Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > Tech Talk
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Sound Formats
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedSound Formats

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
Chipiron View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2005
Location: Spain
Status: Offline
Points: 780
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Sound Formats
    Posted: September 15 2005 at 07:42

Perhaps this thread is not new, but I haven't found it ...

I want to compare the sound quality of several audio formats: mp3, wma and aac. I know wma and mp3 but I've never used aac I will use the files for a portable device, so, I don't need a higher quality than 128 kbps wma or so. What would be the equivalent in aac? I know the equivalence is not exact but I need some orientation. Is there any good article on the subject on the web?

Thanks a lot.



Edited by Chipiron
[IMG]http://www.belderrain.es/GIFs/tora.gif">
Back to Top
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 15 2005 at 08:04
The higher the compression, the harsher the sound.
Back to Top
Lindsay Lohan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: May 25 2005
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 3254
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 15 2005 at 08:13

NEVER USE WMA...the f**king files is encrypted with DRM wich makes them unplayable on other pc's....I am currently having the trouble of my life crackin this DRM protection...as for MP3'S you should atleast concider 192 or even 256kbps because 128 is quite awfull to listen to...

Back to Top
Chipiron View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2005
Location: Spain
Status: Offline
Points: 780
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 15 2005 at 08:21
I've never had trouble changing files from one PC to another device... I use my own CDs as a source. Maybe that solves the problem?
[IMG]http://www.belderrain.es/GIFs/tora.gif">
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Online
Points: 21138
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 15 2005 at 08:26
Originally posted by maidenrulez maidenrulez wrote:

NEVER USE WMA...the f**king files is encrypted with DRM wich makes them unplayable on other pc's....I am currently having the trouble of my life crackin this DRM protection...as for MP3'S you should atleast concider 192 or even 256kbps because 128 is quite awfull to listen to...

Not exactly true, you can configure the Windows Media Player to encode the files unencrypted.

Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Online
Points: 21138
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 15 2005 at 08:29
Originally posted by Chipiron Chipiron wrote:

Perhaps this thread is not new, but I haven't found it ...

I want to compare the sound quality of several audio formats: mp3, wma and aac. I know wma and mp3 but I've never used aac I will use the files for a portable device, so, I don't need a higher quality than 128 kbps wma or so. What would be the equivalent in aac? I know the equivalence is not exact but I need some orientation. Is there any good article on the subject on the web?

Thanks a lot.

My opinion is that all these formats sound pretty much the same. They are all highly optimized, and perhaps WMA 64kbps and AAC 64kbps have a little advantage compared to mp3 64kbps ... but who would want to listen to that anyway?

With 128kpbs, I can hear no differences.

BTW: Depending on the quality of your portable device, encoding in 192kbps can make a HUGE difference. I use mp3 64-192kbps VBR ... this results in files with 160kbps avg.

Back to Top
GoldenSpiral View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3839
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 15 2005 at 08:44
From my experience, having used all 3 formats, mp3 is still the most versatile.  both wma and aac get slightly better quality at lower bitrate, but aac was annoying to me because it could only play in itunes, and I couldnt find a reliable file converter to change them if i wanted to use them elsewhere (i.e. burn a data cd for use in an mp3 compatible CD player), and the same goes for .wma.  Technically they are better for sound quality, but most devices nowadays are compatible to mp3 files, but not all 3.

so, my recommendation is to use mp3's but rip at 192kbps.  128 is awful.  256 is nice but takes up a good deal of space, which is a problem when you have a large collection. 
http://www.myspace.com/altaic
ALTAIC

"Oceans Down You'll Lie"
coming soon
Back to Top
Chipiron View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2005
Location: Spain
Status: Offline
Points: 780
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 15 2005 at 10:10

Thank you all!

I've read that both wma and aac claim to get acceptable quality at 64kbps. I've checked that it's false for wma, and it seems to me that, following your advice, it's false for aac as well...

[IMG]http://www.belderrain.es/GIFs/tora.gif">
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Online
Points: 21138
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 15 2005 at 10:15
^ that's entirely subjective. 64kbps can be sufficient with really crappy headphones ... but even then you hear the compression quite clearly.
Back to Top
Lindsay Lohan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: May 25 2005
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 3254
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 15 2005 at 11:21
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

Originally posted by maidenrulez maidenrulez wrote:

NEVER USE WMA...the f**king files is encrypted with DRM wich makes them unplayable on other pc's....I am currently having the trouble of my life crackin this DRM protection...as for MP3'S you should atleast concider 192 or even 256kbps because 128 is quite awfull to listen to...

