Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Why do you blame collins?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedWhy do you blame collins?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 456
Author
Message
sbrushfan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: November 07 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1177
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 26 2006 at 16:51
Originally posted by plstipus143 plstipus143 wrote:

Personally I feel Mike and Tony are as much to blame as Phil

THANK YOU!!!!!!!! I LOVE YOU!!!!!!

People....just because Phil sang for post-Gabriel Genesis does NOT mean he owned the group! Not one damn bit!  He might have had a say in what the band played, but the people who were there from the onset were Tony and Mike.  They tend to get a lot of short shrift for "selling out", but, truth be told, the group by that time was a 3-piece and everyone had equal say (the songwriting credits were to all of them).  Let's not blame Phil for bringing a pop sensibility to what might otherwise have been regarded as "old hat".  Does the world really need another "Stagnation? or "Supper's Ready"? IMO, no.

Some world views are spacious, and some are merely spaced...
Back to Top
pakish View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 02 2005
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 166
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 26 2006 at 17:27

You people talk as if Collins was the only one in the band. Didn't the other guys had any brains at all to make anything?

Plus everything has it's cicle of life. Born, Growth, Reproduction, Ageing, Death.

I think they did their contibution to the music and it was so important that it will trascend. That's the important thing. And collins contibuted

TOEFL in latin america = neolanguage   
Back to Top
The Wizard View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 18 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 7341
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 26 2006 at 17:46
I just think of pop and prog Genesis as too different bands and not worry about Collins at all.
Back to Top
ken4musiq View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 14 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 446
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 26 2006 at 19:31

Another band would be Soft Machine, their debut also has most components of prog (and was released before ITCOTCK), yet it wasn't the big breakthrough in rock music KC made a year later.

You are probably right here about SM . . .  My argument is that KC did not hold a 'special place' in the history of prog. until much later and although they may have turned many people on to prog, it does not mean that they were the first 'prog' band. 

The jazz sophistication of the first album lay not only in the improvisation but the orchestrations, which are Ian McDonald, although compositional credit is given to all on the two tracks that are most well- orchestrated: 21st and Epitaph. This may have something to do with the bands recognition of the interest of the orchestrations.  The use of the bass clarinet seems to have reference to Miles Davis Bitches Brew, which came out earlier in the year. Also some of the harmonic vocabulary at the beginnning of The Court seems to come out of BB.  The first KC was an incredible ensemble.

 . . .to put it in perspective of Genesis.  From my reading it seems that Genesis held a very distinct place among fans of early prog.  I think a big part of it must have been the theatrics or maybe the lyrics, which are not mutually exclusive.  There seems to be an important place that theatrics held in early prog.  ELP was also a very theatrical band, but the theatrics lay in musical virtuosity, destroying organs, spinning pianos and revolving drums sets.  Genesis relied more on mood than virtuosity and destruction.  I think that mood was an important element to the escapist notions of early prog. For Genesis as for KC, the destruction of this world was inevitable. KC sees this reality through the expressionistic eyes of terror.  Genesis is more resolved to the reality and creates an escapist fantasy.  ELP, like the Who and Hendrix were acting it out.  (Radiohead really picks up where they left off with that theme.) 



Edited by ken4musiq
Back to Top
Losendos View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 03 2005
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 571
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 27 2006 at 06:40

 

  By the late 70s and early 80s noone was really making full prog. What was selling was pop/prog of the likes of Alan Parsons,the Genesis of ATTW3, Jon and Vangelis.90125 and Mike Oldfield had a big hit in Crises which was one side pop one side prog.

Camel also had some dismal attempts at cracking the charts.

Other tastes of the early 70s were also derided by the late 70s , think the Carpeneters, America , Bread or early 70s Bee Gees.

It seems most styles have their day but then have to move on be it prog,glamrock, disco, pop, punk , West Coast,grunge ,new wave , new romantics, rap,electronic.

The next generation of kids want their own heroes and  idols.

Krishna says in Bhagavad Gita Time I am the destroyer of all things.

 By the late 80s prog was gone completely.

 So let us celebrate Phil Collins contribution to prog with the understanding that the direction music took into the 80s had nothing at all to do with him.

 Three cheers for Dr Bogenbroom

 

 

How wonderful to be so profound
Back to Top
BebieM View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 01 2004
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 854
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 27 2006 at 17:26
Originally posted by richardh richardh wrote:

Sorry but Pete Sinfield wrote the lyrics on In The Court Of The Crimson King NOT Greg Lake.


