Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - First metal band, Genesis?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedFirst metal band, Genesis?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>
Author
Message
Zenith View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 21 2006
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 331
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 30 2006 at 04:44

Genesis metal??? Get some rewax

We're only in it for the music!!!
Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 30 2006 at 05:18

I have never considered them in any way 'metal' related, although I know they were an influence on numerous metal bands, like Iron Maiden and Van Halen (apparently Eddie Van Halen's style was very influenced by Hackets 'tapping')

I think their 'heavier' moments were really just that; moments. These heavy sections sat alongside predominantly light or symphonic passages of music.

Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
Back to Top
Rosescar View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 07 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 715
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 30 2006 at 05:21
Some moments, yes.

Just some moments.
My music!

"THE AUDIENCE WERE generally drugged. (In Holland, always)." - Robert Fripp
Back to Top
M. B. Zapelini View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 21 2005
Location: Brazil
Status: Offline
Points: 773
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 30 2006 at 05:25

I never thought of Genesis as a heavy band. In early seventies they were an adventurous band, messing with various musical styles, but they're definitely not heavy. Cannot judge a band by some elements or a few songs. If you only listen to "Long Gone Geek", you'd probably call Procol Harum as a metal band...

IMO, "You Really Got Me" (The Kinks) was the first metal song!! This was released in 1965... Believe me or not, The Rolling Stones version to "She Said Yeah" (check out for "Out of Our Heads - UK version" - the one with the same cover of "December's CHildren") was another heavy 1965 song...

"He's a man of the past and one of the present"
PETER HAMMILL
Back to Top
BaldFriede View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10266
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 30 2006 at 05:28
Someone will name "Helter Skelter" by the Beatles next. 


BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.
Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 30 2006 at 05:43

Then of course, there's Helter Skelter by the Beatles. That was probably the first metal song...

 

 

 

 

Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
Back to Top
Infidel View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: August 30 2005
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 20
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 30 2006 at 05:43

Well, I can see his point but I wouldn't say they're the "first" metal band. The Knife, The Musical Box, Hogweed, Moonlit Night all have some quite heavy elements to them (especially the versions on the first Genesis Live LP). It's riff based material over a persistent beat - the basic formula of what many people identify as "metal."

Yes, there are other bands who qualify more readily with the "metal" sound (esp Rush, Purple, Zepplin) but these early tracks of Genesis simply have a metal element. AFAIC, the early stuff up until the time Gabriel left, are far more accessible to a broader audience than anything that came later.

While we're at it - what was "Whodunnit?" Sometimes (when I can bear to listen to it) I think it just might have been a response to Punk ... ?

MPA

As eyes see young stars assemble
Back to Top
Paulieg View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 18 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 934
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 30 2006 at 05:59
Originally posted by troy troy wrote:

Originally posted by ProgsCerebrum ProgsCerebrum wrote:

I have been thinking about this for a long time...early genesis was often dark/gothic and the guitar parts occasionally got really heavy...not to mention hacketts finger-tapping.  Of course its been said that bands like Sabbath, King Crimson, Led Zepplin, etc. made up the foundation of what we know as metal today.  But in my opinion, Genesis belongs in that group, even if they dont have that blatant "metal" sound...people tend to overlook their heaviness.  Just my two cents.

You're highWink

 

Just my thinking!!!

Back to Top
Moribund View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: March 21 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 210
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 30 2006 at 06:36
No.
Just because there are some heavy passages, this is NOT metal. Ever. The heavy moments on Trespass sound clumsy and childlike next to the more assured folksy pastoral styles which the band excelled at. All rock can have it's heavy moments. That's what Rock is. But to me only those bands who explore noise and heaviness explicitly should be called Heavy Metal. Bands which balanced progressive styles with Heavy or Metal influences were Crimson (occasionally), Purple, Led Zep, Rush, Rainbow, Blue Oyster Cult, Todd Rungren, Primus, Cardiacs, Mars olta & probably many I don't myself know. Er, but not Genesis.
New Progressive Rock Live show now touring UK theatres!
www.masterpiecestheconcert.co.uk
Back to Top
Dragon Phoenix View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: August 31 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 1475
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 30 2006 at 06:44
Originally posted by NetsNJFan NetsNJFan wrote:

Genesis?  Metal?  Ha!  Please don't ruin my favorite band with silly accusations. 



Blog this:
http://artrock2006.blogspot.com
Back to Top
akin View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 06 2004
Location: Brazil
Status: Offline
Points: 976
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 30 2006 at 06:45
Those Genesis fanatics... Come on, Genesis heavy metal? When you listen to one Genesis song with a hard riff, listen to Deep Purple, Black Sabbath, Uriah Heep albuns of the same year.

It's hard to realise that Genesis didn't invent new genres and the importance of the band is just the quality of their work as a progressive band? They are among the most famous and acclaimed progressive rock bands and their albuns are loved by almost every prog fan. Isn't it enough?
Back to Top
BaldFriede View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10266
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 30 2006 at 09:09
Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

I reckon it was much earlier than that - the riffing and heaviness is evident in the Kinks and the Who respectively, and the "amps up to 11" thing is almost completely inherent in the music of Blue Cheer - who are at the root of grunge as well, IMO.

