Alan Holdsworth or John McLaughlin?? |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | ||
Jim Garten
Special Collaborator Retired Admin & Razor Guru Joined: February 02 2004 Location: South England Status: Offline Points: 14693 |
Topic: Alan Holdsworth or John McLaughlin?? Posted: February 16 2004 at 07:24 |
|
Please note, this is a totally unbiased and objective, honest poll to truly discover who in the group's opinion is the greater guitarist; John McLaughlin (all praise to him from whom all blessings come), or ..... the other one.
|
||
Jon Lord 1941 - 2012 |
||
Vibrationbaby
Forum Senior Member Joined: February 13 2004 Status: Offline Points: 6898 |
Posted: February 16 2004 at 10:27 | |
John McLaughlin is the god of guitar.
|
||
Redstar
Forum Newbie Joined: February 16 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 61 |
Posted: February 16 2004 at 16:48 | |
I find it hard to cast a vote in this thread without seeing Fripp's name anywhere on the ballot. A vote between the two names listed is fine, but when you start throwing phrases like "de best ever" into the mix, my conscious won't let me vote honestly without ol' Bob as an option... |
||
Gonghobbit
Forum Senior Member Joined: February 03 2004 Status: Offline Points: 232 |
Posted: February 16 2004 at 17:46 | |
Personally, I think McLaughlin is notably more accomplished than Holdsworth, who of course is excellent himself.
|
||
'This is a local shop, there's nothing for you here'
|
||
Alexander
Forum Senior Member Joined: February 02 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 237 |
Posted: February 16 2004 at 21:36 | |
Both are fantastic, but I prefer McLaughlin.
|
||
On A Dilemmia Between What I Need & What I Just Want
|
||
Peter
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: January 31 2004 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 9669 |
Posted: February 16 2004 at 23:19 | |
I voted for Alan McLaughlin, but John Holdsworth is very very VERY good too!
|
||
"And, has thou slain the Jabberwock?
Come to my arms, my beamish boy! O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!' He chortled in his joy. |
||
corbet
Prog Reviewer Joined: February 01 2004 Status: Offline Points: 101 |
Posted: February 17 2004 at 04:36 | |
haha, I love those "options" Jim. I actually had to stare at it for a few minutes before I figured out why I couldn't seem to pick.... Now, my glorious opinion: John McLaughlin is a masterful guitarist, but, relatively speaking, he comes from the "standard road" and it's not too hard to see what he's doing on the instrument or how he does it. He can rip, for sure, and he definitely has more rhythm hand action than Allan, but most importantly for me, I tend to actually like the musical projects he's involved in without too much reservation. Allan, on the other hand, is a one-of-a-kind guitarist, and a completely unique force in the history of improvisation. He's simply one of the best soloists ever, on any instrument. His technique and imagination are off the charts. McLaughlin himself once said, "if I had any idea what Allan was doing, I'd steal from him! But I don't have a clue" or something like that. ... However, most of Allan's solo albums sound like 80's elevator music -- except with mindblowing solos. DUH. "Secrets" is one of my favorite albums ever, but I would never play it for anyone except another AH fan!! Or maybe a Sade fan. sigh... He just needed some testosterone shots in his diet... |
||
Jim Garten
Special Collaborator Retired Admin & Razor Guru Joined: February 02 2004 Location: South England Status: Offline Points: 14693 |
Posted: February 17 2004 at 07:17 | |
That's pretty fair comment Corbet, On a purely technical level, AH could be seen as a superior guitarist, but as far as emotion & feel goes, I'd have to go for JM everytime.