Oh, you're right of course! How could I forget ...
Back to Top
BebieM View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 01 2004
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 854
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 27 2006 at 17:33
Originally posted by ken4musiq ken4musiq wrote:

Another band would be Soft Machine, their debut also has most components of prog (and was released before ITCOTCK), yet it wasn't the big breakthrough in rock music KC made a year later.

You are probably right here about SM . . .  My argument is that KC did not hold a 'special place' in the history of prog. until much later and although they may have turned many people on to prog, it does not mean that they were the first 'prog' band. 

The jazz sophistication of the first album lay not only in the improvisation but the orchestrations, which are Ian McDonald, although compositional credit is given to all on the two tracks that are most well- orchestrated: 21st and Epitaph. This may have something to do with the bands recognition of the interest of the orchestrations.  The use of the bass clarinet seems to have reference to Miles Davis Bitches Brew, which came out earlier in the year. Also some of the harmonic vocabulary at the beginnning of The Court seems to come out of BB.  The first KC was an incredible ensemble.

 . . .to put it in perspective of Genesis.  From my reading it seems that Genesis held a very distinct place among fans of early prog.  I think a big part of it must have been the theatrics or maybe the lyrics, which are not mutually exclusive.  There seems to be an important place that theatrics held in early prog.  ELP was also a very theatrical band, but the theatrics lay in musical virtuosity, destroying organs, spinning pianos and revolving drums sets.  Genesis relied more on mood than virtuosity and destruction.  I think that mood was an important element to the escapist notions of early prog. For Genesis as for KC, the destruction of this world was inevitable. KC sees this reality through the expressionistic eyes of terror.  Genesis is more resolved to the reality and creates an escapist fantasy.  ELP, like the Who and Hendrix were acting it out.  (Radiohead really picks up where they left off with that theme.) 



I think i got your point now.

I'm afraid I don't know much about the actual mentality of the time and the development of prog in that regard being way too young and not having read much about it.
Back to Top
dralan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 29 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 339
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 27 2006 at 18:31
 You cant really single out Collins, all of them jumped on the pop bandwagon at one time or another. But on Duke with Phils real first attempts at songwriting --  i.e. "Misunderstanding", you can see the direction they were heading. 
Back to Top
sbrushfan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: November 07 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1177
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 28 2006 at 16:12
True, Dralan...pop though it was, it was DEAD catchy!  Still, we gotta single everyone out.  I can't help but wonder if Collins was picked on because, whether we know it or not, he was still the "New guy"...he didn't join Genesis til they had 2 records out.
Some world views are spacious, and some are merely spaced...
Back to Top
Hemispheres View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 22 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 533
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 28 2006 at 16:47

i think people blame him Because he was the frontman and his solo stuff is really bland pop and they just assume it was him and hes such an easy target just look at the guy

This picture scares me

[IMG]http://www.wheresthatfrom.com/avatars/miguelsanchez.gif">[IMG]http://www.rockphiles.com/all_images/Act_Images/TheMothersOfInvention/mothers300.jpg">
Back to Top
sbrushfan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: November 07 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1177
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 28 2006 at 16:58
Certainly not his most flattering pose, I'll say.  Wink
Some world views are spacious, and some are merely spaced...
Back to Top
alan_pfeifer View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: December 05 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 823
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 28 2006 at 17:13
Originally posted by ivan_2068 ivan_2068 wrote:

Originally posted by alan_pfeifer alan_pfeifer wrote:

You know, musicans have  to eat too.

  1. Peter Gabriel
  2. Steve Hackett
  3. Dave Gilmour
  4. Roger Waters
  5. Ian Anderson
  6. Robert Fripp
  7. Bill Bruford
  8. Tony Levin
  9. Steve Howe
  10. Rick Wakeman

Are not exactly poor

Iván

Indeed, and Let's hope they're not

But seriously, why do we blame Collins?  If he destryoed the band and all, then wouldn't the Rutherford and Banks have left the band as well?

Back to Top
Under View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 389
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 31 2006 at 08:52
Originally posted by erik neuteboom erik neuteboom wrote:

I was as agressive as your 'Medieval moving picture' .. , mr. Under!

By the way, where do you live in Holland?

Sorry for the late reply, Erik. Problems with my ADSL Provider.
I live near Utrecht.

 

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 456

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.133 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.