Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Snow Dog
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
|
Topic: Why Queen are "Magic" Posted: December 13 2005 at 07:45 |
What is behinds Queens greatness?
- The Vocals - Those harmonies are to die for.....3 good singers make for a very dramatic affect. Queen are possibly the best harmonic rock group ever
- The Guitar - Brian May is an exceptional and original guitarist, not to mention his innovative use of guitar "orchestration" using multi tracking techniques
- Songwriting - With 4 songwriters in the band its no surprise they have produces so much good stuff
- Front man - Mercury, surely one of the best?
- Diversity - Wide range of styles of their music has increased their longevity.
Edited by Snow Dog
|
|
|
darren
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 31 2005
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 452
|
Posted: December 13 2005 at 07:54 |
... all of the above?
|
"they locked up a man who wanted to rule the world.
the fools
they locked up the wrong man."
- Leonard Cohen
|
|
Guests
Forum Guest Group
|
Posted: December 13 2005 at 07:57 |
|
|
pero
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 11 2005
Location: Croatia
Status: Offline
Points: 1242
|
Posted: December 13 2005 at 07:57 |
Are you paid for this ?
|
|
Snow Dog
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
|
Posted: December 13 2005 at 08:00 |
pero wrote:
Are you paid for this ?
|
No. I just wanted to start a debate, see what everyone else has to offer, see who disagrees and why and make a positive thread if possible.
|
|
|
pero
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 11 2005
Location: Croatia
Status: Offline
Points: 1242
|
Posted: December 13 2005 at 08:03 |
For me only "Bohemian rapsody" is all above mentioned.
|
|
nimrodel
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 07 2005
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 1217
|
Posted: December 13 2005 at 08:23 |
Snow Dog i love you..
|
We want... a shrubbery!
|
|
Blacksword
Prog Reviewer
Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
|
Posted: December 13 2005 at 08:26 |
Cant really argue with any of Snowies points. They were/are an extremely talented band. I have five of their albums, but why can I not stand listening to them these days??
|
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
|
|
Snow Dog
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
|
Posted: December 13 2005 at 08:36 |
Blacksword wrote:
Cant really argue with any of Snowies points. They were/are an extremely talented band. I have five of their albums, but why can I not stand listening to them these days?? |
I don't know....sometimes you just....move on!
|
|
|
Syzygy
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 16 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 7003
|
Posted: December 13 2005 at 09:05 |
Queen were one of the greatest singles bands since the Beatles (in fact, arguably THE greatest) and a superb live act, but I've never rated their albums that highly. Freddie Mercury was a brilliant front man, and the world is a slightly duller place without him in it.
|
'Like so many of you
I've got my doubts about how much to contribute
to the already rich among us...'
Robert Wyatt, Gloria Gloom
|
|
Andrea Cortese
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 05 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 4411
|
Posted: December 13 2005 at 09:10 |
Great band indeed!
The most representative album of all above mentioned is A Night At The Opera (great also that Taylor's one "I'm In Love With My Car")!!
|
|
NutterAlert
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 07 2005
Location: In transition
Status: Offline
Points: 2808
|
Posted: December 13 2005 at 09:18 |
|
Proud to be an un-banned member since 2005
|
|
Blacksword
Prog Reviewer
Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
|
Posted: December 13 2005 at 09:44 |
You really are a nutter aren't you!
Paul Rogers better than Freddie Mercury?? Ho ho ho...
Seriously though, I think I prefer the first two albums to anything else they done. 'A night at the Opera' is one of those classic rock albums, but I like the rawness of the debut, and the way that rwness meets alittle of the Queen to come, on the second album. I can take or leave anything after ANATO.
|
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
|
|
NutterAlert
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 07 2005
Location: In transition
Status: Offline
Points: 2808
|
Posted: December 13 2005 at 09:49 |
Blacksword wrote:
You really are a nutter aren't you!
Paul Rogers better than Freddie Mercury?? Ho ho ho...
