Forum Home Forum Home > Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements > Help us improve the site
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Yes fans vs. Genesis fans
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedYes fans vs. Genesis fans

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 5>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
ken4musiq View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 14 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 446
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 09 2006 at 10:54
Originally posted by ivan_2068 ivan_2068 wrote:

Ken4musi wrote: [quote]Roudabout was a pop song.  Watcher of the Skies was a pop song. 

Watcher of the Skies......A song with:

  1. A 2:15 minutes of 100% Baroque dark intro by Tony Banks playing Church Organ and Mellotron,
  2. At least 7 dramatic changes
  3. Incredible Organ work blended with Steve Hackett's best guitar.
  4. The most amazing team work by the Rhytrm section, Phil and Mike are absolutely perfect. 
  5. Amazing and deep lyrics.
  6. Excellent Melotron work, considered by Mellotron Planet as one of the Top songs of the genre. 
  7. Absolutely and 100% Symphonic structure

And you consider it POP????????????????????????????????????????????

What have you smoked lately??? If you can't leave it (What would be better), go to your dealer and tell him to sell you the good stuff, the one you're usink is killing your neurones, you forget what you wrote, write without coherence and you say Watcher of the Skies is Pop...bad symptoms

Watcher of the Skies  is a 500% Prog track, here, in China or in Australia, abdsolutely no relation with POP.

Surely you are clueless, and I'm not saying it's great (Despite it is IMO) but I assure you is an icon of Progressive Rock.

Iván

BTW; Your logic is not subtlem, is fla

 

You obviously have not understood one word I have said. Roundabout was numnber 15 in the states and that alone makes it a pop song. Watcher could have been a pop hit if the subject matter was not too intense for mainstream radio.  But it has all the elements of a good pop song, notably pop song structure and a good hook.  this is what I meant when I said that Yes and Geneisis took pop structure and imposed prog elements on them as opposed to KC or ELP who did not. One can asks the question, when does it stop becoming pop and argue that these songs stop becoming pop when . . . .but to just dismiss it shows that you have very little knowledge of music, which is okay but for the fact that you just don't seem to know it.

Back to Top
ken4musiq View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 14 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 446
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 09 2006 at 10:47

Lets hold a Battle of Epping Forest, between Genesis and Yes fans! Never mind having a prog curry night, this is much more exciting! Let's beat the sh*t out of each other! I'll be right in there! Well actually I might follow Harold Demur and nip up the nearest tree....  >>

 

This is one of the best track on Selling because of the duet singing.  When Gabriel and Collins sang together, they really sounded good; there voices blended quite well.  They should hahe done a lot more of that.

Back to Top
Phil View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 17 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1881
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 09 2006 at 10:44
Lets hold a Battle of Epping Forest, between Genesis and Yes fans! Never mind having a prog curry night, this is much more exciting! Let's beat the sh*t out of each other! I'll be right in there! Well actually I might follow Harold Demur and nip up the nearest tree.... 
Back to Top
Lord Qwerty View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie


Joined: February 07 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 82
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 09 2006 at 10:36
Lord Qwerty will forever remain a true and faithul servant to the Crimson King. As long as this conflict does not disrupt court life, Lord Qwerty will never choose to ride his lizard into combat against the giant hogweeds and starship troopers. Let this be a warning to all involved.
Lord Qwerty is remarkably pretentious.
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 09 2006 at 00:25

Ken4musi wrote:

Quote Roudabout was a pop song.  Watcher of the Skies was a pop song. 

Watcher of the Skies......A song with:

  1. A 2:15 minutes of 100% Baroque dark intro by Tony Banks playing Church Organ and Mellotron,
  2. At least 7 dramatic changes
  3. Incredible Organ work blended with Steve Hackett's best guitar.
  4. The most amazing team work by the Rhytrm section, Phil and Mike are absolutely perfect. 
  5. Amazing and deep lyrics.
  6. Excellent Melotron work, considered by Mellotron Planet as one of the Top songs of the genre. 
  7. Absolutely and 100% Symphonic structure

And you consider it POP????????????????????????????????????????????

What have you smoked lately??? If you can't leave it (What would be better), go to your dealer and tell him to sell you the good stuff, the one you're usink is killing your neurones, you forget what you wrote, write without coherence and you say Watcher of the Skies is Pop...bad symptoms

Watcher of the Skies  is a 500% Prog track, here, in China or in Australia, abdsolutely no relation with POP.

Surely you are clueless, and I'm not saying it's great (Despite it is IMO) but I assure you is an icon of Progressive Rock.

Iván

BTW; Your logic is not subtlem, is flawed.



Edited by ivan_2068
            
Back to Top
ken4musiq View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 14 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 446
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 08 2006 at 22:49

Wny don't you try to come up with one coherent argument about the music rather then trying to disprove my logic,m which is a lot more subtle than you are able to comprehend.

