Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - How Progressive is Pink Floyd ?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedHow Progressive is Pink Floyd ?

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
eduardossc View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 15 2005
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 257
Direct Link To This Post Topic: How Progressive is Pink Floyd ?
    Posted: October 06 2005 at 12:07

 Itīs very common people thinking "Dark side of the moon" is, or may be the best prog album ever. I have always argued "Dark side" has not a single prog sound or note. The structure of the songs are simplistic and the playing doesnīt match a single second on "Tarkus".

 I think "The wall" is even less progressive. ...Well, I think there is no progressive rock whatsoever on these albums.

 How big is the dogma around Pink Floyd?. Is people really aware of what they are calling progressive rock when they argue Pink Floyd is one of the best 5 progressive rock bands?. 

Back to Top
chopper View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 13 2005
Location: Essex, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 20030
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 06 2005 at 12:12

I would say DSOTM is a prog album, don't know about The Wall as I've never heard it all but as a concept album it probably fits into the prog genre. The same arguments apply to Lamb Lies Down on Broadway (short, simple songs) but nobody doubts that is a prog album (do they?).

I would also say that PF have "crossed over" from prog into the mainstream of music. DSOTM has sold 30 million odd copies but I bet the majority of purchasers would not regard themselves as prog rock fans.

Back to Top
DACE View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 30 2005
Location: Spain
Status: Offline
Points: 140
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 06 2005 at 12:44
Can you really tell me that "Wish You Were Here" or "Animals" are not prog?
Back to Top
Raff View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 29 2005
Location: None
Status: Offline
Points: 24429
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 06 2005 at 13:26

DSOTM is not my favourite PF album, but I would never say it's not progressive. I know on this site there is a section containing sort of guidelines on what is progressive rock, which are not as rigid as many people here would like. Of course PF's music is not symphonic prog like Genesis', but IMO it fits the real meaning of the word 'progressive'. Being prog is not only a question of writing 20-minutes songs or having classical influences. BTW, I absolutely love Tarkus, and I love PF as well...

Back to Top
krusty View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: September 27 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1777
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 06 2005 at 14:28
Does it really matter what you call Pink Floyd or DSotM??
But Wikipedia seems to think both are Prog. Rock

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_rock

I'm not saying whoever put the above page together knows anymore than you or I but the fact that none of us can decide for sure, means we may as well just move on.







Back to Top
eduardossc View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 15 2005
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 257
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 06 2005 at 14:57

Originally posted by krusty krusty wrote:

Does it really matter what you call Pink Floyd or DSotM??
But Wikipedia seems to think both are Prog. Rock

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_rock

I'm not saying whoever put the above page together knows anymore than you or I but the fact that none of us can decide for sure, means we may as well just move on.

  You know?, it really doesnīt matter what I call Pink Floyd. Pink Floydīs music is great and Iīve enjoyed a large part of their discography. Whatsmore, I hate that "Prog, not prog, and pop, not pop" arguments. I love Genesis and really hate when people say Genesis is now crap because they played pop since 1980. And to me, they just changed and the pop they wrote is good. Is good music. I donīt care if itīs pop or not as long as I enjoy it. I love 80īs pop and try to get everything I donīt have already. I really enjoy 60īs oldies no matter how simple they are.

 I started this Poll because Iīve always felt people tend to make something much bigger of Floydīs music, than what it really is. I really think it is overrated. As overrated as any band may be when it receives such media support. Like The Beatles for example.

 Still, there are albums way more progressive and much more creative and complex than "Dark side", like Metamorfosiīs "Inferno" and it is not even on the "Best prog album list" in this site. For situations like this I feel frustrated when I see "Dark side" on top of things.





Back to Top
tanis573 View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: August 23 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 27
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 06 2005 at 18:14
Just pretend The Wall is one huge song.  There, that's prog.
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21206
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 06 2005 at 18:23
I think they are 87.5% progressive.
Back to Top
The Miracle View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: May 29 2005
Location: hell
Status: Offline
Points: 28427
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 06 2005 at 18:31

Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

I think they are 87.5% progressive.

I agree. They were prog until The Wall. But their proggiest is from Piper to Obscured By Clouds

Back to Top
Pr@gmatic View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 04 2005
Location: Virgin Islands
Status: Offline
Points: 1023
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 06 2005 at 18:50

They're prog as much as Crimson, Yes, ELP, you name it...

It's just that they don't play Symphonic Prog like those bands I've mentioned.

Floyd belongs to another subgenre of prog called Psychedelic/Space Rock.

So the approach they've taken to make music is different as, say... the one ELP took, just like you've compared.

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.121 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.