I like the quote from JM - reminds me of a track on Zappa's 'shut up & play yer guitar' album - "The Secret Carlos Santana Chord Progression"; with Zappa though, you never knew whether he was playing serious homage, or taking the p - I hope it was the former. This also leads to a couple of mid '70s albums that JM released with Carlos Santana - I've never heard them & would be interested if anyone out there has...... |
||
Jon Lord 1941 - 2012 |
||
Dan Bobrowski
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: February 02 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 5243 |
Posted: February 17 2004 at 11:22 | |
I doubt if the Gom Jabbar could penetrate the thick skin Allan has developed over the years from the jabs by the JM camp. McLaughlin is amazing, we all concur. I have read interviews with JM and he does feel AH is, technically, superior. I also agree that Allan plays something beyond the comprehension of most casual listeners. Of all the duet possibilities out there, this is the one showdown that could prove to be the single most electrical firestorm. I'll side with Allan, tone, originality, emotive quality.... it's all there. Just for the Curious: http://www.therealallanholdsworth.com/allanshome.htm |
||
Tauhd Zaļa
Forum Senior Member Joined: February 18 2004 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 340 |
Posted: February 18 2004 at 07:18 | |
I have voted for Allan Holdsworth because I'm not a fan of Mahavishnu Orchestra. Afterall I LOVED John McLaughlin in Shakti (Steve Hackett, you are in the best place in my ears and in my heart !) |
||
The State Of Grace Is Achieved
|
||
lucas
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: February 06 2004 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 8138 |
Posted: February 21 2004 at 16:47 | |
Allan Holdsworth is great and played in a wider range of styles than Mc Laughlin : prog-rock with Tempest (played the violin apart besides the guitar), canterbury with Soft Machine, fusion with Bruford, jazz-rock with Tony Williams and further in his own solo career, pop with Level 42, and played also with the Johansson brothers (members of the metal band Stratovarius) and Jeff Watson (shredding). I don't regard Mahavishnu as a good band, I prefer the american band they inspired, I mean Dixie Dregs, who are really much better.
|
||
"Magma was the very first gothic rock band" (Didier Lockwood)
|
||
shark
Forum Newbie Joined: February 23 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 35 |
Posted: February 23 2004 at 07:45 | |
Holdsworth is, we can all agree here, a great improviser but someone who has been stuck in a groove for quite a long time. Once you move past his unbelievable technique, you get to his writing skills and the guy doesn't seem to be able to move beyond improvising in the electric trio/quartet format. But before anyone suggests he has had a more eclectic career that McLaughlin, please pick up McLaughlin's entire output on CD (the new box-set wouldn't be a bad idea) and you may change your mind.
|
||
Velvetclown
Forum Senior Member Joined: February 13 2004 Status: Offline Points: 8548 |
Posted: May 17 2004 at 02:15 | |
John McLaughlin.
|
||
Dick Heath
Special Collaborator Jazz-Rock Specialist Joined: April 19 2004 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 12816 |
Posted: May 17 2004 at 08:22 | |
Come on this is a serious debate. Fripp is a southerner coming from Dorset, while Mclaughlin and Holdsworth are northerners (proud of their Yorkshire birthplace). Like comparing apples and cheese in a food debate.
Allan Holdsworth is great and played in a wider range of styles than Mc Laughlin I think some more homework is required Lucas - there is a large Austrian-based discography of McLaughlin that includes his work pre-"Extrapolation" as a session musician, so takes in pop, blues etc. prog-rock with Tempest - McLaughlin has played with Jon Hiseman and a lot of us were calling Mahavishnu Orch prog rock and well as jazz rock back in '72. Canterbury with Soft Machine - Holdsworth had his own distinctive sound by then - and IMHO there was no distintive Canterbury guitar sound (regardless of what Ed Macan states in "Rocking The Classics"). fusion with Bruford - always thought Bruford produced excellent jazz rock , so I'm not sure of your definitions here. There was a major discussion on the definition of jazz fusion (which includes the likes of Jan Garbarek and The Hilliard Ensemble and without a rock rhythm to be heard) and one of its sub-divisions jazz rock, about 5 years ago on the big web jazz fusion discussion group, Fusenet. It went some way to sort out the confusion - but you'll have to dig deep into their archives to find the correspondence. jazz-rock with Tony Williams - but McLaughlin was the first guitarist in Tony Williams' Lifetime - and I'm reminded listening to the recently reissued "Believe It", there was a large chunk of jazz funk here. further in his own solo career, pop with Level 42 - solo - no, AH will admit to being a hired hand (and there was good reason for this) - and Guaranteed (was that the one?) is not one of my top ten Holdsworth albums- and again check out that discography on McLaughlin for his pop credentials Played also with the Johansson brothers (members of the metal band Stratovarius- a dubious reference, when there is so much better coming from Jens Johansson (IMHO) - and I see many similarities in the versatilities of Jan Hammer and Jens Johansson Jeff Watson (shredding). - A one off. A couple of McLaughlin's albums are suggested to broaden your knowledge - including playing with Jeff Beck - "The Promise" and "Electric Guitarist" I don't regard Mahavishnu as a good band, I prefer the american band they inspired, I mean Dixie Dregs, who are really much better. I accept your opinion but musically I feel the opposite: art is in the ears of the beholder).