Next under consideration are the Cream, Spooky Tooth, Bakerloo, High Tide, May Blitz and a swathe of heavy blues bands around in the late 1960s-early 1970s.

Next to these heavyweights, Genesis are very much at the lighter end as a generalism - but there's no disputing that Prog Rock absorbed influences from ALL genres, and Genesis at their heaviest wrote some stonking riffs.

Also, consider that Metal and Prog Rock can have a lot more in common than hardcore fans of either genre would really like to admit.


I always like to learn about new words; this one ("stonking") was in none of my dictionaries. A web search brought up this:

Quote STONKING

[Q] From Peter Weinrich: “From time to time The Economist likes to indulge in a little verbal slumming, and does so this week (May 12–18). On p59 it refers to the prime minister who ‘may have a stonking lead in the polls’. The only meaning I ever knew for being stonked was being stoned, sloshed or otherwise drunk—does The Economist mean his lead is enough to get drunk on, or make him drunk with success? Either way it seems a new twist to an older word.”

[A] The Economist isn’t actually slumming, but using an informal word in moderately common use in Britain. Stonk and its relatives are an interesting bunch: with all those strong consonants they’re thudding, active, strongly masculine words. And there may be two separate origins involved.

According to the Macquarie Dictionary, stonkered in Australia can mean drunk, which is presumably the sense you know, though it also has associated ideas of being defeated, exhausted, done in, or lethargic, as after a large meal. This comes from the verb stonker, which at one time could mean to kill, but is now the action of outwitting or defeating somebody. It is generally said that this in turn comes from an old Scots term stonk, originally and oddly the stake in a game of marbles. According to the Oxford English Dictionary, the first recorded use of it was in John Jamieson’s Etymological Dictionary of the Scottish Language in 1841, in which he said that stunk was “the stake put in by boys in a game, especially in that of marbles”. According to the Concise Scots Dictionary, this is now only local Scots dialect, and it suggests the Scots got it from local English dialect (do try to keep up), which might have originated in stock, a store, presumably the bag or other container the marbles or money were kept in. The Australian use seems to have come out of soldiering—at least, the first examples in the Australian National Dictionary (hang on a minute while I move some of these books out of the way) are from military publications at the end of the First World War, in 1918.

That, you will probably feel, comprehensively deals with one sense of the word, but as yet it doesn’t help with the way that it turns up in The Economist piece. That meaning is well known in Britain, as I said earlier, where a stonker is something which is large or impressive of its kind. Hence stonking, a word of vague positive emphasis: “That’s a stonking good idea”, what Tony Thorne described in his Dictionary of Contemporary Slang as “an all-purpose intensifying adjective”. It seems to have been especially in vogue around the end of the 1980s.

The word was popularised widely in 1991 when the annual BBC charity telethon, Comic Relief, used the word in its catch phrase; there was even a song produced, The Stonk, by Hale and Pace and the Stonkers, which briefly reached the top of the UK charts (“Good evening, here is the six o’clock stonk, over the nation there’s a brand new craze, You see it going on wherever music plays, It’s funky and it’s punky and it’s impolite, You can do it by day but it’s better at night”; the word stonker has since become a slang term for an erection; to what extent the lyric of this song had anything to do with it is uncertain).

Now it could well be that this sense of stonking came from the other—after all, there was plenty of opportunity for British and Australian soldiers to exchange slang during two world wars. But it seems more probable that the British sense comes from military jargon, in which a stonk is an intensive artillery bombardment. The OED has examples dating from 1944. It is sometimes said that the word in this sense is a mangled version of the formal description, Standard Regimental Concentration, which seems a terrible stretch. But the word was certainly in wide use among soldiers post-war and seems to have spread out from there.





As a former professional translator I am always grateful for learning new words. Thanks a lot!


Edited by BaldFriede


BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.
Back to Top
A'swepe View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: December 08 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 590
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 30 2006 at 09:43
Originally posted by Andrea Cortese Andrea Cortese wrote:

Heavy Metal starts with In-A-Gadda-Da-Vida, the fabulous album released by Iron Butterfly in 1968!

You are absolutely right! Way back in 1968 Iron Butterfly defied the conventional genre-classifications of the time. They were labeled as Psychedelic, but not the same way as Quicksilver Messenger Service was. IB, Grand Funk Railroad, Led Zeppelin & others were the precursors of what is knows today as Heavy Metal.

David - Never doubt in the dark that which you believe to be true in the light.
http://www.myspace.com/aardvarktxusa - Instrumental rock
http://www.soundclick.com/aardvarktxusa
Back to Top
RoyalJelly View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 29 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 582
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 30 2006 at 09:58
     Hello, people, anybody remember a guy named Jimi Hendrix? He came
to England in 67 and blew away all those British guitarists with his heavy
sound, and they all started to go that way...Zeppelin, the Yardbirds, the
Stones, the Who, you name it. Jimi invented that big guitar sound, and to
give credit to others who emulated him is just a distortion of history. Let's
not forget the Cream either, Clapton was very influenced by Hendrix.

