Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
bluetailfly
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 28 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1383
|
Posted: December 29 2005 at 19:43 |
BaldFriede wrote:
bluetailfly wrote:
BaldFriede wrote:
Peter wrote:
Joren wrote: "But we're not talking about prog anymore."
Not talking about PROG?! Achtung! Raus! Raus! Schnell, schnell! Es ist verboten! Gott im himmel! 
(No offense, Diddy. I remember some of my German course, but I bet that the above is full of errors....)
|
Only one error; the "H" in "Himmel" has to be capitalized. Nouns begin with a capital letter in German. Of course your sentences are ellipses only; there are no verbs in them (but for the auxiliary verb "ist"), which makes it easier.
|
Also, isn't it "Gott in Himmel!" not "im." I'm pretty sure.
|
No, it is "im". Short for "in dem". Dative. Trust a native speaker.
|
But I thought the dative form is only used for indirect objects, which Himmel isn't in this case (I think it's the object of a preposition). So why "in dem" and not "in den" aka "in"? I took several semesters of German, but I defer to your expertise. I'm just wondering why.
|
"The red polygon's only desire / is to get to the blue triangle."
|
 |
BaldFriede
Prog Reviewer
Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10266
|
Posted: December 29 2005 at 20:02 |
Because of the dative. The article "der" is declinated like this:
Nominative - der Genitive - des Dative - dem Accusative - den
Specifying a location requires the dative in German, so it is "in dem Himmel" (which sounds clumsy in German and would only be used if there were several heavens and you wanted to specify which one you mean. The stress of the sentence would have to be on the article then, "in dem Himmel", "in this heaven" (actually "dem" is short for "diesem", the dative of "dies", "this" (specification). Also note that "diesem" is only used in combination with nouns which are masculine or neutral; for feminine nouns it would have to be "dieser". In a table it would look like this:
German articles: masculine feminine neutral
Nominative der die das
Genitive des der des
Dative dem der dem
Accusative den die das
with specification:
masculine feminine neutral Nominative dieser diese dieses Genitive dieses dieser dieses Dative diesem dieser diesem Accusative diesen diese dieses)
If there is only one heaven, the "in dem" is further shortened to "im"). Interestingly, if you want to express that you go into heaven (specifying direction and not location), the accusative is used, and it is "in den Himmel" (which cannot be shortened to "in Himmel" the way "in dem Himmel" is shortened to "im Himmel"). If you are confused now: Yes, German grammar IS complicated.
Edited by BaldFriede
|
 BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.
|
 |
NetsNJFan
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 12 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3047
|
Posted: December 29 2005 at 20:05 |
This one definitely takes the cake

|
|
 |
bluetailfly
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 28 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1383
|
Posted: December 30 2005 at 11:43 |
BaldFriede wrote:
Because of the dative. The article "der" is declinated like this:
Nominative - der Genitive - des Dative - dem Accusative - den
Specifying a location requires the dative in German, so it is "in dem Himmel" (which sounds clumsy in German and would only be used if there were several heavens and you wanted to specify which one you mean. The stress of the sentence would have to be on the article then, "in dem Himmel", "in this heaven" (actually "dem" is short for "diesem", the dative of "dies", "this" (specification). Also note that "diesem" is only used in combination with nouns which are masculine or neutral; for feminine nouns it would have to be "dieser". In a table it would look like this:
German articles: masculine feminine neutral Nominative der die das Genitive des der des Dative dem der dem Accusative den die das
with specification:
masculine feminine neutral Nominative dieser diese dieses Genitive dieses dieser dieses Dative diesem dieser diesem Accusative diesen diese dieses)
If there is only one heaven, the "in dem" is further shortened to "im"). Interestingly, if you want to express that you go into heaven (specifying direction and not location), the accusative is used, and it is "in den Himmel" (which cannot be shortened to "in Himmel" the way "in dem Himmel" is shortened to "im Himmel"). If you are confused now: Yes, German grammar IS complicated.
|
Thanks for the very thorough response on the matter; I didn't remember that specifying location required the dative. I remember that I was often bewildered by all the rules, and also found it difficult to memorize which article goes with which noun. We were always being tested on it and there was really no underlying pattern to help you; you just had to know that Das went with Wienerschnitzel. (and the fact that there were fast food restaurants called Der Wienerschnitzel didn't help!)
|
"The red polygon's only desire / is to get to the blue triangle."
|
 |
NELMOMEDELPROG
Forum Groupie
Joined: November 27 2005
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 41
|
Posted: December 30 2005 at 12:35 |
ROGER DEAN!!!!!!
|
 |
UncleMeat
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 23 2005
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 288
|
Posted: December 30 2005 at 16:17 |
Peter wrote:
Joren wrote: "But we're not talking about prog anymore."
Not talking about PROG?! Achtung! Raus! Raus! Schnell, schnell! Es ist verboten! Gott im himmel! 
(No offense, Diddy. I remember some of my German course, but I bet that the above is full of errors....) |
I saw that Joren lives in the Netherlands, so he does not speak German
but Dutch. Believe me, these two languages maybe look alike but are are
very very different.
You should have written: Opletten! Wegwezen! Snel, snel! Het is verboden. O mijn God!
|
Music Is The Best
|
 |
UncleMeat
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 23 2005
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 288
|
Posted: December 30 2005 at 16:22 |
And talking about Covers: it is of course a question of taste, but I do
not like Roger Dean covers. The early genesis covers are okay, and the
Lamb stands out as.