 

Yeap, Genesis is a Pop band that represents the spirit ans aesthetics of Prog

I don't have this bias that posits prog against pop. I have often argued that I prog bands should write pop songs.  Roudabout was a pop song.  Watcher of the Skies was a pop song.  ELP's trilogy or King Crimson Larks' Tongues are not pop tunes.

Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 08 2006 at 22:35

Yeap, Genesis is a Pop band that represents the spirit ans aesthetics of Prog

You can write 50 pages to explain what you tried yo say, but can't justify that, is pure BS.

But you want more contradictions to explain???

In this post you wrote: "I believe that the it is true because even though the band was not popular like Yes or ELP"

But a few posts ago you wrote:

Ken4musiq wrote before and he forgot:

Quote Yes, they were the most popular prog band, but was prog ever about popularity.

Ok pal explain me  how in hell is it possible that Genesis was the most popular Prog band and at the same time "not popular like Yes or ELP"

Reading what you wrote before and thinking doen't harm you dude, it helps you!!!!

Ken4music wrote:

Quote Instead of asking me to clarify my point or opening up to discussion you close it off just to prove that oh, you are right and Genesis is the greatest band in the world.   You could have asked, it seems to me that there is a contradiction in your point. Is there, can you clarify it? and if there is a contradiction in a point I made you just dismiss everything I say.  Because a point I made is wrong or misinformed does not mean that everything I say is wrong. I am here to learn and share like eveyone else.

Again you prove you don't know what you're talking about.

Read all my pósts and tell me if I ever said Genesis is the greatest band in the world

You'll find that I clearly state that I can only say I like Genesis more than the rest of the bands and I would never dare to say they are beter than Yes, Pink Floyd etc. The only arrogant who writes incoherences here are you pretending to explain with complex but absurd arguments that you didn't forgot what you had said a couple hours before.

Ken4music wrote:

Quote PS you seem to argue with me when I agree with you. For example, I was not stating that Genesis abstinence from the indulgence of jazz or classical elements was a 'bad thing' I was just stating a fact. the important word is indulgence, Yes they did explore classical music, came up with a madrigal like style and referenced Bach, but they did not indulge it, as in over the top, the way Yes and ELP did.  

Again you contradict yourself, you sai: a) they did not bring in over the top classic references like Yes and ELP did. Remember that at the time, the Band and Jefferson Airplane were considered "progressive rock."

Now you affirm they got explored Classical music and you compare them with Jefferson Airplane, who may be prog for you, but not for most of he world...READ WHAT YOU WROTE BEFORE YOU SPEAK!!!!

Ken4musiq wrote:

Quote

Listen to Perpetual Change from the Yes Album and see why someone would be annoyed that fans on this site set up Genesis as the ultimate prog rock ensmble.

I have all Yes albums except Big Generator, all their DVD's and went to see them at least 4 times, and still I LIKE Genesis music more, This is personal taste, and most of the progheads in the world seem appreciate Genesis music as much or even more than Yes music.

Leave your arrogance behind, that attitude of trying to teach Prog in a place where there's a lot of people that knows much more than you about the genre (Not talking about me just in case you want to say I'm arrogant), will make you fall in more contradictions.

Nobody said that Genesis is better than Yes, many of us like Genesis more (And we're entitled to our opinion and/or taste), but there are very few who dare to say that one band is better than the other.

BTW: We are not talking about fans on this site, we're talking about Progressive Rock fans all around Prog Web Sites.

Iván

 

 



Edited by ivan_2068
            
Back to Top
ken4musiq View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 14 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 446
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 08 2006 at 21:12

 Genesis is a pop band and admittedly so, yet they never broke through the confines of the fan base during their classic period. 

 You are amazing, now I can prove you don't even know what yopu say... In this post you affirm Genesis is a Pop band, but today at 14:13 Hrs on another thread you said:

 

Genesis is a pop band in the sense that they write well-crafted songs and Genesis fans concur with this statement but the distinction I am making is that Genesis was also for many of the most die hard prog fans the best example of the prog rock aesthetic, that is well crafted pop songs that are enhanced through progressive concepts, odd meters, extended instrumental passages, symphonic keyboard orchestration, classical innuendo, guitar layering, etc.  Obviously it is still the case. PS Yes was doing the same thing. ELP was not nor was Crimson.

Why I think that this it is the case that they were the most popular in the prog community is because I've read people saying that.  I believe that the it is true because even though the band was not popular like Yes or ELP, they were the most influential on the neo-prog bands, notably, Marillion, which shows that musicians in the prog community really repsected what Genesis was doing. So in some sense I am agreeing with you.  What I am contesting is the notion and its continued perpetuation that Gensis is somehow better than these other bands, thus dominating the top ten.