Both guitarists rank equal top in my mind, and so it is pretty difficult to differentiate between the two. Style-wise on electric guitar, they are different and each is most discernable for how they play without knowing the record being played - this is equally true wrt guitar synth and acoustic guitar. The check out McLaughlin's liner notes on "Things You See: A Tribute To The Music Of Allan Holdsworth" , Gary Husband's piano album, for the respect shown there. There were strong rumours about 3 years ago, that McLaughlin invited Holdsworth to guest on an album - never came about. I was once lucky to interview Holdsworth, who said he didn't see the point of great guitarists dueting because they usually did not want to pull out the stops, least quality gave way to a competition who had the best licks - this was after Truth In Shredding , while the Metheny/Scofield and Scofield/Abercrombie collaborative albums go someway to show such inhibition. Holdsworth has the reputation for sheer bloodymindedness by following a particular path musically, which I greatly admire in him, while Mclaughlin has played jazz jazz rock, blues, world and in the early days pop (apparently on a couple of 60's hit singles with Jimmy Page - also a London session musician in the mid 60's).
Thanks to the poll compiler there is a get out of jail card in one of the options offered! I shall take that.
|
||
Trotsky
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 25 2004 Location: Malaysia Status: Offline Points: 2771 |
Posted: August 30 2005 at 02:24 | |
Another early poll (who are some of these collaborators ... Redstar?) with a twist from Jim Garten ... but seriously, I do prefer McLaughlin ... although both of them are usually not my favourite members of the projects in which they involve themselves ...
|
||
"Death to Utopia! Death to faith! Death to love! Death to hope?" thunders the 20th century. "Surrender, you pathetic dreamer.
"No" replies the unhumbled optimist "You are only the present." |
||
Wolf Spider
Forum Senior Member Joined: August 04 2005 Location: Poland Status: Offline Points: 1617 |
Posted: August 30 2005 at 05:14 | |
Holdsworth is the man
|
||
memowakeman
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: May 19 2005 Location: Mexico City Status: Offline Points: 13032 |
Posted: August 30 2005 at 11:59 | |
YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
||
Follow me on twitter @memowakeman |
||
floydaholic
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 30 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 240 |
Posted: August 30 2005 at 12:40 | |
Holdsworth might have Mclaughlin in terms of technical skill(Though Mclaughlin is a beast technically speaking). However Mclaughlin was an incredibly influential and creative guitarist.
|
||
I'll see you on the Darkside of the moon...
|
||
Syzygy
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: December 16 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 7003 |
Posted: August 30 2005 at 13:47 | |
On electric guitar, there's not much to choose - personally I prefer Mclaughlin, but not because he's 'better' in any objective sense. When it comes to acoustic guitar it's a different story - from My Goals Beyond to Shakti and collaborations with all manner of musicians (including Paco De Lucia and Al DiMeola) McLaughlin has proved himself a true master of acoustic improvisation in both Western and Indian modes. Few Western musicians have blended so sealessly into Indian traditional music, and Mclaughlin has done so and remained a master of jazz guitar. On acoustic guitar he's a clear winner. Let's big it up for da Mahavishnu man! |
||
'Like so many of you
I've got my doubts about how much to contribute to the already rich among us...' Robert Wyatt, Gloria Gloom |
||
Moogtron III
Prog Reviewer Joined: April 26 2005 Location: Belgium Status: Offline Points: 10616 |
Posted: August 30 2005 at 15:42 | |
Allan Holdsworth. I love some of his albums. Sand, Secrets and Wardenclyffe Tower are FANTASTIC! And I love his guitar parts for the first UK and the first two Bruford albums!
|
||
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |