Ireland
Status: Offline
Points: 1140
|
Posted: February 17 2006 at 14:30 |
mission4prog wrote:
Yes, is definately.
The Beatles, however...what's the deal with that?
m4p
|
Oh Jesus Christ no
|
|
My computer's broke
|
|
Syzygy
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 16 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 7003
|
Posted: February 17 2006 at 14:38 |
The Big Generator is way more progressive than Abbey Road 
|
|
'Like so many of you
I've got my doubts about how much to contribute
to the already rich among us...'
Robert Wyatt, Gloria Gloom
|
|
-Radioswim-
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 15 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 331
|
Posted: February 17 2006 at 14:40 |
..........  I am haveing a hard time trying to figure out who's kidding and who's not. YES? Not a Prog-band? NO, I disagree, YES are prog. "Say NO to YES!  "
|
Dust in the Kitchen
|
|
memowakeman
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: May 19 2005
Location: Mexico City
Status: Offline
Points: 13032
|
Posted: February 17 2006 at 14:46 |
Just for Fun section
Yes isnt prog man.. you know that... 
|
|
Follow me on twitter @memowakeman
|
|
Winter Wine
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 12 2005
Location: Ireland
Status: Offline
Points: 1140
|
Posted: February 17 2006 at 14:48 |
I'm not much of a Yes fan myself, always preferred The Chimpmunks
Found them far more innovative and mature
Edited by Winter Wine
|
|
My computer's broke
|
|
richardh
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 28107
|
Posted: February 17 2006 at 14:54 |
Tony Fisher wrote:
The only REALLY progressive band was The Wombles. The added drama, costumes and did away with proper instruments completely.
Add them immediately!
|
 Remember Your A Womble 
|
|
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
|
Posted: February 17 2006 at 15:10 |
When they started out - and even when they were in their heyday, Yes weren't prog, and nor were the other so-called "Prog Greats".
The term "Prog Rock" was invented posthumously...
|
|
Gentle Tull
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 13 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 518
|
Posted: February 17 2006 at 15:21 |
Gentle Tull totally agrees with Lord Qwerty!
I think we should take out Yes, Genesis, Gentle Giant, and other "prog" greats, and add Blink 182, My Chemical Romance, and Fall Out Boy. They rock!
|
|
|
|
ken4musiq
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 14 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 446
|
Posted: February 17 2006 at 15:51 |
Legoman wrote:
ken4musiq wrote:
Lord Qwerty wrote:
Well, everyone else was
questioning the validity of other bands, so Lord Qwerty felt like
taking the time to focus on a band he doesn't really feel matches the
criteria of 'Progressive'. After all, they were never as innovative and
diverse as the Beatles, as emotionally charged as Radiohead, or as
influential as Deep Purple. (There are EASILY a hundred metal bands for
every prog band). That, and they are FAR less consistent than any of
the aforementioned bands. Also, this is the band that popularized
the notion that you had be a vituoso (Whatever that means!) to be
considered a 'progressive' musician. These are my technical and moral
reasons why I do not consider Yes to be a progressive band.
Therefore, I believe that they should be removed from Prog Archives immediately.
|
LQ I am glad to see you have a sense of humor. But I don't
think Yes should be the next to go. Jethro Tull has already been
eliminated. I think ELP should be next, followed by Pink Floyd,
King Crimson, Yes, Gentle Giant, VDGG leaving Genesis the only
true progressive rock band. |
Hahaha. I am glad to see that everyone has a sense of humor
today. Gentle Giant could never ever be considered a non-prog
band. They are pactically in the definition. Hahaha.
I love the Giant...
Anyway, I am glad that Lord Qwerty decided to say something about Yes
because I have always sort of felt that way. I mean, I like them,
I think they are progressive but not as much as a lot of other bands
and definately not deserving of the number 1 album of all time.
THAT'S WHY THEY DON'T HAVE IT ANYMORE! Way to go, Thick as a
Brick. <3
|
Last week I may have been excited about that but then I read that TAAB
was number one, then number two, then number one, then number three,
then number two, then number two, then number four, then number three,
then ....
How's this . . .I think ELP should be next, followed by Pink Floyd,
King Crimson, Yes, Genesis, VDGG leaving Gentle Giant,the only
true progressive rock band
|
|
Blacksword
Prog Reviewer
Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
|
Posted: February 17 2006 at 15:55 |
Get rid of Yes and get Mariah in here ASAP!
I know prog when I hear it and Yes is closer to pop than Madonna. Have you guys never heard Close to the Edge? It sounds like the flamin' Bee Gees...
|
|
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
|
|
Lex C
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 11 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 246
|
Posted: February 17 2006 at 19:58 |
|
Everyone knows that Yes is absolute garbage, they have never done
anything cool like epic songs and albums. I think that it is only
fitting that Yes Rush Gentle Giant Opeth Pain of Salvation Dream
Theater Therion Genisis King Crimson Marillion Frank Zappa Jethro Tull
and Pink Floyd all get removed as well, music is overrated I mean, come
on, people on this site must be doing something wrong, everyone watches
MTV now because they sure as hell know real music, can only come from
power chords and music turntables.
|
|
Lord Qwerty
Forum Groupie
Joined: February 07 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 82
|
Posted: February 17 2006 at 20:03 |
|
Besides, listening to too much of Jon Anderson sounds like it could be a bad influence on some people...
|
|
Lord Qwerty is remarkably pretentious.
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
/PAlogo_v2.gif "Progarchives.com Homepage")
Is Yes really prog?
