Forum Home Forum Home > Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements > Report abuse here
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Inappropriate reviews
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedInappropriate reviews
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 2627282930 141>
Author
Message
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Cygnus X-2 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 24 2004
Location: Bucketheadland
Status: Offline
Points: 21342 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 22 2005 at 23:41
Originally posted by Hangedman Hangedman wrote:

Originally posted by Cygnus X-2 Cygnus X-2 wrote:

Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

You have to admit, that Waters version of the Wall is dire though!

I will agree with you on that. Why did it have to suck so much!?!!?!!!

I think alot of parts are excellent. I think your all just mad because Goodbye Blue Sky gets butchered , but pretty much the entire second half of the dvd is great... just becuase its not PF doesnt mean it cant be well done.

Alright, there are a few good parts, but on the whole, it was a debacle! And Goodbye Blue Sky is one of the best songs on the Wall.
Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2005 at 03:45

I'll have a look at the DT's Cygnus, I had already weeded out some of the worst!Confused

Re the ratings only, there could of course be two "Velvetclowns"!LOL
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21185 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2005 at 03:54
Originally posted by Easy Livin Easy Livin wrote:

I'll have a look at the DT's Cygnus, I had already weeded out some of the worst!Confused

Re the ratings only, there could of course be two "Velvetclowns"!LOL

 I also noticed the double ratings by Velvetclown, they're also in other DT albums. The ratings didn't show up in the list, so it's entirely possible that he had forgotten that he already rated the albums and his email address had changed.
Recently listened to:
Back to Top
Cluster One View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 03 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 780 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2005 at 04:53
Originally posted by Easy Livin Easy Livin wrote:

I saw that one BJ. It is rather oddly composed, but as a review it seems fine to me. I'll probably edit out the "prostitute" comment though (seems a bit slanderous!Embarrassed) .

Any other comments on the review?

By the way, I think the general standard of the reviews being submitted recently has been fantastic. Has anyone else noticed an improvement?


I don't necessarily like his format (all the capitals, and crap) nor what he said in the review BUT his ranking (1 star) is pretty close to the mark. I (very generously) gave this DVD 2 stars.

I say keep the review, since so few people have even reviewed this DVD to begin with...
Marmalade...I like marmalade.
Back to Top
Manunkind View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 02 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 2373 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2005 at 08:51
LATEST 20 PROGRESSIVE ROCK MUSIC REVIEWS
TOOL Ænima progressive rock album and reviews Progressive Metal
(Studio Album, 1996)
TOOL "Ænima"
Review (Permanent link) by s1ipp3ry @ 8:49:15 AM EST, 9/23/2005
1 stars   these guys are not progrssive ! these guys are not progrssive ! these guys are not progrssive ! these guys are not progrssive ! these guys are not progrthese guys are not progrssive ! ssive ! these guys are not progrssive ! these guys are nthese guys are not progrssive ! ot progrssive ! these guys are not progrssive ! these guys are not progrssivthese guys are not progrssive !these guys arethese guys are not progrssive ! not progrssive ! e ! these guys are not progthese gthese guys are not progrssive ! uys are not progrssive ! rssive ! these guys are not progrssivethese guys are not progrssive ! ! these guys are not progrssive ! these guys these guys are not progrssive ! are not progrssive ! these guys are not progrssive ! thesthese guys are not progrssive ! e guys are not progrssive ! these guys are not progrssivthese guys are not progrssive ! e ! these guys are not progrssive ! these guys are not prothese guys are not progrssive ! grssive ! these guys are not progrssive ! I have listened to the CD and theres no way these guys are progressive.

 

This is not a rview! This is not a rview! This is not a rview!...
"In war there is no time to teach or learn Zen. Carry a strong stick. Bash your attackers." - Zen Master Ikkyu Sojun
Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2005 at 09:08
I'll delete it, I'll delete it, I'll delete it, I'll delete it
Back to Top
tuxon View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 21 2004
Location: plugged-in
Status: Offline
Points: 5502 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2005 at 14:25

I'm not asking you to delete this BTW (please don't the rating is genuine, so it would be an informed "rating only"), but.