Today, the influence of Yes, King Crimson and ELP on many of the new prog bands, notably Dream Theater and The Mars Volta shows that ELP and Yes, though not as immediately affective on the next generation of prog as Genesis,  were doing something musically to be reckoned with, it just took them thirty years to reckon with it.

 

PS>
Instead of asking me to clarify my point or opening up to discussion you close it off just to prove that oh, you are right and Genesis is the greatest band in the world.   You could have asked, it seems to me that there is a contradiction in your point. Is there, can you clarify it? and if there is a contradiction in a point I made you just dismiss everything I say.  Because a point I made is wrong or misinformed does not mean that everything I say is wrong. I am here to learn and share like eveyone else.

PS you seem to argue with me when I agree with you. For example, I was not stating that Genesis abstinence from the indulgence of jazz or classical elements was a 'bad thing' I was just stating a fact. the important word is indulgence, Yes they did explore classical music, came up with a madrigal like style and referenced Bach, but they did not indulge it, as in over the top, the way Yes and ELP did.

Listen to Perpetual Change from the Yes Album and see why someone would be annoyed that fans on this site set up Genesis as the ultimate prog rock ensmble.

 



Edited by ken4musiq
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 08 2006 at 20:29
Originally posted by ivan_2068 ivan_2068 wrote:

Originally posted by ken4musiq ken4musiq wrote:

 Genesis is a pop band and admittedly so, yet they never broke through the confines of the fan base during their classic period. 

 You are amazing, now I can prove you don't even know what yopu say... In this post you affirm Genesis is a Pop band, but today at 14:13 Hrs on another thread you said:

Ken4musiq wrote today:

Quote Genesis was always the most popular band among prog heads because they defined the purest example of the prog aesthetic.

Who can believe what you say after this contradiction? How can Genesis be a POP band and at the same time define Progressive aesthetic?

For God's sake!!!!!!!!!! I was going to debate about all this post, but after proving you don't even know what you say....What's the point???

Iván

 




hahahahah I bet you are one hell of a lawyer.  Not looking forward to the day when I slip up and you catch it
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 08 2006 at 20:22
Originally posted by ken4musiq ken4musiq wrote:

 Genesis is a pop band and admittedly so, yet they never broke through the confines of the fan base during their classic period. 

 You are amazing, now I can prove you don't even know what yopu say... In this post you affirm Genesis is a Pop band, but today at 14:13 Hrs on another thread you said:

Ken4musiq wrote today:

Quote Genesis was always the most popular band among prog heads because they defined the purest example of the prog aesthetic.

Who can believe what you say after this contradiction? How can Genesis be a POP band and at the same time define Progressive aesthetic?

For God's sake!!!!!!!!!! I was going to debate about all this post, but after proving you don't even know what you say....What's the point???

Iván

 

            
Back to Top
ken4musiq View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 14 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 446
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 08 2006 at 16:00

[QUOTE=lunaticviolist]And when the hell are ELP going to get into the top 10?!>>>

 

is taht we ELP fans are more discerning and do not woish to force our views on the rest of the world.  when I reviewed ELP, I did so conservatively not wanting my personal bias to influence my opinions.  I tried to be objective but now I realize that was a mistake. The first ELP, which I only gave three stars because I knew only an ELP fan would love the three fates, fundamentally changed and defined prog rock, more so then any other prog album. It made the neo-classic aesthetic an imperative.

Back to Top
Progger View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 26 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1188
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 08 2006 at 15:47
Originally posted by Tony Fisher Tony Fisher wrote:

Originally posted by Progger Progger wrote:

Originally posted by Thufir Hawat Thufir Hawat wrote:

It’s only the Genesis fans who vote CTTE 1

Star, they are just jealous of it. But seriously

CTTE is much better than SEBTP. Anyway

Its just a list so it doesn’t really mean anything.

I'm glad someone else can see the corruption by the small minority of Genesis fans. And Yes, CTTE is far, far , far , far superior to SEBTP and any other Geneis album you care to mention!



Crap. SEBTP is much superior - in my opinion. In yours, it is not. Your opinion does not affect my view, nor mine yours. Genesis made 3 albums better than any Yes album (as did Camel). You don't agree. It doesn't matter.

So let's just live and let live without provocative statements, shall we?

The fact is it is not simply based on oppinions! Any musician worth their salt will tell you that YES's CTTE, FRAGILE ect is a notch or two above what Genesis produced or were capable of [FACT]. Also, for an album to be considered a masterpiece in the truest sense it has to be perfect in every sense. The poor production alone of Genesis's 70's output takes their albums down to **** stars to begin with....



Edited by Progger
Back to Top
Tony Fisher View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: April 30 2005
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 967
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 08 2006 at 14:15
Originally posted by Progger Progger wrote:

Originally posted by Thufir Hawat Thufir Hawat wrote:

It’s only the Genesis fans who vote CTTE 1

Star, they are just jealous of it. But seriously

CTTE is much better than SEBTP. Anyway

Its just a list so it doesn’t really mean anything.

