Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Prog’s bad name: who’s responsible?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedProg’s bad name: who’s responsible?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Poll Question: prog’s bad name: who’s responsible?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
0 [0.00%]
2 [2.67%]
7 [9.33%]
2 [2.67%]
0 [0.00%]
0 [0.00%]
0 [0.00%]
3 [4.00%]
4 [5.33%]
43 [57.33%]
9 [12.00%]
5 [6.67%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message
Tony Fisher View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: April 30 2005
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 967
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 09 2005 at 09:24

Hard to blame anyone specifically. Prog had a few good years and then people got bored and went off into other genres. But it didn't do itself any favours with some of the pretentious, overblown extremes (ELP, Wakeman) or the attempts to become more mainstream and commercial (Yes, Genesis).

Rule 1 of media seems to be "Find something new and shocking and push it" and that's what they did with Punk. That Grundy interview with the Sex Pistols was probably a catalyst for the demise of prog, since Punk was suddenly "dangerous" and therefore sexy.

Back to Top
Drachen Theaker View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 22 2005
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 376
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 09 2005 at 09:27
It was Colonel Mustard in the library with the lead
piping...

Actually, the posturing Muppets in the rock press.
Like Big Brother made Goldstein the popular hate
figure in 1984, they've set up Prog as the rock
equivalent of the Two Minute Hate - except it's now
been a 28 Year Hate!
"It's 1973, almost dinnertime and I'm 'aving 'oops!" - Gene Hunt
Back to Top
NutterAlert View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 07 2005
Location: In transition
Status: Offline
Points: 2808
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 09 2005 at 09:31

I've just remembered a name of a real grade A arse...Lester Bangs.

"[Lester Bangs] was the great gonzo journalist, gutter poet, and romantic visionary of rock writing.."

Yeah right!

What an oaf that man was (may he rest in peace). read his biography, well 12 pages, before throwing it in the bin.

Proud to be an un-banned member since 2005
Back to Top
The Hemulen View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 31 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 5964
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 09 2005 at 09:39
Wakeman, ELP, Gabriel etc were easy targets for the music press. The media is mostly responsible, but us proggers have to concede that sometimes we did make things easy for them...
Back to Top
RoyalJelly View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 29 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 582
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 09 2005 at 10:07

Originally posted by iguana iguana wrote:

i shan't go into bashing the music press – one must
always be nice & considerate to people who are just
plain DEAF. besides, most of them have their heads
so far up each others' backsides that they must at
best be ignored at any time.

my choice of scapegoat would be jon anderson and
steve howe, who completely lost the plot in 1973 and
created "tales from topographic oceans", IMHO the
biggest turd ever released under the prog rock
banner and largely responsible why everyone else
screamed "enough already!" in the aftermath. both
have redeemed themselves very quickly since but
the genre and music in general have never quite
recovered...

 

     I find this chronic Tales bashing rather simple minded, especially the whole notion that they'd gone "too far"...what is too far? Should fans and critics dictate where the limits of artistic creation lie? I think artists must be free to explore, Yes was moving into totally unexplored territory, and while imperfect, the research & experience gained in Tales made Relayer possible. The "redeeming" that Yes went through later was, in IMHO, moving back onto safe, unchallenging territory and that's what killed progressive, not courageous exploration.

     As for the myth that everybody attacked Tales as being "enough already", Time Magazine named it as album of the year the year that it came out, and expressed great appreciation for the courage and ambitions of this young group. It doesn't get any more mainstream than that in terms of recognition, the revised history that it was immediately despised by all was adapted later by jounalists to support their anti.prog agenda. I loved it then and now, you don't have to take the concept so seriously, it's just great music.

Back to Top
Korova View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 04 2005
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 189
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 09 2005 at 10:08
It's ridiculos to blame artists!
anyway...who the hell voted for fripp!
it's all fault of the music buisness!

La Speranza della coscienza č forza
La Speranza del sentimento č schiavitů
La Speranza del corpo č malattia
                                       (G.I. Gurdjieff)
Back to Top
Mr. Krinkle View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 12 2005
Location: barcelona
Status: Offline
Points: 212
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 09 2005 at 21:18
I dont know, but i think that there have always been moments in prog where bands and even fans got too pretentious. I can say that since i see a lot of comments around here speacking of prog rock above all other music generes (or many of them) and of progfans who see themselves far above of fans of other generes. For those reasons it is very possible that this amazing genere is put under the lable of a "snob" genere. 
Back to Top
zabriskiepoint View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: October 20 2005
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 13
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 09 2005 at 21:21
Also, the musicians that sold out and did not mantein their characteristic style and quality. I mean, how can a person that heard only "Turn it on again" from Genesis can believe that Phil Collins was once a great percusionist, Banks a great keyboard player, and Rutherford a great bass player?
Back to Top
Legoman View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 21 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 306
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 09 2005 at 22:58
Now... don't get me wrong.  Phil Collins did some amazing sh*t... but he went WAY too poppy afterwards.  Makes me sick.  A friend of mine says sometimes, "Phil Collins has a tendency of taking a big ol' dump on his music career sometimes."  Hahaha.  And I believe that is sooo true.  He should really just stop... seriously... for the love of god and the prog name.  Stop Collins.