I think that a lot of zappa album covers are very nice.
|
Music Is The Best
|
 |
Bj-1
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: June 04 2005
Location: No(r)Way
Status: Online
Points: 31646
|
Posted: December 30 2005 at 18:50 |
- ELP - Tarkus
- Pink Floyd - DSOTM, WYWH, Animals, The Wall, Ummagumma
- Genesis - Nursery Cryme, Foxtrot
- King Crimson - ITCOTCK
- Yes - Fragile, CTTE, Yessongs, TFTO, Relayer, Drama
and many more
|
RIO/AVANT/ZEUHL - The best thing you can get with yer pants on!
|
 |
Big Ears
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 08 2005
Location: Hants, England
Status: Offline
Points: 727
|
Posted: December 31 2005 at 06:21 |
Roger Dean's designs for Yes, Greenslade and Budgie are part of the reason I like progressive and heavy rock. I also liked gatefold covers especially if they contained lyrics. Quadrophenia by The Who is not progressive I know, but it has a great cover and book which is inextricably bound to the album with its photographs telling the story.
|
 |
lordoflight
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 24 2005
Location: Malta
Status: Offline
Points: 105
|
Posted: December 31 2005 at 07:21 |
Hawkwind Space Ritual
Ash Ra Tempel - Same
Amon Duul - Wolf City
Ummagumma
Also, Iron Maiden's early album covers, and Opeth's Blackwater Park, Black Sabbath's debut. Also, some black metal albums have nice artwork (not the ones with the corpse painted idiots posing with axes and spears)
|
 |
Fitzcarraldo
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 30 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1835
|
Posted: December 31 2005 at 08:37 |
|
|
 |
Fitzcarraldo
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 30 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1835
|
Posted: December 31 2005 at 08:39 |
|
|
 |
Fitzcarraldo
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 30 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1835
|
Posted: December 31 2005 at 08:41 |
|
|
 |
Fitzcarraldo
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 30 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1835
|
Posted: December 31 2005 at 08:43 |
|
|
 |
Fitzcarraldo
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 30 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1835
|
Posted: December 31 2005 at 08:44 |
|
|
 |
Topographic Oce
Forum Groupie
Joined: November 25 2005
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 76
|
Posted: December 31 2005 at 14:10 |
raggy wrote:
Is Roger Dean the ultimate prog artist? I know I was sometimes caught out as a kid, accidentally buying the odd duff LP on the grounds that "any album that looks like this must be good", ( ie Osibissa.)
Which cover art most compliments (or contradicts) its musical contents?
Do you lament the passing of the 12" format, when you really got some art for your money? I used to christen each new LP by skinning-up a good 'un on the sleeve whilst listening to it! Try getting your king skins to stay put on a slippy CD cover,...very messy.
My faves (off the top of my head) include;
"Pentateuch of the Cosmogony", Dave Greenslade.(artwork by Patrick Woodroffe, makes Dean's work on Yessongs look like the the scrawlings of a 2 yr old!)
"Relayer." (Roger on top form.)
Rameses "Space Hymes", (also Dean. This band is overlooked on these pages. Not really my taste but may appeal to some prog fans leaning towards the Hippy/space thing. Then again, I'm a GonG freak and I'm still not keen. Oddly enough this band named amongst its members a young Lol Creame and Kevin Godley!!) 12" cover folds out to 24" by 36".
"Space Ritual"-Hawkwind, but like the above mentioned cover it folds out to 6 times its size, so you really need the original vinyl.
any more suggestions/comments? |
I agree that Roger Dean was the master of Prog album artwork but must disagree vehemently with your coment about the OSIBISA (1 S) album that was totally revolutionary and was probably the start of world Music here in the UK.
|
 |
Tony Fisher
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 30 2005
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 967
|
Posted: December 31 2005 at 14:58 |
I think the cover and artwork on the vinyl of Grave New World is completely unsurpassed by anything I have ever seen. The music is brilliant but the LP is worth buying for the cover and booklet alone.
The only other cover that bears comparison is the original cover of Happy to Meet, Sorry to Part by Horslips. They designed it themselves (Charles O'Connor is a trained graphic designer) and it is a 16 page (I think) booklet in the shape of a concertina. They cost too much to make so later vinyls were issued with a simplified version. The originals are real collectors items. A colleague of mine has one but he won't sell me it (the swine!). It makes Brain Salad Surgery's cover look like something a toddler designed, frankly.
I love Dean's designs but a really top cover takes a bit more than just a good picture.
|
 |
Someo Therguy
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 30 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 274
|
Posted: December 31 2005 at 16:20 |
I love the King Crimson covers that feature the paintings of P. J. Crook, like Happy With What You Have To Be Happy With and The Nightwatch DVD. Her work is outstanding.
Edited by Someo Therguy
|
 |
Fitzcarraldo
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 30 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1835
|
Posted: December 31 2005 at 18:08 |
|
|
 |
White Queen
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 28 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 218
|
Posted: December 31 2005 at 19:08 |
ROGER DEAN!!! WHOEVER DID IN THE COURT OF THE CRIMSON KING!!!
|
 |
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.