I'm glad someone else can see the corruption by the small minority of Genesis fans. And Yes, CTTE is far, far , far , far superior to SEBTP and any other Geneis album you care to mention!



Crap. SEBTP is much superior - in my opinion. In yours, it is not. Your opinion does not affect my view, nor mine yours. Genesis made 3 albums better than any Yes album (as did Camel). You don't agree. It doesn't matter.

So let's just live and let live without provocative statements, shall we?
Back to Top
Rorro View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 31 2005
Location: Uruguay
Status: Offline
Points: 508
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 08 2006 at 14:04

 

           Why are we fighting one with each other if we are all on the same side, the battle should be prog vs green day, good charlote, etc.

Back to Top
lunaticviolist View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 17 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 478
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 08 2006 at 13:48
And when the hell are ELP going to get into the top 10?!
My recent purchases:
Back to Top
ken4musiq View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 14 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 446
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 08 2006 at 13:43

The harmonics of Yes and Genesis are quite conventional, compared to some contemporaries. I am not saying there is nothing new in their music;>>>

Truly said. 

There used to be the adage, Yes- major chords, King Crimson-minor chords, (to which one could add Mahavishnu Orchestra- diminished chords.)

Yes was at a secure place in defining mid 1970s popular music. In 1975, there were two schools of Brit pop, Led Zeppelin and Yes.  Led Zeppelin defined the hard rock heavy/metal school although Zep did quite a number of acoustic tracks.  Yes defined the lighter, more ambient fare but also had some good guitar rock numbers.  Maybe Going for the One was an attempt to redefine themselves.  In 1979, Led Zeppelin, the sleeping Led Zeppelin, broke through with In Through the Out Door, which took them from super-stardom to mega-stardom. Later, that year, Pink Floyd followed with The Wall; Another Brick in the Wall Pt 2 was the number 5 single of 1980.  It took them from super-stardom to mega-stardom.   Genesis, of course, also made it into the Pantheon of mega-stardom with their series of mainstream hits from 1980-85.  Yes never had this leap; this was the reason Howe left. But that does not mean that they did not define the progressive rock aesthetic to the rock music world during the 1970s.

If you compare Yes to Genesis and the classic albums of both bands, musically Genesis does not compare.  Yes is so much more innovative, even in their diatonic, harmonic language. The ensemble playing on The Yes Album and Fragile is much better than that of Genesis classic albums. Just listen to the way Yes often played parts of the band against each other, as in Your Move and Perpetual Change, the funk groove of Starship Trooper. (Genesis had almost no groove at all. Bruford was Collins favorite drummer, and Yes, Collins favorite band.) or Roundabout, a classic pop tune that made it to the number fifteen.  Genesis is a pop band and admittedly so, yet they never broke through the confines of the fan base during their classic period.  Still, today, you will not hear any track accept perhaps the Lamb on American classic rock radio.  While I am no fan of Classic rock radio, one can argue that the ability to have broken through it is a feat.  There are quite a number of Yes tracks taht get regular airplay.

The use of keyboards in Close to the Edge, though not wholly original, redefined the way keyboards could be used in popular music.  Close to the Edge  is not one of my favorite Yes track nor one of my fav albums but I wold defend it musically against anything Genesis attempted.

Back to Top
Progger View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 26 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1188
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 04 2006 at 00:49
Originally posted by Thufir Hawat Thufir Hawat wrote:

It’s only the Genesis fans who vote CTTE 1

Star, they are just jealous of it. But seriously

CTTE is much better than SEBTP. Anyway

Its just a list so it doesn’t really mean anything.

I'm glad someone else can see the corruption by the small minority of Genesis fans. And Yes, CTTE is far, far , far , far superior to SEBTP and any other Geneis album you care to mention!

Back to Top
Thufir Hawat View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 09 2006
Location: Antarctica
Status: Offline
Points: 355
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 04 2006 at 00:34

It’s only the Genesis fans who vote CTTE 1

Star, they are just jealous of it. But seriously

CTTE is much better than SEBTP. Anyway

Its just a list so it doesn’t really mean anything.

"I can't see through my eye lids"
Back to Top
Progger View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 26 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1188
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 04 2006 at 00:16
It has become a joke and corrupts the charts! How else can you explain SEBTP to be at number two! It's not even Genesis's best album
Back to Top
Hosanna View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: February 02 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 15
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 02 2006 at 09:38

You all may keep joking. But it seem that not so far are times when at the top of the chart we will see Riverside (increased it's voters 5 times from the end of october till the end of january), Tool, PoS (both increased it's voters by 60-70%, when average increase in a poll is 29%). And Devin Townsend, of course with Synchestra.

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 5>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.176 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.