 

SUPERTRAMP Crime of the Century progressive rock album and reviews Prog Related
(Studio Album, 1974)

SUPERTRAMP "Crime of the Century"
Review (Permanent link) by chad baier @ 1:23:00 PM EST, 9/23/2005

5 stars   It's hard to believe that ROLLING STONE magazine gave this album an awful review when it first came out (they also gave Rush's "Moving Pictures" an awful review, as well). Hands down, one of the finest LP's I've ever laid ears on.
 
 
I just had to laugh out loud.
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2005 at 14:50
Tux, I did delete it, but I wrote to the reviewer asking him to submit another one. He hasn't reviewed the album at all.
Back to Top
Ben2112 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: March 15 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 870 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2005 at 18:54
Originally posted by Easy Livin Easy Livin wrote:



Takes all sort Ben eh?ConfusedLOL


Indeed it does. Looking at what I wrote yesterday, well, all I can say is...I was just a bit too harsh. I don't know what the deal was yesterday, I jumped down a couple of people's throats. Palm Palmer, if you're reading this, I apologize for the gusto with which I attacked your review. Actually, I do agree with a fairly good portion of it.

/schizophrenia off
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2005 at 19:14
Originally posted by Hangedman Hangedman wrote:

Originally posted by Cygnus X-2 Cygnus X-2 wrote:

Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

You have to admit, that Waters version of the Wall is dire though!

I will agree with you on that. Why did it have to suck so much!?!!?!!!

I think alot of parts are excellent. I think your all just mad because Goodbye Blue Sky gets butchered , but pretty much the entire second half of the dvd is great... just becuase its not PF doesnt mean it cant be well done.

I agree....just because its not PF, doesn't mean it can't be well done.

BUT, this is not well done by any stretch of the imagination!!!!!!!!!

And I'm a very tolerant sort of guy!
Back to Top
Bj-1 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 04 2005
Location: No(r)Way
Status: Online
Points: 31328 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 23 2005 at 20:15

New Page "New Page" (2005)
Review (Permanent link) by Abuse Boys @ 1:23:00 PM EST, 9/23/2005
5 stars   New Page, New Page, New Page, New Page, New Page, New Page, New Page, New Page, New Page, New Page, New Page, New Page, New Page, New Page, New Page, New Page, New Page, New Page, New Page, New Page, New Page, New Page, New Page, New Page, New Page, New Page, New Page, New Page, New Page, New Page, New Page, New Page, New Page, New Page, New Page, New Page, New Page, New Page, New Page,

This is an dream review

 
RIO/AVANT/ZEUHL - The best thing you can get with yer pants on!
Back to Top
Tony Fisher View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: April 30 2005
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 967 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 24 2005 at 04:43

Recently, someone called jordisubir has given 1* ratings (no reviews) to Animals, Wish You Were Here, Mirage, Crime of the Century amongst many others. I can't find one album he's given more than 1* to. I think he is just trashing albums for the sake of being a prat. Can someone please check this and delete all his ratings (as they are distorting the ratings considerably) if this is so?

We need thoughtful reviews and ratings. not random vendettas. You may not like these albums but there is no way they could all be rated 1*.
Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 24 2005 at 04:51

That's a real can of worms Tony. If that's how he feels about them, he is entitled to say so. The old argument about no ratings without reviews is certainly strengthened by situations like that, as it would force him to explain, but I don't think we can assume a vendetta here.

As long as ratings without reviews are permitted, there's not a lot I can do about "moderating" them.
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21185 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 24 2005 at 04:57
Originally posted by Easy Livin Easy Livin wrote:

That's a real can of worms Tony. If that's how he feels about them, he is entitled to say so. The old argument about no ratings without reviews is certainly strengthened by situations like that, as it would force him to explain, but I don't think we can assume a vendetta here.

As long as ratings without reviews are permitted, there's not a lot I can do about "moderating" them.

There's a guy who calls himself "yesfan" ... apparently he just rated every prog metal album that he could think of 1 star. If it turned out that he rates every symphonic prog album 5 stars, and every prog metal album 1 star ...

That's an insult for every single person whose review is deleted because there is no reasoning.

