Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Suggest New Bands and Artists
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Dos anyone really know who is prog???????
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedDos anyone really know who is prog???????

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
Guests View Drop Down
Forum Guest Group
Forum Guest Group
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Dos anyone really know who is prog???????
    Posted: November 27 2005 at 20:13

All i can gather from this site is someone picks an abstract, obscure or doesn't fit into any pigeon hole, then they must be prog. Kate Bush, sings weirdly has sort of long songs, shags a prog guy and hoopla she is prog? Styx, couldn't spell prog, but once again are pronounced prog (or related, some sh*te like that). Where do the keepers of this site get off? Do they kowtow to the North American fascination with prog rock, that they did not invent and have had a miniscule effect on prog rock. Prog rock is European, mainly British (not English as most people would have you believe) is this why our westerly neighbours look askance and jealously add rubbish to these archives.

Since when did a one year old band deserve an archive? Music must have longevity, Dream Theatre doesn't have that nor any other AOR rubbish from the states.

Classical music has longevity, let's have Mozart, Beethoven, Sibelius et al. Nope? Didn't think so, any smart arse comments welcome, but at least i have the balls to speak some real reason.



Edited by dream_orchestra
Back to Top
Plastic Man View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: November 06 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 75
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 28 2005 at 04:17
whats the difference between british and english? and yes, the north american bands suck, no subtlety (among other things)  whatsoever.

Edited by Plastic Man
I begin to wonder if the points of all the ancient myths are solemnly di-rected straight.. at.. meeeeeeeeee!
Back to Top
chopper View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 13 2005
Location: Essex, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 20031
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 28 2005 at 08:17
Originally posted by dream_orchestra dream_orchestra wrote:

All i can gather from this site is someone picks an abstract, obscure or doesn't fit into any pigeon hole, then they must be prog. Kate Bush, sings weirdly has sort of long songs, shags a prog guy and hoopla she is prog? Styx, couldn't spell prog, but once again are pronounced prog (or related, some sh*te like that). Where do the keepers of this site get off? Do they kowtow to the North American fascination with prog rock, that they did not invent and have had a miniscule effect on prog rock. Prog rock is European, mainly British (not English as most people would have you believe) is this why our westerly neighbours look askance and jealously add rubbish to these archives. Since when did a one year old band deserve an archive? Music must have longevity, Deam Theatre doesn't have that nor any other AOR rubbish from the states.

Classical music has longevity, let's a Mozart, Beethoven, Sibelius et al. Nope? Didn't think so, any smart arse comments welcome, but at least i have the balls to speak some real reason.

Kate Bush did not "shag a prog guy" (unless you're referring to Danny McIntosh).

There have been numerous debates on this site as to who or what is prog - I would suggest you check some of them out.

Are you saying that only old European bands can be prog?

Back to Top
cobb View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 10 2005
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 1149
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 28 2005 at 08:26
Dream Theater have been around since the 80's, not exactly new kids on the block and obviously not a one album wonder. But what is wrong with giving a new band prog status if that's what they are playing- take for example Wobbler of Magic Pie, both only with one release, but both obviously welcome entries to the archive. Give credit where credit is due.

Adding all these other, older and established artists as an after thought, now that's a different matter all together
Back to Top
SolariS View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 27 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 891
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 30 2005 at 22:36

 

ohhh now i get it. prog rock is defined by nationality and not so much the music. well that makes it pretty easy. why the hell are we wasting all our time in discussion

 

and what's with this "north american fascination with prog rock"? i must be living in the wrong area because none of my friends have even heard of progressive rock.

 

Maybe we should just try being honest for a change. What you really meant to say was, "I have a grudge against america. Now I am going manifest my anger by hating against american bands."

 

I'm no nationalist and I certainly don't support all the policies of my country, but the real point youre trying to get across is as transparent as glass.

**Cough Cough, your signature "America is pregnant with anticipation, But is murdered by the hand of the inevitable."

Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 30 2005 at 23:51
Originally posted by dream_orchestra dream_orchestra wrote:

All i can gather from this site is someone picks an abstract, obscure or doesn't fit into any pigeon hole, then they must be prog. Kate Bush, sings weirdly has sort of long songs, shags a prog guy and hoopla she is prog? Styx, couldn't spell prog, but once again are pronounced prog (or related, some sh*te like that). Where do the keepers of this site get off? Do they kowtow to the North American fascination with prog rock, that they did not invent and have had a miniscule effect on prog rock. Prog rock is European, mainly British (not English as most people would have you believe) is this why our westerly neighbours look askance and jealously add rubbish to these archives. Since when did a one year old band deserve an archive? Music must have longevity, Deam Theatre doesn't have that nor any other AOR rubbish from the states.

Classical music has longevity, let's a Mozart, Beethoven, Sibelius et al. Nope? Didn't think so, any smart arse comments welcome, but at least i have the balls to speak some real reason.

You know my position towards classic Prog', but not everything is black and white:

  1. Frank Zappa was doing Prog stuff before almost any British band.
  2. Kansas is in the same level than most of the icons.
  3. Italian Prog' is at least in the same level as British
  4. Sweeden made great Prog' when British bands had already dried.

