Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Hemispheres
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 22 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 533
|
Topic: Favourite Prog Era Posted: January 22 2006 at 22:10 |
69-72 probbably 72-74 is also good damn its hard
|
[IMG]http://www.wheresthatfrom.com/avatars/miguelsanchez.gif">[IMG]http://www.rockphiles.com/all_images/Act_Images/TheMothersOfInvention/mothers300.jpg">
|
|
NetsNJFan
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 12 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3047
|
Posted: January 22 2006 at 22:19 |
72-74 easily was prog's crowning period
76-79 also had it's fair share of creativity and innovation, albeit with lesser known bands, more in the Canterbury and RIO genres
|
|
|
Hemispheres
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 22 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 533
|
Posted: January 22 2006 at 22:31 |
69-72 i think i might like better because there was still clear psychadelic influences and better albums Close To The Edge,Foxtrot,Pawn Hearts first three soft machine albums,Birds Of Fire,Hot Rats and many other albums but my fav crimson era was probably 72-74 and KC are probably my fav band so its a hard one
|
[IMG]http://www.wheresthatfrom.com/avatars/miguelsanchez.gif">[IMG]http://www.rockphiles.com/all_images/Act_Images/TheMothersOfInvention/mothers300.jpg">
|
|
Moogtron III
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 26 2005
Location: Belgium
Status: Offline
Points: 10616
|
Posted: January 23 2006 at 05:22 |
NetsNJFan wrote:
72-74 easily was prog's crowning period
76-79 also had it's fair share of creativity and innovation, albeit with lesser known bands, more in the Canterbury and RIO genres |
I second that.
|
|
Norbert
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 20 2005
Location: Hungary
Status: Offline
Points: 2506
|
Posted: January 23 2006 at 07:18 |
1971-74, but there is an option like that.
1972-1974 fom the list.
|
|
T-BONE
Forum Groupie
Joined: December 16 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 77
|
Posted: January 23 2006 at 07:34 |
Nickelback prog???? Tell why you feel that way???
|
|
ANDREW
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 21 2005
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 3064
|
Posted: January 23 2006 at 07:43 |
72-74.
But 69-72 is more important for the development of progressive music.
|
|
Zargus
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 08 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 3491
|
Posted: January 23 2006 at 07:46 |
69-72
|
|
|
kebjourman
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 26 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 393
|
Posted: January 26 2006 at 20:12 |
69-72
thank god no one said anything in the 80s
|
|
Bj-1
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: June 04 2005
Location: No(r)Way
Status: Offline
Points: 31619
|
Posted: January 26 2006 at 20:20 |
69-76
Which means: Can't decide!
|
RIO/AVANT/ZEUHL - The best thing you can get with yer pants on!
|
|
Hemispheres
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 22 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 533
|
Posted: January 28 2006 at 20:38 |
|
[IMG]http://www.wheresthatfrom.com/avatars/miguelsanchez.gif">[IMG]http://www.rockphiles.com/all_images/Act_Images/TheMothersOfInvention/mothers300.jpg">
|
|
Moatilliatta
Prog Reviewer
Joined: December 01 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3083
|
Posted: January 28 2006 at 20:45 |
Well, the 70s would be the easy answer for most, but I am probably one of few who absolutely love recent prog, so much as to vote for them in this poll. The Mars Volta, Coheed, Dream Theater, The Flower Kings, The Tangent, Tool, Porcupine Tree, Niacin, Neal Morse, etc. I adore the new stuff as much as I do the classics. While in most cases, I would have to hand it to the early-mid 70s, I think the new bands deserve at least one vote. So I'll give them that vote.
|
www.last.fm/user/ThisCenotaph
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.