Not exactly true, you can configure the Windows Media Player to encode the files unencrypted.

No f**king way...i ripped some stuff from cd's to wma files on a old machines and backed up the wma files...Now on my new machine it wont play on any kind of media player because it says it needs the liceneces from the old machine...but i dont got the f**king licensces and you cant f**king turn them off

f**kING MICROSOFT MEDIA PLAYER

Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Online
Points: 21138
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 15 2005 at 11:29

^ Right beneath the dropdown in the options where you can select the format of the ripped files, there should be a checkbox to enable/disable copy protection.

Of course this decision has to be made when the files are created ... once encrypted, they can only be decrypted with the appropriate keys.



Edited by MikeEnRegalia
Back to Top
Lindsay Lohan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: May 25 2005
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 3254
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 15 2005 at 11:48
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

^ Right beneath the dropdown in the options where you can select the format of the ripped files, there should be a checkbox to enable/disable copy protection.

Of course this decision has to be made when the files are created ... once encrypted, they can only be decrypted with the appropriate keys.

ah i thought the copy protection was something else but its too late blah...i guess i have to use my hacking skills to try to decrypt the code it is pretty old it was encryptet in DRM Ver2 so i guess that will make it a bit easier

Back to Top
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 15 2005 at 15:27
Mike, how can you listen to Rammstein?
For sure, you can listen to it over compressed on a PC.
Back to Top
goose View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 20 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 4097
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 15 2005 at 18:29
Don't use CBR, use a good VBR model for the best quality relative to bitrate.
 
Have a read of http://wiki.hydrogenaudio.org/index.php?title=Main_Page#Audi o_Formats and indeed a search through www.hydrogenaudio.org for a comprehensive answer.
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Online
Points: 21138
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 15 2005 at 19:37

Originally posted by oliverstoned oliverstoned wrote:

Mike, how can you listen to Rammstein?
For sure, you can listen to it over compressed on a PC.

I listen to www.last.fm radio player ... sometimes a track is played and when I'm at work I 'm busy and can't skip it fast enough ...



Edited by MikeEnRegalia
Back to Top
Fitzcarraldo View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 30 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1835
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 16 2005 at 22:50
Originally posted by Chipiron Chipiron wrote:

Perhaps this thread is not new, but I haven't found it ...

I want to compare the sound quality of several audio formats: mp3, wma and aac. I know wma and mp3 but I've never used aac I will use the files for a portable device, so, I don't need a higher quality than 128 kbps wma or so. What would be the equivalent in aac? I know the equivalence is not exact but I need some orientation. Is there any good article on the subject on the web?

Thanks a lot.

 

Chipiron,

You might find the following threads useful. Some of them discuss the various formats MP3/WMA/OOG/AAC/FLAC etc. and also give URLs for sites which have audio comparisons and further details. There is also discussion on the SACD vs DVD-A debate and the vinyl vs CD debate, with some interesting comments. It's worth reading through them all - you'll probably learn quite a bit.

http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4034

http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=990

http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1795

http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=716

http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=864

 

Back to Top
Chipiron View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2005
Location: Spain
Status: Offline
Points: 780
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 17 2005 at 04:01
Originally posted by Fitzcarraldo Fitzcarraldo wrote:

Originally posted by Chipiron Chipiron wrote:

Perhaps this thread is not new, but I haven't found it ...

I want to compare the sound quality of several audio formats: mp3, wma and aac. I know wma and mp3 but I've never used aac I will use the files for a portable device, so, I don't need a higher quality than 128 kbps wma or so. What would be the equivalent in aac? I know the equivalence is not exact but I need some orientation. Is there any good article on the subject on the web?

Thanks a lot.

 

Chipiron,

You might find the following threads useful. Some of them discuss the various formats MP3/WMA/OOG/AAC/FLAC etc. and also give URLs for sites which have audio comparisons and further details. There is also discussion on the SACD vs DVD-A debate and the vinyl vs CD debate, with some interesting comments. It's worth reading through them all - you'll probably learn quite a bit.

http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4034

http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=990

http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1795

http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=716

http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=864

 

 

Thank you, Fitzcarraldo!

I'm going to study a lot!!!

[IMG]http://www.belderrain.es/GIFs/tora.gif">
Back to Top
oVerCaffeinated View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: June 17 2005
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 15
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 17 2005 at 11:11
I'd use Ogg Vorbis if I was doing low bitrate encodes.
Remain calm, there is a dog in the vents.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.133 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.