A little advice for you people writing "This is crap This is crap This is crap This is crap This is crap This is crap This is crap This is crap ...": Just don't write anything at all to ensure that your rating stays in the database.



Edited by MikeEnRegalia
Recently listened to:
Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 24 2005 at 05:17

Mike,

I hear you, and I agree it is an issue. I had said many times I was against ratings without reviews. At least we can see now when people appear to be abusing the system, and use that as "evidence". As far as your advice is concerned, as a rule I would delete the text and leave the rating anyway.

I can only suggest the ratings without reviews issue continues to be brought up regularly.
Back to Top
tuxon View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 21 2004
Location: plugged-in
Status: Offline
Points: 5502 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 24 2005 at 05:24
Originally posted by Easy Livin Easy Livin wrote:

 

As long as ratings without reviews are permitted, there's not a lot I can do about "moderating" them.

Yes you can, I don't know what information you have available, for I think there are ways to moderate ratings
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21185 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 24 2005 at 05:33
Originally posted by Easy Livin Easy Livin wrote:

Mike,

I hear you, and I agree it is an issue. I had said many times I was against ratings without reviews. At least we can see now when people appear to be abusing the system, and use that as "evidence". As far as your advice is concerned, as a rule I would delete the text and leave the rating anyway.

I can only suggest the ratings without reviews issue continues to be brought up regularly.

Yes that's true ... and I'm very pleased about those ratings being "out in the open" now.

But I'm not sure how that can help to prevent or reduce abuse. "yesfan" is a good example: It appears to be abuse, but we can't be certain.

Maybe there's a way to detect abuse on the database level ... I'll PM M@x.
Recently listened to:
Back to Top
Tony Fisher View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: April 30 2005
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 967 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 24 2005 at 06:25
Originally posted by Easy Livin Easy Livin wrote:

That's a real can of worms Tony. If that's how he feels about them, he is entitled to say so. The old argument about no ratings without reviews is certainly strengthened by situations like that, as it would force him to explain, but I don't think we can assume a vendetta here.

As long as ratings without reviews are permitted, there's not a lot I can do about "moderating" them.

Exactly - he's entitled to SAY so. He doesn't say ANYTHING - he just rates them low. If he rates so many highly rated (by so many others) albums so low and doesn't give ANY albums high ratings (I haven't checked them all but a fair few) I suspect he just hates all prog, in which case he has no place on this site. We want constructive reviews and sensible comment, otherwise the ratings system is pointless. Sure, give "bad" albums poor ratings if you feel they're justified (I've only given one - Piper at the Gates - but I explained why I hate it) but don't just sl*g a random selection of albums as he seems to have done.

It's silly that a rating with no review stays, but a bad (ie inapporopriate) review gets deleted.
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 24 2005 at 06:42
Originally posted by Tony Fisher Tony Fisher wrote:

Originally posted by Easy Livin Easy Livin wrote:

That's a real can of worms Tony. If that's how he feels about them, he is entitled to say so. The old argument about no ratings without reviews is certainly strengthened by situations like that, as it would force him to explain, but I don't think we can assume a vendetta here.

As long as ratings without reviews are permitted, there's not a lot I can do about "moderating" them.

Exactly - he's entitled to SAY so. He doesn't say ANYTHING - he just rates them low. If he rates so many highly rated (by so many others) albums so low and doesn't give ANY albums high ratings (I haven't checked them all but a fair few) I suspect he just hates all prog, in which case he has no place on this site. We want constructive reviews and sensible comment, otherwise the ratings system is pointless. Sure, give "bad" albums poor ratings if you feel they're justified (I've only given one - Piper at the Gates - but I explained why I hate it) but don't just sl*g a random selection of albums as he seems to have done.

It's silly that a rating with no review stays, but a bad (ie inapporopriate) review gets deleted.

Hear, hear.........DOWN WITH THE SYSTEM!!!!!!!!!Nuke
Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 24 2005 at 06:58

Anyway... Can we keep this thread for inappropriate reviews guys. The rating without reviews issue is an important one, keep it going elsewhere.Wink

Meanwhile, keep those reviews observations coming, both new ones and old reviews which are lurking in the depths. I really appreciate your help in unearthing them!Clap
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 2627282930 141>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.164 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.