     But Gensis? Even Yes had heavier moments...some of Yessongs.
Crimson of course was much, much heavier...

Edited by RoyalJelly
Back to Top
bluesurfer View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: September 06 2005
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 1
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 30 2006 at 12:08

Led Zeppelin, Black Sabbath and Deep Purple were the precursors of heavy metal, not Genesis!

Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 30 2006 at 16:54
Originally posted by BaldFriede BaldFriede wrote:

I always like to learn about new words; this one ("stonking") was in none of my dictionaries. A web search brought up this:

Quote STONKING

[Q] From Peter Weinrich: “From time to time The Economist likes to indulge in a little verbal slumming, and does so this week (May 12–18). On p59 it refers to the prime minister who ‘may have a stonking lead in the polls’. The only meaning I ever knew for being stonked was being stoned, sloshed or otherwise drunk—does The Economist mean his lead is enough to get drunk on, or make him drunk with success? Either way it seems a new twist to an older word.”

[A] The Economist isn’t actually slumming, but using an informal word in moderately common use in Britain. Stonk and its relatives are an interesting bunch: with all those strong consonants they’re thudding, active, strongly masculine words. And there may be two separate origins involved.

According to the Macquarie Dictionary, stonkered in Australia can mean drunk, which is presumably the sense you know, though it also has associated ideas of being defeated, exhausted, done in, or lethargic, as after a large meal. This comes from the verb stonker, which at one time could mean to kill, but is now the action of outwitting or defeating somebody. It is generally said that this in turn comes from an old Scots term stonk, originally and oddly the stake in a game of marbles. According to the Oxford English Dictionary, the first recorded use of it was in John Jamieson’s Etymological Dictionary of the Scottish Language in 1841, in which he said that stunk was “the stake put in by boys in a game, especially in that of marbles”. According to the Concise Scots Dictionary, this is now only local Scots dialect, and it suggests the Scots got it from local English dialect (do try to keep up), which might have originated in stock, a store, presumably the bag or other container the marbles or money were kept in. The Australian use seems to have come out of soldiering—at least, the first examples in the Australian National Dictionary (hang on a minute while I move some of these books out of the way) are from military publications at the end of the First World War, in 1918.

That, you will probably feel, comprehensively deals with one sense of the word, but as yet it doesn’t help with the way that it turns up in The Economist piece. That meaning is well known in Britain, as I said earlier, where a stonker is something which is large or impressive of its kind. Hence stonking, a word of vague positive emphasis: “That’s a stonking good idea”, what Tony Thorne described in his Dictionary of Contemporary Slang as “an all-purpose intensifying adjective”. It seems to have been especially in vogue around the end of the 1980s.

The word was popularised widely in 1991 when the annual BBC charity telethon, Comic Relief, used the word in its catch phrase; there was even a song produced, The Stonk, by Hale and Pace and the Stonkers, which briefly reached the top of the UK charts (“Good evening, here is the six o’clock stonk, over the nation there’s a brand new craze, You see it going on wherever music plays, It’s funky and it’s punky and it’s impolite, You can do it by day but it’s better at night”; the word stonker has since become a slang term for an erection; to what extent the lyric of this song had anything to do with it is uncertain).

Now it could well be that this sense of stonking came from the other—after all, there was plenty of opportunity for British and Australian soldiers to exchange slang during two world wars. But it seems more probable that the British sense comes from military jargon, in which a stonk is an intensive artillery bombardment. The OED has examples dating from 1944. It is sometimes said that the word in this sense is a mangled version of the formal description, Standard Regimental Concentration, which seems a terrible stretch. But the word was certainly in wide use among soldiers post-war and seems to have spread out from there.





As a former professional translator I am always grateful for learning new words. Thanks a lot!

 

That's a STONKING definition, BF!!!

Back to Top
Zargus View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 08 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 3491
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 30 2006 at 18:38
First metal band, Genesis?  Prog/pop if ya ask me  no way close to metal.
Back to Top
Hendrix828 View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie


Joined: November 19 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 63
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 30 2006 at 23:21
The Jimi Hendrix Experience
Back to Top
Hendrix828 View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie


Joined: November 19 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 63
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 30 2006 at 23:23

Originally posted by RoyalJelly RoyalJelly wrote:

     Hello, people, anybody remember a guy named Jimi Hendrix? He came
to England in 67 and blew away all those British guitarists with his heavy
sound, and they all started to go that way...Zeppelin, the Yardbirds, the
Stones, the Who, you name it. Jimi invented that big guitar sound, and to
give credit to others who emulated him is just a distortion of history. Let's
not forget the Cream either, Clapton was very influenced by Hendrix.

     But Gensis? Even Yes had heavier moments...some of Yessongs.
Crimson of course was much, much heavier...

 

He did Purple Haze,Manic Depression etc. in 1966.

Back to Top
Mongo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: January 12 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 370
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 30 2006 at 23:37
Blue Cheer- Vincebus Eruptum-1965
"The options are ever fewer on the ground these days" Fish
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.152 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.