So......???

Iván



Edited by ivan_2068
            
Back to Top
chopper View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 13 2005
Location: Essex, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 20031
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 01 2005 at 08:10

Originally posted by Plastic Man Plastic Man wrote:

whats the difference between british and english? and yes, the north american bands suck, no subtlety (among other things)  whatsoever.

English is from England, British is from England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Obviously there are no great prog bands from Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.

Back to Top
goose View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 20 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 4097
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 01 2005 at 08:19
...which makes some people bitter?
Back to Top
Politician View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 02 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 521
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 01 2005 at 10:44
I don't think longevity is an issue: a progressive band that released an
album last week (irrespective of whether it is a GOOD album) deserves to
be listed here just as much as a band that has issued classic albums for
the last thirty years. But I agree the envelope is being pushed to the
extent where the description "prog" starts to become meaningless.
QUEEN? KATE BUSH? And now an argument to include TALKING HEADS?
Back to Top
richardh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 28830
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 02 2005 at 11:45

< Dos anyone really know who is prog??????? >

I do but I'm not telling

Back to Top
NecroManiac View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: November 29 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 224
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 02 2005 at 13:52
This is prog:



What's yer faovrite album? =^_^=
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 02 2005 at 14:12

Originally posted by Politician Politician wrote:

I don't think longevity is an issue: a progressive band that released an
album last week (irrespective of whether it is a GOOD album) deserves to
be listed here just as much as a band that has issued classic albums for
the last thirty years. But I agree the envelope is being pushed to the
extent where the description "prog" starts to become meaningless.
QUEEN? KATE BUSH? And now an argument to include TALKING HEADS?

Hmmmm, once again...these are prog related, not prog!

 

Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Forum Guest Group
Forum Guest Group
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 02 2005 at 18:22

To Solaris my signature, if you know anything about music is taken from America by the Nice, abd was spoken by the son of a black American singer......FACT. I didn't say American, i was suggesting that North American bands (that includes Canada) are not forerunners of prog nor have they ever pushed the barriers as far as the European bands.

As for Ivan the nitwit........what are you trying to say????

As for goose, why be bitter of an inferior country, yup nearly all prog bands come from England, but at least we are not hated universally abroad.

Anyway i stand by what i have written, let's include classical prog..................there are plenty to choose from.

Back to Top
goose View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 20 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 4097
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 02 2005 at 21:28

Only because most people think Scotland is part of England

Edited by goose
Back to Top
BePinkTheater View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 01 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1381
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 04 2005 at 20:35
The joke you made about STYX not being able to spell would have been really funny if you hadn't misspelled Does.
I can strangle a canary in a tin can and it would be really original, but that wouldn't save it from sounding like utter sh*t.
-Stone Beard
Back to Top
PROGMAN View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: February 03 2004
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 2664
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 07 2005 at 06:38
Originally posted by chopper chopper wrote:

Originally posted by Plastic Man Plastic Man wrote:

whats the difference between british and english? and yes, the north american bands suck, no subtlety (among other things)  whatsoever.

English is from England, British is from England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Obviously there are no great prog bands from Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.

MAN, BUDGIE, BLUEHORSES, SUPER FURRY ANIMALS, all have something PROG in them except TOM JONES and BRYN TERFEL.

CYMRU AM BYTH
Back to Top
goose View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 20 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 4097
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 07 2005 at 08:01
I'm really confused by how many people don't know the difference between England and Britain. That's akin to not knowing the difference between the US and America .
Back to Top
NutterAlert View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 07 2005
Location: In transition
Status: Offline
Points: 2808
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 07 2005 at 08:41
Originally posted by dream_orchestra dream_orchestra wrote:

To Solaris my signature, if you know anything about music is taken from America by the Nice, abd was spoken by the son of a black American singer......FACT. I didn't say American, i was suggesting that North American bands (that includes Canada) are not forerunners of prog nor have they ever pushed the barriers as far as the European bands.

As for Ivan the nitwit........what are you trying to say????

As for goose, why be bitter of an inferior country, yup nearly all prog bands come from England, but at least we are not hated universally abroad.

Anyway i stand by what i have written, let's include classical prog..................there are plenty to choose from.

and to get your final bonus point...name that Black American Singer?

Proud to be an un-banned member since 2005
Back to Top
Andrew Vernon View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: November 26 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 37
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 08 2005 at 23:50
Does the way we describe music truly matter? Meh... sorry, just not really a Rolling Stone magazine fan... y'know... everything has to have its place! f**k off, no it doesn't.
over thinking, over analyzing separates the body from the mind.

feed my will to feel this moment, urging me to cross the line.

reaching out to embrace whatever may come.
Back to Top
spo1977 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: December 09 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 285
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 11 2005 at 13:55
I think the term progressive gets used quite loosley. I do not know how much energy one should put forth arguing whether a band is prog or not. I simply think think of prog as odd time changes, unusual song structures/songwriting, complexity, generally pushing the envelope and doing things with music that do not follow formulas. I could be wrong though. 
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.129 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.