I would say that Wakeman might be worse for Prog... his stuff definately is a lot more sh*tty than Collins but most people have no idea who he is or know that he has made 204335972 albums.  Where-as... Collins is well known...
Back to Top
Hendrix828 View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie


Joined: November 19 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 63
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 10 2005 at 18:49
Originally posted by StyLaZyn StyLaZyn wrote:

Although the media is to blame, it's important to recognize that listeners of Prog can think for themselves.  They know what type of music can be appreciated.  Prog is not for the unthinking, non-appreciative masses.  Do I blame the general public?  Not really.  Look how easily they are swayed.  (i.e. in the USA, Bush is President and STILL in office)  The inability to think for oneself is such a tragedy of the human being. 

I've mentioned before that the reason pop works and Prog doesn't could be rooted in simplicity.  Does not Progressive Rock take time to digest?  Pop must have the quality of immediate satisfaction.  This is what the music critics go after.  One the music becomes difficult to understand, it is treated less favorably. 

Another thing to consider is what do the lyrics of Prog convey?  Typically not "boy meets girl" topics, yet this is a fundamental understanding we all have.  Once heavier ideas or fantasy topics are sung about, it becomes an immediate turn off to the general public.  They either can't relate or just don't have time. 

The quality of the musician is expected to be high and doesn't matter what they are playing.  So for one to point to Prog musicians being above standard is inconsequential to the average listener.  Very fine musicians are found in pop music, they just aren't showing their prowess.  I don't believe the general public wants to listen to odd meters or incredible chops song after song. 

 

I agree with all of that!!

You're typical western teen/young adult (mostly American) can't grasp the concept of Prog comapred to Teenybopper sh*t. As long as it's catchy,a dumbed down audience will get it and like it. As soon as music involves thinking or instrumentals most people want nothing to do with it!!

Not to be sexist,but most females have this view with music. As long as it's catchy,they like it,no matter how stupid it is!! That's why I alway's stay away from the "MUSIC" topic when I'm around my female friends. Cause I know it will only end in high stress levels for myself



Edited by Hendrix828
Back to Top
FragileDT View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: June 20 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1485
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 10 2005 at 19:06
Absolutely the media. The media couldn't have an intelligent form of music
flooding the airwaves. It would blow people's minds.

EDIT: And as Fripp said, saying that your affiliated with prog when talking
about a record contract, is like poison.

Edited by FragileDT
One likes to believe
In the freedom of music
But glittering prizes
And endless Compromises
Shatter the illusion
Of integrity
Back to Top
Losendos View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 03 2005
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 571
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 10 2005 at 19:36

 

  Probably the newspaper and corporate magnates who employ the music journalists and decided there shouldn't be a market for prog

How wonderful to be so profound
Back to Top
Losendos View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 03 2005
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 571
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 10 2005 at 19:40

 

  other than that there is a Greek saying that those who the Gods want to destroy they first make crazy

 

  The Gods decided to destroy prog through four pieces of craziness in chronoligacal order

 TFTO by Yes

 ELP's works tour where they took a symphony orchestra to play mediocre material and went bust

 Roger Waters mental self indulgence , woe is me ,

 Genesis desire for money

 

How wonderful to be so profound
Back to Top
Froth View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 19 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 461
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 11 2005 at 11:22
Originally posted by thefalafelking thefalafelking wrote:

Rick Wakeman without any doubt.

 

cheers

 

flfkng

dont know about that. Wakeman wasn't taking himself 100% seriously and was just having fun, and making some amazing music at the same time. Jon Anderson, Chris Squire and Steve Howe on the other hand did. I do think the music press didnt do Prog any good either, largley cos they consist, with some obvious exceptions, of miserable tone deaf punks cant cope with stuff they dont understand.... yep thats NME for you!.    Oh for the days of melody maker! 

Back to Top
thefalafelking View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 28 2005
Location: Belgium
Status: Offline
Points: 130
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 11 2005 at 13:15
Originally posted by Froth Froth wrote:

Originally posted by thefalafelking thefalafelking wrote:

Rick Wakeman without any doubt.

cheers

 

flfkng

dont know about that. Wakeman wasn't taking himself 100% seriously and was just having fun, and making some amazing music at the same time. Jon Anderson, Chris Squire and Steve Howe on the other hand did. I do think the music press didnt do Prog any good either, largley cos they consist, with some obvious exceptions, of miserable tone deaf punks cant cope with stuff they dont understand.... yep thats NME for you!.    Oh for the days of melody maker! 

In this case, it's not important how Wakemen saw himself. The issue is about the perception of the outside world. He indeed made amazing music, with Yes..

 

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.141 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.