Seriously though, I think I prefer the first two albums to anything else they done. 'A night at the Opera' is one of those classic rock albums, but I like the rawness of the debut, and the way that rwness meets alittle of the Queen to come, on the second album. I can take or leave anything after ANATO.
|
, couldn't find the tongue in cheek smiley for the Rodgers/mercury bit..
|
Proud to be an un-banned member since 2005
|
|
salmacis
Forum Senior Member
Content Addition
Joined: April 10 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 3928
|
Posted: December 13 2005 at 15:08 |
Yes I love the first 4 or so Queen albums, yet for me I'd add the 'no synths' characteristic to the 'magic' list; I felt they were perhaps on the wane somewhat when they introduced synths as they lost a good deal of their production experimentation.
|
|
bluetailfly
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 28 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1383
|
Posted: December 13 2005 at 15:18 |
Syzygy wrote:
Queen were one of the greatest singles bands since the Beatles (in fact, arguably THE greatest) and a superb live act, but I've never rated their albums that highly. Freddie Mercury was a brilliant front man, and the world is a slightly duller place without him in it. |
"Greatest singles band" ??? Queen? You mean like "Fat Bottomed Girls" and "Another One Bites the Dust"??? Those singles?
You're comparing those to, say, "I Feel Fine," "And I Saw Her Standing There" and "Strawberry Fields Forever." ???
Perhaps a reconsideration is in order, as well as an apology to those of us with finely-calibrated musical sensibilities...
Edited by bluetailfly
|
"The red polygon's only desire / is to get to the blue triangle."
|
|
thefalafelking
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 28 2005
Location: Belgium
Status: Offline
Points: 130
|
Posted: December 13 2005 at 15:36 |
bluetailfly wrote:
Syzygy wrote:
Queen were one of the greatest singles bands since the Beatles (in fact, arguably THE greatest) and a superb live act, but I've never rated their albums that highly. Freddie Mercury was a brilliant front man, and the world is a slightly duller place without him in it. |
"Greatest singles band" ??? Queen? You mean like "Fat Bottomed Girls" and "Another One Bites the Dust"??? Those singles?
You're comparing those to, say, "I Feel Fine," "And I Saw Her Standing There" and "Strawberry Fields Forever." ???
Perhaps a reconsideration is in order, as well as an apology to those of us with finely-calibrated musical sensibilities...
|
Yes, Queen IS a great single band. I also like The Beatles a lot, and I think there's no use in comparing their styles! but Queen DID make a lot of awesome singles: Another one bites the dust, seven seas of rhye, bohemian rhapsody , innuendo (both quite risky), the show must go on, i'm going slightly mad and even a kind of magic, breakthrue, I want it all...(and many, many more) yes, when i think of these, I think they can match the beatles' single quality
|
|
Lindsay Lohan
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 25 2005
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 3254
|
Posted: December 13 2005 at 15:42 |
Some kind of magic..hmm
And there is surely bands that outbeats queen on all of the above criterias...
Edited by Lindsay Lohan
|
|
|
salmacis
Forum Senior Member
Content Addition
Joined: April 10 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 3928
|
Posted: December 13 2005 at 15:57 |
Lindsay Lohan wrote:
Some kind of magic..hmm
And there is surely bands that outbeats queen on all of the above criterias...
|
I'd personally say Uriah Heep were better to these ears, but it could also be argued that Heep rarely if ever did albums as cohesive as 'Queen II' and 'A Night At The Opera'. Yet, I'd find it doubtful Queen never heard Heep's work...
|
|
thefalafelking
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 28 2005
Location: Belgium
Status: Offline
Points: 130
|
Posted: December 13 2005 at 16:09 |
I always liked Uriah Heep very much. Favourite albums: Live 1973, Look at Yourself, ... but I think already at the time of Return to Fantasy they were becoming a band of whom the players carried sh*t for brains (exagerated, I know, but I like the sentence). But tunes like sweet lorraine, july morning, tears in my eyes, ... are amazing!!!
But, I saw a few concert fragments of them on DVD and it's just awfull, argh!! I just hate the image of the singer, he looks like an over-emotional piece of wood in a glamrock outfit. and that guitarplayer mick box, though he's quite good, he acts like a child imitating his favourite guitar hero! (on the same DVD he played guitar with one arm broken!). I've never seen the DVD since, I'm afraid it would make my love for the good Uriah Heep albums go away!
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.